Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

>>> THE GREAT AHWW SURVEY! <<< [repost]

262 views
Skip to first unread message

Asikaa

unread,
Feb 20, 1996, 3:00:00 AM2/20/96
to

Reposted for the last time... anyone missing this post will have to get
it from me via mail, or wait until I get it onto my webpage.

THE GREAT 1995 AHWW SURVEY RESULTS!!!!

Yes, that's right. After months of apologies and procrastination, I have
finally finished processing the completed survey questionnaires. In the
end I received over 25 replies, totalling nearly 10,000 lines of data!

The statistics shown below are intended to represent a general picture of
various aspects of our packmembers' lives. Please note that there is no
supposition involved here... All this is from hard data, so don't flame
me if you don't agree. I reckon that this survey is highly accurate, if
you consider the numbers involved... No-one knows exactly how many
packmembers we have, but if we say 100 as a rough figure, that means that
the survey covered over 25% of the target population (TV viewing
figures often use 0.01% or lower).

Comments and discussion are welcomed... I think you'll find the results
interesting, and sometimes surprising.

SURVEY RESULTS by Asikaa
(All figures are shown as a percentage of the total number of survey
respondents)

Results are in descending percentage order where applicable.
Comments by me are indented with >>>

SECTION 1 - GENERAL INFORMATION

Phenotypes:

1. Wolf 56 %
2= Bear 8 %
2= Cat 8 %
2= Dog 8 %
3= Lynx 4 %
3= Panther 4 %
3= Windigo 4 %
3= Fox 4 %
3= Not were 4 %

>>> As I suspected, wolf came out on top. I know it's an old argument,
>>> but does anyone want to suggest why wolf is so prevalent?

Gender:

1. Male 72 %
2. Female 28 %

>>> Better than I expected, considering the estimated Internet ratio is 12
>>> males to every female.

Average age (mean): 23.6 years

Ethnic Origin:

1. West Euro. 52 %
2. American 20 %
3. Native Am. 12 %
4. East Euro. 8 %
5= Asian 4 %
5= Other 4 %

Geographical Distribution:

1. USA 56 %
2. Aus/NZ 20 %
3. Canada 16 %
4= Germany 4 %
4= UK 4 %

Occupational Split:

1. FT Employed 52 %
2. Student 48 %


SECTION 2 - PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES

Hair Colour:

1. Dark Brown 52 %
2. Light Brown 32 %
3. Black 12 %
4. Redhead 4 %

>>> I would have said that this is down to genetics, as brown is usually
>>> dominant, but looking at the eye colour results...

Hair Length:

1. Medium 36 %
2= Longish 20 %
2= Very Long 20 %
3. Very short 16 %
4. Short 8 %

Eye Colour:

1. Blue 36 %
2. Hazel 24 %
3. Brown 20 %
4. Green 16 %
5. Other (?!) 4 %

Height (Males):

1. 5'9"-6' 55 %
2. 6'1"-6'4" 28 %
3. 5'5"-5'8" 17 %

Height (Females):

1. 5'5"-5'8" 71 %
2. 5'0"-5'4" 29 %

>>> The height stats for both sexes are pretty much average.

Weight (Males):

1. 161-180lbs 28 %
2. 181-200lbs 22 %
3= 100-140lbs 17 %
3= 141-160lbs 17 %
4. 201-220lbs 11 %
5. Over 220lbs 5 %

Weight (Females):

1= 161-180lbs 43 %
1= 100-141lbs 43 %
2. 141-160lbs 14 %

Build:

1. Medium 32 %
2. Broad 24 %
3. Wiry 16 %
4. Overweight 12 %
5= Thin 8 %
5= Slim 8 %

>>> You modest lot, you! No-one answered "muscular" :)

Main Senses

Ocular (vision):

1. Shortsighted 68 %
2. Near-perfect 16 %
3. Perfect 12 %
4. Longsighted 4 %

>>> Pretty damn amazing. Seeing as wolves are naturally shortsighted
>>> (in a way), this is quite strange. It was mainly the felines that
>>> answered "perfect" or "near-perfect." Again, a close tie-in.

Colourblindness:

1. None 100 %

Olfactory (smell):

1. Good 48 %
2. Exceptional 44 %
3. Average 8 %

Aural (hearing):

1= Exceptional 44 %
1= Good 44 %
2. Average 8 %
3. Poor 4 %

>>> Like vision, both senses of smell and hearing seem to follow
>>> the traits of were animals.

