First "Stimulus" Fails. Hussein Says Let's Do It Again.
Eddie Haskell
Is this fucker insane? Or is it that he's perfectly content to be a one term
president as long as he gets to destroy the country?
DECEMBER 9, 2009
Obama Pushes New Job Stimulus
By JONATHAN WEISMAN
President Barack Obama pressed forward with an expansion of his $787 billion
stimulus plan Tuesday, unveiling job-creation proposals that largely build
on the initial package, including a hiring tax credit that his own party
jettisoned as unworkable and some business owners deemed ineffective.
In a speech at the Brookings Institution, Mr. Obama avoided calling his jobs
push a new stimulus plan. But White House officials acknowledged that the
president was taking stimulus components that he believed worked best and
extending or amplifying them.
These include putting an additional $50 billion toward infrastructure
spending, ramping up Treasury Department lending to small businesses through
the Troubled Asset Relief Program, extending tax credits for business
investment and offering state and local governments a fresh lifeline.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126028857157682051.html?mod=rss_Today's_Most_Popular
-Eddie Haskell
Lamont Cranston
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125185379218478087.html#
SEPTEMBER 2, 2009
U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
By DEBORAH SOLOMON
WASHINGTON -- Government efforts to funnel hundreds of billions of
dollars into the U.S. economy appear to be helping the U.S. climb out of
the worst recession in decades.
http://www.smartmoney.com/investing/economy/third-quarter-gdp-growth-revised-lower/
The U.S. economy grew more slowly than initially believed, the
government said Tuesday morning. The Commerce Department revised its
third-quarter reading of the gross domestic product downward, saying the
economy grew at a 2.8% annual rate, rather than the 3.5% pace estimated
last month.
Eddie Haskell
"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont....@Shadow.com> wrote in message
news:hfol55$4ql$1...@news.datemas.de...
By Hussein's own assessment that unemployment could exceed 8% without the
"stimulus," it is a failure, Crankston, you drooling cretin.
-Eddie Haskell
suds mcduff
---But, gosh, even the right wing WSJ and smartmoney mag say it's
worked....are you loon?
Eddie Squwak
> Eddie Haskell wrote:
> > [quoted text muted]
> >> a 2.8% annual rate, rather than the 3.5% pace estimated last month.
> >
> > By Hussein's own assessment that unemployment could exceed 8% without the
> > "stimulus," it is a failure, Crankston, you drooling cretin.
>
> ---But, gosh, even the right wing WSJ and smartmoney mag say it's
> worked....are you loon?
>
>
Failure! Failure!
We love Sarah! Obama is a Failure!
It's like a Mantra!
Global Warming Science Is A Religoion!
Liberals Smear Republicans!
They're GUILTY, not us!
Yeah, sure people pissed on Bush.
90% of them didn't know what Bush did between Jan 20 2001 and Sep 10 2001.
But he inherited a robust economy, admitted to inheriting a fiscal surplus.
And up until Sep 12 2001? He was lower in the ratings than Obama is now!
And he did f**k all.
Daniel
> Is this fucker insane? Or is it that he's perfectly content to be a one term
> president as long as he gets to destroy the country?
The funniest thing is that these dipshits actually think he will get
re-elected.
Tim Crowley
Wanna bet? Oh wait, you can't bet, you have to stay in hiding.
Daniel
wrote:
> Eddie Haskell wrote:
>
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125185379218478087.html#
>
> SEPTEMBER 2, 2009
>
> U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
Unemployment over 10%
Foreclosure rate at record levels
http://www.realtytrac.com/foreclosure/foreclosure-rates.html
Over 100 banks failed in 2009
http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html
Nore debt that all previous Presidents combined
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123629969453946717.html
nobama popularity below 50%
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
A majority of Americans against nobamacare
http://www.gallup.com/poll/124496/americans-leaning-against-healthcare-legislation.aspx
Feel free to tell us nobama is a success.
fargo116
We don't THINK it, Danny Dumbfuck. We KNOW it.
And there is nothing you can do about it.
S. Olson
fargo116
> On Dec 9, 11:59 am, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@Shadow.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Eddie Haskell wrote:
>
> >http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125185379218478087.html#
>
> > SEPTEMBER 2, 2009
>
> > U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
>
> Unemployment over 10%
>
> Foreclosure rate at record levelshttp://www.realtytrac.com/foreclosure/foreclosure-rates.html
Which was predicted.
> Over 100 banks failed in 2009http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html
Which was predicted.
> Nore debt that all previous Presidents
combinedhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB123629969453946717.html
Which the Drunken Frat Boy has already rung up.
> nobama popularity below 50%http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_adminis...
Which is normal.
> A majority of Americans against nobamacarehttp://www.gallup.com/poll/124496/americans-leaning-against-healthcar...
That's because they don't like the latest compromise that Senator
Harry Reid engineered to try and get GOP Cocksuckers to vote for
health care reform instead of insisting on their own plan, "Don't get
sick," or their backup plan, "If you do get sick, die quickly."
> Feel free to tell us nobama is a success.
Ok. he's a success. Seven more years to go.
S. Olson
Daniel
> On Dec 12, 8:39 am, Daniel <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 9, 11:48 am, "Eddie Haskell" <f...@eeaeae.com> wrote:
>
> > > Is this fucker insane? Or is it that he's perfectly content to be a one term
> > > president as long as he gets to destroy the country?
>
> > The funniest thing is that these dipshits actually think he will get
> > re-elected.
>
> We don't THINK it, Danny Dumbfuck. We KNOW it.
yep, below 50%, and you dipshits keep on thinking it.
Daniel
> On Dec 12, 8:46 am, Daniel <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 9, 11:59 am, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@Shadow.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Eddie Haskell wrote:
>
> > >http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125185379218478087.html#
>
> > > SEPTEMBER 2, 2009
>
> > > U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
>
> > Unemployment over 10%
>
> > Foreclosure rate at record levelshttp://www.realtytrac.com/foreclosure/foreclosure-rates.html
>
> Which was predicted.
By who? nobama told us everything would be all better with the
"stimulus". Was he lying?
>
> > Over 100 banks failed in 2009http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html
>
> Which was predicted.
By who? nobama told us everything would be all better with the
"stimulus". Was he lying?
>
> > Nore debt that all previous Presidents
> combinedhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB123629969453946717.html
>
> Which the Drunken Frat Boy has already rung up.
Once again, you show your ignorance. nobama has run up more debt in
less than ONE YEAR in office than ALL Presidents did COMBINED.
>
> > nobama popularity below 50%http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_adminis...
>
> Which is normal.
To who? You're an idiot.
>
> > A majority of Americans against nobamacarehttp://www.gallup.com/poll/124496/americans-leaning-against-healthcar...
>
> That's because they don't like the latest compromise that Senator
> Harry Reid engineered to try and get GOP Cocksuckers to vote for
> health care reform instead of insisting on their own plan, "Don't get
> sick," or their backup plan, "If you do get sick, die quickly."
Wrong again. A majority of Americans don't want nobamacare in any way,
shape or form. nobamacare is the wrong answer, but he doesn't give a
shit.
>
> > Feel free to tell us nobama is a success.
>
> Ok. he's a success.
Only in the minds of retards like you.
fargo116
Danny Dumbfuck, you clowns have NO chance of beating the President.
Got that? NO CHANCE.
S. Olson
fargo116
Nope. What I wrote is dead bang true, Danny Dumbfuck. They want a
publc option that the insurance companies can't game their way
around.
>
>
> > > Feel free to tell us nobama is a success.
>
> > Ok. he's a success.
>
> Only in the minds of retards like you.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Don't blame me. You asked.
S. Olson
Daniel
nobama the surrender monkey is already a lame duck. Can't get anything
through Congress, what a clown.
Daniel
I asked? Feel free to point out the question.
Eddie Haskell
"suds mcduff" <sudsmcd...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hg06pq$4j7$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
"Pass the stimulus or unemployment could surpass 8%."
-Hussein
> are you loon?
Are you insane?
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
"Eddie Squwak" <eddie...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.258d71f86...@news.x-privat.org...
> suds mcduff wrote
>> Eddie Haskell wrote:
>> > [quoted text muted]
>> >> a 2.8% annual rate, rather than the 3.5% pace estimated last month.
