Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Converting GWBASIC to ASCII Taxt

35 views
Skip to first unread message

PeterM

unread,
Apr 25, 2010, 1:18:41 PM4/25/10
to

ArarghMai...@not.at.arargh.com

unread,
Apr 25, 2010, 7:28:22 PM4/25/10
to
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:18:41 -0700 (PDT), PeterM <pmhi...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Or, SAVE"name",A
--
ArarghMail004 at [drop the 'http://www.' from ->] http://www.arargh.com
BCET Basic Compiler Page: http://www.arargh.com/basic/index.html

To reply by email, remove the extra stuff from the reply address.

Auric__

unread,
Apr 26, 2010, 10:35:19 AM4/26/10
to
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 23:28:22 GMT, wrote:

> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:18:41 -0700 (PDT), PeterM <pmhi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Use RB58.com at http://www.powerbasic.com/files/pub/tools/dos/
> Or, SAVE"name",A

I read an article on the www several years ago where some guy had sat down
and figured out the entire encoding for some reason. I'm sure it's still
around.

--
Born crying, live complaining, die disappointed.

ArarghMai...@not.at.arargh.com

unread,
Apr 26, 2010, 6:33:20 PM4/26/10
to
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:35:19 GMT, "Auric__"
<not.m...@email.address> wrote:

>On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 23:28:22 GMT, wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:18:41 -0700 (PDT), PeterM <pmhi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Use RB58.com at http://www.powerbasic.com/files/pub/tools/dos/
>> Or, SAVE"name",A
>
>I read an article on the www several years ago where some guy had sat down
>and figured out the entire encoding for some reason. I'm sure it's still
>around.

I did the same for a mini-computer Basic, back around 1985 or so. More
time consuming than difficult.

Dustin Cook

unread,
Apr 26, 2010, 9:23:34 PM4/26/10
to
ArarghMai...@NOT.AT.Arargh.com wrote in
news:h25ct5lghqeaailnm...@4ax.com:

> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:35:19 GMT, "Auric__"
> <not.m...@email.address> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 23:28:22 GMT, wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:18:41 -0700 (PDT), PeterM
>>> <pmhi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Use RB58.com at http://www.powerbasic.com/files/pub/tools/dos/
>>> Or, SAVE"name",A
>>
>>I read an article on the www several years ago where some guy had sat
>>down and figured out the entire encoding for some reason. I'm sure
>>it's still around.
> I did the same for a mini-computer Basic, back around 1985 or so. More
> time consuming than difficult.
>

It was all tokenized wasn't it?


--
"Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh.. nudge
this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior

Tom Lake

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 8:19:22 AM4/27/10
to
>>>I read an article on the www several years ago where some guy had sat
>>>down and figured out the entire encoding for some reason. I'm sure
>>>it's still around.

Here's one:

http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~af380/GW-BASIC-tokens.html

>> I did the same for a mini-computer Basic, back around 1985 or so. More
>> time consuming than difficult.
>>
>
> It was all tokenized wasn't it?
>

If it was, it wasn't a DEC machine. BASIC Plus saved its source in ASCII.

Tom Lake

Dustin Cook

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 12:46:19 PM4/27/10
to
"Tom Lake" <tl...@twcny.rr.com> wrote in
news:hr6kg2$r10$1...@news.albasani.net:

No, my bad. I was thinking of gwbasic.. default was a tokenized save... ,a
saved as ascii if memory serves...

ArarghMai...@not.at.arargh.com

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 12:50:39 PM4/27/10
to
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:23:34 GMT, Dustin Cook
<bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:

>ArarghMai...@NOT.AT.Arargh.com wrote in
>news:h25ct5lghqeaailnm...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:35:19 GMT, "Auric__"
>> <not.m...@email.address> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 23:28:22 GMT, wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:18:41 -0700 (PDT), PeterM
>>>> <pmhi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Use RB58.com at http://www.powerbasic.com/files/pub/tools/dos/
>>>> Or, SAVE"name",A
>>>
>>>I read an article on the www several years ago where some guy had sat
>>>down and figured out the entire encoding for some reason. I'm sure
>>>it's still around.
>> I did the same for a mini-computer Basic, back around 1985 or so. More
>> time consuming than difficult.
>>
>
>It was all tokenized wasn't it?

The one I did was.

Dustin Cook

unread,
Apr 27, 2010, 6:15:37 PM4/27/10
to
ArarghMai...@NOT.AT.Arargh.com wrote in
news:nd5et5hlae1hdteup...@4ax.com:

> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:23:34 GMT, Dustin Cook
> <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>ArarghMai...@NOT.AT.Arargh.com wrote in
>>news:h25ct5lghqeaailnm...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:35:19 GMT, "Auric__"
>>> <not.m...@email.address> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 23:28:22 GMT, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:18:41 -0700 (PDT), PeterM
>>>>> <pmhi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Use RB58.com at http://www.powerbasic.com/files/pub/tools/dos/
>>>>> Or, SAVE"name",A
>>>>
>>>>I read an article on the www several years ago where some guy had
>>>>sat down and figured out the entire encoding for some reason. I'm
>>>>sure it's still around.
>>> I did the same for a mini-computer Basic, back around 1985 or so.
>>> More time consuming than difficult.
>>>
>>
>>It was all tokenized wasn't it?
> The one I did was.

Yep.. time consuming. Did you do it all by hand or write yourself a util
to do some of the work?

ArarghMai...@not.at.arargh.com

unread,
Apr 28, 2010, 2:47:59 PM4/28/10
to
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:15:37 GMT, Dustin Cook
<bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:

>ArarghMai...@NOT.AT.Arargh.com wrote in
>news:nd5et5hlae1hdteup...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:23:34 GMT, Dustin Cook
>> <bughunte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>ArarghMai...@NOT.AT.Arargh.com wrote in
>>>news:h25ct5lghqeaailnm...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:35:19 GMT, "Auric__"
>>>> <not.m...@email.address> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 23:28:22 GMT, wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:18:41 -0700 (PDT), PeterM
>>>>>> <pmhi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Use RB58.com at http://www.powerbasic.com/files/pub/tools/dos/
>>>>>> Or, SAVE"name",A
>>>>>
>>>>>I read an article on the www several years ago where some guy had
>>>>>sat down and figured out the entire encoding for some reason. I'm
>>>>>sure it's still around.
>>>> I did the same for a mini-computer Basic, back around 1985 or so.
>>>> More time consuming than difficult.
>>>>
>>>
>>>It was all tokenized wasn't it?
>> The one I did was.
>
>Yep.. time consuming. Did you do it all by hand or write yourself a util
>to do some of the work?

Wrote a program. Should still have it, but can't find it just now.

0 new messages