Re: Best repeater?

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Rudolph Rhein

unread,
Nov 19, 2021, 11:42:38 PM11/19/21
to
iwannabastartsomeday <iwannabeas...@invalid.org> wrote:

> Which type of repeater/booster is best for this?
>
> Line of sight is mostly not there. Getting a bounced signal off a metal
> gate and can just barely connect but not reliably-getting 1 to 3 stars
> on the laptop windows readout. When I can connect, signal is speed is
> half way decent. Sometimes if I power off the router and on again and
> change my mac address, I can then connect. I don't know what is going on
> with that, but I do have the logon PW for connection to the router. This
> is an ISP that is known for it's flakiness. And they
> are using some kind of software so as to prevent weak connections,
> either by mac address or position of the units. I could do a factory
> reset of the modem but it's a hassle, I don't want to mess with it.
>
> This is a shared router with the owner and I don't have the password, so
> can do nothing with those settings. (for all you netcops: YES I do have
> owner permission)
>
> Router is in a separate house may not be on same electrical circuit. I
> have positioned the router for max. benefit, but it's not enough.
>
> I need a repeater or signal booster. I am using a laptop, windows 8.1.
> Number of bars on laptop does not reliably show the signal strength, I
> can either connect or not connect often depending the weather and other
> unknown variables.
>
> I want a repeater that is easy to setup, plug in, without having to
> enter the settings for the main ISP router/modem. Any constructive
> replies welcomed.

My first recommendation is something like this, but see more below.
https://help.nmsu.edu/files/2020/03/thumbnail_IMG_3814.jpg

This is what I "think" you have based on what you said.
1. Your laptop connects to an access point of weak/flaky signal strength.
2. That AP appears to be a router which connects to a modem (to the ISP).
3. You have the passphrase for that AP but not the password for the router.
4. You want a better connection without messing with the router or modem.

While we don't know the frequency range (2.4GHz or 5GHz), or what your
120VAC power considerations are at the location of the laptop, even so it
seems to me you have a few options, one of which is the "repeater" you speak
of (assuming you can keep it dry & power it up wherever you end up placing
it).

That repeater can be almost any extra router you have on your shelves. If
you can protect it from the elements and get power to it, that repeater can
be positioned roughly about halfway between the laptop and what I'll call
the "main router" to act as a wireless repeater.

I have only set up wired repeaters (because the speeds are double that way)
but I don't recall that you have to mess with the main router to set up a
repeater (but double check that this is a correct assumption). If that's the
case then almost any router will work as a wireless repeater and even if the
one you have on your shelf doesn't have the firmware to be a wireless
repeater, most can be set up with DD-WRT or Tomato or the like which will
likely allow wireless repeating.

Another option is to plug in a more powerful transmitter and a more
sensitive receiver to your laptop USB or Ethernet port. If you're not LOS
and hence bouncing signal it would at least give you more signal to bounce
to the main router, and it would pluck out more signal to receive from the
main router.

While USB transmitter/receivers are what most people would use to increase
the signal strength and receiver sensitivity of a laptop, you may need more
powerful & more sensitive professional equipment to plug into your laptop.
https://www.amazon.com/Wireless-USB-WiFi-Adapter-PC/dp/B07V4R3QHW

A much more powerful transmitter and a more sensitive receiver could be
plugged into your laptop's Ethernet port if you have 120VAC power at the
laptop location. https://help.nmsu.edu/files/2020/03/thumbnail_IMG_3814.jpg
https://help.nmsu.edu/connection-settings-for-apartment-communities/

Almost any access point will work plugged into your laptop Ethernet port
which is why that's what I recommend, because you can find powerful ones.
https://community.ui.com/questions/Which-device-bullet-nano-pico-loco-bests-serves-DUAL-use-needs-as-a-laptop-and-home-wifi-extender/32192267-3a65-4264-bea8-bcc247b77549

I guessed at a few things above so let me know if I guessed wrong.

