clinton Stratigic Oil Reserve withdraw had to be refined over seas 2002 Waterloo for DNC
CB
that we can't get oil, its the inability to process it. The sole reason is
because clinton and al gore threw flower child mentality of impressionism
hadn't the forethought of cause and effect. By stopping all attempts at
building new refineries and preventing exploration and environmentally safe
exploitation, the clinton's/gore have seen to it America's economy is
constricted. The DNC seems to be saying, "good".
The consequence of the clinton's/gore "is" the trickle down energy crisis we
are living in today. clinton's legacy lives on.
2002 for the GOP? No sweat.
CB
F. Prefect
For starters, the so called "strategic oil reserve" is for military
purposes and would do very little to effect the supply/demand
equation.
Secondly, Clinton, Gore, or and other politician will ever have any
long term effect on the per capita consumption of hydrocarbon fuels in
this country unless taxes are imposed at a rate that would
meaningfully reduce our rate of consumption.
Thirdly, no politician in his/her right mind would ever impose such
taxes and expect to remain in office.
That leaves one explanation/solution to our little problem of
consuming over twice the fuels we can domestically produce.
Guess what? Energy prices are going to rise, and rise rapidly over
the near term. Ah yes, I seem to remember, lets see, it was back in
the 70's. Gas lines, higher fuel prices, and oh yes, fuel efficient
cars began to roll off the assembly lines.
How quickly we forget.
F. Prefect
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has
made a lot of people very angry and been widely been
regarded as being a bad move.....Douglas Adams
CB
"F. Prefect" <fo...@inter-linc.net> wrote in message
news:3afc1ebf...@news.alt.net...
> On Thu, 10 May 2001 11:52:43 -0400, "CB" <C...@prayforme.com> wrote:
>
> >clinton Strategic Oil Reserve withdraw had to be refined over seas. It's
not
> >that we can't get oil, its the inability to process it. The sole reason
is
> >because clinton and al gore threw flower child mentality of impressionism
> >hadn't the forethought of cause and effect. By stopping all attempts at
> >building new refineries and preventing exploration and environmentally
safe
> >exploitation, the clinton's/gore have seen to it America's economy is
> >constricted. The DNC seems to be saying, "good".
> >
> >The consequence of the clinton's/gore "is" the trickle down energy crisis
we
> >are living in today. clinton's legacy lives on.
> >
> >2002 for the GOP? No sweat.
> >
> >CB
> >
> For starters, the so called "strategic oil reserve" is for military
> purposes and would do very little to effect the supply/demand
> equation.
No kidding, Slick Willy listened to no council and did it any way for the
impressionism. It's not the result he was after, it was the impression he
cares and to tweak the adults.
>
> Secondly, Clinton, Gore, or and other politician will ever have any
> long term effect on the per capita consumption of hydrocarbon fuels in
> this country unless taxes are imposed at a rate that would
> meaningfully reduce our rate of consumption.
Which would further constrict the economybecause of the trickle-down effect
on the cost of living. It was announced yesterday that meat prices are going
up 3% due to higher fuel costs.
>
> Thirdly, no politician in his/her right mind would ever impose such
> taxes and expect to remain in office.
clinton's/gore raised the tax on gas the year he took office.
>
> That leaves one explanation/solution to our little problem of
> consuming over twice the fuels we can domestically produce.
Help "is" on its way.
>
> Guess what? Energy prices are going to rise, and rise rapidly over
> the near term. Ah yes, I seem to remember, lets see, it was back in
> the 70's. Gas lines, higher fuel prices, and oh yes, fuel efficient
> cars began to roll off the assembly lines.
Your a genius.
>
> How quickly we forget.
I don't think so, the public will remember what clinton and the DNC did to
America.
CB