>> >
>> > By Hussein's own assessment that unemployment could exceed 8% without
>> > the
>> > "stimulus," it is a failure, Crankston, you drooling cretin.
>>
>> ---But, gosh, even the right wing WSJ and smartmoney mag say it's
>> worked....are you loon?
>>
>>
>
> Failure! Failure!
>
> We love Sarah! Obama is a Failure!
>
> It's like a Mantra!
>
>
>
> Global Warming Science Is A Religoion!
>
> Liberals Smear Republicans!
>
> They're GUILTY, not us!
>
>
>
>
> Yeah, sure people pissed on Bush.
>
>
> 90% of them didn't know what Bush did between Jan 20 2001 and Sep 10 2001.
>
> But he inherited a robust economy, admitted to inheriting a fiscal
> surplus.
Bush inherited a recession, Enron, WorldCom and the dot com bust.
BRAACK!
"inherited a robust economy"
BRAACK!
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
"fargo116" <farg...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7873eb2d-946a-4fde...@9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 12, 8:46 am, Daniel <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 9, 11:59 am, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@Shadow.com>
> wrote:
> A majority of Americans against
> nobamacarehttp://www.gallup.com/poll/124496/americans-leaning-against-healthcar...
> That's because they don't like the latest compromise that Senator
> Harry Reid engineered to try and get GOP Cocksuckers to vote for
> health care reform
Democrats haven't done anything to get republicans on board. All their
efforts have been at trying to get blue dog DEMOCRATS on board, Mrs. Olson.
Nice try though, DNC talking point that it is.
BRAACK!
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
No, Mrs. Olson, they don't want their taxes and insurance premiums going up
and Medicare to be cut. All of which will happen.
All that being the case, ask yourself, what's the REAL reason for this
legislation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXGhvoekY44
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
"Tim Crowley" <timmyt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d01a32d2-2090-477c...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
I'll bet a 100 dollars. Give me your address and I'll send you the money if
I lose.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
True. There's nothing we can do about fact that you don't think, Mrs. Olson.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
So you think ACORN will steal it again, huh, Mrs. Olson?
-Eddie Haskell
fargo116
There you go,
S. Olson
fargo116
> "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7873eb2d-946a-4fde...@9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 12, 8:46 am, Daniel <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 9, 11:59 am, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@Shadow.com>
> > wrote:
> > A majority of Americans against
> > nobamacarehttp://www.gallup.com/poll/124496/americans-leaning-against-healthcar...
> > That's because they don't like the latest compromise that Senator
> > Harry Reid engineered to try and get GOP Cocksuckers to vote for
> > health care reform
>
> Democrats haven't done anything to get republicans on board. All their
> efforts have been at trying to get blue dog DEMOCRATS on board, Mrs. Olson.
LOL...The Obama administration seems to regard GOP Cocksuckers as
thinking the country's welfare is important. However they don't.
> Nice try though, DNC talking point that it is.
>
> BRAACK!
P.S. - LOL...you clowns want to deny that you have EVER had a hand in
making the mess we're in now. Actually, I would place a bill in front
of you FORCING you to vote down a public option. And if you did, I'd
put in front of you AGAIN. If you voted it down a second time, I would
put it in front of you AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN until the voters
threw your ass out of office for denying them health insurance or you
caved.
S. Olson
fargo116
> "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Actually, they wouldn't. I would say that you know that, Felcher, but
I think you just may be dumb enough not to.
S. Olson
fargo116
> "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
LOL...Pretending to not understand something does not make you look
like you know what you're talking about, Felcher.
S. Olson
fargo116
> "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Considering that they didn't steal the election in 2008, the answer is
no.
Face it, President Obama beat the shit out of you clowns by more than
5 million votes.
S. Olson
suds mcduff
WSJ
>> are you loon?
>
> Are you insane?
>
> -Eddie Haskell
----My question was answered....you are indeed a loon.....
suds mcduff
----He's too busy being brainwashed by rightard propaganda on youtube....
Lamont Cranston
news:4b2672ab$0$13680$9a6e...@news.newshosting.com
Poor Iddy. He practices his barnyard animal mating cry constantly, but
he still can't get that ewe to fuck him.
>
> -Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
Pure conjecture.
>>> are you loon?
>>
>> Are you insane?
>>
>> -Eddie Haskell
>
> ----My question was answered....you are indeed a loon.....
Yep, you're nuts alright.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
The democrat's plan will increase the deficit, cut Medicare, and increase
insurance premiums. Now, ask yourself, why are they doing this? Furthermore,
why in the damned world are you supporting it? Are you insane?
UPDATE 1-US Senate health plan would raise some premiums-CBO
Mon Nov 30, 2009 11:45am EST
Wed, Nov 18 2009
WASHINGTON, Nov 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate's healthcare bill would raise
insurance premiums by at least 10 percent by 2016 for those independently
buying coverage, but subsidies would reduce the actual costs for half of
that group, the Congressional Budget Office said on Monday.
CBO: Republican health plan would reduce premiums, cut deficit
By: Susan Ferrechio
Chief Congressional Correspondent
11/05/09 6:30 AM EST
The Congressional Budget Office Wednesday night released its cost analysis
of the Republican health care plan and found that it would reduce health
care premiums and cut the deficit by $68 billion over ten years.
CBO stands by estimate tort reform will save taxpayers billions
12/13/2009 7:47 PM By Chris Rizo
Douglas Elmendorf
WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline)--The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office
says it stands by its analysis that medial malpractice limits would save
American taxpayers billions of dollars.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
Why do you want to increase the deficit, cut Medicare and increase insurance
premiums?
Democrat zombie?
Eddie Haskell
On Dec 14, 10:15 am, "Eddie Haskell" <f...@eeaeae.com> wrote:
> "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7873eb2d-946a-4fde...@9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 12, 8:46 am, Daniel <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 9, 11:59 am, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@Shadow.com>
> > wrote:
> > A majority of Americans against
> > nobamacarehttp://www.gallup.com/poll/124496/americans-leaning-against-healthcar...
> > That's because they don't like the latest compromise that Senator
> > Harry Reid engineered to try and get GOP Cocksuckers to vote for
> > health care reform
>
> Democrats haven't done anything to get republicans on board. All their
> efforts have been at trying to get blue dog DEMOCRATS on board, Mrs.
> Olson.
> LOL...The Obama administration seems to regard GOP Cocksuckers as
> thinking the country's welfare is important. However they don't.
Ah, yes.. the ol' claim the republicans are guilty of what you know the
democrats are guilty of routine.
UPDATE 1-US Senate health plan would raise some premiums-CBO
Mon Nov 30, 2009 11:45am EST
Wed, Nov 18 2009
WASHINGTON, Nov 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate's healthcare bill would raise
insurance premiums by at least 10 percent by 2016 for those independently
buying coverage, but subsidies would reduce the actual costs for half of
that group, the Congressional Budget Office said on Monday.
CBO: Republican health plan would reduce premiums, cut deficit
By: Susan Ferrechio
Chief Congressional Correspondent
11/05/09 6:30 AM EST
The Congressional Budget Office Wednesday night released its cost analysis
of the Republican health care plan and found that it would reduce health
care premiums and cut the deficit by $68 billion over ten years.
CBO stands by estimate tort reform will save taxpayers billions
12/13/2009 7:47 PM By Chris Rizo
Douglas Elmendorf
WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline)--The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office
says it stands by its analysis that medial malpractice limits would save
American taxpayers billions of dollars.
> Nice try though, DNC talking point that it is.
>
> BRAACK!
> P.S. - LOL...you clowns want to deny that you have EVER had a hand in
> making the mess we're in now.
PC is the purview of the left Mrs. Olson.
> Actually, I would place a bill in front
> of you FORCING you to vote down a public option.
Um-k.
> And if you did, I'd
> put in front of you AGAIN.
Um-k.
> If you voted it down a second time, I would
> put it in front of you AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN until the voters
> threw your ass out of office for denying them health insurance or you
> caved.
I'd make this into a commercial and show it wall to wall.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-bY92mcOdk
Then, after people figured about the public option is a single payer
government take-over ruse this is what would happen to the democrats.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yq1KeyEARBU
What's it like to belong to a party whose only chance of survival is
predicated on fooling people - whose agenda requires constant trickery and
lies?
