* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
>>Without nipples, breasts would be pointless.
>>
>I hope nobody tries to milk this thread; I lactose jokes that leave
>behind good mammaries.
>
Yeah, they just leave you in C cups.
OK, now have you gotten that off your chest?
I'd rather get to the point.
--
dmh
Funny, I don't remember being absent minded...
http://scrawlmark.cjb.net
Phyllis M. LaVietes <lavi...@dhc.net> wrote in article
<3D0269E921D503C5.B23DDDA3...@lp.airnews.net>...
> J. A. Mc. <xx...@lvdi.net> wrote in message
> news:388fdc0c...@news2.lvdi.net...
> > On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:48:33 -0800, Hayward Jablomey
> > <juanhuno...@pinkfloyd.com.invalid> tweaked a mouse's tail to
> > post:
> >
> > >>Without nipples, breasts would be pointless.
> > >>
> > >I hope nobody tries to milk this thread; I lactose jokes that leave
> > >behind good mammaries.
> > >
> > Yeah, they just leave you in C cups.
>
> OK, now have you gotten that off your chest?
I think it just goes to prove that they're really strapped for puns.
There's only one way to solve this equation and that's with an algebra.
Algebra? I thought that was what the Little Mermaid wore.
Greg
--
Visit the "Webb" Page
http://www.vci.net/~spatula
"Dennis Hammes" <scraw...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:388D34...@worldnet.att.net...
> J. A. Mc. wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:48:33 -0800, Hayward Jablomey
> > <juanhuno...@pinkfloyd.com.invalid> tweaked a mouse's tail to
> > post:
> >
> > >>Without nipples, breasts would be pointless.
> > >>
> > >I hope nobody tries to milk this thread; I lactose jokes that leave
> > >behind good mammaries.
> > >
> > Yeah, they just leave you in C cups.
>
She wore C-shells by the seashore...
--
dmh
An unbreakable tool is handy for
breaking whatever you're working on.
http://scrawlmark.cjb.net
Did I crack the above joke? Boy, do I feel like a boob.
>J. A. Mc. wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:48:33 -0800, Hayward Jablomey
>> <juanhuno...@pinkfloyd.com.invalid> tweaked a mouse's tail to
>> post:
>>
>> >>Without nipples, breasts would be pointless.
>> >>
>> >I hope nobody tries to milk this thread; I lactose jokes that leave
>> >behind good mammaries.
>> >
>> Yeah, they just leave you in C cups.
>
>I'd rather get to the point.
Now we've come full circle, conical isn't it?
> Without nipples, breasts would be pointless.
Well, you can jugs for yourself. Tit's true!
--
John 3:16
Dennis Hammes <scraw...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:388E01...@worldnet.att.net...
> Stan Kegel wrote:
> >
> > "John R. Walradt" wrote:
> > > Phyllis M. LaVietes <lavi...@dhc.net> wrote in article
> > > <3D0269E921D503C5.B23DDDA3...@lp.airnews.net>...
> > > > J. A. Mc. <xx...@lvdi.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:388fdc0c...@news2.lvdi.net...
> > > > > On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:48:33 -0800, Hayward Jablomey
> > > > > <juanhuno...@pinkfloyd.com.invalid> tweaked a mouse's tail
to
> > > > > post:
> > > > > >>Without nipples, breasts would be pointless.
> > > > > >I hope nobody tries to milk this thread; I lactose jokes that
leave
> > > > > >behind good mammaries.
> > > > > Yeah, they just leave you in C cups.
> > > > OK, now have you gotten that off your chest?
> > > I think it just goes to prove that they're really strapped for puns.
> > > There's only one way to solve this equation and that's with an
algebra.
> >
> > Algebra? I thought that was what the Little Mermaid wore.
>
> She wore C-shells by the seashore...
She must have been living in Bali.
>
>On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 21:28:15 -0800, Dennis Hammes
><scraw...@worldnet.att.net> tweaked a mouse's tail to post:
>
>>J. A. Mc. wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:48:33 -0800, Hayward Jablomey
>>> <juanhuno...@pinkfloyd.com.invalid> tweaked a mouse's tail to
>>> post:
>>>
>>> >>Without nipples, breasts would be pointless.
>>> >>
>>> >I hope nobody tries to milk this thread; I lactose jokes that leave
>>> >behind good mammaries.
>>> >
>>> Yeah, they just leave you in C cups.
>>
>>I'd rather get to the point.
>
>Now we've come full circle, conical isn't it?
>
This thread should be nippled in the bud right now
tortoni spumoni & co.
I agree. It's been an udder failure.
Would you prefer another cock and ball story?
>"P. Stashio Nutz" wrote:
>> In article <3893210f...@news2.lvdi.net>, xx...@lvdi.net (J. A. Mc.)
>> writes:
>> >On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 21:28:15 -0800, Dennis Hammes
>> ><scraw...@worldnet.att.net> tweaked a mouse's tail to post:
>> >>J. A. Mc. wrote:
>> >>> On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:48:33 -0800, Hayward Jablomey
>> >>> <juanhuno...@pinkfloyd.com.invalid> tweaked a mouse's tail to
>> >>> post:
>> >>> >>Without nipples, breasts would be pointless.
>> >>> >I hope nobody tries to milk this thread; I lactose jokes that leave
>> >>> >behind good mammaries.
>> >>> Yeah, they just leave you in C cups.
>> >>I'd rather get to the point.
>> >Now we've come full circle, conical isn't it.
>> This thread should be nippled in the bud right now
>I agree. It's been an udder failure.
I don't know about that - I find your posts a teat.
I like to see that, bosom buddies.
Cybe R. Wizard
@
flightofdragons.com
Hooter hell doesn't?
What does your flushing mechanism have to do with hooters?
It's made of bras?
>Somewhere in the Cyberworld, on Sat, 29 Jan 2000 18:08:24 GMT,
>xx...@lvdi.net (J. A. Mc.) scribbled inanely:
>
>>On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 00:07:02 -0800, Stan Kegel <ke...@fea.net> tweaked
>>a mouse's tail to post:
>>
>>>"P. Stashio Nutz" wrote:
>>>> In article <3893210f...@news2.lvdi.net>, xx...@lvdi.net (J. A. Mc.)
>>>> writes:
>>>> >On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 21:28:15 -0800, Dennis Hammes
>>>> ><scraw...@worldnet.att.net> tweaked a mouse's tail to post:
>>>> >>J. A. Mc. wrote:
>>>> >>> On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 10:48:33 -0800, Hayward Jablomey
>>>> >>> <juanhuno...@pinkfloyd.com.invalid> tweaked a mouse's tail to
>>>> >>> post:
>>>> >>> >>Without nipples, breasts would be pointless.
>>>> >>> >I hope nobody tries to milk this thread; I lactose jokes that leave
>>>> >>> >behind good mammaries.
>>>> >>> Yeah, they just leave you in C cups.
>>>> >>I'd rather get to the point.
>>>> >Now we've come full circle, conical isn't it.
>>>> This thread should be nippled in the bud right now
>>>I agree. It's been an udder failure.
>>I don't know about that - I find your posts a teat.
>I like to see that, bosom buddies.
Corset help if we all pull together.