Re: Global Warming sceptic physically attacked on live, national, television.....
pyjamarama
wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:37:57 -0800 (PST), bvallely <bvall...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Og8WcwOzVvA&feature=player_embedded#
>
> >But, seriously, is anyone surprised?
>
> Left wing nutjobs sure do like to throw shit don't they.
> Funny. The same people that go around bitching about how uncivilized
> the world is resort to behaving like monkeys when disagreed with.
And if the 20th century taught us anything is that the first things
leftist do when they assume absolute power is ban religion, install a
secret police apparatus, round up "dissidents", establish a gulag
system and set themselves to killing any and all who fundamentally
disagree or otherwise get in their way.
100 million unfortunate left-wing "subjects" found that out the hard
way.
Collectivist Statism -- the greatest evil the world has ever known.
And they have the body count to prove it.
boo-radley
Nah, that's the facist repgulicans
tunderbar
And some, if not all, of the most massively polluted areas of the
world are from the former communist states.
fargo116
wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:37:57 -0800 (PST), bvallely <bvall...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Og8WcwOzVvA&feature=player_embedded#
>
> >But, seriously, is anyone surprised?
>
> Left wing nutjobs sure do like to throw shit don't they.
> Funny. The same people that go around bitching about how uncivilized
> the world is resort to behaving like monkeys when disagreed with.
LOL...I like how First doesn't mention the guy who gets behind the
whining fellow in the polar bear suit and waves a sign that says "I'm
with Stupid -------->"
S. Olson
bvallely
> Left wing nutjobs sure do like to throw shit don't they.
> Funny. The same people that go around bitching about how uncivilized
> the world is resort to behaving like monkeys when disagreed with.
Remember when Nancy Pelosi was crying because there were Tea Party
protests - she seemed to feel people who disagreed with her signaled
the end of civilization.
JohnM
wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:37:57 -0800 (PST), bvallely <bvall...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Og8WcwOzVvA&feature=player_embedded#
>
> >But, seriously, is anyone surprised?
So seemingly obvious as a put-up job, it's surprising a lot more
people than the pulverbot fell for it.
How can you tell? The camera stayed on the reporter, that's how. Even
a Faux News cameraman knows enough to pan round for any assailant.
Unless, of course, he's been told in advance not to.
Secondly, the studio talking-face appeared well briefed to make
maximum capital from the "incident", urging the reporter to"stay-safe"
over and over again.
Finally the missile - there isn't one. The pictures show a light green
smudge on two or three frames, perhaps to disguise what was actually
thrown by the "assailant". Either that, or it was a scrunched up piece
of cellophane/polythene wrapper, as it is possible to see background
through it.
In any case, as journalism it certainly smells - and more likely
stinks.
fargo116
> .> Left wing nutjobs sure do like to throw shit don't they.
> > Funny. The same people that go around bitching about how uncivilized
> > the world is resort to behaving like monkeys when disagreed with.
>
> .
> Remember when Nancy Pelosi was crying because there were Tea Party
> protests
Unmm. No. Would you mind showing us the video?
S. Olson
Bill Ward
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-S3Q_hTuWU>
Of course the violence she alludes to in SF was from the left.
On 9/12, hundreds of thousands of Tea Party folks marched on Washington,
with no violent incidents, and left behind a clean Mall.
columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote:"On 9/12, hundreds of thousands of Tea Party folks marched on
Washington, with no violent incidents, and left behind a clean Mall. "
good for them, and on that same note it means nobody tried to stop
them with violence either, so you have no real point.
fargo116
Bill, it's pretty easy to handle a teeny, tiny crowd like the
Teabaggers. I mean there have been bigger crowds at a Montreal Expos
game and they don't even exist anymore. "Hundreds of thousands" you
say? An estimate made by PECOTA creator--the baseball statistics
system--Nate Silver of Five Thirty Eight was that the teabaggers
amounted to 70,000 people.
So "hundreds of thousands" in your lexicon means '70,000?'
S. Olson
Bill Ward
No, that's just your feeble attempt to minimize the Tea Party
phenomenon. Ignore it at your own risk.