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont....@Shadow.com> wrote in message
Ah, yes.. the ol' claim the republican is guilty of what you know the
democrat is guilty of routine.
Mrs. Olson: The word is 'm-o-p-p-i-n-g,' you fucking idiot.
Eddie Haskell: Oh, yeah? Well, you're an idiot that never gets any.
Mrs. Olson: I don't? Gee, you better check your goat, Felcher. Because
Lamont and I got that a long time ago.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
He won the Mickey Mouse vote.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
Admitting that you don't think doesn't make you look smart, Mrs. Olson.
-Edie Haskell
fargo116
> "suds mcduff" <sudsmcduff19...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:hg7lga$h5b$3...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Eddie Haskell wrote:
> >>news:hg06pq$4j7$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
> >>> Eddie Haskell wrote:
> >>>>news:hfol55$4ql$1...@news.datemas.de...
> >>>>> Eddie Haskell wrote:
>
> >>>>>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125185379218478087.html#
>
> >>>>> SEPTEMBER 2, 2009
>
> >>>>> U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
>
> >>>>> By DEBORAH SOLOMON
> >>>>> WASHINGTON -- Government efforts to funnel hundreds of billions of
> >>>>> dollars into the U.S. economy appear to be helping the U.S. climb out
> >>>>> of the worst recession in decades.
>
>
> >>>>> The U.S. economy grew more slowly than initially believed, the
> >>>>> government said Tuesday morning. The Commerce Department revised its
> >>>>> third-quarter reading of the gross domestic product downward, saying
> >>>>> the economy grew at a 2.8% annual rate, rather than the 3.5% pace
> >>>>> estimated last month.
> >>>> By Hussein's own assessment that unemployment could exceed 8% without
> >>>> the "stimulus," it is a failure, Crankston, you drooling cretin.
> >>> ---But, gosh, even the right wing WSJ and smartmoney mag say it's
> >>> worked....
>
> >> "Pass the stimulus or unemployment could surpass 8%."
>
> > U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
> > WSJ
>
> Pure conjecture.
>
> >>> are you loon?
>
> >> Are you insane?
>
> >> -Eddie Haskell
>
> > ----My question was answered....you are indeed a loon.....
>
> Yep, you're nuts alright.
Face reality, Felcher. The sheet music fell off your stand a LONG time
ago.
S. Olson
Eddie Haskell
Damn, still a french-fry short of a full order I see.
-Eddie Haskell
fargo116
> "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> > up
> > and Medicare to be cut. All of which will happen.
> > Actually, they wouldn't. I would say that you know that, Felcher, but
> > I think you just may be dumb enough not to.
>
> The democrat's plan will increase the deficit, cut Medicare, and increase
> insurance premiums. Now, ask yourself, why are they doing this? Furthermore,
> why in the damned world are you supporting it? Are you insane?
Actually, I know for a fact it doesn't do #1 and #3.
I haven't followed the Medicare 'cut.' What I want to know is is it a
Medicare 'cut' or is it just an elimination to avoid duplication of
services?
The Congressional Budget Office found that the House health care
reform bill--the Affordable Health Care for America Act (H.R.
3962)--"would result in a net reduction in federal budget deficits of
$109 billion over the 2010-2019 period." Felcher, where's the
increase?
Under the House plan the CBO analysis includes a chart indicating that
when accounting for the premium caps, most families will pay premiums
of significantly less than $15,000 in 2016 to purchase the reference
plan in the exchange. I think it's around $8800. What's insane about
saving over six grand, Felcher?
S. Olson
fargo116
> "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:3b2856fe-fc37-4ac8...@j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 14, 10:15 am, "Eddie Haskell" <f...@eeaeae.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:7873eb2d-946a-4fde...@9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> > On Dec 12, 8:46 am, Daniel <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 9, 11:59 am, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@Shadow.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > A majority of Americans against
> > > nobamacarehttp://www.gallup.com/poll/124496/americans-leaning-against-healthcar...
> > > That's because they don't like the latest compromise that Senator
> > > Harry Reid engineered to try and get GOP Cocksuckers to vote for
> > > health care reform
>
> > Democrats haven't done anything to get republicans on board. All their
> > efforts have been at trying to get blue dog DEMOCRATS on board, Mrs.
> > Olson.
> > LOL...The Obama administration seems to regard GOP Cocksuckers as
> > thinking the country's welfare is important. However they don't.
>
> Ah, yes.. the ol' claim the republicans are guilty of what you know the
> democrats are guilty of routine.
Show us the evidence that the Democrats were in the White House
between 2000-2008, would you?
fargo116
So you are calling most of the people in the US 'Mickeymouse'?
S. Olson
fargo116
> "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:8fda3c9a-d2a7-4328...@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 14, 10:23 am, "Eddie Haskell" <f...@eeaeae.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:1f8c3e33-6d4b-4656...@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> > On Dec 12, 8:39 am, Daniel <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 9, 11:48 am, "Eddie Haskell" <f...@eeaeae.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Is this fucker insane? Or is it that he's perfectly content to be a
> > > > one
> > > > term
> > > > president as long as he gets to destroy the country?
>
> > > The funniest thing is that these dipshits actually think he will get
> > > re-elected.
> > > We don't THINK it, Danny Dumbfuck. We KNOW it.
> > > And there is nothing you can do about it.
>
> > True. There's nothing we can do about fact that you don't think, Mrs.
> > Olson.
> > LOL...Pretending to not understand something does not make you look
> > like you know what you're talking about, Felcher.
>
> Admitting that you don't think doesn't make you look smart, Mrs. Olson.
Get your own line, Felcher.
S. Olson
Eddie Haskell
On Dec 15, 10:44 am, "Eddie Haskell" <f...@eeaeae.com> wrote:
> "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> > No, Mrs. Olson, they don't want their taxes and insurance premiums going
> > up
> > and Medicare to be cut. All of which will happen.
> > Actually, they wouldn't. I would say that you know that, Felcher, but
> > I think you just may be dumb enough not to.
>
> The democrat's plan will increase the deficit, cut Medicare, and increase
> insurance premiums. Now, ask yourself, why are they doing this?
> Furthermore,
> why in the damned world are you supporting it? Are you insane?
> Actually, I know for a fact it doesn't do #1 and #3.
Yep, you're insane.
> I haven't followed the Medicare 'cut.' What I want to know is is it a
> Medicare 'cut' or is it just an elimination to avoid duplication of
> services?
No, they claim that they will cut 300 billion from Medicare via elimination
of waste and fraud. If you believe that I have a bridge to sell you.
> The Congressional Budget Office found that the House health care
> reform bill--the Affordable Health Care for America Act (H.R.
> 3962)--"would result in a net reduction in federal budget deficits of
> $109 billion over the 2010-2019 period." Felcher, where's the
> increase?
Smoke and mirrors, Mrs. Olson. They reach that conclusion for the first 10
years by starting taxation to pay for it now, while the benefits won't start
for anywhere from 3 to 5 years from now, and with imaginary savings from
Medicare. After the first 10 years the deficit explodes. When will you ever
learn that everything with the democrats is about trickery?
> Under the House plan the CBO analysis includes a chart indicating that
> when accounting for the premium caps, most families will pay premiums
> of significantly less than $15,000 in 2016 to purchase the reference
> plan in the exchange. I think it's around $8800. What's insane about
> saving over six grand, Felcher?
The cost of premiums will go up because they will mandate things like
pre-existing conditions be covered, but they say that for some the cost will
be less because the government will subsidize it. Did you get that? What
they are doing will make healthcare costs go up, but won't go up because the
government will subsidize insurance premiums.
Do you grasp just how insane that is?
Now, ask yourself, why are they doing this? What's the ulterior motive?
Oh, and speaking of forcing insurance companies to cover pre-existing
conditions. The idea is to get younger people who are healthy in the mix to
make this work, but they will be able to simply wait until they get sick to
enroll, and any penalty for not doing so depending on what day it is either
nonexistent or lower that insurance.
These idiots do not know what they are doing.
Or do they?
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
What the hell are you talking about now, Mrs. Olson?
Why did you delete the rest of my post?
Stumped?
