The situation.

[Chronicler]

One personnel has been demonstrating poor conduct over a protracted
period of time. The Client having had enough of the one personnel's
protracted poor conduct demands that this one personnel be removed
from area A.

The administration's solution is to keep this one personnel in his
regularly scheduled time slot is to place him in area B.

In order to accomplish this, three other uninvolved personnel are
displaced from their regular scheduled time slots and areas where they
have all been happy and have performed well.

The result is; the one personnel who caused the problem is left in a
positive situation. While the three other personnel are placed in a
negative situation, with which they are very up happy and feel
cheated.

Why is it that the administration considers the well-being of the one
problem causing personnel to be of more value than that of a total of
thee other non problem causing personnel?

Three personnel are experiencing the negative consequences of one
personnel's poor conduct, while the one personnel remains comfortable
and unaffected.