On Friday, April 8, 2016 at 1:10:11 PM UTC-4, Lesmond wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:05:19 -0700 (PDT), lenona wrote:
>
> >Including young people who don't grasp that accomplishments made before they were born are just as important - often more so - than things that happened after they became old enough to start following the news?
>
> So how can naming a movie they have never seen tell them who he was?
If they've seen or heard of the more recent, musical version of "Little Shop of Horrors" but are not aware of the original movie, putting that title next to his name, with the date, might at least make them ask "wait - wasn't that made later?" Thus begins the conversation.
Or, if they had to read any Edgar Allen Poe in school, chances are they've at least HEARD of "The Pit and the Pendulum." So that could be a good choice to make them ask questions, too.
Here's a thread I started on critic Ty Burr's 2007 book "The Best Old Movies for Families: A Guide to Watching Together":
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/rec.arts.movies.past-films/%22ty$20burr%22/rec.arts.movies.past-films/RbgMXgIILhU/UdGLQPWeCqAJ
Excerpt (from the back cover of the book):
"FOR THE OLDER ONES (Ages 13+): Burr recommends relating old movies to
teens' contemporary favorites: without Hitchcock, there could be no
The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, without Brando, no Johnny Depp."
BTW, I forgot to mention that the kids who saw Buster Keaton's "One Week" were 9 years old.
Ty Burr himself commented, halfway down the thread!
The book now has 26 reviews at Amazon, all of which have 4 or 5 stars.
Lenona.