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sjvc6baor8&feature=related>
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VMXz6xGeqc&feature=related>
When your head's in the sand, your butt's about to be kicked.
fargo116
LOL....by who, Bill? Liars like yourself? The teabaggers passed around
on the internet pictures of what they SAID was their protest....except
that in the picture there wasn't a building where one should have
been. Turned out later they were trying to pass off an aerial photo of
the Milllion Man March as THEM.
This isn't the first time you been caught telling a whopper. One of
the organizers said ABC news had estimated there were between one and
1.5 million people at the protest in Washington D.C. Turns out ABC had
made no such estimate.
So I am not really concerned about a bunch of liars "kicking my ass"
or anyones.
Got that, liar?
S. Olson
bvallely
> On Dec 17, 2:06 am, First Post <last_p...@LyingLeftistsare.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:37:57 -0800 (PST), bvallely <bvall...@aol.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Og8WcwOzVvA&feature=player_embedded#
>
> > >But, seriously, is anyone surprised?
>
> So seemingly obvious as a put-up job, it's surprising a lot more
> people than the pulverbot fell for it.
>
> How can you tell? The camera stayed on the reporter, that's how. Even
> a Faux News cameraman knows enough to pan round for any assailant.
> Unless, of course, he's been told in advance not to.
If it were a put up job, we absoultely would have seen the attacker.
He would have worn a goofy outfit and screamed "death to Trig Palin"
or something equally vile.
The left is furious - for decades, they were allowed to say any
gibberish they wished without question - suddenly, Americans are
standing up and saying "no more".
History is against you, my friend.
Bruno Muscarelli
"Bill Ward" <bw...@ix.REMOVETHISnetcom.com> wrote in message
news:XpednbwEif4mUbbW...@giganews.com...
Is that why your heroes were in full control of the country and have now
been voted OUT?
bvallely
> > When your head's in the sand, your butt's about to be kicked.
.
> Is that why your heroes were in full control of the country and have now
> been voted OUT?
That was almost 14 months ago.
There's another election in 10 months.
Obama's job approval's at a smart 44%.
44% of Americans wish Bush was still President.
In 1994, the Republicans were ahead in the Generic Congressional polls
by two.
Today, the Republicans are ahead by seven points.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/generic_congressional_ballot
We're looking at a Republican landslide.
fargo116
They are at 49.3%, ValleyGirl.
> 44% of Americans wish Bush was still President.
>
> http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_adminis...
67% wish Santa was real.
> In 1994, the Republicans were ahead in the Generic Congressional polls
> by two.
>
> Today, the Republicans are ahead by seven points.
The exact percentage has the republicans ahead by 2.3%. That's within
the margin of error.
> http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_ameri...
>
> We're looking at a Republican landslide.
I very much doubt that using "The Democrats aren't cleaning up our
mess FAST enough. Vote REPUBLICAN!" is a winning slogan.
S. Olson
Bill Ward
Now _that's_ funny. Those signs they were so ferociously waving about
looked a bit off topic, then.
> This isn't the first time you been caught telling a whopper. One of the
> organizers said ABC news had estimated there were between one and 1.5
> million people at the protest in Washington D.C. Turns out ABC had made
> no such estimate.
>
> So I am not really concerned about a bunch of liars "kicking my ass" or
> anyones.
Better keep your head out of the sand then, chuckles.
Bill Ward
No, that's next year, and they're hardly my heroes.
Bruno Muscarelli
If it walks like a duck......
fargo116
You can wave all the signs you want. It doesn't turn 70,000 into
"hundreds of thousands, like you claimed, now does it, liar?
S. Olson
JohnM
> On Dec 18, 6:30 am, JohnM <john_howard_mor...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 17, 2:06 am, First Post <last_p...@LyingLeftistsare.invalid>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:37:57 -0800 (PST), bvallely <bvall...@aol.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Og8WcwOzVvA&feature=player_embedded#
>
> > > >But, seriously, is anyone surprised?
>
> > So seemingly obvious as a put-up job, it's surprising a lot more
> > people than the pulverbot fell for it.
