In article <Soq1s.401$pl4...@newsfe12.iad>,
best...@yahoo.com says...
Is this suppose to be a holder for a X86 segmented (1MB) architecture
SEG:OFF addressing scheme? If that is the case, the SEG:OFF may be 2 16
bit values, but it does *NOT* mean that you can concatenate the two
values and get a 32 bit absolute address. Which means that your
"Whole" should have an absolute address in it and your "SegOff" is just
two parts of that absolute address. Remember, multiple segment:offset
pairs can map into the same linear/absolute address. I think of the
segment as page number, and those pages are just 16 bytes long.
Naturally, if you may be referring to something else entirely, and I am
wasting your time. Also, if you are in a flat memory addressing scheme
you are correct and I am just wasting your time again. :)