Werelike Attributes:

(Percentage that replied "yes")

1. Heightened awareness 80 %
2. Some kind of psychic ability 60 %
3. Sharp/long canine teeth 44 %
4. Soft furlike hair 40 %
5. Good stamina/strength 36 %
6. Increased aggression 32 %
7. Exceptional balance 24 %
8. Unusually prevalent body hair 20 %


SECTION 3 - EMOTIONAL PROFILE

Percentage ruled by emotions:

1. Sometimes 48 %
2. Mostly 40 %
3. Not at all 12 %

Percentage that show emotions:

1= Most times 44 %
1= Only strong 44 %
2. Never 12 %

>>> You're an emotional bunch, it seems.

Most Common Emotion Experienced:

1. Happiness 40 %
2. Frustration 28 %
3. Other 12 %
4. Pleasure 8 %
5= Anger 4 %
5= Sadness 4 %
5= Loneliness 4 %

>>> The "other" section included responses such as wonder, hope, and
>>> (you know who you are) lust! :)

General Outlook:

1. Optimistic 56 %
2. Neither 32 %
3. Pessimistic 12 %

Things That Make Us Happiest:

1. Helping others 48 %
2. Overall relaxation 20 %
3. Giving to others 16 %
4= Physical pleasure 8 %
4= Success 8 %

Things We Would Prefer:

1. Good friends 88 %
2. Fantastic sex life 8 %
3. Nice place to live 4 %

>>> This is a nice result.


SECTION 4 - EDUCATION

Self-Assessed Level of Education:

1. Well Educated 76 %
2. Very Well Educated 16 %
3. Average 8 %

Highest Qualifications Gained or Working Towards:

1. Ordinary Degree 36 %
2. Diploma 24 %
3. High School 20 %
4. Honours Degree 16 %
5. Masters Degree 8 %

>>> They can call us crazy, but they can't call us stupid!

SECTION 5 - RELIGION & SPIRITUALITY

Religious/Non-religious:

1. Non-religious 56 %
2. Religious 44 %

Faith Analysis:

1. Christian 46 %
2. Wiccan 27 %
3= Shaman 9 %
3= Pagan 9 %
3= Anubic 9 %

Spirituality/Faith Balance:

1. About Equal 82 %
2= More Important 9 %
2= Less Important 9 %

Therianthropy/Faith Conflict:

1. Supports Faith 82 %
2= Opposes Faith 9 %
2= Neither 9 %

Born Into Wrong Body?

1. No 72 %
2. Yes 28 %

>>> This result surprises me. I fully expected it to be the inverse...

SECTION 6 - ACTIVITIES & INTERESTS

Level of Regular Exercise:

1. Casual Exerciser 76 %
2. Couch Potato 20 %
3. Fit Athlete 4 %

Member of Interest Group:

1. Yes 56 %
2. No 44 %

Therianthropy-linked Interests:

1. Yes 76 %
2. No 24 %


SECTION 7 - RELATIONSHIPS & SEX

Sexuality:

1. Bisexual 52 %
2. Heterosexual 36 %
3. Homosexual 8 %
4. Not Sure 4 %

>>> Another result that doesn't seem to conform to society's general
>>> views. Pretty cool, I think. It shows that not only are we more
>>> accepting, but that we also trust each other enough to be open about
>>> our sexuality.

Marital Status:

1. Single 64 %
2. Committed long-term 36 %

>>> Yes I know there are a couple of married weres, but they didn't
>>> enter the survey, okay? :)

Virginity:

1. No 72 %
2. Yes 16 %
3. Yes, through choice 12 %

Current Sexual Relationships:

1. No 60 %
2. Yes 40 %

Were partners:

1. No 70 %
2. Yes 30 %

>>> Lucky thirty percent!

Importance of Sex:

1. Important 60 %
2. Could do without it 20 %
3. Essential 12 %
4. Not Important 8 %

Therianthropic Advantages in Sex:

(Percentages that replied "yes")

1. Changes your attitude to sex 80 %
2. Increases sexual appetite 68 %
3. Increases your skill as a lover 52 %
4. Increases sexual stamina 36 %

>>> It's official! Weres are better lovers!!! (Just kidding, humans!) :)

Sexual Attraction to Phenotype (ie - werewolf attracted to canids):

1. Yes, same phenotype 60 %
2. Not attracted 28 %
3. Yes, more than one 12 %

>>> Now this *is* interesting... nearly three-quarters of the pack are zoo!

