How to tell if your HHO cell will fail?
HHO using Baking Soda/Salt is Scammed
that is the root cause of your High Amps sucking off your car's
Alternator (indirect gas consumption) and off your battery.
It doesn't matter if you use PMW to lower the current, you still increase
the Amps through chemical electrolyte. A HHO Cell is not a motor. PMW
is made to save Amps on a motor in motion.
You can't return your bought item from HHO maker through eBay but you can
complain and learn from your mistake. The best approach to use a good
HHO cell is to ask if the CELL produces PURE Hydrogen? If not then don't
buy it, Do not fall for "high LPM". Your wrong gas will leak into the
user's compartment, I already tried it, it's unhealthy to drive with
poisonous gas. Your pet can detect it too if you turn it on.
Don Lancaster
A HHO cell is CERTAIN to fail.
As GUARANTEED by exergy.
--
Many thanks,
Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: d...@tinaja.com
Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com
NotMe
The most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.
For once we have both in one post.
"HHO using Baking Soda/Salt is Scammed" <omar.b...@ymail.com> wrote in
message news:goqdnQHQO87tjrjU...@posted.toastnet...
: If the seller told to use Salt, Baking Soda, Vinegar or POH then you know
:
:
Eeyore
HHO using Baking Soda/Salt is Scammed wrote:
There is no such thing as HHO, hence failure is assured.
$cienceboy
>
> HHO using Baking Soda/Salt is Scammed wrote:
>
>
> There is no such thing as HHO, hence failure is assured.
>
"Theres....Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, starboard bow."
Eeyore
"$cienceboy" wrote:
> Eeyore wrote:
> >
> > HHO using Baking Soda/Salt is Scammed wrote:
> >
> > There is no such thing as HHO, hence failure is assured.
>
> Isn't HHO the same as H20 ? water ?
Not according to the crackpot 'believers' in it who think it is a fuel.
http://www.google.com/search?&rls=en&q=hho+fuel
Graham
Fred Kasner
No! HHO is a nonexistant construct that some idiots on this NG beleive
exist. HHO is impossible since an H atom in water cannot bond to another
H atom in the same molecule.
FK
George
of chemistry and were convinced that they were creating monatomic
hydrogen with their electrolysis units, but then what do I know??
George
Eeyore
George wrote:
> I sort of thought this came from those who have little or no knowledge
> of chemistry and were convinced that they were creating monatomic
> hydrogen with their electrolysis units, but then what do I know??
I believe your interpretation to be correct. Strangely, such loonies only
appear to exist in the CONUS and nowhere else.
I can't help but query the efficacy of your education system.
Graham
George
designed to "dumb down" the masses, and it is succeeding admirably. Sad,
so sad.
George
NotMe
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriend...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:492CE89E...@hotmail.com...
:
:
OzziLand and Canada have a few adherents. One group went public and have the
Canadian version of the SEC and FTC on their backs.
:
Eeyore
NotMe wrote:
> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriend...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> : George wrote:
> :
> : > I sort of thought this came from those who have little or no knowledge
> : > of chemistry and were convinced that they were creating monatomic
> : > hydrogen with their electrolysis units, but then what do I know??
> :
> : I believe your interpretation to be correct. Strangely, such loonies only
> : appear to exist in the CONUS and nowhere else.
> :
> : I can't help but query the efficacy of your education system.
>
> OzziLand and Canada have a few adherents. One group went public and have the
> Canadian version of the SEC and FTC on their backs.
In the UK, I'm not sure if it would be Trading Standards, the Advertising
Standards Authority or the Serious Fraud Office.
Graham
Mr.Ress
near as I can figure out, HHO is supposed to represent H2O separated,
they're too ignorant to realize it should be 2(H2)+O2.
Eeyore
"Mr.Ress" wrote:
Ah but it is claimed HHO can be produced without the losses associated with
the electrolytic production of 2(H2)+O2 !
Intruigingly it's a seemingly unique US obsession.
http://uk.youtube.com/results?search_query=hho&search_type=&aq=f
Graham
Eeyore
JakTheHammer wrote:
> "$cienceboy" <david...@internode.on.net> wrote
> Yes HHO & H2O are the same but most amateurs like to call HHO instead to
> signify that H2O has been separated. Eeyore, you don't know science not
> even electronic so don't try to move your lips for nothing Ok Diarrhea?
Go fuck yourself.
HHO as desribed by the believers as a fuel does not exist. H2O is water and
is most definitely not a fuel.
Graham
Eeyore
JakTheHammer wrote:
> The 2 should be in lower position dummy, got it Fuck?
Fuck yourself and explain how to do that in ASCII whilst you're at it.
Jakthehammer
"jakthehammer" IMPOSTER wrote:
<>
To Quote someone who said it so well.........
"Grow up. Stop using the lookalike fake nyms. Show some spine by
posting under yer own banner, or stop wasting bandwidth (and
everyone's time) with this sophomoric, chickenshit, cross-posting,
pseudo-oppositional trash.
Apparently, no one of any recognizable gender wants anything to do
with you. Hence this endless, weak-ass, ridiculous, basement-
sockazoid game. Trust me, this is not the way to ameliorate that
situation.
Repeat -- Grow up. Be cool. Talk sense.
And you'll have it made. "
jdear64
> "$cienceboy" <davidga...@internode.on.net> wrote in message
>
> news:013b9c70$0$20631$c3e...@news.astraweb.com...
> signify that H2O has been separated.
H2O separated from what?
Eeyore
jdear64 wrote:
> On Dec 4, 9:38 am, "JakTheHammer" <jakthh...@aol.com> wrote:
> > "$cienceboy" <davidga...@internode.on.net> wrote in message
> > > Eeyore wrote:
> >
> > >> HHO using Baking Soda/Salt is Scammed wrote:
> >
> > >> There is no such thing as HHO, hence failure is assured.
> >
> > > Isn't HHO the same as H20 ? water ?
> >
> > > "Theres....Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, starboard
> > > bow."
> >
> > Yes HHO & H2O are the same but most amateurs like to call HHO instead to
> > signify that H2O has been separated.
>
> H2O separated from what?
His brain (if he has one) I expect. That would help explain the malfunction.
Graham
Fred Kasner
> "Fred Kasner" <fka...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:4L_Wk.9068$YU2...@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com...
> still incorrect format if you want to be really picky about it. The 2
> should be in lower position dummy, got it Fuck? You should understand
> why amateur wrote it HHO to signify Gas instead of Water. Go fuck
> yourself asshole.
>
>
You may have noticed it but this NG on the Usenet is not a binary medium
and only ASCII is permitted. To show a subscript would require a
non-ASCII binary inserted in the ASCII flow of data. Hence the use of
the meaningless H2O which all intelligent people understand as H
followed by the subscript 2 followed by O.
We understand that your last sentence was added in order to demonstrate
the level of your intelligence and the quality of your civility.
FK