UFC Fighter Delivers A Masterclass In How To Deal With The Media

[Ubiquitous]

It was just a few days ago that a Republican lawmaker from South Carolina
named Nancy Mace invoked the invented concept of “white privilege” in a
congressional hearing. She was supposedly trying to put Hunter Biden in his
place by saying that he’s the beneficiary of “white privilege,” because he
can ignore subpoenas without suffering any consequences. But as I explained
on the show at the time, all Nancy Mace did was legitimize the Left’s
framing, which is fundamentally anti-white and fraudulent. Hunter Biden does
not benefit from his skin color. He benefits from the fact he’s the son of
the president of the United States. Everyone knows that.

So all Nancy Mace accomplished was reinforcing a false narrative that
demonizes millions of white people, and accuses them of having unearned
privilege simply because they were born with a certain skin color. She also
derailed the entire hearing by allowing Democrats like AOC to harp on their
own personal definitions of “white privilege.”

As counterproductive and idiotic as Nancy Mace’s stunt was, it does need to
be said that it wasn’t that surprising. Nancy Mace isn’t exactly a staunch,
far-right conservative. She raised money for Liz Cheney, came out in support
of the so-called “LGBTQ movement,” and voted to hold former Trump adviser
Steve Bannon in contempt of Congress. This is the track record of someone you
might expect to adopt the Left’s narrative on “white privilege,” because
she’s adopted so many of the Left’s other narratives.

The much bigger issue is that Nancy Mace is just one example of a larger
problem in the Republican Party — one that affects politicians we’re told are
considerably smarter, and more right-of-center, than Nancy Mace.

Take Matt Gaetz, for example. Gaetz obviously doesn’t comply with the Left’s
new speech codes. He publicly humiliated Mark Milley, who was the chairman of
the joint chiefs of staff at the time, for teaching soldiers about “white
rage.” He also led the effort to oust House Speaker Kevin McCarthy because he
wasn’t sufficiently committed to the “America First” movement. All this is to
say, Matt Gaetz is the last person you’d expect to pull a Nancy Mace and
start adopting the Left’s framing on identity politics.

But this week, that’s exactly what Matt Gaetz did.

Appearing on Newsmax, Gaetz began talking about Donald Trump’s big win in the
Iowa Caucuses. And he said that, based on his experience on the ground in
Iowa, Trump is attracting more “diverse” voters, meaning voters who aren’t
white. And Matt Gaetz presented this as a good thing. Here’s how he phrased
it:

Matt Gaetz:

“For every Karen we lose, there’s a Julio and a Jamaal ready to
sign up for the MAGA movement. That abodes well for our ability
to be diverse and durable." pic.twitter.com/fslOPui91c

— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) January 18, 2024

“For every Karen we lose, there’s a Julio and a Jamaal ready to sign up for
the MAGA movement.” If we decode the language there, Matt Gaetz is saying
that in the freezing tundra of Iowa, he apparently didn’t see a lot of white
women. But he did see tons of Hispanics and black people coming out for
Donald Trump. They were presumably waving their MAGA flags around in the
blizzard conditions or whatever.

Even if you pretend that’s true, which it clearly isn’t, the language Matt
Gaetz used in that clip tells you a lot. No Republican, Matt Gaetz included,
would ever dream of speaking this way about black voters in the reverse. You
aren’t going to hear Gaetz say of black voters who don’t vote Republican
(which is the vast majority): “Oh we don’t need those Jamals. We’ve got
plenty of white people to take their place.” He’s only going to talk like
that about white women, or “Karens,” as he calls them.

Here is a Republican who is even considered (wrongly, I think) to be “far
right” who has entirely adopted the Left’s anti-white rhetoric and racial
double standards. That’s how pervasive this stuff is. He’s happy to attack
“Karens,” but he’d never do the same in reverse, because then he’d be called
a racist. And he can’t have that.

