FDR caused Pearl Harbor
Dems lost the Viet Nam War
Carter was a liberal
Reagan won the Cold War
Reagan destroyed the Soviet Union
Reagan freed the hostages in Tehran
Clinton was a Carter repeat
Bush 2 was legitimately elected by the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court is full of liberal activists
Saddam was an evil dictator who gassed his own people (only after the Gulf
War of 91. He never did such a thing while a friend of Rumsfeld and Cheney)
Bush 2 led the country during 9/11.
Guiliani led NYC during 9/11 (if there had been a foot race that day he
would have won the blue ribbon).
...and buildings magically explode into dust and planes vaporize too!!
(add to the post as needed)
Whats these assclown Bozos talking about? Bush's entire presidency,
if you can call it that, WAS a terror attack on America.
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4755 (20100108) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> GOP myths
>
>
> FDR caused Pearl Harbor
False. Japanese imperialism caused PH.
> Dems lost the Viet Nam War
Undenyably
> Carter was a liberal
Duh.
> Reagan won the Cold War
Why, yws, yes he did.
> Reagan destroyed the Soviet Union
Why, yws, yes he did.
> Reagan freed the hostages in Tehran
Why, yws, yes he did.
> Clinton was a Carter repeat
False
> Bush 2 was legitimately elected by the Supreme Court
False
> The Supreme Court is full of liberal activists
False
> Saddam was an evil dictator who gassed his own people (only after the
True
> Gulf War of 91. He never did such a thing while a friend of Rumsfeld and
> Cheney) Bush 2 led the country during 9/11.
False
> Guiliani led NYC during 9/11 (if there had been a foot race that day he
> would have won the blue ribbon).
True
> ...and buildings magically explode into dust and planes vaporize too!!
False
> (add to the post as needed)
>
--
"I know what you're thinking. Did he fire six shots or only five? Well, to
tell you the truth, in all this excitement, I've kinda lost track myself. But
being as this is a .44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, and
would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question: Do I
feel lucky? Well, do ya punk?"
> GOP myths
>
>
> FDR caused Pearl Harbor
> Dems lost the Viet Nam War
Micromanagement by Johnson and McNamera did.
--
Sleep well tonight,
RD (The Sandman)
Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?
> "POW WOW" <in...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
> news:hi8iqv$2ke$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>
>
>>GOP myths
>>
>>
>>FDR caused Pearl Harbor
>
> False. Japanese imperialism caused PH.
>
>
>>Dems lost the Viet Nam War
>
> Undenyably
Can you say "Richard Nixon"?
>
>
>>Carter was a liberal
>
> Duh.
Centrist.
>
>
>>Reagan won the Cold War
>
> Why, yws, yes he did.
Why, no, he did not. The USSR collapsed under its own
weight. Reagan had nothing to do with it.
>
>
>>Reagan destroyed the Soviet Union
>
> Why, yws, yes he did.
Why, no, he did not. See above.
>
>
>>Reagan freed the hostages in Tehran
>
> Why, yws, yes he did.
He freed them by buying off the captors.
>
>
>>Clinton was a Carter repeat
>
> False
>
>
>>Bush 2 was legitimately elected by the Supreme Court
>
> False
True.
>
>
>>The Supreme Court is full of liberal activists
>
> False
>
>
>>Saddam was an evil dictator who gassed his own people (only after the
>
> True
>
>
>>Gulf War of 91. He never did such a thing while a friend of Rumsfeld and
>>Cheney) Bush 2 led the country during 9/11.
>
> False
True.
>>>Dems lost the Viet Nam War
>>
>> Undenyably
>
>Can you say "Richard Nixon"?
Can you say CONGRESS? Cuz if CONGRESS had kept it PROMISE to fund
South Vietnam, your buds, the commies would never have won. CONGRESS
cut off the ammo supply. There were supply ships sitting off the
coast when CONGRESS pulled the plug.
>>>Carter was a liberal
>>
>> Duh.
>
>Centrist.
You are delusional. Carter was the second most libtarded pResident
until Obammao.
>
>>
>>
>>>Reagan won the Cold War
>>
>> Why, yws, yes he did.
>
>Why, no, he did not. The USSR collapsed under its own
>weight. Reagan had nothing to do with it.
Commie apologist. Ask Putin what he thinks of "star wars" and how
much the defunct USSR spent trying to counter it.
Ridiculous bs bobbitted.
Conservatives believe in smaller government (they don't)
Tax cuts stimulate government revenues (they stimulate government
borrowing, which is dishonestly counted as revenue)
Capitalism thrives on competition. Capitalism thrives on crushing or
eliminating competition, then skyjacking prices. (oil, diamonds,
healthcare, the defense industry and its $600.00 screwdrivers, cable
TV etc.)
