that is, the volume of the alarms (which now number at least three,
rather than just one as in the non-shock ironman models) is far too
low--much lower than on the non-shock ironman.
my theory: the engineers simply forgot the sound won't penetrate the
thicker case as well and didn't compensate for the additional
thickness.
i have repeatedly emailed timex about this, but i have never even
received a response, much less the back-and-forth that i should think
the company might engage in with a customer who cares enough to assess
its products carefully and analytically.
any feedback would be welcome!
dan richman
seattle
or they simply don't care.
>
> i have repeatedly emailed timex about this, but i have never even
> received a response, much less the back-and-forth that i should think
> the company might engage in with a customer who cares enough to assess
> its products carefully and analytically.
>
well I have a Casio triple sensor watch that I cannot hear the alarm
even with the watch up next to my ear, it is basically useless but then
I didn't buy it for the alarm.
the only alarms I like are the old Seiko bellmatics and JLC memovox and
other mechanical alarms that actually vibrate on the wrist as well sound
on a bell or gong.
better luck next time
Beau G.
"Beau G." <mt6...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1195051359.2...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
Beau G.
On Nov 14, 11:13 am, "Jack Denver" <nunuv...@netscape.net> wrote:
> My daughter (13 yrs old.) wears an Timex Ironman (ladies size - Ironlady?)
> and is pretty hard on it, but there's never been any problem with the
> pushers. I do recall that there is a little spring that transmits the
> vibration from the buzzer to the back which acts as a diaphragm. You might
> want to check your watch to see if this spring is in place and to be sure
> the back is not installed upside down which would put the spring in the
> wrong place.
>
> "Beau G." <mt69...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> seattle- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -