On Monday, August 16, 2021 at 12:21:11 AM UTC-7, Mike wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2021, Wombrat wrote
> (in article <sfcpab$uci$
1...@dont-email.me>):
> > On 16/08/2021 2:31 AM, Mike wrote:
> > > On Aug 15, 2021, Elle wrote
> > > (in article<
a266257f-0549-4b9a...@googlegroups.com>):
> > >
> > > > On Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 8:06:13 AM UTC-7, Mike wrote:
> > > > > On Aug 10, 2021, Elle wrote
> > > > > (in article<
46593bb5-4cd2-437c...@googlegroups.com>):
> > > > > > On Monday, August 9, 2021 at 1:46:35 AM UTC-7, Mike wrote:
> > > > > > > On Aug 9, 2021, Jason Evans wrote
> > > > > > > (in article <seqp7j$7o2$
1...@theuse.news.theuse.net>):
> > > > > > > > On Sun, 08 Aug 2021 08:15:13 -0700, Mike wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Is that why the Army also gave him a bad conduct discharge??
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It's shocking that the Army would discharge anyone.
> > > > > > > He was charged with battery.
> > > > > > Likely because there was sure to be a re-volt if they hadn't.
> > > > > Current standards would have considered that a re-volt-ing development
> > > > Some folks turn negative charges into positive outcomes.
> > >
> > > Or send you to the old volts home.
> >
> > Not much chance of that unless they induce some more capacity.
> Not much chance due to the impedance from the bean counters.
Folks always think the economic solution is alternating current political party in power...but joule notice we just trade one problem for another.