Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

html help site

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Adam

unread,
Feb 1, 2002, 11:26:35 AM2/1/02
to
Hey guys I'm creating a site that gives tutorials on everthing from html to
cgi-perl and since this is the html newsgroup I was wondering if you guys
could take a look at my html section of my site. I only have the first three
pages done but before I get too far down the road I was wondering if you
guys could tell me if I'm on the right track and if it's easy to understand
and most of all helpful for newbies. Aslo what do you think about the text
area boxes that translate whatever you type into a web page to help people
try out new things they learn.
And feed back would be great thanks,
http://www.centennialmedia.com/tutorials/html.html

Jim Hollomon

unread,
Feb 1, 2002, 12:42:19 PM2/1/02
to
On Fri, 01 Feb 2002 16:26:35 GMT, "Adam" <adamb...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Nice look. Clean and easy to read. Thanks for text that's big enough
to see.

I first tripped when reading the second paragraph. You have a syntax
error that's one of my pet peeves. "If your looking at this page..."
should read "If you're looking at this page..."

Your is the possessive of you. You're is the contraction of "you are."
The two text strings are not interchangeable. I believe that sites
that claim to be well informed enough to teach deserve good copy
editing. If that's not your strong suit, you're welcome to ask for a
more thorough copy review here.

Other than that, it isn't clear to me what the > symbols mean in the
text box at the upper right of the main page.

Jim Hollomon, Web Developer
ET Productions -- http://www.etproductions.com/
We Build Web Sites that Build Net Profits
Statisticians do it with 95% confidence

Simon Brooke

unread,
Feb 1, 2002, 1:59:54 PM2/1/02
to
"Adam" <adamb...@hotmail.com> writes:

> Hey guys I'm creating a site that gives tutorials on everthing from html to
> cgi-perl and since this is the html newsgroup I was wondering if you guys
> could take a look at my html section of my site. I only have the first three
> pages done but before I get too far down the road I was wondering if you
> guys could tell me if I'm on the right track and if it's easy to understand
> and most of all helpful for newbies.

You're using fixed width tables. Please don't. While your coding
standards are far better than most sites which claim to teach HTML,
this is one fault it would be better not to teach them. Indeed, it
would be better particularly on a teaching site to use DIVs rather
than tables for layout.

I liked your 'try your own HTML' example feature; that's definitely
nice. However, it would be nice if you could parse the result for
coding errors, or provide an option for the user to validate it. You'd
need to use a friendly validator like Nick Kew's.

--
si...@jasmine.org.uk (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

to err is human, to lisp divine
;; attributed to Kim Philby, oddly enough.

Jeff Thies

unread,
Feb 1, 2002, 3:20:42 PM2/1/02
to
> Hey guys I'm creating a site that gives tutorials on everthing from html to
> cgi-perl and since this is the html newsgroup I was wondering if you guys
> could take a look at my html section of my site.

from the site:
...

<body>
This is my first web page!
This is sentence number 2.
This is sentence number 3.
</body>
...

Is it a good idea to teach people to put text directly in the body?

I only have the first three
> pages done but before I get too far down the road I was wondering if you
> guys could tell me if I'm on the right track and if it's easy to understand
> and most of all helpful for newbies. Aslo what do you think about the text
> area boxes that translate whatever you type into a web page to help people
> try out new things they learn.

I think that may encourage people that writing bad html is OK because it
will render in the browser they are using.

Why not start with paragraphs and headings first?

Teaching structure I think is a better idea. I've seen far too many
Dreamweaver pages that are html mumbo jumbo.



> And feed back would be great thanks,
> http://www.centennialmedia.com/tutorials/html.html

And, please don't teach font tags!

Jeff

Adam

unread,
Feb 1, 2002, 6:53:26 PM2/1/02
to

"Jeff Thies" <cybe...@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
news:3C5AF8E4...@sprintmail.com...

> > Hey guys I'm creating a site that gives tutorials on everthing from html
to
> > cgi-perl and since this is the html newsgroup I was wondering if you
guys
> > could take a look at my html section of my site.
>
> from the site:
> ...
>
> <body>
> This is my first web page!
> This is sentence number 2.
> This is sentence number 3.
> </body>
> ...
>
> Is it a good idea to teach people to put text directly in the body?
Very good point. I will take about the part that shows text without the
paragraph tags or some kind of container.

>
> And, please don't teach font tags!
>
> Jeff
I promise....all formating will be in the CSS section
Thanks, so much for taking a look at it. I'm pretty new to news groups but I
can alreaday tell I'm going to love them


Adam

unread,
Feb 1, 2002, 6:55:24 PM2/1/02
to

"Simon Brooke" <si...@jasmine.org.uk> wrote in message
news:87hep1t...@gododdin.internal.jasmine.org.uk...

