I THINK THAT WE HAVE BEEN SLANDEROUSLY ACCUSED OF IMPROPERLY UTILISING
ANTHONY HOPKINS ‘CENSUS TAKER’ QUOTE OUT OF CONTEXT IN MAKING AN ATTACK ON
OUR PROTAGONIST ENVIRONMENTALISTS / VEGANS ...
IF THEY WANT TO WEAR A TATTOO BEHIND THE EAR THEN THEY HAVE MADE A CHOICE
AND WE RESPECT THAT AS THEIR ACCOUNTABILITY WHICH TO THEM IS OUT IS SIGHT
IS NEVER OUT OF MIND...
...BUT SINCE THEY ARE IMPULSIVE CREATURES A DECISION MADE IN THE PAST MAY
BECOME DISCOMFORTING IN THE FUTURE...
REGGIE (
REG...@KROTEKO.COM) @ 0201 HOURS ON 10 DECEMBER 2018: "WHY BELIEVE
SCIENCE WHEN YOU CAN BELIEVE TRUMP?
I believe everything Trump says. I don't believe anything scientists say.
Trump will make me grate.
No education is required to believe Trump. Everything he says is simple."
DOLF @ 0519 HOURS ON 10 DECEMBER 2018: "
— GNOSIS OSMOSIS —
“REGGIE THE VEGGIE
TRIES TO BE RECUSED.
OF A NAZI IDENTITY.
BUT AS MEATHEAD.
A PARADING VEGAN. {@334 - PROLEGOMENA SECTION #46 - PSYCHOLOGICAL IDEAS
(Critique, pp. 341 ff.)}
BY A FLAP IS FIXATED.
HE’S A CHEESY BOGAN.
THAT’S EMANCIPATED.”
<
https://www.facebook.com/125982670754724/posts/2268673266485643/>
<
http://www.grapple369.com/images/Reggie.jpeg>
[SBS NEWS @ 1500 HOURS ON 7 DECEMBER 2018: Veganism is growing in
popularity – will it eventually become the norm?]
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION #46 - PSYCHOLOGICAL IDEAS: @334: It has long
been observed that in all substances the true subject – namely that which
remains after all accidents (as predicates) have been removed – and hence
the substantial itself, is unknown to us; and various complaints have been
made about these limits to our insight. But it needs to be said that human
understanding is not to be blamed because it does not know the substantial
in things, i.e., cannot determine it by itself, but rather because it wants
to cognize determinately, like an object that is given, what is only an
idea. Pure reason demands that for each predicate of a thing we should seek
its appropriate subject, but that for this subject, which is in turn
necessarily only a predicate, we should seek its subject again, and so
forth to infinity (or as far as we get). But from this it follows that we
should take nothing that we can attain for a final subject, and that the
substantial itself could never be thought by our ever-so-deeply penetrating
understanding, even if *THE* *WHOLE* *OF* *NATURE* *WERE* *LAID* *BARE*
*BEFORE* *IT*; for the specific nature of our understanding consists in
thinking everything discursively, i.e., through concepts, hence through
mere predicates, among which the absolute subject must therefore always be
absent. Consequently, *ALL* *REAL* *PROPERTIES* *BY* *WHICH* *WE* *COGNIZE*
*BODIES* *ARE* *MERE* *ACCIDENTS* *FOR* *WHICH* *WE* *LACK* *A* *SUBJECT* –
*EVEN* *IMPENETRABILITY*, *WHICH* *MUST* *ALWAYS* *BE* *CONCEIVED* *ONLY*
*AS* *THE* *EFFECT* *OF* *A* *FORCE*." [Page 85, 86]
Can you #331 - NOT also see the dichotomy by a buffoonery notion of this
PARIS RIOTS picture (shown above) as presumably an Islamic binomial mindset
of an unreasoned methodology yet presumptuously claiming to dictate peace
as conveying circularity of #492 - AUTONOMOUS VOLUNTARY FREEWILL (ie.
either Liberty / Egalitarian depending upon the nuance) in being
paradoxically entirely of a trinomial providence:
MADNESS AND DARKNESS IS UPON THE PEOPLE AS DERANGED HYSTERIA.