UPDATE 1-US Senate health plan would raise some premiums-CBO
Mon Nov 30, 2009 11:45am EST
Wed, Nov 18 2009
WASHINGTON, Nov 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate's healthcare bill would raise
insurance premiums by at least 10 percent by 2016 for those independently
buying coverage, but subsidies would reduce the actual costs for half of
that group, the Congressional Budget Office said on Monday.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN3042820120091130
----------------------------
CBO: Republican health plan would reduce premiums, cut deficit
By: Susan Ferrechio
Chief Congressional Correspondent
11/05/09 6:30 AM EST
The Congressional Budget Office Wednesday night released its cost analysis
of the Republican health care plan and found that it would reduce health
care premiums and cut the deficit by $68 billion over ten years.
--------------------------
CBO stands by estimate tort reform will save taxpayers billions
12/13/2009 7:47 PM By Chris Rizo
Douglas Elmendorf
WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline)--The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office
says it stands by its analysis that medial malpractice limits would save
American taxpayers billions of dollars.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
Why can't we save billions via tort reform, Mrs. Olson?
Answer: Because trial lawyers are the democrats single biggest contributors.
Did you see where the democrats quietly killed that DC voucher program for
poor kids in DC? Why you ask?
Answer: Because the NEA doesn't like school choice and gives the democrats
big bucks.
Why do you support this kind of sick corruption?
What was that you said about giving a shit about the welfare of the nation
and it's people?
Don't be a fool. The only thing democrats give a shit about is POWER.
And that is precisely what "healthcare reform" is all about.
IT IS DISTRESSINGLY clear that congressional leaders never really meant it
when they said there would be a fair hearing to determine the future of the
District's federally funded school voucher program. How else to explain
language tucked away in the mammoth omnibus spending bill that would
effectively kill the Washington Opportunity Scholarship Program?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/13/AR2009121302440.html
Oh, well. Too bad.
CBO stands by estimate tort reform will save taxpayers billions
12/13/2009 7:47 PM By Chris Rizo
Douglas Elmendorf
WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline)--The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office
says it stands by its analysis that medical malpractice limits would save
American taxpayers billions of dollars.
Oh, well. Too bad.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
It wouldn't have to be most. Just enough to get him over the top. Then of
course there was voter intimidation. You know, that egregious crime that
Holder won't prosecute?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU
Wonder what would happen to those people had they been skin-heads?
Under Bush or Hussein?
I think you know the answer.
This administration is as corrupt as sin.
When none of the defendants filed any response to the complaint or appeared
in federal district court in Philadelphia to answer the suit, it appeared
almost certain Justice would have prevailed by default. Instead, the
department in May suddenly allowed the party and two of the three defendants
to walk away. Against the third defendant, Minister King Samir Shabazz, it
sought only an injunction barring him from displaying a weapon within 100
feet of a Philadelphia polling place for the next three years-action that's
already illegal under existing law.
There was outrage over the decision among Congressional Republicans, the
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, and in the Justice Department's Civil
Rights Division-especially after it was learned one of the defendants who
walked was Jerry Jackson, a member of Philadelphia's 14th Ward Democratic
Committee and a credentialed poll watcher for the Democratic Party last
Election Day.
Then the Washington Times reported on July 30 that six career lawyers at
Justice who had recommended continuing to pursue the case were overruled by
Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli-a top administration political
appointee. One of the career attorneys, Appellate Chief Diana Flynn, had
urged in an internal memo that a judgment be pressed against the defendants
to "prevent the paramilitary style intimidation of voters" in the future.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203550604574361071968458430.html
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
Err.. No thanks. Don't use the stuff..
-Eddie Haskell
fargo116
> "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:d1a10706-d20d-41d6...@d20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 15, 10:44 am, "Eddie Haskell" <f...@eeaeae.com> wrote:
>
> > "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> > > No, Mrs. Olson, they don't want their taxes and insurance premiums going
> > > up
> > > and Medicare to be cut. All of which will happen.
> > > Actually, they wouldn't. I would say that you know that, Felcher, but
> > > I think you just may be dumb enough not to.
>
> > The democrat's plan will increase the deficit, cut Medicare, and increase
> > insurance premiums. Now, ask yourself, why are they doing this?
> > Furthermore,
> > why in the damned world are you supporting it? Are you insane?
> > Actually, I know for a fact it doesn't do #1 and #3.
>
> Yep, you're insane.
>
> > I haven't followed the Medicare 'cut.' What I want to know is is it a
> > Medicare 'cut' or is it just an elimination to avoid duplication of
> > services?
>
> No, they claim that they will cut 300 billion from Medicare via elimination
> of waste and fraud. If you believe that I have a bridge to sell you.
LOL...So we're supposed to believe a guy like FELCHER.
> > The Congressional Budget Office found that the House health care
> > reform bill--the Affordable Health Care for America Act (H.R.
> > 3962)--"would result in a net reduction in federal budget deficits of
> > $109 billion over the 2010-2019 period." Felcher, where's the
> > increase?
>
> Smoke and mirrors, Mrs. Olson. They reach that conclusion for the first 10
> years by starting taxation to pay for it now, while the benefits won't start
> for anywhere from 3 to 5 years from now, and with imaginary savings from
> Medicare. After the first 10 years the deficit explodes. When will you ever
> learn that everything with the democrats is about trickery?
So again, we're supposed to believe an economic whiz like FELCHER.
> > Under the House plan the CBO analysis includes a chart indicating that
> > when accounting for the premium caps, most families will pay premiums
> > of significantly less than $15,000 in 2016 to purchase the reference
> > plan in the exchange. I think it's around $8800. What's insane about
> > saving over six grand, Felcher?
>
> The cost of premiums will go up because they will mandate things like
> pre-existing conditions be covered, but they say that for some the cost will
> be less because the government will subsidize it. Did you get that? What
> they are doing will make healthcare costs go up, but won't go up because the
> government will subsidize insurance premiums.
>
> Do you grasp just how insane that is?
So again, we're supposed to believe the likes of FELCHER instead of
the Congressional Budget Office.
> Now, ask yourself, why are they doing this? What's the ulterior motive?
>
> Oh, and speaking of forcing insurance companies to cover pre-existing
> conditions. The idea is to get younger people who are healthy in the mix to
> make this work, but they will be able to simply wait until they get sick to
> enroll, and any penalty for not doing so depending on what day it is either
> nonexistent or lower that insurance.
>
> These idiots do not know what they are doing.
>
> Or do they?
FELCHER = The Economic Genius Who Claims FDR did NOTHING to Alleviate
the Great Depression. LOL
S. Olson
fargo116
No, because I had a bet with Lamont that you'd submit your post again.
All I can say is KA-CHING!
You guys are soooo predictable.
S. Olson
fargo116
Does the Copenhagen get in the way?
S. Olson
Governor Swill
>> "Pass the stimulus or unemployment could surpass 8%."
>U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
>WSJ
Remember what Reagan said he was going to do to fix the economy?
Remember the recession of 1982? The worst recession on record since
the Depression. Much worse than today's economy.
Swill
--
In the exam room . . .
Doctor: "Public Opt . . ."
Elephant: "SOCIALISM!"
Doctor: "Reflexes good."
fargo116
> suds mcduff <sudsmcduff19...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> "Pass the stimulus or unemployment could surpass 8%."
> >U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
> >WSJ
>
> Remember what Reagan said he was going to do to fix the economy?
>
> Remember the recession of 1982? The worst recession on record since
> the Depression. Much worse than today's economy.
These clowns seem to think that just because we aren't cleaning up
their messes FAST enough, that we will put their incompentent asses
back in charge.
S. Olson
Eddie Haskell
"Governor Swill" <governo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7bkgi5d1j1bp060l6...@4ax.com...
> suds mcduff <sudsmcd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> "Pass the stimulus or unemployment could surpass 8%."
>>U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
>>WSJ
>
> Remember what Reagan said he was going to do to fix the economy?
Yeah, cut taxes and reign in spending.
Here's what Hoover did:
"The final attempt of the Hoover Administration to rescue the economy was
the passage of the Emergency Relief and Construction Act which included
funds for public works programs and the creation of the Reconstruction
Finance Corporation (RFC) in 1932."
"In order to pay for these and other government programs, Hoover agreed to
one of the largest tax increases in American history. The Revenue Act of
1932 raised income tax on the highest incomes from 25% to 63%. The estate
tax was doubled and corporate taxes were raised by almost 15%."
Sound familiar?