>
> > How can you tell? The camera stayed on the reporter, that's how. Even
> > a Faux News cameraman knows enough to pan round for any assailant.
> > Unless, of course, he's been told in advance not to.
>
> .
> If it were a put up job, we absoultely would have seen the attacker.
> He would have worn a goofy outfit and screamed "death to Trig Palin"
> or something equally vile.
OK. You probably know Faux News tactics pretty well so I'll take your
word on it. But you failed to explain the mysterious non-missile that
appears to have been at most a scrunched-up piece of polythene film.
Nor have you explained the rehearsed and well-polished response of the
talking-face in the studio.
<content that seems to have been inadvertently snipped by bvalley>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Secondly, the studio talking-face appeared well briefed to make
maximum capital from the "incident", urging the reporter to "stay-
safe" over and over again.
Finally the missile - there isn't one. The pictures show a light green
smudge on two or three frames, perhaps to disguise what was actually
thrown by the "assailant". Either that, or it was a scrunched up piece
of cellophane/polythene wrapper, as it is possible to see background
through it.
In any case, as journalism it certainly smells - and more likely
stinks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The left is furious - for decades, they were allowed to say any
> gibberish they wished without question - suddenly, Americans are
> standing up and saying "no more".
>
> History is against you, my friend.
I'm more interested in posterity, thank you very much. And I do not
either need or want your friendship.
fargo116
Careful, John, you're going to hurt Valleygirl's widdle feelings. He's
been kinda touchy on this point ever since his kids said about the
same thing to him at Christmastime.
S. Olson
fargo116
wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:37:57 -0800 (PST), bvallely <bvall...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Og8WcwOzVvA&feature=player_embedded#
>
> >But, seriously, is anyone surprised?
>
> Funny. The same people that go around bitching about how uncivilized
> the world is resort to behaving like monkeys when disagreed with.
LOL! Somebody hit a clown dressed in a polar bear suit right in the
forehead with a kohirabi and Cavuto acts like a bunch of people were
kicking him to the curb.
S. Olson
bvallely
Why on Earth are you wasting all this effort to defend a jerk who
threw something?
JohnM
Because the jerk likely worked for Faux News, and the whole charade
was a put-up job to help compound Murdoch's bid for the US media. That
way he gets to run the country - instead of those half-wit politicians
you imagine you democratically chose to represent you.
JohnM
I've never seen transparent kohlrabi before. Are you sure that's what
it was?
bvallely
> Because the jerk likely worked for Faux News, and the whole charade
> was a put-up job to help compound Murdoch's bid for the US media. That
> way he gets to run the country - instead of those half-wit politicians
> you imagine you democratically chose to represent you.
And the left insists the Birther's are crazy.
I M @ good guy
wrote:
Wait until they try to start imposing penalties
of $750 per worker on companies with 50 or more
workers that don't provide health insurance.
Look for companies with more than 45 and less
than 80 workers lay off all but 45, or shut down.
Look for any individual that is penalized for
not having health insurance to get very upset.
How many votes will the people that voted
for imposing the first "must do" legislation in
American history get in the election in 10 months?
The situation in small town America is the
worse since about 1940, the cash flow has
slowed to a trickle, people without a secure
job are in a pickle, the disability applications
are at an all time high.
Where is a guy that can't put food on the
table going to get $300 a month or more to
pay for health insurance?
A congress person said the health care
bill will prevent catastrophic illness from
causing a loss of home and life savings,
but the people that can't afford health
insurance have no life savings, and are
likely not home owners.
Not Sure
You don't need to get so upset. It's not your fault that there were
hundreds of thousands of teabaggers that day. Now go sit in the corner
and have a good cry, moron :)
>
> S. Olson- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Not Sure
How's the tinfoil hat fitting today? :)
That
> way he gets to run the country - instead of those half-wit politicians
> you imagine you democratically chose to represent you.- Hide quoted text -
fargo116
They would be because they are, Valley Girl. In fact, the Birthers are
nuttier than the inside of a jar of Skippy.
S. Olson
fargo116
70,000.
LOL
I've seen more people in the stands at a Cowboys' game.
S. Olson