Charlie Crist and Larry Craig are straight
Giveaways to corporations are not socialistic in nature.
Barney Frank caused the banking crisis
Bill Clinton was responsible for 9/11
The jury is still out on evolution
The jury is still out on global warming
> Harry Callahan wrote:
>
>> "POW WOW" <in...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
>> news:hi8iqv$2ke$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>>
>>
>>>GOP myths
>>>
>>>
>>>FDR caused Pearl Harbor
>>
>> False. Japanese imperialism caused PH.
>>
>>
>>>Dems lost the Viet Nam War
>>
>> Undenyably
>
> Can you say "Richard Nixon"?
More like the Dem Congress leaving the South Vietnamese to the tender mercies
of the Commies.
>
>>
>>
>>>Carter was a liberal
>>
>> Duh.
>
> Centrist.
In what fantasy land?
>
>>
>>
>>>Reagan won the Cold War
>>
>> Why, yws, yes he did.
>
> Why, no, he did not. The USSR collapsed under its own
> weight. Reagan had nothing to do with it.
If Reagan hadn't pushed as hard as he did we'd still be in a Cold War with
Mother Russia, but thanks for playing anyway.
>
>>
>>
>>>Reagan destroyed the Soviet Union
>>
>> Why, yws, yes he did.
See above. Unless you are admitting that socialism destroys countrys? Hmm,
Obama is a socialist, i guess he hasn't learned the lesson yet.
>
> Why, no, he did not. See above.
>
>>
>>
>>>Reagan freed the hostages in Tehran
>>
>> Why, yws, yes he did.
>
> He freed them by buying off the captors.
He freed them becuase the Mullahs were afraid of the Cowboy since he was
Jimmy the limp noodle.
>
>>
>>
>>>Clinton was a Carter repeat
>>
>> False
>>
>>
>>>Bush 2 was legitimately elected by the Supreme Court
>>
>> False
>
> True.
To bad you weren't on the planet at the time. EVERY recount including the one
the media conducted concluded that Bush had sufficient votes. But hey, why
let reality get in the way of a good lie?
>
>>
>>
>>>The Supreme Court is full of liberal activists
>>
>> False
>>
>>
>>>Saddam was an evil dictator who gassed his own people (only after the
>>
>> True
>>
>>
>>>Gulf War of 91. He never did such a thing while a friend of Rumsfeld and
>>>Cheney) Bush 2 led the country during 9/11.
>>
>> False
>
> True.
Now I know you're a socilist 'cause you want to rewrite history. 5,000 Kurds
were gassed to death in Halabja in 1988!!! What's it like to be so wrong?
>
>>
>>
>>>Guiliani led NYC during 9/11 (if there had been a foot race that day he
>>>would have won the blue ribbon).
>>
>> True
>>
>>
>>>...and buildings magically explode into dust and planes vaporize too!!
>>
>> False
>
--
Lamont is clearly a socilist and has to rewrite history to fit the narrative
of insanity puhed by his superiors.
--
Al Gore didn't invent the internet, but he did invent Global Warming.
"Hide the Decline"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk
31,486 American scientists, including 9,029 with PhDs, don't agree the
science is settled.
http://www.petitionproject.org/
What it appears to be all about
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEZszGJHbK4&feature=video_response
Conservatives believe in smaller government than liberals do.
They DO spend too much,but only about a quarter of what this liberal
administration has after only one year.
You ain't seen nuthin' yet!
> Tax cuts stimulate government revenues (they stimulate government
> borrowing, which is dishonestly counted as revenue)
True to a point. Tax cuts DO increase tax revenue for the government.
That is an indisputible truth. Has happened time after time after time
throughout our history.
Of course, our government believes in the 'the more you make, the more
you spend" principle, so yes, they probably do SPEND more when tax
revenues are up.
> Capitalism thrives on competition. Capitalism thrives on crushing or
> eliminating competition, then skyjacking prices. (oil, diamonds,
> healthcare, the defense industry and its $600.00 screwdrivers, cable
> TV etc.)
If there were indeed, true competetion in the marketplace, instead of
govenrment mandated, captialism sapping restrictions on oil,
healthcare, cable, etc., then the prices would go DOWN. Another simple
fact, proven time and time and time again. Competition in the
marketplace drives DOWN prices, while at the same time, provides a
better product or service.
> Charlie Crist and Larry Craig are straight
Crooked as question marks!
> Giveaways to corporations are not socialistic in nature.
Right on there. Welfare, in ANY manner, is socialistic in nature.
> Barney Frank caused the banking crisis
Not the sole reason, but a huge part of it. To deny such proves one is
either blind, stupid, or both.