> Remember the recession of 1982? The worst recession on record since
> the Depression. Much worse than today's economy.
Oh, so you admit that Hussein, Clinton and Algore are all liars then.
Nice going, Swill. You've shit all over yourself again.
Bah hahahahaha!
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
Boy, Mrs. Olson. You just never learn, do you?
<children chuckling>
You may take your seat now.
Now, I'll direct your attention to the monitor, and pay attention, there'll
be a test later on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs
Now, I'll direct your attention to the blackboard:
"In 1992, Congress mandated that Fannie and Freddie increase their purchases
of mortgages for low-income and medium-income borrowers. Operating under
that requirement, Fannie Mae, in particular, has been aggressive and
creative in stimulating minority gains."
"The two companies are now required to devote 42% of their portfolios to
loans for low- and moderate-income borrowers"
"Although Fannie Mae actually has exceeded its target since 1994, it is
resisting any hike. It argues that a higher target would only produce more
loan defaults by pressuring banks to accept unsafe borrowers."
http://articles.latimes.com/1999/may/31/news/mn-42807
"The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory
overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a
decade ago."
"Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency
would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the
two largest players in the mortgage lending industry."
"McCain Letter Demanded 2006 Action on Fannie and Freddie"
"Sen. John McCain's 2006 demand for regulatory action on Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac could have prevented current financial crisis, as HUMAN EVENTS
learned from the letter shown in full text below."
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=28973
Unlike Bush and McCain, as senator, Obama did nothing, other than earn the
distinction of becoming the second largest recipient of F&F contributions in
the entire congress, even in his short stint there.
Bill Clinton himself said it best:
"I think the responsibility the Democrats have may rest more in resisting
any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to
put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."
-Bill Clinton
''These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any
kind of financial crisis,'' said Representative Barney Frank of
Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee.
''The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on
these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.''
-Eddie Haskell
Lamont Cranston
> "Governor Swill" <governo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:7bkgi5d1j1bp060l6...@4ax.com...
>> suds mcduff <sudsmcd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> "Pass the stimulus or unemployment could surpass 8%."
>>> U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
>>> WSJ
>>
>> Remember what Reagan said he was going to do to fix the economy?
>
> Yeah, cut taxes and reign in spending.
LOL! Reagan increased taxes more times than any president in history.
He reigned in spending so much that he *doubled* the national debt. He
fixed the economy so well that unemployment *averaged* 7.5% during the 8
years that he was in office.
You're a fucking moron, Iddy.
One other thing, Felcher. You have something on your lips.
Eddie Haskell
No retort.
I win.
> > The Congressional Budget Office found that the House health care
> > reform bill--the Affordable Health Care for America Act (H.R.
> > 3962)--"would result in a net reduction in federal budget deficits of
> > $109 billion over the 2010-2019 period." Felcher, where's the
> > increase?
>
> Smoke and mirrors, Mrs. Olson. They reach that conclusion for the first 10
> years by starting taxation to pay for it now, while the benefits won't
> start
> for anywhere from 3 to 5 years from now, and with imaginary savings from
> Medicare. After the first 10 years the deficit explodes. When will you
> ever
> learn that everything with the democrats is about trickery?
> So again, we're supposed to believe an economic whiz like FELCHER.
No retort.
I win again.
> > Under the House plan the CBO analysis includes a chart indicating that
> > when accounting for the premium caps, most families will pay premiums
> > of significantly less than $15,000 in 2016 to purchase the reference
> > plan in the exchange. I think it's around $8800. What's insane about
> > saving over six grand, Felcher?
>
> The cost of premiums will go up because they will mandate things like
> pre-existing conditions be covered, but they say that for some the cost
> will
> be less because the government will subsidize it. Did you get that? What
> they are doing will make healthcare costs go up, but won't go up because
> the
> government will subsidize insurance premiums.
>
> Do you grasp just how insane that is?
> So again, we're supposed to believe the likes of FELCHER instead of
> the Congressional Budget Office.
CBO:
"Average premiums per policy in the nongroup market in 2016 would be roughly
$5,800 for single policies and $15,200 for family policies under the
proposal, compared with roughly $5,500 for single policies and $13,100 for
family policies under current law."
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/107xx/doc10781/11-30-Premiums.pdf
I win again.
> Now, ask yourself, why are they doing this? What's the ulterior motive?
>
> Oh, and speaking of forcing insurance companies to cover pre-existing
> conditions. The idea is to get younger people who are healthy in the mix
> to
> make this work, but they will be able to simply wait until they get sick
> to
> enroll, and any penalty for not doing so depending on what day it is
> either
> nonexistent or lower that insurance.
>
> These idiots do not know what they are doing.
>
> Or do they?
> FELCHER = The Economic Genius Who Claims FDR did NOTHING to Alleviate
> the Great Depression. LOL
I see what it is now. You *enjoy* getting public bare ass spankings.
FDR's policies prolonged Depression by 7 years, UCLA economists calculate
<SMACK!>
By Meg Sullivan August 10, 2004 Category: Research
Two UCLA economists say they have figured out why the Great Depression
dragged on for almost 15 years, and they blame a suspect previously thought
to be beyond reproach: President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
<SMACK!>
After scrutinizing Roosevelt's record for four years, Harold L. Cole and Lee
E. Ohanian conclude in a new study that New Deal policies signed into law 71
years ago thwarted economic recovery for seven long years.
<SMACK!>
"Why the Great Depression lasted so long has always been a great mystery,
and because we never really knew the reason, we have always worried whether
we would have another 10- to 15-year economic slump," said Ohanian, vice
chair of UCLA's Department of Economics. "We found that a relapse isn't
likely unless lawmakers gum up a recovery with ill-conceived stimulus
policies."
In an article in the August issue of the Journal of Political Economy,
Ohanian and Cole blame specific anti-competition and pro-labor measures that
Roosevelt promoted and signed into law June 16, 1933.
[Remind you of someone?]
<SMACK!>
"President Roosevelt believed that excessive competition was responsible for
the Depression by reducing prices and wages, and by extension reducing
employment and demand for goods and services," said Cole, also a UCLA
professor of economics. "So he came up with a recovery package that would be
unimaginable today, allowing businesses in every industry to collude without
the threat of antitrust prosecution and workers to demand salaries about 25
percent above where they ought to have been, given market forces. The
economy was poised for a beautiful recovery, but that recovery was stalled
by these misguided policies."
Using data collected in 1929 by the Conference Board and the Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Cole and Ohanian were able to establish average wages and prices
across a range of industries just prior to the Depression. By adjusting for
annual increases in productivity, they were able to use the 1929 benchmark
to figure out what prices and wages would have been during every year of the
Depression had Roosevelt's policies not gone into effect. They then compared
those figures with actual prices and wages as reflected in the Conference
Board data.
In the three years following the implementation of Roosevelt's policies,
wages in 11 key industries averaged 25 percent higher than they otherwise
would have done, the economists calculate. But unemployment was also 25
percent higher than it should have been, given gains in productivity.
Meanwhile, prices across 19 industries averaged 23 percent above where they
should have been, given the state of the economy. With goods and services
that much harder for consumers to afford, demand stalled and the gross
national product floundered at 27 percent below where it otherwise might
have been.
"High wages and high prices in an economic slump run contrary to everything
we know about market forces in economic downturns," Ohanian said. "As we've
seen in the past several years, salaries and prices fall when unemployment
is high. By artificially inflating both, the New Deal policies
short-circuited the market's self-correcting forces."
The policies were contained in the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA),
which exempted industries from antitrust prosecution if they agreed to enter
into collective bargaining agreements that significantly raised wages.
Because protection from antitrust prosecution all but ensured higher prices
for goods and services, a wide range of industries took the bait, Cole and
Ohanian found. By 1934 more than 500 industries, which accounted for nearly
80 percent of private, non-agricultural employment, had entered into the
collective bargaining agreements called for under NIRA.
Cole and Ohanian calculate that NIRA and its aftermath account for 60
percent of the weak recovery. Without the policies, they contend that the
Depression would have ended in 1936 instead of the year when they believe
the slump actually ended: 1943.
Roosevelt's role in lifting the nation out of the Great Depression has been
so revered that Time magazine readers cited it in 1999 when naming him the
20th century's second-most influential figure.