> I liked your 'try your own HTML' example feature; that's definitely
> nice. However, it would be nice if you could parse the result for
> coding errors, or provide an option for the user to validate it. You'd
> need to use a friendly validator like Nick Kew's.
>
Thanks for the idea I will definetly add something to catch coding errors
and let them know how to fix it. Add the option for validation is great.
Thanks for all the help


Adam

unread,
Feb 1, 2002, 6:57:22 PM2/1/02
to
"Jim Hollomon" <ET...@etproductions.com> wrote in message
news:3c5bd316...@news.cavtel.net...

> I first tripped when reading the second paragraph. You have a syntax
> error that's one of my pet peeves. "If your looking at this page..."
> should read "If you're looking at this page..."
>
> Your is the possessive of you. You're is the contraction of "you are."
> The two text strings are not interchangeable. I believe that sites
> that claim to be well informed enough to teach deserve good copy
> editing. If that's not your strong suit, you're welcome to ask for a
> more thorough copy review here.

Thanks for the correction I will fix it right away

> Other than that, it isn't clear to me what the > symbols mean in the
> text box at the upper right of the main page.
>
> Jim Hollomon, Web Developer
> ET Productions -- http://www.etproductions.com/
> We Build Web Sites that Build Net Profits
> Statisticians do it with 95% confidence

I guess those where just supposed to point to the stuff on the right but now
that I look at it it probaly is useless.
Thanks for the help,
Adam


Adam

unread,
Feb 1, 2002, 7:05:39 PM2/1/02
to
I still new to news groups and I posted this to alt.html.critique and
alt.html.writers and alt.html.writes.guild because I thought I would get the
most respones that way on more than one news group but I got you same three
guys on all three newsgroups. How did that happend. The exact same respones
from you 3 guys in three diffrent newsgroups. It it better for me just to
post into this one alt.html.critique
Thanks,
Adam


Tina - Affordablehost.com

unread,
Feb 1, 2002, 7:02:41 PM2/1/02
to

"Adam" <adamb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > And feed back would be
great thanks,
> http://www.centennialmedia.com/tutorials/html.html


Good content. The bright blue kinda hurts my eyes though.

--Tina
--
Hosting starting @ $30 per YEAR
Providing reliable hosting since 1997
http://www.AffordableHOST.com - Linux
Save 10% with this Discount Code: newsgroup

Adam

unread,
Feb 1, 2002, 7:51:45 PM2/1/02
to

"Tina - Affordablehost.com" <ti...@affordablehost.com> wrote in message
news:a3fao...@enews1.newsguy.com...

>
> "Adam" <adamb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > And feed back would be
> great thanks,
> > http://www.centennialmedia.com/tutorials/html.html
>
>
> Good content. The bright blue kinda hurts my eyes though.
>
Sorry about that on my monitor it doesn't seem very bright. I tried to pick
color that were easy on the eyes. Should I make the blue a little darker? or
what or color would you suggest. Remember I have white links on the menu.
Thanks,
Adam


Tina - Affordablehost.com

unread,
Feb 1, 2002, 10:20:09 PM2/1/02
to
"Adam" <adamb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BKG68.6370$Kx3.2...@typhoon.jacksonville.mediaone.net...


I like muted blues. Hence, the color of my site. :-)

Geoff Ball

unread,
Feb 2, 2002, 12:20:21 AM2/2/02
to
"Adam" <adamb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%kz68.5892$Kx3.2...@typhoon.jacksonville.mediaone.net...

> And feed back would be great thanks,
> http://www.centennialmedia.com/tutorials/html.html

You forgot the mailto: on all the pages, where you ask if we want to
write a tutorial.

<a
href="webm...@centennialmedia.com">webm...@centennialmedia.com</a>

You also forgot the "n" in your no-break space entity on the JavaScript
page:

New&nbsp;York&bsp;Bound!

And put one too many on the DHTML page:

New&nbsp;York&nbsp; Bound!

You might want to think about using SSI for your linkbar at the top,
Recent News box at the right, etc. That way, you'd only have to update
one file to change everything (because you aren't going to want to have
to change hundreds of files later; I suggest you switch to it now).

Regards,
Geoff


Adam

unread,
Feb 2, 2002, 1:11:10 AM2/2/02
to

"Geoff Ball" <ge...@geoffball.net> wrote in message
news:pGK68.47079$M3.67...@news1.telusplanet.net...

