In article <t2epjd$3iqf1$
3...@news.freedyn.de>
"Tranny - Inmate Number P01135809" <
patr...@protonmail.com> 
wrote:
WASHINGTON — Last June, the Lincoln Project was on a high.
Led by several prominent former Republican consultants, its 
slickly produced ads attacking President Donald Trump made it 
perhaps the best known of the so-called Never Trump 
organizations. The group tried to claim a higher moral ground in 
an effort to purge Trump from the GOP. Money flowed in by the 
tens of millions of dollars from donors eager to help.
But within the organization, a crisis was brewing.
In June 2020, members of the organization’s leadership were 
informed in writing and in subsequent phone calls of at least 10 
specific allegations of harassment against co-founder John 
Weaver, including two involving Lincoln Project employees, 
according to multiple people with direct knowledge of the 
situation. The email and phone calls raise questions about the 
Lincoln Project’s statement last month that it was “shocked” 
when accusations surfaced publicly this year. It’s also the 
first known suggestion that Weaver targeted a Lincoln Project 
staffer.
Despite the early warning, the group took no action against 
Weaver and pressed forward with its high-profile work. For the 
collection of GOP consultants and former officials, being anti-
Trump was becoming very good for business. Of the $90 million 
Lincoln Project has raised, more than $50 million has gone to 
firms controlled by the group’s leaders.
There is no evidence that the Lincoln Project buried the 
allegations against Weaver for business reasons. But taken 
together, the harassment allegations and new revelations about 
spending practices raise significant questions about the 
management of one of the highest-profile antagonists of Trump. 
The revelations threaten the stature of not just the Lincoln 
Project but the broader coalition of establishment-oriented 
Republican groups working to excise Trump from the party.
Lincoln Project co-founder Steve Schmidt insisted that he and 
the rest of the group’s leadership were not aware of any 
internal allegations of wrongdoing involving Weaver.
“No Lincoln Project employee, intern, or contractors ever made 
an allegation of inappropriate communication about John Weaver 
that would have triggered an investigation by HR or by an 
outside employment counsel,” Schmidt said. “In other words, no 
human being ever made an allegation about any inappropriate 
sexualized communications about John Weaver ever.”
Weaver declined to comment for this story, but in a statement 
released late last month to Axios he generally acknowledged 
misconduct and apologized.
“To the men I made uncomfortable through my messages that I 
viewed as consensual mutual conversations at the time: I am 
truly sorry,” he wrote. “They were inappropriate and it was 
because of my failings that this discomfort was brought on you.”
The Lincoln Project launched in November 2019 as a super PAC 
that allowed its leaders to raise and spend unlimited sums of 
money.
Its founders represent a who’s who of prominent Republican 
strategists on cable television, including Schmidt and Reed 
Galen, both former advisers to John McCain; conservative 
attorney George Conway; former New Hampshire GOP chair Jennifer 
Horn; Florida-based veteran political ad maker Rick Wilson; and 
Weaver, who has long advised former Ohio Gov. John Kasich.
Backed by its founders’ commanding social media presence, the 
organization quickly attracted a massive following of Trump 
critics in both parties that exceeded even its own founders’ 
expectations.
Since its creation, the Lincoln Project has raised $90 million. 
But only about a third of the money, roughly $27 million, 
directly paid for advertisements that aired on broadcast and 
cable, or appeared online, during the 2020 campaign, according 
to an analysis of campaign finance disclosures and data from the 
ad tracking firm Kantar/CMAG.
That leaves tens of millions of dollars that went toward 
expenses like production costs, overhead — and exorbitant 
consulting fees collected by members of the group.
“It raises questions about where the rest of the money 
ultimately went,” said Brendan Fischer, an attorney with the 
nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center in Washington. “Generally 
speaking, you’d expect to see a major super PAC spend a majority 
or more of their money on advertisements and that’s not what 
happened here.”
The vast majority of the cash was split among consulting firms 
controlled by its founders, including about $27 million paid to 
a small firm controlled by Galen and another $21 million paid to 
a boutique firm run by former Lincoln Project member Ron 
Steslow, campaign finance disclosures show.