"This is exciting and valuable research," said Robert E. Lucas Jr., the 1995
Nobel Laureate in economics, and the John Dewey Distinguished Service
Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago. "The prevention and
cure of depressions is a central mission of macroeconomics, and if we can't
understand what happened in the 1930s, how can we be sure it won't happen
again?"
NIRA's role in prolonging the Depression has not been more closely
scrutinized because the Supreme Court declared the act unconstitutional
within two years of its passage.
"Historians have assumed that the policies didn't have an impact because
they were too short-lived, but the proof is in the pudding," Ohanian said.
"We show that they really did artificially inflate wages and prices."
Even after being deemed unconstitutional, Roosevelt's anti-competition
policies persisted - albeit under a different guise, the scholars found.
Ohanian and Cole painstakingly documented the extent to which the Roosevelt
administration looked the other way as industries once protected by NIRA
continued to engage in price-fixing practices for four more years.
The number of antitrust cases brought by the Department of Justice fell from
an average of 12.5 cases per year during the 1920s to an average of 6.5
cases per year from 1935 to 1938, the scholars found. Collusion had become
so widespread that one Department of Interior official complained of
receiving identical bids from a protected industry (steel) on 257 different
occasions between mid-1935 and mid-1936. The bids were not only identical
but also 50 percent higher than foreign steel prices. Without competition,
wholesale prices remained inflated, averaging 14 percent higher than they
would have been without the troublesome practices, the UCLA economists
calculate.
NIRA's labor provisions, meanwhile, were strengthened in the National
Relations Act, signed into law in 1935. As union membership doubled, so did
labor's bargaining power, rising from 14 million strike days in 1936 to
about 28 million in 1937. By 1939 wages in protected industries remained 24
percent to 33 percent above where they should have been, based on 1929
figures, Cole and Ohanian calculate. Unemployment persisted. By 1939 the
U.S. unemployment rate was 17.2 percent, down somewhat from its 1933 peak of
24.9 percent but still remarkably high. By comparison, in May 2003, the
unemployment rate of 6.1 percent was the highest in nine years.
Recovery came only after the Department of Justice dramatically stepped
enforcement of antitrust cases nearly four-fold and organized labor suffered
a string of setbacks, the economists found.
"The fact that the Depression dragged on for years convinced generations of
economists and policy-makers that capitalism could not be trusted to recover
from depressions and that significant government intervention was required
to achieve good outcomes," Cole said. "Ironically, our work shows that the
recovery would have been very rapid had the government not intervened."
-UCLA-
I win again.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
You predicted that I'd win the debate like I always do, huh, Mrs. Olson?
Now, grab the Vaseline, 'cause this is gonna hurt:
Eddie Haskell
You mean that place Hussein went to pick up the Grammy or whatever it was
they give people for being a liberal and / or terrorist?
-Eddie Haskell
Lamont Cranston
The only place where you ever win anything, Felcher, is in your very
tiny, very delusional mind.
HINT: You are universally recognized as a trolling imbecile.
Eddie Haskell
"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont....@Shadow.com> wrote in message
news:hgb9a6$hij$1...@news.datemas.de...
> "Eddie Haskell" <fg...@eeaeae.com> wrote in message
> news:4b29248e$0$13575$9a6e...@news.newshosting.com
>> "Governor Swill" <governo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:7bkgi5d1j1bp060l6...@4ax.com...
>>> suds mcduff <sudsmcd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> "Pass the stimulus or unemployment could surpass 8%."
>>>> U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
>>>> WSJ
>>>
>>> Remember what Reagan said he was going to do to fix the economy?
>>
>> Yeah, cut taxes and reign in spending.
>
> LOL! Reagan increased taxes more times than any president in history.
After lowering them.
> He reigned in spending so much that he *doubled* the national debt.
So raising taxes doesn't work?
> He fixed the economy so well that unemployment *averaged* 7.5% during the
> 8 years that he was in office.
Thanks to Carter.
> You're a fucking moron, Iddy.
And you're a moron that never gets any pussy.
Mrs. Olson: The word is 'm-o-p-p-i-n-g,' you fucking idiot.
Eddie Haskell: Oh, yeah? Well, you're an idiot that never gets any.
Mrs. Olson: I don't? Gee, you better check your goat, Felcher. Because
Lamont and I got that a long time ago.
> One other thing, Felcher. You have something on your lips.
Still glistening from your mom's pussy?
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont....@Shadow.com> wrote in message
No retort.
I win yet again.
-Eddie Haskell
fargo116
> "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:f6cba465-616a-43e0...@19g2000vbq.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 15, 8:26 pm, Governor Swill <governor.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > suds mcduff <sudsmcduff19...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> "Pass the stimulus or unemployment could surpass 8%."
> > >U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
> > >WSJ
>
> > Remember what Reagan said he was going to do to fix the economy?
>
> > Remember the recession of 1982? The worst recession on record since
> > the Depression. Much worse than today's economy.
> > These clowns seem to think that just because we aren't cleaning up
> > their messes FAST enough, that we will put their incompentent asses
> > back in charge.
>
> Boy, Mrs. Olson. You just never learn, do you?
Already answered this Felcher.
Fannie and Freddie got into subprime junk and helped fuel the housing
bubble, but they were trailing the irrational exuberance of the
private sector. They lost market share in the years 2002-2007, as the
volume of private issue mortgage backed securities exploded.
In short, while Fannie and Freddie were completely irresponsible in
their lending practices, the claim that they were responsible for the
financial disaster is absurd on its face -- kind of like the claim
that the earth is flat. Free market conservatives know that the claim
that Fannie and Freddie were responsible is ridiculous. They just say
it because they know that news outlets like Market Place will treat it
as a serious proposition and thereby muddy the waters in the mind of
the public.
What else you got? Is it this?
"I wipe my own ass, and with Scott toilet paper. Why? Because them
other brands just ain't worth a shit."
-Felcher,
'Global Warming is a LIE Climate change: this is the worst scientific
scandal of our generation'
Nov. 30, 2009
> <children chuckling>
S. Olson
Eddie Haskell
On Dec 16, 11:27 am, "Eddie Haskell" <f...@eeaeae.com> wrote:
> "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:f6cba465-616a-43e0...@19g2000vbq.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 15, 8:26 pm, Governor Swill <governor.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > suds mcduff <sudsmcduff19...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> "Pass the stimulus or unemployment could surpass 8%."
> > >U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
> > >WSJ
>
> > Remember what Reagan said he was going to do to fix the economy?
>
> > Remember the recession of 1982? The worst recession on record since
> > the Depression. Much worse than today's economy.
> > These clowns seem to think that just because we aren't cleaning up
> > their messes FAST enough, that we will put their incompentent asses
> > back in charge.
>
> Boy, Mrs. Olson. You just never learn, do you?
> Already answered this Felcher.
> Fannie and Freddie got into subprime junk and helped fuel the housing
> bubble, but they were trailing the irrational exuberance of the
> private sector. They lost market share in the years 2002-2007, as the
> volume of private issue mortgage backed securities exploded.
Sigh.. Mrs. Olson, you've learned nothing, have you?
<children laughing>
You may take your seat.
Now, I want you to stay in at recess and write on the blackboard "Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac buy mortgages from lenders and bundle them into securities;
that provides lenders the funds to lend more" one hundred times.
http://articles.latimes.com/1999/may/31/news/mn-42807
<children chuckling>
> In short, while Fannie and Freddie were completely irresponsible in
> their lending practices, the claim that they were responsible for the
> financial disaster is absurd on its face -- kind of like the claim
> that the earth is flat. Free market conservatives know that the claim
> that Fannie and Freddie were responsible is ridiculous. They just say
> it because they know that news outlets like Market Place will treat it
> as a serious proposition and thereby muddy the waters in the mind of
> the public.
"Is not either" is not an argument, Mrs. Olson. Am I going to have to send
another note home to your mom?
> What else you got? Is it this?
> "I wipe my own ass, and with Scott toilet paper. Why? Because them
> other brands just ain't worth a shit."
Oh, man, the eloquence.
> -Felcher,
> 'Global Warming is a LIE Climate change: this is the worst scientific
> scandal of our generation'
> Nov. 30, 2009
True, but why do you keep repeating it?
-Eddie Haskell
fargo116
> "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Already answered this Felcher.
