Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

qbasic 7.5

30 views
Skip to first unread message

Thomas

unread,
Oct 8, 2005, 11:59:52 PM10/8/05
to
Where can I download a free version of QBASIC 7.5? If this is not possible
then is there anyway I can get some sort of free compiler for QBASIC 1.1?Any
help appreciated.


ararghmai...@now.at.arargh.com

unread,
Oct 9, 2005, 2:10:13 AM10/9/05
to
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 23:59:52 -0400, "Thomas" <fuji...@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

>Where can I download a free version of QBASIC 7.5?

No where. No such critter, that I ever heard of.

QBasic only came in two flavors, 1.0 & 1.1

QuickBasic came in 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 4.1, 4.5, (6.?), 7.0, 7.1 and
VBDOS 1.0. No 7.5.

>If this is not possible then is there anyway I can get some sort of
>free compiler for QBASIC 1.1?

Well, one such is BCET, but it is for Win32 and doesn't do GRAPHICS
and some other things. 2nd URL in the sig if you want to try it.


--
ArarghMail510 at [drop the 'http://www.' from ->] http://www.arargh.com
BCET Basic Compiler Page: http://www.arargh.com/basic/index.html

To reply by email, remove the garbage from the reply address.

Tom Lake

unread,
Oct 9, 2005, 2:19:15 AM10/9/05
to
"Thomas" <fuji...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:aA02f.11552$2F2.1...@news20.bellglobal.com...

> Where can I download a free version of QBASIC 7.5? If this is not possible
> then is there anyway I can get some sort of free compiler for QBASIC
> 1.1?Any help appreciated.

http://qb4all.com/


J French

unread,
Oct 9, 2005, 5:35:05 AM10/9/05
to
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 01:10:13 -0500,
ararghmai...@NOW.AT.arargh.com wrote:

>On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 23:59:52 -0400, "Thomas" <fuji...@sympatico.ca>
>wrote:
>
>>Where can I download a free version of QBASIC 7.5?
>No where. No such critter, that I ever heard of.
>
>QBasic only came in two flavors, 1.0 & 1.1
>
>QuickBasic came in 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 4.1, 4.5, (6.?), 7.0, 7.1 and
>VBDOS 1.0. No 7.5.

PDS 6.0 was released - it was buggy and rapidly followed by 7.0


ararghmai...@now.at.arargh.com

unread,
Oct 9, 2005, 5:37:55 AM10/9/05
to
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 09:35:05 +0000 (UTC), ere...@nowhere.uk (J French)
wrote:

Yea, but it was a bit of a hack job, that's why the ?. The compiler
was 6.0, but the IDE was 4.5, IIRC.

J French

unread,
Oct 9, 2005, 6:05:49 AM10/9/05
to
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 04:37:55 -0500,
ararghmai...@NOW.AT.arargh.com wrote:

<snip>

>>>QuickBasic came in 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 4.1, 4.5, (6.?), 7.0, 7.1 and
>>>VBDOS 1.0. No 7.5.

>>PDS 6.0 was released - it was buggy and rapidly followed by 7.0

>Yea, but it was a bit of a hack job, that's why the ?. The compiler
>was 6.0, but the IDE was 4.5, IIRC.

When 6.0 came out we were using MS Business Basic 1.2 (1983)
(BCD maths and numeric storage - rather than the MS format)

IIRC that had no IDE

I did not use PDS 6.0, but I think the others just chucked away the
IDE and used SideKick Plus

PDS 7.0 used the generic M editor, most of us used that, but I did not
bother and stuck with SK Plus

It is a bit of a pity that MS did not continue with BCD and just offer
IEEE as an alternative - but I can see that they wanted to get inline
with industry standards.


gor...@gsweet.fsnet.co.uk

unread,
Oct 9, 2005, 6:41:10 AM10/9/05
to
I see MS have seen fit to close down there page below where you used to
be able to get aLegal copy of QBASIC found in OLDDOS.EXE from
ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/softlib/MSLFILES

However all the Old basics are still available from
GWBASIC, QBasic, QuickBasic etc available from here

http://www.ojodepez-fanzine.net/network/qbdl/

Gordon

ararghmai...@now.at.arargh.com

unread,
Oct 9, 2005, 3:33:33 PM10/9/05
to
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 10:05:49 +0000 (UTC), ere...@nowhere.uk (J French)
wrote:

