Moonbat Debbie Dingell Shows She Thinks You Are an Idiot As She Airs Out the Newest Democrat Talking Point

[Gone Fishin']

It is totally unprecedented in American history.

The House of Representatives has voted Articles of Impeachment
against President Trump and then refused to do anything else.
Nothing. In a way the use of the US Constitution as a prop to
try to gain transitory electoral advantage is pretty much a page
out of the American left’s playbook.


David Burge
@iowahawkblog
1. Target a respected institution
2. Kill & clean it
3. Wear it as a skin suit, while demanding respect

122
5:46 AM - May 25, 2016
Twitter Ads info and privacy
76 people are talking about this

Why she’s mewling about a fair trial an other obvious bullsh**,
what Pelosi is really dealing with is trying to de-stick herself
from this tarbaby. No matter how popular impeachment is at The
Bulwark and The Dispatch and San Francisco, the issue is a total
dog in key states the Democrats must win in order to defeat
Donald Trump. The charges against him are certifiably bizarre.
The way the impeachment inquiry was conducted would have made
Roland Freisler green with envy. If the charges are summarily
dismissed…or worse yet, the House “impeachment managers” are
forced to present the dog’s breakfast of a case to the American
people in the face of an actual defense, the Democrats are going
to suffer significant political damage.

Pelosi’s only way out of this is to try to convince the public
that her interjecting herself into the affairs of the Senate is
appropriate, and, failing that, that there is nothing unusual
about Pelosi holding onto the Articles of Impeachment.

This is where Michigan Democrat Debbie Dingell comes in. If
you’ve never heard of her before this week,there is a good
reason. She’s a mediocrity who won an House seat because her
husband, dead Democrat John Dingell, was able to see to her
succeeding him when he had to retire.

She was on Fox News Sunday, telling a huge lie and trying to
gaslight you into believing that there is absolutely nothing
amiss with the House Speaker sitting on Articles of Impeachment.

Chris Wallace: All right. Why is Speaker Pelosi delaying in
sending the articles of impeachment over to the Senate and how
long is she willing and prepared to wait?

Debbie Dingell: So, I don’t know what the timeframe will be, but
I would like to remind people that when President Clinton was
impeached, he was impeached on December 19th and the managers
were not appointed until January 6th. The Congress doesn’t
return until January 6th and was kind of referred to by Marc
Short earlier. There were two resolutions at that time. One was
a resolution to proceed that was passed by 100 to 0 and then
there was a second resolution about who the witnesses would be.

This is a lie. The House passed Articles of Impeachment by about
noon on Saturday, December 19, 1998. By 3 p.m. that same day the
House had appointed impeachment managers and forwarded the
Articles of Impeachment to the Senate. This is from CNN on
Saturday, December 19, 1998:

WASHINGTON (AllPolitics, December 19) — A deeply divided House
of Representatives impeached President Bill Clinton Saturday on
charges of lying under oath to a federal grand jury and
obstructing justice in the Monica Lewinsky affair. The two
allegations of “high crimes and misdemeanors” next go to the
Senate for trial.

Enough Republicans broke ranks to defeat the two other articles
of impeachment recommended one week ago by the House Judiciary
Committee. Those accused Clinton of committing perjury in his
deposition in the Paula Jones case and abusing his power in his
efforts to cover up his sexual relationship with Lewinsky, a
former White House intern.

Committee Chairman Henry Hyde, who will prosecute the case in
the Senate, delivered the impeachment articles to the Secretary
of the Senate at 3 p.m. ET. The trial is expected to get
underway in mid-January after the 106th Congress takes office.

There was a subsequent reappointment of impeachment managers as
a new House was sworn in before the Senate took up the trial and
the resolution passed by the previous House had expired with it.
That is not the case here.

Here’s the thing. Dingell either knew she lied on television or
she’s a moron. I’m open to either scenario but I tend to believe
she’s just a liar. Chris Wallace just let the lie go. I say let
it go because there is nothing in his history that leads me to
believe he did not know the history of the Clinton impeachment
and didn’t prep for the inevitable comparisons. What is shows is
that the Democrats and their minions realize what a mess this is
and are trying their damnedest to find a way out of it for
Pelosi. And to find that way out they will tell brazen lies
because they actually think you are that stupid.


Amee Vanderpool
@girlsreallyrule
Here is Trump last night at his rally after he was impeached by
the House, complaining about Debbie Dingell after all he did for
her late husband John Dingell and then she voted to impeach him.
He even suggests that the late Congressman is in hell-even his
supporters groan.

Embedded video
2,665
4:21 AM - Dec 19, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
1,796 people are talking about this
streiff
Managing Editor at RedState
Former infantry officer, CGSC grad and Army Operations Center
alumnus.
RedState member since 2004.
polite emails to editorat...@gmail.com Jerk emails will be
blocked.
Follow me on Twitter
Read more by streiff

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2019/12/23/debbie-dingell-show-
thinks-idiot-airs-newest-democrat-talking-point/