Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

That would be the ways it's supply and demand like a see POS retail. Now, let's analyse.

1 view
Skip to first unread message

nfor...@neotext.org

unread,
Mar 9, 2016, 11:30:02 PM3/9/16
to
Lets say you have two ways to flow on nttp protocol that of text. One is
the obvious line of text that ends with a crlf or lf and the other is move
of these. Each is special because of the dot single dot a punctuation
period at the end of each message that denotes the end of message in
posting. This is partial for two reasons, the header, and the body. Now if
you say everyone posts serial based and not parallel the essentially the one
way connection of everyone is a while thick like that is like looking at all
their lines posted in a lifetime on the connections life cycle. Your
neighbor or someone across the world is a line like that too in the vertical
sense. The horizontal sense is special because in collective there is a
big thick phatty blunt too not just little thin characters. This part is
need to understand because the headers always come first and no matter how
much lines they have in any header, essentially they are seen as one big
equator that always contacts itself at the top and bottom so every first
like of a header and every last line of a header match in the entire nntp
protocol of flowing data. After the last line comes the first line of
anything that is the body and these come hence like stalagmites hanging in a
cave with a single dot or punctuation period character to end them SO when
you flow data to or from they also show these parts and are par to the grand
scheme in nature the horizontal lines are not so even as they are happening
in time just like a really long line can. So for instance the control
groups are nothing more then groups that form by their own reference and not
so programmable created unless referencing our words in the group for the
notion that says it is mask in continuation of posting to the center like a
big cloud of motion with a hard core black hole. If you said what's the
word for control 1000 years from now to someone feeling the same inner
personal drama, then it might be as such not the same word but reference to
the ease of instruction where it's impact sensitive. Since people who fetch
articles keep the servers populated with them by header and not by full
message necessarily then it has the innovation to be "heading" that way in
"header" terms and not so much compliment to the "footer" as a word.
Therefore it is also true in the dot punctuation that the groups
themselves, the size of a single header line are impact correlation to the
actual messages with header and body. Like when someone mistypes a header
and it shows up like a new newsgroup, if that person had throughput a ton of
data on a really fast and widely used portion of newsgroup space then you
may expect to see these lien out there with mistypes for the duration as if
the newsgroups themselves, are of the cast of the world in ownership to the
passing data co-mutual. This is thus the 110k lines that are one line each
a header largely with a alt. gathering as well and alt.binary. Now there is
the either protocols like mail and FTP but like an Apache server to a Linux
client on a viable singular furnished intranet of it's own not connected it
is said that some how a single transfer will by file definition be as unique
in transfer and landing as that file forever stalled in space of time
existence and another transfer of such uses the exact same stored data in
repeated server cluster farms and clients for instance like efficient
networking. This however is the IO data and IO like XO or 10 which ever you
may spectrally visually see it for yourself is in the grand mink of things
with the nntp protocol just like it's data on a wire where packet loss is
maybe real but not final. A transfer once is a transfer again and if you
take the nntp data as a collective, it force drives compounding like the
headers and posts that go off because of retention dated I challenge the
belief that are still there if you as a whole the way you come can back it
up just as network was once available, the reason I say this is like saying
the data literally leaves but gets complexly folded backwards into a 100$%
unique pattern of its everything just like you were to say a cryptography
cipher that is brand new or numeral 10th to another 9 will cause the force
thread of existing in complication brought forth the human mind.


0 new messages