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC* necessity
comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY
DOLF @ 1528 HOURS ON 9 DECEMBER 2018: "We see from another poster's
unreasoned and pejorative response just how true and self satisfying a
contempt by ignorance as #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL can really be and
especially so within a herd mentality where a foolsome dignity is bestowed
by a common consensus but doesn't have sufficient sensibility excepting its
own self-entitlement by which it engorges itself within a hedonistic
lustful *FRAUDULENT* indecency that it's opine is worth something more than
a *RAZOO* ...
[F, {@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6)}
i, {@2: Sup: 15 (#21); Ego: 9 (#15)}
x, {@3: Sup: 48 (#69); Ego: 33 (#48)}
e, {@4: Sup: 53 (#122); Ego: 5 (#53)}
d, {@5: Sup: 57 (#179); Ego: 4 (#57)}
i, {@6: Sup: 66 (#245); Ego: 9 (#66)}
t, {@7: Sup: 23 (#268); Ego: 38 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7})}
f, {@8: Sup: 29 (#297); Ego: 6 (#110)}
o, {@9: Sup: 8 (#305); Ego: 60 (#170)}
r, {@10: Sup: 17 (#322); Ego: 9 (#179)}
y, {@11: Sup: 69 (#391 ***); Ego: 52 (#231 ***)}
o, {@12: Sup: 48 (#439); Ego: 60 (#291)}
u] {@13: Sup: 24 (#463); Ego: 57 (#348)}
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 as *BEFORE* *THE* *FRENCH* *REVOLUTION*)
SECTION #54 AS IDEA: @348: "This then is the statement and solution of the
whole antinomy in which reason finds itself entangled in the application of
its principles to the sensible world, and of which the former (the mere
statement) even by itself would already be of considerable benefit toward a
knowledge of human reason, even if the solution of this conflict should not
yet fully satisfy the reader, who has here to combat a natural illusion
that has only recently been presented to him as such, after he had
*HITHERTO* *ALWAYS* *TAKEN* *THAT* *ILLUSION* *FOR* *THE* *TRUTH*.
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (
GOV....@GMAIL.COM) @ 1347 HOURS ON 9 DECEMBER 2018:
"MADNESS AND DARKNESS IS UPON [*DOLF*] AS DERANGED HYSTERIA.
Fixed it for you."
— POUTING SNOUT —
“THAT’LL DO PIG...
HAVE SOME SWILL.
GIVE IT A WHIRL.
WITH YOUR FORK.
GRUE[L]SOME JIG.
FOR SUCH A DILL.
WORTHLESS PEARL.
AND ENDLESS PORK.”
YOUTUBE: “That'll do pig, that'll do (Babe)”
<
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjQtzV9IZ0Q>
One consequence of all this is, indeed, inevitable; namely, that since *IT*
*IS* *COMPLETELY* *IMPOSSIBLE* *TO* *ESCAPE* *FROM* *THIS* *CONFLICT* *OF*
*REASON* *WITH* *ITSELF* *AS* *LONG* *AS* *THE* *OBJECTS* *OF* *THE*
*SENSIBLE* *WORLD* *ARE* *TAKEN* *FOR* *THINGS* *IN* *THEMSELVES* – and not
for what they in fact are, that is, for mere appearances – the reader is
obliged, for that reason, to take up once more the deduction of all our
cognition a priori (and the examination of that deduction which I have
provided), in order to come to a decision about it. For the present I do
not require more; for if, through this pursuit, he has first thought
himself deeply enough into the nature of pure reason, then the concepts by
means of which alone the solution to this conflict of reason is possible
will already be familiar to him, a circumstance without which I cannot
expect full approbation from even the most attentive reader. [IMMANUEL
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA. p 144]
RAZOO: used to denote an imaginary coin of little value or a very small sum
of money.