> You forgot the mailto: on all the pages, where you ask if we want to
> write a tutorial.
>
> <a
> href="webm...@centennialmedia.com">webm...@centennialmedia.com</a>
>
> You also forgot the "n" in your no-break space entity on the JavaScript
> page:
>
> New&nbsp;York&bsp;Bound!
>
> And put one too many on the DHTML page:
>
> New&nbsp;York&nbsp; Bound!
>
> You might want to think about using SSI for your linkbar at the top,
> Recent News box at the right, etc. That way, you'd only have to update
> one file to change everything (because you aren't going to want to have
> to change hundreds of files later; I suggest you switch to it now).
>
> Regards,
> Geoff
Thanks for noticing all those things. Just about to head to bed so I'll get
to them in the morning. I like your idea about ssi for the common navagaton
bar at the top etc.. where it's the same on all pages so I'll do that. Hey
with the help of all the people on this news group my site will will
wonderful and correct in no time!
Again thank you guys so much!
Adam


Spooky Guy Next Door

unread,
Feb 2, 2002, 11:06:32 AM2/2/02
to
Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered, weak and weary, Adam
(adamb...@hotmail.com) wrote:

> "Jeff Thies" <cybe...@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3C5AF8E4...@sprintmail.com...
> > > Hey guys I'm creating a site that gives tutorials on everthing from html
> to
> > > cgi-perl and since this is the html newsgroup I was wondering if you
> guys
> > > could take a look at my html section of my site.
> >
> > from the site:
> > ...
> >
> > <body>
> > This is my first web page!
> > This is sentence number 2.
> > This is sentence number 3.
> > </body>
> > ...
> >
> > Is it a good idea to teach people to put text directly in the body?
> Very good point. I will take about the part that shows text without the
> paragraph tags or some kind of container.

Please remember that <P></P> isn't there to provide double-spacing or
anything like that, but rather to denote paragraphs.

(I'm not saying you don't know that, but I'm not saying you do, either
:o))

--
The ideas expressed in the above post are my own, with the possible
exception of the one involving a scarecrow and a stick of butter.
blog - http://www.cyberfuddle.com/infinitebabble/
cyberfuddle - http://www.cyberfuddle.com/
learn HTML - http://smiley.vh.mewl.net/markhtml/

Thomas Lotze

unread,
Feb 4, 2002, 5:50:12 AM2/4/02
to
Adam schrieb:

>
> And feed back would be great thanks,
> http://www.centennialmedia.com/tutorials/html.html

Consider including <link rel=""> navigation. Recent
Mozillas, Lynx, Links etc can use this. The structure
of your tutorial seems to call for that.

I like the clean look of your site.

Cheers, Thomas

--
Thomas Lotze - thomas.lotze *at* gmx.net

http://www.thomas-lotze.de/

Adam

unread,
Feb 4, 2002, 4:52:31 PM2/4/02
to
"Thomas Lotze" <thomas...@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:3C5E6764...@gmx.net...

> Consider including <link rel=""> navigation. Recent
> Mozillas, Lynx, Links etc can use this. The structure
> of your tutorial seems to call for that.
What are you refering to? The style sheet information is the only think I
see that has a rel="". I'm sorry I don't understand.

> I like the clean look of your site.

Thanks:)
Adam


Thomas Lotze

unread,
Feb 5, 2002, 6:35:26 AM2/5/02
to
Adam wrote:

[ <link rel=""> navigation. ]

>

> What are you refering to? The style sheet information is the only think I
> see that has a rel="". I'm sorry I don't understand.


You can have more of those <link rel=""> tags, right next
to your stylesheet reference. They tell about related
documents, and what that relation is. For instance, you
could have

<link rel="home" href="http://my.domain.dom/">

in all your subpages, so a user agent knows what the
home page of the project is.

Mozilla, for instance, can be configured to display a
toolbar will icons for the home page, the page above
the current one in your hierarchy, and a lot of other
things, so there's a means of navigation in addition to
whatever you do on your pages themselves.

The advantage is that the user doesn't have to learn
your navigation scheme, and in an ideal world where all
browsers support <link> style navigation, a lot of
clutter could be removed from most pages.


Especially interesting for your site would be things
like <link rel="start">, "prev", "next", "contents" etc
which are designed to guide the user through a linear
tour. That's what you do with the "Next" link at the
bottom of your pages.

See, for instance,

http://www.subotnik.net/html/link.html.en

HTH. Cheers,

Adam

unread,
Feb 5, 2002, 9:48:07 AM2/5/02
to
"Thomas Lotze" <thomas...@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:3C5FC37E...@gmx.net...

> You can have more of those <link rel=""> tags, right next
> to your stylesheet reference. They tell about related
> documents, and what that relation is. For instance, you
> could have
>
> <link rel="home" href="http://my.domain.dom/">
>
> in all your subpages, so a user agent knows what the
> home page of the project is.
>
> Mozilla, for instance, can be configured to display a
> toolbar will icons for the home page, the page above
> the current one in your hierarchy, and a lot of other
> things, so there's a means of navigation in addition to
> whatever you do on your pages themselves.
>
> The advantage is that the user doesn't have to learn
> your navigation scheme, and in an ideal world where all
> browsers support <link> style navigation, a lot of
> clutter could be removed from most pages.
>
>
> Especially interesting for your site would be things
> like <link rel="start">, "prev", "next", "contents" etc
> which are designed to guide the user through a linear
> tour. That's what you do with the "Next" link at the
> bottom of your pages.
>
> See, for instance,
>
> http://www.subotnik.net/html/link.html.en
>
cool thanks for the info. I learn something new everyday:)


0 new messages