>On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 04:37:55 -0500,


>ararghmai...@NOW.AT.arargh.com wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>>>>QuickBasic came in 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 4.1, 4.5, (6.?), 7.0, 7.1 and
>>>>VBDOS 1.0. No 7.5.
>
>>>PDS 6.0 was released - it was buggy and rapidly followed by 7.0
>
>>Yea, but it was a bit of a hack job, that's why the ?. The compiler
>>was 6.0, but the IDE was 4.5, IIRC.
>
>When 6.0 came out we were using MS Business Basic 1.2 (1983)
>(BCD maths and numeric storage - rather than the MS format)
>
>IIRC that had no IDE

QuickBasic4.5 was the IDE for Compiler 6.0, AFAIK.


>
>I did not use PDS 6.0, but I think the others just chucked away the
>IDE and used SideKick Plus
>
>PDS 7.0 used the generic M editor, most of us used that, but I did not
>bother and stuck with SK Plus

7 had the M editor, and it also had the QBX IDE. The copy of 6 that I
have also seems to have the M editor, with QB as the IDE. 7.1 and
VBDOS don't seem to have the M editor.

>It is a bit of a pity that MS did not continue with BCD and just offer
>IEEE as an alternative - but I can see that they wanted to get inline
>with industry standards.

Yes, being able to do:
"DIM Total AS DECIMAL * 10" ' (floating deciaml point) or
"DIM Total AS DECIMAL * 10.2" ' (fixed decimal point)
would have been very nice. Maybe I should add that to BCET.

Much better than the abortion they created for PDS 7: CURRENCY.
(which BCET treats as an int 64 with no bias)

ararghmai...@now.at.arargh.com

unread,
Oct 9, 2005, 3:45:28 PM10/9/05
to
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 14:33:33 -0500,
ararghmai...@NOW.AT.arargh.com wrote:

<snip>


>>IIRC that had no IDE
>QuickBasic4.5 was the IDE for Compiler 6.0, AFAIK.

My error: QuickBasic 4.00b as it turns out. Just tried it.
<snip>

ararghmai...@now.at.arargh.com

unread,
Oct 9, 2005, 3:47:45 PM10/9/05
to

FYI: All are still Copyright MS and with the possible exception of
QBasic, would probably be a copyright violation to download.

Andru Luvisi

unread,
Oct 10, 2005, 8:19:17 PM10/10/05
to
>>>>> "gordon" == gordon <gor...@gsweet.fsnet.co.uk> writes:
gordon> I see MS have seen fit to close down there page below
gordon> where you used to be able to get aLegal copy of QBASIC
gordon> found in OLDDOS.EXE from
gordon> ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/softlib/MSLFILES

I just checked, and ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/softlib/MSLFILES/OLDDOS.EXE
seems to be there and seems to still download just fine.

Andru
--
Andru Luvisi

Quote Of The Moment:
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from
mediocre minds.
-- Albert Einstein

They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers.
But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.
-- Carl Sagan

H-Man

unread,
Oct 11, 2005, 12:06:25 PM10/11/05
to
On 9 Oct 2005 03:41:10 -0700, gor...@gsweet.fsnet.co.uk wrote:

> I see MS have seen fit to close down there page below where you used to
> be able to get aLegal copy of QBASIC found in OLDDOS.EXE from
> ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/softlib/MSLFILES
>

Funny, I can't get there with IE (XPSP2) but I can using Filezilla. If I
try in Filezilla with a passive connection I can't get a directory listing,
but if I uncheck that option, I can get a directory listing and dowloading
works fine.

--
HK

Derek

unread,
Oct 12, 2005, 10:58:57 AM10/12/05
to
No need to be frustrated by any of these GUI tools. The NT ftp.exe
utility works Just Fine.

Cheers

Derek

Gerhard Demleitner

unread,
Oct 21, 2005, 10:44:36 PM10/21/05
to
As far as I remember ftp.microsoft.com was down for a while. I just
visited ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/softlib/MSLFILES with WinXP SP1a IE6
with usual bugfixes. WORKED! But Where are all the old files gone?
They removed a lot :-(
0 new messages