Georgia Sec. of State Blows Up Fani Willis' Case Against Trump

[Leroy N. Soetoro]

https://republic-brief.com/georgia-sec-of-state-blows-up-fani-willis-case-
against-trump-3/

Absolute bombshell in Trump’s favor.

Based on the statements and testimony of Georgia Secretary of State, Brad
Raffensperger, the former President, Donald Trump, did not request that he
to partake in any illicit activities in the presidential election of 2020.

The denial of the assertion that Trump requested Raffensperger to
criminally “find votes” significantly undermines Fulton County District
Attorney Fani Willis’ racketeering argument against Trump and 18
individuals associated with him.

As to the statement made by Jonathan Turley, a professor at George
Washington University Law School, Raffensperger’s testimony indicated that
the phone call, although deemed “extraordinary,” was characterized as a
“settlement negotiation.” This conversation occurred within the context of
a deliberation on the pursuit of an additional vote recount, rather than a
request to fabricate new votes.

According to Turley, “The call was misrepresented by the [Washington] Post
and the transcript later showed that Trump was not simply demanding that
votes be added to the count but rather asking for another recount or
continued investigation. Again, I disagreed with that position but the
words about the finding of 11,780 votes was in reference to what he was
seeking in a continued investigation. Critics were enraged by the
suggestion that Trump was making the case for a recount as opposed to just
demanding the addition of votes to the tally or fraudulent findings.”

“Raffensperger described the call in the same terms,” he added. “He
correctly described the call as ‘extraordinary’ in a president personally
seeking such an investigation, particularly after the completion of the
earlier recount. That is manifestly true. However, he also acknowledged
that this was a ‘settlement negotiation’.”

“So what was the subject of the settlement talks?” Turley questioned.
“Another recount or further investigation. The very thing that critics
this week were apoplectic about in the coverage. That does not mean that
Trump had grounds for the demand. Trump’s participation in the call was
extraordinary and his demands were equally so. However, the reference to
the vote deficit in demanding continued investigation was a predictable
argument in such a settlement negotiation. As I previously stated, I have
covered such challenges for years as a legal analyst for CBS, NBC, BBC,
and Fox. Unsupported legal claims may be sanctionable in court, but they
have not been treated as crimes.”

However, Fani Willis considers the phone call between Donald Trump and
Brad Raffensperger as a significant element in her “racketeering” lawsuit,
which attempts to portray the legal process of contesting elections as a
criminal operation. Former President Donald Trump used legal avenues to
address concerns with the outcome of the 2020 election, with the intention
of seeking a lawful resolution rather than engaging in any illicit
attempts to invalidate the election results.

There appears to be a lack of viable criminal charges in this situation,
as it seems that the story has been fabricated by individuals who oppose
Trump politically, with the intention of preventing him from participating
in a presidential election and denying voters the opportunity to elect him
as president.

According to a recent study commissioned by a local media outlet, a
majority of respondents in Georgia expressed their opposition to the idea
of former President Donald Trump accepting a plea deal offered by District
Attorney Fani Willis.

According to a study conducted exclusively by 11Alive in Atlanta, the
majority of respondents, accounting for 55 percent, expressed a preference
for President Trump to undergo a trial. Meanwhile, 21 percent of
participants indicated that he should consider accepting a deal, while 24
percent either remained uncertain or refrained from expressing an opinion.

According to an unidentified individual, referred to as Eros, who leans
towards the Republican party and resides in Cobb County, “I would rather
him do a plea agreement.”

“He wants to prove everyone wrong and become president again. So I don’t
think his pride would allow him to plead guilty,” asserted Beth Carter, a
voter in Midtown who tends to support the Democratic party.

Richard Holloway, a member of the Republican Party hailing from Lithia
Springs, expressed his support for a trial concerning Donald Trump, as he
holds the belief that such a trial would result in his exoneration.

“I’m for Trump. Go, Trump. ‘Know what I mean?’ Good luck,” Holloway said,
expressing his skepticism over the likelihood of successfully convicting
him.

According to Leelt Ermias from Atlanta, the outcome would be contingent
upon the specific circumstances surrounding the plea. “It would depend on
the details of the plea,” Ermias said, adding that she does not support
Trump.

Prosecutors are vested with the power to engage in plea bargaining,
wherein they have the ability to offer plea agreements that go beyond the
customary terms of probation or sentencing requirements. According to
11Alive, the agreements may encompass the defendant’s consent to
participate in counseling or their exclusion from a specific jurisdiction.

According to Clint Rucker, a former Fulton County prosecutor who currently
practices law privately, “Imposing a requirement that the person never run
for public office again could be a condition that could be part of a
negotiated plea.”

Trump has said he will not take a plea offer.


--
We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so that
stupid people won't be offended.

Durham Report: The FBI has an integrity problem. It has none.

No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.
Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.

Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
fiasco, President Trump.

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
queer liberal democrat donors.

President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed
dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.