"Fannie and Freddie got into subprime junk and helped fuel the
housing
bubble, but they were trailing the irrational exuberance of the
private sector. They lost market share in the years 2002-2007, as the
volume of private issue mortgage backed securities exploded.
"In short, while Fannie and Freddie were completely irresponsible in
their lending practices, the claim that they were responsible for the
financial disaster is absurd on its face -- kind of like the claim
that the earth is flat. Free market conservatives know that the claim
that Fannie and Freddie were responsible is ridiculous. They just say
it because they know that news outlets like Market Place will treat
it
as a serious proposition and thereby muddy the waters in the mind of
the public." - Economist Dean Baker
What else you got? Is it this?
"I wipe my own ass, and with Scott toilet paper. Why? Because them
other brands just ain't worth a shit."
-Felcher,
'Global Warming is a LIE Climate change: this is the worst scientific
scandal of our generation'
Nov. 30, 2009
> <children chuckling>
S. Olson
Governor Swill
>"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont....@Shadow.com> wrote
>> "Eddie Haskell" <fg...@eeaeae.com>
>>> "Governor Swill" <governo...@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> suds mcduff <sudsmcd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Pass the stimulus or unemployment could surpass 8%."
>>>>> U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus WSJ
>>>> Remember what Reagan said he was going to do to fix the economy?
>>> Yeah, cut taxes and reign in spending.
>> LOL! Reagan increased taxes more times than any president in history.
>After lowering them.
Indian giver.
>> He reigned in spending so much that he *doubled* the national debt.
>So raising taxes doesn't work?
Not if you cut them to rock bottom first. The whole point is to be
able to *pay* for the spending and tax cuts. That part of the
conservative formula was forgotten, it seems.
>> He fixed the economy so well that unemployment *averaged* 7.5% during the
>> 8 years that he was in office.
>Thanks to Carter.
The inflation started under Nixon after he took the dollar off the
gold standard. Then he imposed socialist wage and price controls.
Right. Your wages sure got frozen but prices didn't stop going up.
Communism at it's worst. Shortages of paper bags for goat's sake!
Imposing a 55 mph limit and shoveling regulations out the door as fast
as they could.
Ford decided unemployment was a worse bogey man than inflation, so he
started borrowing and spending tens of billions. The national debt,
stable against GDP since Eisenhower (debt dropped precipitously under
Truman), suddenly exploded. One of the hottest topics of the 1976
campaign was the exploding deficit. Carter flattened, but couldn't
stop the resulting inflation. Add another oil surge in the election
year of 1980 and our economy was screwed. Meanwhile, Carter decided
that inflation had become more to be feared than employment rates (he
was quite right) so the Fed started jacking up interest rates in order
to reduce spending and stop the upward pressure on prices.
Inflation peaked in 1980 at 13.5%. By 1982 inflation was only a hair
over 6%. Then interest rates started coming back down. Iran had gone
back to pumping. The Alaska pipeline was opened and running full
blast. Norway and Britain were pumping out of the North Sea. Mexico
was online and then the Saudis slashed the price of OPEC oil. The
resulting "oil price war" dropped gasoline under half a dollar a
gallon for a while.
With energy cheap (due to seventies oil investments under Ford and
Carter), inflation vanished and the economy boomed.
But you say all that prosperity was due to Reagan and the bad stuff
was leftovers from Carter?
Obama's been less than a year in office. I guess we can blame Bush
for the recession like you blame Carter.
>> You're a fucking moron, Iddy.
>And you're a moron that never gets any pussy.
Why don't you give him some, Iddy? Oh that's right, liberals got
better pussy but conservatives got better dick. ;-)
>> One other thing, Felcher. You have something on your lips.
>Still glistening from your mom's pussy?
Getting ready for some conservative dick, apparently.
Daniel
> On Dec 13, 1:32 pm, Daniel <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 13, 2:29 pm, fargo116 <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 12, 3:34 pm, Daniel <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 12, 11:20 am, fargo116 <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Dec 12, 8:46 am, Daniel <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Dec 9, 11:59 am, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@Shadow.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
>
>
> > > > > > >http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125185379218478087.html#
>
> > > > > > > SEPTEMBER 2, 2009
>
> > > > > > > U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
>
>
> > > > > > Foreclosure rate at record levelshttp://www.realtytrac.com/foreclosure/foreclosure-rates.html
>
> > > > > Which was predicted.
>
> > > > By who? nobama told us everything would be all better with the
> > > > "stimulus". Was he lying?
>
> > > > > > Over 100 banks failed in 2009http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html
>
> > > > > Which was predicted.
>
> > > > By who? nobama told us everything would be all better with the
> > > > "stimulus". Was he lying?
>
> > > > > > Nore debt that all previous Presidents
> > > > > combinedhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB123629969453946717.html
>
> > > > > Which the Drunken Frat Boy has already rung up.
>
> > > > Once again, you show your ignorance. nobama has run up more debt in
> > > > less than ONE YEAR in office than ALL Presidents did COMBINED.
>
> > > > > > nobama popularity below 50%http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_adminis...
>
> > > > > Which is normal.
>
> > > > To who? You're an idiot.
>
> > > > > > A majority of Americans against nobamacarehttp://www.gallup.com/poll/124496/americans-leaning-against-healthcar...
>
> > > > > That's because they don't like the latest compromise that Senator
> > > > > Harry Reid engineered to try and get GOP Cocksuckers to vote for
> > > > > sick," or their backup plan, "If you do get sick, die quickly."
>
> > > > Wrong again. A majority of Americans don't want nobamacare in any way,
> > > > shape or form. nobamacare is the wrong answer, but he doesn't give a
> > > > shit.
>
> > > Nope. What I wrote is dead bang true, Danny Dumbfuck. They want a
> > > publc option that the insurance companies can't game their way
> > > around.
>
> > > > > > Feel free to tell us nobama is a success.
>
> > > > > Ok. he's a success.
>
> > > > Only in the minds of retards like you.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > Don't blame me. You asked.
>
> > I asked? Feel free to point out the question.
>
> "Feel free to tell us nobama is a success."
>
> There you go,
>
I don't know where you went to school, but a question has a QUESTION
MARK at the end of the sentence. Feel free to point out the question
mark at the end of the sentence.
fargo116
> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@Shadow.com> wrote in message
>
> news:hgb9a6$hij$1...@news.datemas.de...
>
> > "Eddie Haskell" <f...@eeaeae.com> wrote in message
> >news:4b29248e$0$13575$9a6e...@news.newshosting.com
> >> "Governor Swill" <governor.sw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:7bkgi5d1j1bp060l6...@4ax.com...
> >>> suds mcduff <sudsmcduff19...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> "Pass the stimulus or unemployment could surpass 8%."
> >>>> U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
> >>>> WSJ
>
> >>> Remember what Reagan said he was going to do to fix the economy?
>
> >> Yeah, cut taxes and reign in spending.
>
> > LOL! Reagan increased taxes more times than any president in history.
>
> After lowering them.
>
> > He reigned in spending so much that he *doubled* the national debt.
>
> So raising taxes doesn't work?
>
> > He fixed the economy so well that unemployment *averaged* 7.5% during the
> > 8 years that he was in office.
>
> Thanks to Carter.
>
> > You're a fucking moron, Iddy.
>
> And you're a moron that never gets any pussy.
>
> Mrs. Olson: The word is 'm-o-p-p-i-n-g,' you fucking idiot.
>
> Eddie Haskell: Oh, yeah? Well, you're an idiot that never gets any.
>
> Mrs. Olson: I don't? Gee, you better check your goat, Felcher. Because
> Lamont and I got that a long time ago.
>
> > One other thing, Felcher. You have something on your lips.
>
> Still glistening from your mom's pussy?
LOL...How's Nicole Kidman doing, Felcher? Still claiming you ate her
out? LOL
"I wipe my own ass, and with Scott toilet paper. Why? Because them
other brands just ain't worth a shit."
