Re: Why did you cowardly post your unscholarly drivel to alt.flame, Biil Cleere?
±
>
> "ą" <h0plib...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:43B0D1B4...@hotmail.com...
> > subRoutine wrote:
> > >
> > > "ą" <h0plib...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:43B0B979...@hotmail.com...
> > > > subRoutine wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > "03:15:38 GMT" <as...@mail.gr> wrote in message
> > > > > news:0ng0r1t8ghh6uevbt...@news.readfreenews.net...
> > > > > > "The U.S. Constitution" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> did this:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > "03:15:38 GMT" <as...@mail.gr> wrote in
> > > > > > > news:povkq1dl1001d3dan...@news.readfreenews.net:
> > > > > > >
> > > [...]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You should see his emails.
> > > > > >
> > > > > Mr. Chickenshit-Flake, I dare you to outerfilth my emails.
> > > > >
> > > > > Not only do you demonstrate a lack of confidence by imploring people to
> > > > > vote _your way_ with your .sig during the voting process, you also
> > > > > allude to the fact that my emails were flames. I dare to you prove
> > > > > it without my permission to post them.
> > > >
> > > > Is everyone in alt.flame an Outer Filth except you, James?
> > >
> > > You are the biggest outerfilth of them all, Deano. Stand proud.
> >
> > Who in alt.flame isn't an Outer Filth, Outer Filth?
> >
> Try not to make sweeping generalizations to rationalize your outerfilth
> behaviour, hYpoCriTe.
From: "subRoutine.W2@mm" <s!0.0^7ii.s...@mmx.CICS.mvs>
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: A Knuckle-Typist Grunts
Message-ID: <a96a50taupthbg82l...@4ax.com>
I've outed emails many times, Snotty. In fact, I've outed everyone's
just recently.
-
From: "subRoutine.W2@mm" <s!0.0^7ii.s...@mmx.CICS.mvs>
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: Jereon Van Kessel, alt dot flame's Email Troll
Date: 8 Feb 2004 17:46:02 GMT
Organization: Bxzzzaffgh Enterprises Ink.
Message-ID: <h0tc20t6lsig81p1o...@4ax.com>
Return-Path: <Troll...@aol.com>
Received: (cpmta 14567 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2004 14:44:42 -0800
Received: from 64.12.136.6 (HELO imo-m03.mx.aol.com) by
smtp.c009.snv.cp.net (209.228.34.142) with SMTP; 16 Jan 2004
14:44:42 -0800
X-Received: 16 Jan 2004 22:44:42 GMT
From: Troll...@aol.com
Message-ID: <1d9.187c64...@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:44:35 EST
Subject: Re: A favor.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="part1_1d9.187c64b4.2d39c353_boundary"
X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10709
--part1_1d9.187c64b4.2d39c353_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lastly, this will be our last email exchange. I will not be opening any
further mail from you. If you wish to for all appearance continue on as
allies at a.f or simply ignore each other then you can put yes in your
next
subject.
If not then flame away at group but i do guarantee that I will be outing
my Koput archive. Happy trails. -jb
-
From: "subRoutine.W2@mm" <s!0.0^7ii.s...@mmx.CICS.mvs>
Message-ID: <j4v5201klg87orj4r...@4ax.com>
Posting emails to usenet is the sign of classless peasant. All you did
was demonstrate how much lower you were able to sink than the one you
are accusing.
>
> _-
> -_
> subRoutine <http://www.softtargets.com>
> Overunity Energy Mechanism
> 0,0,1
>
> Ari Asikainen's response to a civilized request in email; "flaming would
> have been my only response". . .
> <dog0r19qebvnaennm...@news.readfreenews.net>
> I don't like flaming in email and flaming is the only proper response
> to what you wrote. If you give me your permission to quote your email,
> I'm willing to answer it right here on alt.flame. What do you say?
-------
/ \
/ \ /-----\
| (@) | | SnuH |
| (O) | \_ ___/
| / | ||
| \ /_ / //
\ \____/ / /
\ /
\_____,