Backbones
Karl H.
I've heard of other people saying about problems with other ISPs today -
maybe there is a backbone problem ? Anyone else having problems with
connections apart from RHA ?
--
Karl H.
con...@windoze98.co.uk
Shep©<:)
wrote:
>
>I've heard of other people saying about problems with other ISPs today -
>maybe there is a backbone problem ? Anyone else having problems with
>connections apart from RHA ?
Apart from the usual authentication problems IG click are having,the
data
throughput/pings is it's usual high standard
>Host Name IP Address Hop Ping Time Ping Avg % Loss Pkts r/s Ping best/worst
>interconnect5.ilford.fixed.bt.net194.74.77.229 1 34ms 36ms 0% 11 / 11 33ms / 44ms
>core2-gig2-0.ilford.ukcore.bt.net194.74.16.85 2 34ms 36ms 0% 11 / 11 34ms / 40ms
>core2-pos8-0.ealing.ukcore.bt.net62.6.196.254 3 35ms 36ms 0% 11 / 11 34ms / 41ms
>transit1-gig5-0.ealing.ukcore.bt.194.72.9.132 4 36ms 36ms 0% 11 / 11 34ms / 42ms
>bcr1-serial6-0-0-0.London.cw.net 166.63.163.225 5 38ms 38ms 0% 10 / 10 34ms / 47ms
>bcr1-so-0-3-0.Thamesside.cw.net 166.63.211.149 6 40ms 41ms 0% 10 / 10 36ms / 47ms
>acr1-so-3-2-1.NewYorknyr.cw.net 166.63.211.146 7 112ms 111ms 0% 10 / 10 108ms / 115ms
>corerouter1.WestOrange.cw.net 204.70.9.138 8 108ms 112ms 0% 10 / 10 108ms / 117ms
>corerouter1.WillowSprings.cw.net 204.70.9.135 9 129ms 134ms 0% 10 / 10 129ms / 139ms
>acr1-loopback.Chicagochd.cw.net 208.172.2.61 10 128ms 135ms 0% 10 / 10 128ms / 173ms
>bar3-loopback.Chicagochd.cw.net 208.172.2.7 11 135ms 133ms 0% 10 / 10 131ms / 137ms
>city-of-rochelle.Chicagochd.cw.ne166.63.136.114 12 183ms 147ms 0% 10 / 10 133ms / 190ms
>cool.rochelle.net 207.40.232.7 13 136ms 136ms 0% 10 / 10 133ms / 151ms
I do hope RHA bring the system back up to standard as it's almost
unusable even on ISDN.Way too much PL.
Jim Crowther
>
>I've heard of other people saying about problems with other ISPs today -
>maybe there is a backbone problem ? Anyone else having problems with
>connections apart from RHA ?
>
for me on G4 number and Red ROMP, Purple had a trickle through it.,
news.cis.dfn.de were down, ('Network Down' message or somesuch) for
about half an hour. Cyberstrider unreachable. Horlicksed all round,
I'd say.
Direct connection (telnet) to the US seemed fine, but not to Demon or
cis.dfn.de
Demon is up now on non-Surftime numbers, RHA have had their moments as
well, but screwed at the moment for me.
Must be DoS day...
--
Jim Crowther "It's MY computer" (tm Steve Gibson)
Nanoprobe (tm S.G.) Announced: <URL:http://grc.com/np/np.htm>
** DoS attack solution found - Steve Gibson **
<URL:http://grc.com/r&d/NoMoreDoS.htm>
D.D.R.
"ShepŠ<:)" <sh...@gmx.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5uvuuskadugvuqh1o...@4ax.com...
> >maybe there is a backbone problem ? Anyone else having problems with
> >connections apart from RHA ?
>
> data
> throughput/pings is it's usual high standard
That is not the impression I get from reading the postings on alt.igclick.
--
David.D.Russell.
Remove NOSPAM to reply by email.
Martin Christy
news:MPG.145965971...@127.0.0.1...
>
> I've heard of other people saying about problems with other ISPs today -
> maybe there is a backbone problem ? Anyone else having problems with
> connections apart from RHA ?
>
> Karl H.
> con...@windoze98.co.uk
Telewest have several main links to US down - this is causing congestion on
all UK Internet.
I have (not free) providers that use BT, Telewest & MCI - none are good
right now. Guess we should all bear that in mind before blaming RHA.
M. Christy
Shep©<:)
<davidr...@redhotant.com> wrote:
>
>"Shep©<:)" <sh...@gmx.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:5uvuuskadugvuqh1o...@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:10:39 +0100, Karl H. <con...@windoze98.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >I've heard of other people saying about problems with other ISPs today -
>> >maybe there is a backbone problem ? Anyone else having problems with
>> >connections apart from RHA ?
>>
>> Apart from the usual authentication problems IG click are having,the
>> data
>> throughput/pings is it's usual high standard
><snip>
>
>That is not the impression I get from reading the postings on alt.igclick.
I cannot comment on the postings on there or any other forum as I can
only go by my connection 01482 area and as you see from my previous
post the pings and lack of packet loss on 13 hops to the USA are
superb.The dual bonding only works now and then but once connected my
single channel 64k is excellent and always has been with them and I'm
having to use them a lot at the moment to play my online games as RHA is
useless at the moment for me.So long as IG don't go under I'd be quite
content with a good,reliable single channel ISDN connection at the £30
PA I've paid.As I don't use their e-mail or news servers everything is
fast for me with their connection.
Off -peak times I connect 1st time so as I found out from one of the
support they have still not recovered from the massive influx of users
they got when EZ and Quip went to the wall so it's a modem user/ports
ration thing.If they implement more of said as they have indicated then
things should improve with luck but all these un-metered providers seem
a little flakey but still no where near as bad as my old ISP which I was
paying £15 PM for.
Andy Fraser
> maybe there is a backbone problem ? Anyone else having problems with
> connections apart from RHA ?
Apparently BT Internet was a bit bad last night. Maybe we owe RHA a small
apology. They seem better this morning but not by much and it *is* the
morning. I'm still getting download speeds of just over 2kb/sec. MSN still
weird though. The page loads then the "Page cannot be displayed" message
pops up! RHA or IE problem?
--
Andy.
[MSN: andyfr...@hotmail.com] [Yahoo: andyfraser20] [AIM: AndyFrs711]
[ICQ# 92367547]
dwad
Andy Fraser <andyfr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:39f01368$1...@news.jakinternet.co.uk...
> Apparently BT Internet was a bit bad last night. Maybe we owe RHA a small
> apology. They seem better this morning but not by much and it *is* the
> morning. I'm still getting download speeds of just over 2kb/sec. MSN still
> weird though. The page loads then the "Page cannot be displayed" message
> pops up! RHA or IE problem?
>
> --
> Andy.
> [MSN: andyfr...@hotmail.com] [Yahoo: andyfraser20] [AIM: AndyFrs711]
> [ICQ# 92367547]
>
>
the 0808 number, but the throughput is still as bad as yesterday. And the
day before. Something on the status page about all this would be nice. I
haven`t noticed rDNS working properly with the 010 number/bank ever...alot
of the problem seems to be in the DNS itself atm. Can`t find hostname
etc...And when it does work the throughput is so slow it either times out or
you lose most of the data you ask for.
A Truscott
<kq.larts...@kingqueen.org.uk> wrote:
>I can't get it to authenticate, even on the local rate number; it
>refuses, I dunno why,
Course you know why they have gone totally useless there have been
enough posting's here about em all day to day.
Adam .