Jeff Liebermann

unread,
Nov 20, 2021, 12:40:38 AM11/20/21
to
On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 01:51:05 -0000 (UTC), iwannabastartsomeday
<iwannabeas...@invalid.org> wrote:

>Which type of repeater/booster is best for this?
>
>Line of sight is mostly not there.

Good. A store and forward repeater, signal booster, range extender or
whatever will work if the endpoints cannot see each other. It's when
there are two RF paths, one direct from source to endpoint, and the
other going from source to endpoint via a store and forward repeater,
that things go awry.

In 2015, I gave a song and dance presentation on mesh networking to
the local Linux users group:
<http://www.learnbydestroying.com/jeffl/FLUG-talk-2015-02-28/Mesh-talk.pdf>
<http://www.learnbydestroying.com/jeffl/FLUG-talk-2015-02-28/>
Note that a mesh network is nothing more than a repeater, where
multiple endpoints can also act as repeaters.

This is what 802.11n throughput looks like going directly from a
client radio (bridge) to a wireless access point:
<http://www.learnbydestroying.com/jeffl/FLUG-talk-2015-02-28/802.11gn%20direct.jpg>
That's what it's suppose to look like. Notice that the 25Mbit/sec to
70Mbit/sec 2.4GHz throughput is quite consistent and stable. The
source and endpoint were about 10 ft apart, so there are no signal
strength issues involved.

Then, I added a store and forward repeater into the room, located
roughly half way between the source and endpoint:
<http://www.learnbydestroying.com/jeffl/FLUG-talk-2015-02-28/802.11gn%20through%20Netgear%20repeater.jpg>
That's what a big problem looks like. The graphs are slower and vary
randomly in throughput. The average throughput is 1/2 or less of the
throughput without a store and forward repeater. That's expected
because the system can allow only one radio transmit at a time which
implies that the system needs to send two packets with a repeater
instead of one packet without the repeater. The radios are
desperately trying to communicate directly in order to obtain the best
performance, but are hampered by the repeater which insists on
retransmitting almost every packet.

Yet, there are some systems like that which work. The trick is to
block the direct path, and have everything go through the repeater.
The maximum throughput will still be 1/2 the direct throughput, but
the data rate will be quite constant. In other words, reliable but at
half speed.

I've had some experience with such installs. On customer in a trailer
park wanted to leach off of a nearby coffee shop wi-fi system.
Unfortunately, someone put a large brick building in between, blocking
the line of sight. Fortunately, the layout was such that I found a
place to install a repeater at 90 degrees from each end, so that the
repeater could see both end points, but the end points could not see
each other. It wasn't as fast as it could theoretically operate, but
it was quite reliable. For the curious, yes, I obtained permission to
install the repeater from the owner after I offered a small bribe.

Since I don't know anything about the location, equipment, potential
interference, etc, I can't offer any specific equipment suggestions.
For repeaters, I've been using:
<https://www.tp-link.com/us/home-networking/wifi-router/tl-wr902ac/>
It's not the best but it does have a few advantages. It runs on 5VDC
from a microUSB connector, so it can work with a solar powered battery
only UPS. It also has several modes besides repeater allowing it to
be used as a wireless client bridge at the end of a CAT5 cable. About
$40 plus tax and ship:
<https://www.newegg.com/tp-link-tl-wr902ac-v3-ieee-802-11ac-n-a-5-ghz-ieee-802-11b-g-n-2-4-ghz/p/N82E16833704373>
Note that this is NOT a recommendation for your application.

>I want a repeater that is easy to setup, plug in, without having to
>enter the settings for the main ISP router/modem. Any constructive
>replies welcomed.

Ummm... It is better and easier to obtain permission than to obtain
forgiveness.

Good luck and think about getting your own ISP service. If you're low
income, on some form of public assistance, and can qualify, try these:
<https://www.internetessentials.com>
<https://www.att.com/internet/access/>

--
Jeff Liebermann je...@cruzio.com
PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages