Website (re-)critique requested
Ian
redesigned the whole thing to be dynamic. The main plus for using Ajax
that calls flat files is that I only have to change the front page if I
need to make a change. Essentially it's a complex way of doing lots of
includes. The address is:
Thank you for any feedback--constructive, destructive, or otherwise.
Ian
--
I drink only that which makes
me thirsty. (Thao Nguyen)
http://www.bookstacks.org/
http://mellowcricket.wordpress.com/
Adrienne Boswell
in news:h76sq9$hln$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
> I've asked for feedback on this site before, but have recently
> redesigned the whole thing to be dynamic. The main plus for using Ajax
> that calls flat files is that I only have to change the front page if I
> need to make a change. Essentially it's a complex way of doing lots of
> includes. The address is:
>
> http://www.bookstacks.org/
>
> Thank you for any feedback--constructive, destructive, or otherwise.
>
> Ian
The hover color on the default red/brown is very hard to see, same with
purple.
--
Adrienne Boswell at Home
Arbpen Web Site Design Services
http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info
Please respond to the group so others can share
Chris F.A. Johnson
> I've asked for feedback on this site before, but have recently
> redesigned the whole thing to be dynamic. The main plus for using Ajax
> that calls flat files is that I only have to change the front page if I
> need to make a change. Essentially it's a complex way of doing lots of
> includes. The address is:
>
> http://www.bookstacks.org/
>
> Thank you for any feedback--constructive, destructive, or otherwise.
I find the colours (all of them except plain) garish and distracting.
There is not enough whitespace around the text. When reading a book
online, I don't like to have any distracting stuff around it. I
just want the text of the book.
I tried to read The Hound of the Baskervilles. The first chapter
appears, but there is no link to subsequent chapters.
--
Chris F.A. Johnson, webmaster <http://Woodbine-Gerrard.com>
===================================================================
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)
Jim Moe
>
> http://www.bookstacks.org/
> Thank you for any feedback--constructive, destructive, or otherwise.
>
The site is useless without Javascript, a side-effect of Ajax no doubt.
When viewing a multi-chapter book (after enabling JS), there is no link
to the next chapter and the Back button does not return me to the table of
contents. So I can only ever read the first chapter.
--
jmm (hyphen) list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)
Ian
> When viewing a multi-chapter book (after enabling JS), there is no link
> to the next chapter and the Back button does not return me to the table of
> contents. So I can only ever read the first chapter.
The table of contents is found by clicking the book title again. I see
now that that isn't obvious.
You know, the more I think about it, the more I think that this needs
some reworking. I had been so keen on doing a dynamic version of the
site, I suppose because "dynamic = better" in some way, that I didn't
stop to think that I actually had more functionality with the plain HTML
version.
The version that I had settled on for quite a while was so plain that I
was convinced it was driving away visitors. Let me try and find it in
the Wayback Machine ...
http://web.archive.org/web/20060404162148/http://www.bookstacks.org/
This was, at the time, the result of all my thought on the perfect
design. Just one big div, which, incidentally, looks like a piece of
paper, and everything works inside that. Everyone I showed it to,
however, mistook me for someone who only used one big div because he
couldn't do anything more complicated. So I reworked it.
Does something like this work better? Something else, perhaps, that I
hadn't thought of?
dorayme
Ian <rasta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The version that I had settled on for quite a while was so plain that I
> was convinced it was driving away visitors. Let me try and find it in
> the Wayback Machine ...
>
> http://web.archive.org/web/20060404162148/http://www.bookstacks.org/
If that drove people away it was not because it is plain in looks. As
far as the general look is concerned, it is really more preferable than
your other effort (not that that was so terrible, mind you). The markup
is not the best but at least for me, this sort of plain look is like a
welcome relief from so much fancy pants that people go on with...
What happened to the pic on the Chapter 1? You surely don't need a link
*to* the bottom of the page. You hardly need one these days to the top
either... If you are going to have a page nav, I would like it at top as
well as bottom so I could flip through without scrolling down.
--
dorayme
Ian
> You surely don't need a link
> *to* the bottom of the page. You hardly need one these days to the top
> either... If you are going to have a page nav, I would like it at top as
> well as bottom so I could flip through without scrolling down.
I think the link to the bottom was really a link to the TOC. (It's been
a while since I had the site that way.) The bane of my existence with
this site has been the previous and next links. If I knew how to do it,
I could write a script of some sort to automagically create them for me.
(UltraEdit is neat in that its macro language uses JavaScript, so if you
know some JS, you can write some pretty handy macros.) As it is, I have
to manually add the previous and next links for every file, and there's
about *thirty-five hundred* files so far.
It's much easier to add a link to the TOC, because each TOC is an index
file. So if I did a search and replace, to change:
<a href="#">Back to Top</a>
to:
<a href="index.html">Table of Contents</a>
and then did a RegExp to add the same thing to the top of each file, I
could conceivably save myself about two weeks of on-again, off-again work.
BTW, one of the benefits of that Plain Jane site was that it worked just
fine on cellphones. One wonders why to even use the <div> at all, since
it's just there for decoration. I guess the question is, how far have I
taken the eTexts at Project Gutenberg, and turned them into proper
eBooks? Shouldn't there be some kind of eye candy there? What if readers
are turned off by a site almost as plain as a vanilla ASCII file? What
do they get at Bookstacks that they don't get at PG? All this led to
making a whiz-bang dynamic version, which, as someone pointed out, has
absolutely zero functionality without JS, and can be confusing to use,
as others have noted.
Adrienne Boswell
> The bane of my existence with
> this site has been the previous and next links. If I knew how to do
it,
> I could write a script of some sort to automagically create them for
me.
Could you do something server side?
<?php
/* $pages is the number pages for that book, however you are getting the
information */
if(!isset($_GET['page']))
{
$page = 1;
$next = 2;
$previous = 1;
$first = 1
$last = $pages;
}
else
{
$page = $_GET['page'];
$next = $page+1;
$previous = $page-1;
$first = 1;
$last = $pages;
}
if($page == 1)
{
$atstart = true;
$atend = false
}
elseif{$page == $pages)
{
$atend = true;
$atstart = false;
}
else
{
$atstart = false;
$atend = false
}
?>
<ul>
<?php
if($atstart)
{?>
<li><a href="page.php?book=1&page=<?php echo $next?>">Next</a></li>
<li><a href="page.php?book=1&page=<?php echo $last?>">Last</a></li>
<?php }
elseif($atend)
{?>
<li><a href="page.php?book=1&page=<?php echo $first?>">First</a>
</li>
<li><a href="page.php?book=1&page=<?php echo $next?>">Next</a></li>
<li><a href="page.php?book=1&page=<?php echo $previous?>">Previous
</a></li>
<?php }
else
{
?>
<li><a href="page.php?book=1&page=<?php echo $first?>">First</a>
</li>
<li><a href="page.php?book=1&page=<?php echo $next?>">Next</a></li>
<li><a href="page.php?book=1&page=<?php echo $previous?>">Previous
</a></li>
<li><a href="page.php?book=1&page=<?php echo $last?>">Last</a></li>
<?php } ?>
</ul>
Ian
I will try to implement that. That means the bookmarks will be broken,
although I could always use an .htaccess file to make all HTML files
parse as PHP files. Seeing as they all *will* be PHP files, that
shouldn't be a problem. (Unless that's a bad idea.)
Thank you for the help, though. It's very useful.
Ian
> Could you do something server side?
Okay, I understand what you mean now. Sorry for the confusing last post.
You mean to put those flat files into a database, and call them up in
much the same way, but avoiding all the pitfalls of Ajax / JavaScript.
Yes, I completely agree. I just worry about security, because I get the
impression that working with PHP / MySQL, when one is really just a
newbie at it, poses a good risk of SQL injection attacks. Ah, I guess
it's time to hit the PDF files.
Thanks to all the posters who gave their input. It has been invaluable.
Adrienne Boswell
> Adrienne Boswell wrote:
>> Could you do something server side?
>
> Okay, I understand what you mean now. Sorry for the confusing last
post.
> You mean to put those flat files into a database, and call them up in
> much the same way, but avoiding all the pitfalls of Ajax / JavaScript.
> Yes, I completely agree. I just worry about security, because I get
the
> impression that working with PHP / MySQL, when one is really just a
> newbie at it, poses a good risk of SQL injection attacks. Ah, I guess
> it's time to hit the PDF files.
>
> Thanks to all the posters who gave their input. It has been
invaluable.
>
> Ian
You can do tests server side to make sure that what you are getting from
the client is good, like if you're expecting a numeric value, and you
get alpha, reject it. Also mysql_real_escape_string is your friend.
Create a user with limited privledges (maybe just SELECT), and let the
WWW be that user.
Ian
"cavalcade-of-coding" a reference to Sideshow Bob's Cavalcade of
Whimsey? :-)
Ian
--
http://www.bookstacks.org/
http://mellowcricket.wordpress.com/
Adrienne Boswell
> Thanks again, Adrienne. Also, I know it's off-topic, but is
> "cavalcade-of-coding" a reference to Sideshow Bob's Cavalcade of
> Whimsey? :-)
>
> Ian
No, it's more like the 50's TV show, Cavalcade of Stars, where Jackie
Gleason did a little sketch that turned into The Honeymooners.