The other remarkable thing about this clip is how it inverts all of the
conservative arguments we’ve been hearing for the past several years. We went
from Democrats denying that the Great Replacement was happening, to admitting
it and saying it’s good, to Republicans also agreeing that it’s good and
advocating for a Great Replacement in their own party. But along with being
objectionable, this is also politically suicidal. It actually isn’t at all
even close to true that for every white female voter Republicans lose,
they’re replacing her with a black voter. White women still support
Republicans in far, far greater numbers than black males. It’s not even
close. As Ann Coulter has pointed out many times, the only group Trump lost
ground with in 2020 was white people — specifically white men. And yet
Republicans have apparently decided that the key to victory is to pander for
the minority vote while alienating their key constituency.

Whatever explains this self-defeating embrace of identity politics among
conservatives, it’s definitely catching on. It’s not just Nancy Mace and Matt
Gaetz doing it. In that same hearing where Nancy Mace talked about “white
privilege,” Georgia congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene claimed that Hunter
Biden was afraid of her because she’s a strong, independent woman. Watch:

https://youtu.be/2mS8AZNZXgg

She actually said that, as if it was some kind of devastating insult. “He’s
not afraid because he’s a criminal; he’s afraid because we’re girlbosses.”
That’s the idea. It’s hard to think of a better way to torpedo the case
against Hunter Biden than to use lines like this. When you have a strong case
against someone, you don’t say they’re afraid because you’re a woman. You say
they’re afraid because of the damning facts and evidence you’ve assembled.
This is the exact opposite of what Republicans should have done in this
hearing, but one after another, they did it. They kept commiting to these
vapid displays of identity politics, over and over again.

And it’s not just confined to that one hearing, or to Matt Gaetz interviews.
By now we’re all familiar at this point with Nikki Haley’s constant use of
identity politics during this campaign. In case you somehow missed it, here’s
a mercifully short clip to show you what I’m talking about:

https://youtu.be/zSvQjFfW8-c

Just like the remarks from Nancy Mace or Marjorie Taylor Greene or Matt
Gaetz, this is totally indistinguishable from something AOC might say. It’s
the most cliched form of gender politics imaginable. It’s not just stupid. It
adopts the Left’s narrative that immutable characteristics — like skin color
or gender — matter more than anything else. This is a narrative that has cost
millions of people jobs, college admissions, contracting jobs, federal
financial assistance, and so on. It has been a disaster for this country and
it needs to stop. Instead of saying that, Republicans are embracing it.
They’re reinforcing it at every opportunity.

Why is this happening? It’s possible that we’re seeing yet another cynical
attempt to win over voters. Maybe that’s the explanation. But if that’s the
case, it’s obviously a bad idea. You might remember that Donald Trump devoted
years of his presidency to pushing something called “The First Step Act,”
which Matt Gaetz promoted. The Trump team even ran a Super Bowl ad featuring
a drug trafficker that Trump let out of prison. The idea, according to
Trump’s inner circle, was to improve the GOP’s voting share among black
Americans. Of course it didn’t work. Black voters in 2020 did what they’ve
done in every modern election, which is vote overwhelmingly for Democrats.
Trump got basically the same percentage of the black vote that George W. Bush
did back in 2004.

So if identity politics is a ploy for votes, it doesn’t seem likely to work.
Identity politics from the Right doesn’t appear to convince anyone. But if
you take a few steps back, it’s not hard to see that identity politics is
just one part of a much larger problem among conservatives. Increasingly,
conservatives are embracing the narratives of the Left, wholesale, even when
they’re complete lies. We saw that when Nikki Haley mourned the death of
George Floyd. She immediately bought the official narrative, and then she
went on to say — as American cities were burning down — that George Floyd’s
death needed to be “personal and painful for every American.” We also saw
this from Mitt Romney, who marched with BLM, and even chanted their slogans.

And just the other day, we saw something similar from Ron DeSantis at a CNN
town hall. Watch as CNN’s Wolf Blitzer asks DeSantis a question that’s
premised on a completely false narrative. And then notice that Ron DeSantis
doesn’t push back at all:

DeSantis wasn’t briefed on the border hoax?

He immediately assumes that CNN is telling the truth, when they
were lying. Smearing innocent Texas who are defending this country
and the border.

