Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Problem..
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Jim Bianchi
Dec 24, 2011, 1:12:40 PM12/24/11
to
Well, t'other day I dug out one of my old Walthams, wound it up and
set it to the US Bureau of Standards atomic clock. Next day I checked it
against the same standard and wouldn'tcha know? Damn atomic clock had lost
two and a half minutes!
--
ji...@sonic.net
Linux: gawk, date, finger, wait, unzip, touch, nice, suck, strip, mount,
fsck, umount, make clean, sleep. (Who needs porn when you have /usr/bin?)
set it to the US Bureau of Standards atomic clock. Next day I checked it
against the same standard and wouldn'tcha know? Damn atomic clock had lost
two and a half minutes!
--
ji...@sonic.net
Linux: gawk, date, finger, wait, unzip, touch, nice, suck, strip, mount,
fsck, umount, make clean, sleep. (Who needs porn when you have /usr/bin?)
John Nice
Dec 24, 2011, 5:22:43 PM12/24/11
to
"Jim Bianchi" <ji...@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:slrnjfc5go...@bolt.sonic.net...
> Well, t'other day I dug out one of my old Walthams, wound it up and
> set it to the US Bureau of Standards atomic clock. Next day I checked it
> against the same standard and wouldn'tcha know? Damn atomic clock had lost
> two and a half minutes!
And a merry Christmas to you too!
> set it to the US Bureau of Standards atomic clock. Next day I checked it
> against the same standard and wouldn'tcha know? Damn atomic clock had lost
> two and a half minutes!
John
Revision
Dec 31, 2011, 9:06:04 AM12/31/11
to
> > Well, t'other day I dug out one of my old Walthams, wound it up and
> > set it to the US Bureau of Standards atomic clock. Next day I checked it
> > against the same standard and wouldn'tcha know? Damn atomic clock had lost
> > two and a half minutes!
>
> And a merry Christmas to you too!
>
> John
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/I4agzH7ElLxj1A23GevHk9MTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink
0 new messages