Nature of Zoosexual Attraction:

1. Bisexual 68 %
2. Heterosexual 26 %
3. Homosexual 6 %

Frequency of Zoosexual Experience:

1. Never 64 %
2. More than once 20 %
3. Continually 12 %
4. Once only 4 %


SECTION 8 - MORAL ISSUES

An experiment in were attitudes...

A family member that you are close to (father/mother/brother/sister) is
trapped in a burning building, along with an eminent professor who has a
formula that would give you the power of physical change into your
were-animal at will. You only have the time to save one of them. Which
do you choose to save?

1. Family Member 72 %
2. Professor 28 %

>>> Reasons in favour of saving the family member were generally that
>>> saving the professor would be a wholly selfish act. Reasons against
>>> mostly involved the were not being close to family.


SUMMARY

Although it involved a lot of time and effort, I'm very pleased with how
this survey has turned out. I would like to thank everyone that responded.

So what has it told us about this pack? Well, there are some very
interesting points that have been made. Firstly, the species
distribution is, as we all suspected, very much in favour of the wolf.
We also have a promising gender ratio, with approximately three males to
every female, as opposed to the Internet's overall figure of 10:1,
sometimes quoted as high as 12:1. The average age of the AHWW
packmember is a little over 23 and a half years, which is a couple of
years older than I expected.

I won't go over everything, as I'm sure you can see the figures for
yourselves. Once again, thank you for your time in responding. I now
throw open the floor for discussion...
--
-- Asikaa -- Spiritual wolf, short story writer, artist,
lover of all things canine, reluctant human.
VoiceMail & Telephone Often found on FurryMUCK and SPR
(44) 0956 823041 http://http2.brunel.ac.uk:8080/~ee94pjc
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zoological Organization Of Public Help Information Leaflets and Education

Keith Pepin/AmigaWolf/VAXwolf/DECwolf

unread,
Feb 22, 1996, 3:00:00 AM2/22/96
to
In article <4gcq6a$b...@fourier.brunel.ac.uk>, ee9...@brunel.ac.uk
(Asikaa) wrote:

> SECTION 8 - MORAL ISSUES
>
> An experiment in were attitudes...
>
> A family member that you are close to (father/mother/brother/sister) is
> trapped in a burning building, along with an eminent professor who has a
> formula that would give you the power of physical change into your
> were-animal at will. You only have the time to save one of them. Which
> do you choose to save?
>
> 1. Family Member 72 %
> 2. Professor 28 %
>
> >>> Reasons in favour of saving the family member were generally that
> >>> saving the professor would be a wholly selfish act. Reasons against
> >>> mostly involved the were not being close to family.

Heh, I'd save the professor. I don't need the formula, but I'd gladly
watch the family member die in agony... Then I'd give the formula to every
one here :-)

Also noted- 2/3rds of AHWW is zoo, but 64% have never had sex with an animal??

Hey, you people, YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE MISSING!!

[And for those of you with the worry 'What if my dog doesn't want to screw
me', do you HONESTLY think a large dog would let you do what you wanted
with NO show of resistance??!?!!?!??!?!!??!!?]

--
Keith Pepin- AmigaWolf
Obsessed with all things Amiga, lover of all things lupine
----****####****----
Want to save money on your next phone bill? E-mail aw...@loa.com and tell me YOU WANT TO SAVE MONEY!

LadyD76473

unread,
Feb 23, 1996, 3:00:00 AM2/23/96
to
(Asikaa) writes:

>Phenotypes:
>
> 1. Wolf 56 %
> 2= Bear 8 %
> 2= Cat 8 %
> 2= Dog 8 %
> 3= Lynx 4 %
> 3= Panther 4 %
> 3= Windigo 4 %
> 3= Fox 4 %
> 3= Not were 4 %

Can we assume from this that were-coyotes don't like to fill out survey
forms?

Alone Wolf

//I am just a worthless liar//I am just an imbecile//
//I will only complicate you//Trust in me and fall as well//
//I will find the center in you//I will chew it up and leave//
//Trust me//Trust me.// --Tool

0 new messages