"Unquamne ranis catesbeianis in mente expergisci tibi contigit?"
Is it completely wrong? Should I have said "cum ranis"?
Roule Tabille
The latter quandary can be circumvented by the use of a participle, e.g.,-
Unquamne tibi ranis ocellatis in mentem venientibus expergisci contigit?
Unquamne tibi ranas ocellatas cogitanti expergisci contigit?
(Bullfrog = "rana ocellata" in Smith & Hall.)
> Roule Tabille
Patruus Coaxans
> Umquamne experrectus es ranas ocellatas mente revolvens?
Thanks to both of you.
What about my attempt? I'd be interested to know whether I managed to
construe an impeccable sentence (I did take my time). Apart from the
fact that you both moved tibi towards the beginning, which, I suppose,
renders the sentence more idiomatic.
Roule Tabille
The framework is sound but the "ranis catesbeianis" is difficult to
construe without a participle (not a preposition) to link it in.
Patruus