[R, {@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9)}
A, {@2: Sup: 10 (#19); Ego: 1 (#10)}
Z, {@3: Sup: 81 (#100); Ego: 71 (#81)}
O, {@4: Sup: 60 (#160); Ego: 60 (#141)}
O] {@5: Sup: 39 (#199); Ego: 60 (#201)}
H6996@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 59 (#99); Ego: 19 (#59),
@3: Sup: 68 (#167); Ego: 9 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#206); Ego: 52 (#120),
Male: #206; Feme: #120
} // #199
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #199 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu; *I*
*AM* *NOT* *ONE* *WHO* *CURSETH* *THE* *KING*.
#VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
#TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
#POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
#TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
#CANON: #181
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
@2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
@4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181
#199 as [#40, #100, #9, #700] = qatan (H6996): {UMBRA: #1 as #199 % #41 =
#35} 1) young, small, insignificant, unimportant; 1a) *small*; 1b)
insignificant; 1c) young; 1d) *unimportant*;
G3664@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 29 (#99); Ego: 40 (#110),
@3: Sup: 18 (#117); Ego: 70 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S
WIFE {%19}),
@4: Sup: 28 (#145); Ego: 10 (#190),
@5: Sup: 29 (#174); Ego: 1 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
@6: Sup: 39 (#213); Ego: 10 (#201),
Male: #213; Feme: #201
} // #201
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #201 % #41 = #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration;
I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21 -
Release;
THOTH MEASURE: #37 - Oh Striker, who makest thine appearance in Heaven; *I*
*AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *LOUD* *VOICE*.
#VIRTUE: Purity (no. #37) means the Way of the ruler.
#TOOLS: Compliance (no. #77) means the subject’s preservation.
#POSITION: With Penetration (no. #14), a sharp advance.
#TIME: With Dimming (no. #68), an impeded walk.
#CANON: #196
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_196@{
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 37 (#37),
@2: Sup: 33 (#70); Ego: 77 (#114),
@3: Sup: 47 (#117); Ego: 14 (#128),
@4: Sup: 34 (#151); Ego: 68 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
Male: #151; Feme: #196
} // #196
#201 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #10] = homoios (G3664): {UMBRA: #41 as
#201 % #41 = #37} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: i.e. resembling;
1b) like: i.e. *CORRESPONDING* *TO* *A* *THING*;
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (
GOV....@GMAIL.COM) @ 1013 HOURS ON 8 DECEMBER 2018:
"THERE IS NO TRUTH TO THE SOYLENT GREEN RUMOUR THAT IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH
HALAL CERTIFICATION WASABI IS BEING MARKETED AS KHASHOGGI:
Who the hell are you replying to?
Please learn to Usenet."
DOLF @ 1246 HOURS ON 8 DECEMBER 2018: "I rest my case on the available
proof that we are not having a conversation because you are not capable of
cohering reality."
WOTAWONDERFULWORLD (
WOTAWONDE...@FOOBAR.COM) @ 1635 HOURS ON 8
DECEMBER 2018: "Got to agree with Dolf on this one."
DANIEL60 (
DANI...@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2355 HOURS ON 8 DECEMBER 2018:
"So you know what "cohering reality" is?? Really?? Please explain!! "
DOLF @ 0156 HOURS ON 9 DECEMBER 2018: "What do you mean by the statement:
OMG 🤔
Is it a statement of congruence or incongruity...
Or is it a statement of differentiated truth rather than an attainment of
declarative opportunism within a quagmire as otherwise plethora of conceit?
Unity of apperception as syncretic congruence by the INTELLECTUS conveying
a steeped concordance of temporal reality with the trinomial mathematical
theoretical noumena...
So am I self aware here in the now or am I supra-naturally also within
eternity as immorality looking down upon my chronological existentiality as
a portal context which adheres by relativity natural associators to a
physicality as presence of mortal being.
