Philosophical point: if a fake is as well-made (or almost
so) as the original, where does that leave the original?
Most complaints about fakes centre on their shoddy
manufacture, but if the quality is comparable to the genuine
article, does that not make it a real alternative?
> Philosophical point: if a fake is as well-made (or almost
> so) as the original, where does that leave the original?
> Most complaints about fakes centre on their shoddy
> manufacture, but if the quality is comparable to the genuine
> article, does that not make it a real alternative?
>
If it keeps good time and is useful for several years it leaves the real
thing in the dust. It is not as if you were buying AND USING a fake Leica.
Once we can simulate reality, the lines between reality and simulation
dissappear. It already happenned on TV, computers, etc. Are we living in a real
world?
Andres
I love Replica's, and I'm on the ebaY "safe harbor" forum a lot,
warning and getting cancelled any overtly deceptive auction I see.
Bottom line is, if the auctioneer makes up some bull shit like
"sold as is" "or from an estate sale" so no papers, or history,
that's a dead giveaway it's a fake. A true estate sale dealer
would have anything real appraised to increase the estates proceeds.
With the Fake racket, the Internet is a double edge sword.
Anyone willing to plunk down major coin to buy a watch that
may be a fake can EASILY find info from the maker site
of various online forums to get some basic authentication info.
Anyone who doesn't bother deserves what they pay for...
I hate Replica/Fake sellers who mislead/misrepresent their watches,
but I have no pity whatsoever on their ridiculously stupid victims.
"Erik" <YRL...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:719fc4c.03081...@posting.google.com...