-Felcher,
'Global Warming is a LIE Climate change: this is the worst scientific
scandal of our generation'
Nov. 30, 2009
S. Olson
fargo116
> "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> On Dec 15, 10:32 am, "Eddie Haskell" <f...@eeaeae.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "suds mcduff" <sudsmcduff19...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:hg7lga$h5b$3...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> > > Eddie Haskell wrote:
> > >> "suds mcduff" <sudsmcduff19...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > >>news:hg06pq$4j7$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
> > >>> Eddie Haskell wrote:
> > >>>> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@Shadow.com> wrote in message
> > >>>>> Eddie Haskell wrote:
>
> > >>>>>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125185379218478087.html#
>
> > >>>>> SEPTEMBER 2, 2009
>
>
> > >>>>> WASHINGTON -- Government efforts to funnel hundreds of billions of
> > >>>>> dollars into the U.S. economy appear to be helping the U.S. climb
> > >>>>> out
> > >>>>> of the worst recession in decades.
>
> > >>>>>http://www.smartmoney.com/investing/economy/third-quarter-gdp-growth-...
>
> > >>>>> The U.S. economy grew more slowly than initially believed, the
> > >>>>> government said Tuesday morning. The Commerce Department revised its
> > >>>>> third-quarter reading of the gross domestic product downward, saying
> > >>>>> the economy grew at a 2.8% annual rate, rather than the 3.5% pace
> > >>>>> estimated last month.
> > >>>> By Hussein's own assessment that unemployment could exceed 8% without
> > >>>> the "stimulus," it is a failure, Crankston, you drooling cretin.
> > >>> ---But, gosh, even the right wing WSJ and smartmoney mag say it's
> > >>> worked....
>
> > >> "Pass the stimulus or unemployment could surpass 8%."
>
> > > U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
> > > WSJ
>
>
> > >>> are you loon?
>
> > >> Are you insane?
>
> > >> -Eddie Haskell
>
> > > ----My question was answered....you are indeed a loon.....
>
> > Yep, you're nuts alright.
> > Face reality, Felcher. The sheet music fell off your stand a LONG time
> > ago.
>
> Damn, still a french-fry short of a full order I see.
LOL that sheet music comment really pissed you off, Felcher, didn't
it?
How long have you been a taco shy of a combination plate?
S. Olson
fargo116
Danny Dumbfuck. You ASKED me this:
"Feel free to tell us nobama is a success."
Remember? Wait. Maybe it doesn have your name on it......oh nope, too
bad for you. There it is.
You asked, you got told.
Got it?
S. Olson
suds mcduff
> "suds mcduff" <sudsmcd...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> Eddie Haskell wrote:
>>>> Eddie Haskell wrote:
>>>>> news:hfol55$4ql$1...@news.datemas.de...
>>>>>> Eddie Haskell wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125185379218478087.html#
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SEPTEMBER 2, 2009
>>>>>>
>>>>>> U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WASHINGTON -- Government efforts to funnel hundreds of billions of
>>>>>> dollars into the U.S. economy appear to be helping the U.S. climb out
>>>>>> of the worst recession in decades.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The U.S. economy grew more slowly than initially believed, the
>>>>>> government said Tuesday morning. The Commerce Department revised its
>>>>>> third-quarter reading of the gross domestic product downward, saying
>>>>>> the economy grew at a 2.8% annual rate, rather than the 3.5% pace
>>>>>> estimated last month.
>>>>> By Hussein's own assessment that unemployment could exceed 8% without
>>>>> the "stimulus," it is a failure, Crankston, you drooling cretin.
>>>> ---But, gosh, even the right wing WSJ and smartmoney mag say it's
>>>> worked....
>>> "Pass the stimulus or unemployment could surpass 8%."
>
> Pure conjecture.
---From the right wing Wall Street Journal....
>
>>>> are you loon?
>>> Are you insane?
>>>
>>> -Eddie Haskell
>> ----My question was answered....you are indeed a loon.....
>
> Yep, you're nuts alright.
----Says the wingnut that thinks the WSJ is a leftist mag.....
suds mcduff
>> fargo116 wrote:
>>> On Dec 14, 10:20 am, "Eddie Haskell" <f...@eeaeae.com> wrote:
>>>> "fargo116" <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 12, 3:34 pm, Daniel <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 12, 11:20 am, fargo116 <fargo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Dec 12, 8:46 am, Daniel <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Dec 9, 11:59 am, "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@Shadow.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125185379218478087.html#
>>>>>>>> SEPTEMBER 2, 2009
>>>>>>>> U.S. Economy Gets Lift From Stimulus
>>>> up
>>>> and Medicare to be cut. All of which will happen.
>>> Actually, they wouldn't. I would say that you know that, Felcher, but
>>> I think you just may be dumb enough not to.
>
> Why do you want to increase the deficit, cut Medicare and increase insurance
> premiums?
>
> Democrat zombie?
>
> UPDATE 1-US Senate health plan would raise some premiums-CBO
>
> Mon Nov 30, 2009 11:45am EST
>
> Wed, Nov 18 2009
>
> WASHINGTON, Nov 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate's healthcare bill would raise
> insurance premiums by at least 10 percent by 2016 for those independently
> buying coverage, but subsidies would reduce the actual costs for half of
> that group, the Congressional Budget Office said on Monday.
>
>
> By: Susan Ferrechio
>
> Chief Congressional Correspondent
>
> 11/05/09 6:30 AM EST
>
> The Congressional Budget Office Wednesday night released its cost analysis
> of the Republican health care plan and found that it would reduce health
> care premiums and cut the deficit by $68 billion over ten years.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/yd8xmdr
>
> 12/13/2009 7:47 PM By Chris Rizo
>
> Douglas Elmendorf
>
> WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline)--The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office
> says it stands by its analysis that medial malpractice limits would save
> American taxpayers billions of dollars.
----Ahhhh, tort reform....all the Dr Nick Riveras of the US get a free
pass to mangle and mutilate....
suds mcduff
----Wow! Two "economists" out of hundreds.....the govt didn't intervene
under Hoover and people were starving in the cities, eating grass in the
country....under FDR the employment rate went down every year, and GDP
up except in '38 when conservatives convinced him to try and pay down
the deficit...UH oh, recession....thanks, conservatives....
Daniel
Wow, not only can you not follow a simple conversation, you don't know
when someone is asking a question.
Daniel
fargo116
Danny Dumbfuck, are you denying you ASKED us to tell you President
Obama is a success?
S. Olson
Daniel
Feel free to point out the question mark at the end of the sentence,
I'll wait.
fargo116
So you ARE denying you ASKED us what you asked,
S. Olson
suds mcduff
----Figure irt out....I see you snipped the link explaining "how so"....
fargo116
Are you referring to Danny Dumbfuck or Felcher, suds? They both share
the same brain cell.
S. Olson
Daniel
How can I deny something I never did? Have you found the ? at the end
of the sentence yet?
Daniel
So in other words, none of you fuckwads have anything to support your
claims.
fargo116
Fucks like you it all the time, Danny Dumbfuck. See?
""Feel free to tell us nobama is a success."
Unfortunately for you, you can deny writing that ALL you want.
S. Olson
Have you found the ? at the end
> of the sentence yet?- Hide quoted text -
Daniel
Care to try again in English?
>
> ""Feel free to tell us nobama is a success."
>
> Unfortunately for you, you can deny writing that ALL you want.
I have never denied writing it. I am STILL waiting for you to find
the ? at the end of the sentence. Can't do it, can you fuckwad?
fargo116
Really? Who wrote this?
"How can I deny something I never did?"
Who wrote that? Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm?
S. Olson
Daniel
I guess so, since I never asked a question dealing with nobama being a
success. Keep telling yourself I did though.
suds mcduff
----And, you're to stupid to figure out the reference to meatball drs
who would get away with murder.....
suds mcduff
----The Dumbfuck, of course.....Felcher's probably his sock puppet....or
vice versa...
Anonymous Infidel
Suds McFaggit is a lying chickenhawk obamatard...Nothing to figure out
about that.
Daniel
Been nearly a week now, and still nothing to support your claims. Go
figure.
suds mcduff
----Anonymous Glory Hole is too much of a coward to serve his
county....as well as a perv in the Larry Craig mold.....
suds mcduff
----Sorry you can't figure it out on your own.....without a way to sue
incompetent drs and hospitals, what's there to keep them honest, hmmmmm?
Daniel
> ----Sorry you can't figure it out on your own.....without a way to sue
> incompetent drs and hospitals, what's there to keep them honest, hmmmmm?
Sorry chumptard, you made the claim, you back it up. What's it been,
nearly a month now with no evidence?