<
http://www.grapple369.com/images/TheAgeMasthead.jpeg>
[IMAGE: The Masthead '*DIEU* *ET* *MON* *DROIT*' conveys a CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE @1 - SOVEREIGN / @2 - JUSTICE / @3 - SOLDIER'S BATTLECRY / @4 -
WILL TO BELIEF AND REMEMBRANCE WITHOUT COERCION FROM GREGORIAN CALENDAR
PAPAL BULL OF 1582 BUT ADOPTED BY THE BRITISH EMPIRE AS CALENDAR ACT OF
1751 WHICH DROPPED 3 TO #41 - 13 SEPTEMBER 1752 FROM THE CALENDAR]
The PRINCIPLE OF EVIDENTIAL EXISTENTIALITY in philosophy is a principle
that explains and gives value to the existence of entities. The principle
states that the reality of an entity's existence gives greater value to
prove its existence than would be given through any outward studies. The
principle has become a backbone of the God argument, stating that because
God is a self-evident entity, His existence can only be shared by humans,
thus proof of God is unnecessary and moot. It appears that the existence is
primarily evident to the self only. The God or Supreme self is perceivable
to the self. So evidentially self perception is followed by God perception
and so on. [<
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidential_existentiality>]
WOTAWONDERFULWORLD (
WOTAWONDE...@FOOBAR.COM) @ 1022 HOURS ON 9
DECEMBER 2018: "I think Dolf has explained that fully above."
DOLF @ 1225 HOURS ON 9 DECEMBER 2018: "That ought to read 'syncretic
congruence by the INTELLECTUS'” rather than 'of the'."
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (
SCREAMIN...@GMAIL.COM) @ 1333 HOURS ON 9
DECEMBER 2018: "Oh, it all makes perfect sense then."
DOLF @ 1554 HOURS ON 9 DECEMBER 2018: "That ought to read 'immortality'
rather than 'immorality' however if I had suggested the former it wouldn’t
then 'make perfect sense.'
I was mindful of the reader’s referential context."
If I may then state the cognitive hypothesis as the theoretical obvious:
The SEPTET driver to the mathematical theoretical noumenon provides by an
equitable distribution of trinomial number an ontological basis for the
entelechy:
- the realization of potential.
- the supposed vital principle that guides the development and functioning
of an organism or other system or organization.
- such self-organization requires a special biological force which is known
as entelechy.
- the soul for the spiritus
It therefore may be considered as quintessentially the 'INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS' of an unencumbered will and ought to conform with the
following dialectic which chronicles the: levels / phases / stages /
duration / milestone of any perennial cycle as the dispensational
governance basis of LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA OF 1901 represented by a theoretical mathematical trinomial
noumenon as an Intellectual Property:
MENTALISM: #1 - Will, free will, choice / Remember the Sabbath Day
CORRESPONDENCE: #2 - desire, inclination / Honour Parents
VIBRATION: #3 - disposition towards (something or someone) / Do Not Kill
POLARITY: #4 - favour, affection / Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid
Heteronomy Against Autonomy)
RHYTHM: #5 - last will, testament / Do Not Steal
CAUSE AND EFFECT: #6 - goal, object, purpose, intention / Do Not Bear False
Witness
ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE: #7 - signification, import / Do Not Covet [LATIN
definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
The NOLUNTĀTIS is then a consequence of an opposition as consideration
being a question of relativity as the interoperability by mutuality on what
#8 - TRANSFORMATIVE prototype is to be deployed where the default is the
hetero-square spirogyra order:
#8 as TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE: #1 - unwillingness;
But this is in my view a matter of protocol selection which can be
identified by the classification duality of both the cryptographic # and
the vRUDOLPH DATE being determined by a cosmogonic observation as
computation of rational 22/7 from #0 of Equinox on Wednesday of 20 March
1996 associated to any EVENT as slider dispersal from calendar to the
noumenon.