But in many cases it’s difficult to tell how much members of the 
group were paid. That’s because the Lincoln Project adopted a 
strategy, much like the Trump campaign they criticized, to mask 
how much money they earned.
While several firms did collect payments, Weaver and Wilson are 
not listed in publicly available records. They were likely paid 
as subcontractors to those firms, an arrangement that avoids 
disclosure. Schmidt collected a $1.5 million payment in December 
but quickly returned it.
“We fully comply with the law,” Schmidt said. “The Lincoln 
Project will be delighted to open its books for audit 
immediately after the Trump campaign and all affiliated super 
PACs do so, explaining the cash flow of the nearly $700 million 
that flowed through their organizations controlled by Brad 
Parscale and Jared Kushner.”
The Lincoln Project parted with one co-founder, Horn, last week, 
claiming in an unusual public statement that she was seeking a 
$250,000 signing bonus and a $40,000-a-month consulting 
contract. Horn said that she left following revelations of 
Weaver’s “grotesque” behavior and divergent views with existing 
leadership about how to move forward.
Public records reveal that the unexpected success of the Lincoln 
Project has extended a lifeline to some founders who have spent 
much of the past decade under financial distress.
Over the past decade, Weaver has repeatedly failed to pay taxes, 
defaulted on loans and faced lawsuits from creditors seeking to 
collect. In October, he paid off $313,000 in back taxes owed to 
the IRS dating back to 2011, records show. A separate case in 
Texas is still pending over $340,000 back rent his family owes 
after shuttering a children’s boutique they operated, records 
show.
Others used the money earned during their time with Lincoln 
Project to refinance homes, or purchase a new one. Schmidt 
purchased a $1.4 million “Mountain Modern” custom home in Kamas, 
Utah, with five bedrooms, seven baths and a “stunning” view of 
the Uinta Mountains, according to property records and real 
estate listings. He is currently trying to resell the home for 
$2.9 million.
But as money flowed into the group, multiple people with direct 
knowledge said allegations against Weaver were repeatedly raised 
inside the organization, long before leaders acknowledged them 
publicly in late January. Those with knowledge insisted on 
anonymity in order to disclose private communications.
Last June, someone working for the Lincoln Project payroll sent 
an email to Steslow, one of the organization’s co-founders, 
detailing numerous cases of sexual harassment involving Weaver 
that spanned several years. While the AP has not seen the email, 
its contents were confirmed by four people who had directly seen 
it.
Schmidt did not confirm the existence of the email, saying only 
that if one existed, it was not shared with anyone on the 
organization’s board or leadership.
But multiple people familiar with the situation say that Steslow 
immediately raised the email with Galen, who helped manage day-
to-day operations at the time, and the Lincoln Project’s 
corporate counsel Matthew Sanderson. Steslow also encouraged his 
colleagues to remove Weaver from the organization.
Those allegations and others were discussed on subsequent phone 
calls with organization leaders in June and August, and 
employees were assured that the alleged incidents would be 
investigated. Weaver went out on medical leave in August, but as 
the presidential campaign moved into the summer and fall, there 
was no formal resolution.
The Washington Blade reported earlier this week details of 
another set of internal communications over the summer 
indicating that Lincoln Project leaders were aware of 
allegations against Weaver and preparing to respond to media 
reports.
The allegations against Weaver followed a similar pattern in 
which the 61-year-old married father of two would allegedly send 
private messages to young gay men on Twitter. They often began 
with references to work before shifting to things like their 
personal appearance, workout routines and favorite sexual 
positions.
At least two Lincoln Project employees were targeted last year, 
including an intern who was finishing law school, and a 
communications staffer. There is no allegation of physical 
contact.
Conway, one of the group’s co-founders, said Thursday that he 
had not received anything of value for his Lincoln Project work, 
and he denied knowledge of last summer’s internal discussions.
“No one ever told me of these complaints being made to the 
Lincoln project, and the first I ever heard that Weaver may have 
done anything questionable were rumors I heard well after the 
election, and long after I ceased active involvement with the 
organization,” Conway wrote on Twitter.
https://nypost.com/2021/02/11/how-a-leading-anti-trump-group-
ignored-a-crisis-in-its-ranks/