> Bill Clinton was responsible for 9/11
Not the sole reason, but a huge part of it. To deny such proves one is
either blind, stupid, or both.
> The jury is still out on evolution
I didn't know evolution has been taken to court. What are the
charges??????
> The jury is still out on global warming- Hide quoted text -
>
Global warming is the biggest hoax ever perpertrated on mankind.
While a good chunk of the world is freezing it's ass off this winter,
and temps world-wide have been on the decline for about the past 11 or
12 years, most climate change advocates have hidden in a dark corner
somewhere, trying to stay out of the lime-light, lest they further
prove what idiots they are. They are in the shadows, waiting for the
next heat wave in August, or the next hurricane, before coming back
out of the wood-work.
I'll give you credit.
While most of the world is shivering, you are STILL preaching global
warming!
Just dont preach too loudly, lest someone in the congregation smites
you with an ice cube.
> - Show quoted text -
> Harry Callahan wrote:
>
>> "POW WOW" <in...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
>> news:hi8iqv$2ke$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>>
>>
>>>GOP myths
>>>
>>>
>>>FDR caused Pearl Harbor
>>
>> False. Japanese imperialism caused PH.
>>
>>
>>>Dems lost the Viet Nam War
>>
>> Undenyably
>
> Can you say "Richard Nixon"?
Nixon didn't lose the war, the war was lost by Johnson, McNamera and the
overall disposition of the country on losing soldiers. We, as a country,
no longer had the stomach for a long war and it had no popular support.
>Lamont Cranston <Lamont....@IKWLITHOM.com> wrote in news:hibd9k$eln
>$3...@news.datemas.de:
>
>> Harry Callahan wrote:
>>
>>> "POW WOW" <in...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
>>> news:hi8iqv$2ke$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>>>
>>>
>>>>GOP myths
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>FDR caused Pearl Harbor
>>>
>>> False. Japanese imperialism caused PH.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Dems lost the Viet Nam War
>>>
>>> Undenyably
>>
>> Can you say "Richard Nixon"?
>
>Nixon didn't lose the war, the war was lost by Johnson, McNamera and the
>overall disposition of the country on losing soldiers. We, as a country,
>no longer had the stomach for a long war and it had no popular support.
Wrong. The war was lost before it began because there was no way to
win it. What were we going to do...annex Viet Nam?
Fuck..who still believes that shit?
We were there at the request for help from the French. You know, those
folks who think a warlike stance is holding your hands high and behind
your head. ;)
At least speaking of those outside the resistance.
You mean the ones that saved our ass during the American Revolution?
What kind of idiot believes that crap abut the French anyways?
Well..besides idiot conservatives that is.
Guess what..they serve FRENCH FRIES at the Congressional cafeteria
again!
>At least speaking of those outside the resistance.
And by some account if the resistance wasn't there the US never would
have gone into France first.
That was a French pirate named Jean LaFitte and it was even longer ago
than WWII.
> What kind of idiot believes that crap abut the French anyways?
Having known several of them..... Hell, I agree that most of them are
honorable dudes with the same amount of bravery as we have. It was a
comment that was just as stupid as some of the ones that you make. ;)
> Well..besides idiot conservatives that is.
> Guess what..they serve FRENCH FRIES at the Congressional cafeteria
> again!
>
>>At least speaking of those outside the resistance.
>
> And by some account if the resistance wasn't there the US never would
> have gone into France first.
Ya' never really know. Anyhow one of the major problems we had in Nam
was Johnson's "Those assholes can't bomb a shithouse without my OK." He
and McNamera tried to micromanage the war from Washington and even
McNamera in his memours admits that was a big mistake and has many
misgivings over it.
--
Sleep well tonight, RD (The Sandman)
Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it or allowed bipartisan input,
signed by a president who hasn't read it or provided the public with the
C-Span overview of the plan or the process, with funding administered by
That was the public problem. The under lying problem was it was an un
winnable victory. There was no way for us to win.
Since we had to fight that war under severe restraint and ignorance, we
will never know.
I love morons who have no idea what they are talking about but talk in
absolutes anyway.
Please define a win in Viet Nam.
As usual you offered nothing on topic. You're useless.
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:00:24 -0600, "RD (The Sandman)"
> <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>> That was the public problem. The under lying problem was it was an un
>>> winnable victory. There was no way for us to win.
>>
>>Since we had to fight that war under severe restraint and ignorance, we
>>will never know.
>
> Restrained by law and our moral code?
>
> We didn't lose because we were "constrained"---you idiot
How old are you?
> We lost because the eternal internal drive to unify Vietnam would have
> required we kill EVERY N. Vietnamese in order to "win"
No need, it is past history and we will never know what we may have
achieved had Johnson and McNamera let the military run the war.
You're running from the question. Why?