I can’t believe it. How did DeSantis not know this!

pic.twitter.com/usjPlkYezY

— Cernovich (@Cernovich) January 17, 2024

As Mike Cernovich pointed out on X, this is completely inexcusable. CNN is
flat-out lying about what happened. And in response, maybe because no one
briefed him on this, DeSantis just accepts the premise, which originated from
the Biden White House, even though it was completely wrong. What happened is
that the White House originally claimed that quote, “a woman and two children
drowned near Eagle Pass, and Texas officials blocked U.S. Border Patrol from
attempting to provide emergency assistance.” That was the report that
millions of people heard from CBS News, which broadcast the narrative first.

But shortly afterwards, Joe Biden’s DOJ contradicted that version of events
entirely. As Fox’s Bill Melugin pointed out, the DOJ made it clear that
quote, “The migrants had already drowned at 8 p.m., and the Border Patrol
didn’t inform Texas until an hour later at 9 p.m. … The DOJ now confirms,
those migrants had been deceased for an hour before Texas was even alerted
about it.”

So it’s just like the false claims that the Border Patrol had “whipped”
illegal migrants, as Bill Melugin pointed out. The narrative is just a total
lie, as the Biden administration itself admitted. But even after the DOJ
admitted that, CNN asked Ron DeSantis about it on the debate stage. And
everyone pretended it was true. It’s embarrassing for the DeSantis campaign,
for CNN, and for everyone else involved in this moment. But even if the
narrative were true — even if illegal migrants had died who could have been
saved — it still wouldn’t mean anything. It would be one anecdote that
doesn’t tell us anything about immigration policy more generally. But the
point is that conservatives reflexively accept the version of events they’re
given. They don’t define the narrative. They just play along with the
narrative they’re given. The fact that it’s getting harder and harder to find
exceptions to this rule is not a good sign for the modern conservative
movement.

But the other day, we saw one of these rare exceptions, courtesy of UFC
fighter Sean Strickland. Strickland is an American who just arrived in
Toronto for the UFC fights this weekend. Here’s how he handled a member of
the Canadian press, who tried to corner him with the same kind of dumb gotcha
questions that you’ve heard a million times before. Watch:

Idk who this guy is and I don't care but you're not a man… But you'd
take that as a compliment….. pic.twitter.com/PMR1h4Yp7K

— Sean Strickland (@SStricklandMMA) January 17, 2024

How many conservative politicians could hold their ground in a situation like
that, and affirm — in the face of an “ally” of the LBGTQIA+ community — that
transgenderism is a mental illness? You could probably count the number on
one hand, if that.

Notice how Sean Strickland doesn’t even remotely accept the premise of this
hack’s questions. He doesn’t concede that he was wrong to speak his mind, or
to think unapproved thoughts. Instead he immediately identifies the
“reporter” as a propagandist and laughs in his face. And he reaffirms what he
said before, because it’s what he believes is true. And then afterwards — at
his second press conference in Toronto, after there had been a full media
cycle about this, and Canada’s state press had labeled him a bigot — what did
Sean Strickland do? Watch:

Real Canadians love Sean Strickland. pic.twitter.com/qRZiklCRAf

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) January 18, 2024

You can hear the crowd loves it. At one point a guy runs up to the stage to
shake his hand. So he doesn’t back down, and everyone in the audience
recognizes that and appreciates it. He makes a mockery of the people who
wanted him to cower and apologize — and there were a lot of them in Canada,
particularly in the media. He makes it clear that hate speech isn’t real,
which is bold to say in Canada, where transphobia can get you charged with a
crime. There you have a UFC fighter who’s a more vocal supporter of freedom
of speech than pretty much any conservative politician in America. You won’t
find him talking about “white privilege” or “strong conservative women.” This
is what resonates now.

If the Republican Party wants to win elections, this is the path it needs to
take. If they reject the Left’s obsession with skin color and gender and
homosexuality, then voters will respond. We don’t need another “First Step
Act,” or any pandering to stereotypes like Julio and Jamaal. We need
politicians who are capable of acting like normal people.

If a UFC fighter can do it, there’s no reason the leaders of the Republican
Party can’t.

--
Let's go Brandon!