The Autonomous Prototype is then the source amalgamation of the binomial,
trinomial and chrononomial (#YEAR, #DECADE, #CENTENARY and #MILLENNIUM
orientation) meta descriptor prototypes for each MIRRORED reality:
#9 as MIRRORED AUTONOMOUS PROTOTYPE OF EACH OTHER'S SOVEREIGN AUTONOMY: #2
- ill will, negative disposition (toward something) [LATIN definition:
NOLUNTĀTIS]
DOLF @ 0408 HOURS ON 12 DECEMBER 2018: "YOU ARE NOT AN #343 - *UBERMENSCH*
...
But understand this our FINAL SOLUTION that as a narcissistic imbecile with
an infatuation of self-bestowed dignity which is ignorance as #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL.
It is little wonder that the Dutch capitulated to the Nazi’s within 5 days
but at least the French #22 - *RESISTANCE* will be sufficient to withstand
the hysteria of the SOYLENT GREEN ANARCHIST RIOTING.
We are here to render assistance but that you should to get use to the idea
your ego ought NOT to impose itself by any means whatsoever upon my
SELF-IDENTITY AS FORMULA AS AUTONOMY.
— APPLE RELISH —
"GUILTY AS SIN,
NOT REALLY NICE.
OVERTAKE TIME.
TRUTH'S DEVICE.
HEAR IT RHYME
OUR NANO IS IN."
Otherwise I will give you a lesson which will leave you pickled and it
won't be relish.
Het lijkt erop dat u onderworpen bent aan een gemeenschappelijke stroom
semantiek als het lexicon van opportunisme:
Verzet is zinloos - you will be assimilated!
YOUTUBE: "The Borg Assimilation"
<
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkasJZZxRU0>
THE ÜBERMENSCH (GERMAN FOR "BEYOND-MAN", "SUPERMAN", "OVERMAN",
"SUPERHUMAN", "HYPERMAN", "HYPERHUMAN"); IS A CONCEPT IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF
FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE. IN HIS 1883 BOOK THUS SPOKE ZARATHUSTRA (GERMAN: ALSO
SPRACH ZARATHUSTRA), NIETZSCHE HAS HIS CHARACTER ZARATHUSTRA POSIT THE
ÜBERMENSCH AS A GOAL {
#343 - TELOS / *AUTONOMOUS* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *COHESION*: @65 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 - MARRYING MAIDEN: #3 +
#6 = #9 as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE *AGAINST* *BOTH* *THE* *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *JUXTAPOSITION*: @1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 + #54 = #81 AND PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
@5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29
OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18 = #27 IN REGARD TO THE SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY
} FOR HUMANITY TO SET FOR ITSELF. IT IS A WORK OF PHILOSOPHICAL ALLEGORY {
#288 - META SCHEMA ACQUIESCENCE: @1 - @728 - PASSOVER, @5 - PENTECOST, @65,
#175 THEURGIC SYNCRETISM OF NEOPLATONISM COMMONLY USED BY PYTHAGOREAN
NUMBER DERIVED GOVERNANCE (ROMAN CATHOLICISM / ISLAM etc) THAT IS
UNLAWFULLY DEPLOYING MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS #391 - HOMOGENEOUS
PARADIGM BY #288 - UMBRA RAW MAPPING TO THEIR ANKH HETEROS / TORAH
PROTOTYPES
}, WITH A STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY TO THE GATHAS OF ZOROASTER/ZARATHUSTRA:
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral concepts
{#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1) a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS,
389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is, in the
sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE] {
HOMOIOS
HETEROS
KABBALAH
AS DEFINED
} ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR WITH #164 -
CHRONOLOGICAL PLANE MAPPING] ...
#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - REMEMBER THE
SABBATH]) ...
45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 -
HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
#65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123 -
DO NOT KILL]) ...
130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE
EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]
#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE
[#164 - AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...
166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35 - I
AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]
#175 (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205 -
DO NOT STEAL]) ...
210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
#260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 - BEAR
NO FALSE WITNESS]) ...
#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - COVET NOT])
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature.