The vast majority of the catastrophic damage here was due to flooding,
not wind.
>
> What will you do if you get something like the 1938 storm, a real Cat
> 3 running right up the Jersey shore and into Long Island?
Same thing that happened with Sandy, same thing that has happened in FL
many times, have a lot of damage. What happened in Homestead, FL, for
example?
> >One of the things I find interesting is that 6 of the directors of TX ERCOT or whatever
> >their state electric regulating authority is called, resigned. None of them lived in
> >TX. Yet that big dope Abbott comes out swinging, trying to blame alternative energy
> >for the massive failure. From what I see, it was far more attributable to failure
> >of fossil fuel plants and nukes, to ERCOT estimating a worse case demand wrong,
> >it turned out to be 30%+ higher and to TX choosing not to be connected to national
> >grids. Even some of the alternative energy failure was due to windmills freezing
> >because they chose not to pay extra for the cold options. And sadly when you have
> >a jerk governor spewing BS and lies, it quickly gets picked up by the usual bunch,
> >including Qanon, because it's what they want to hear and they can spin it into
> >another conspiracy claim.
> >
> They were seriously unprepared but they did not plan on it getting
> this cold for this long. The parallels are striking tho.
I don't know that the failure had much to do with the duration of the cold.
The cold came and within a day or so they failed, isn't that what happened?
The biggest two factors I've heard so far was that they underestimated
peak demand by 30% or more. That's not a time dependent thing, if you
don't have the capacity, you don't have it, all it has to do is get cold enough
to exceed your capacity. The frozen windmills, if it's cold and freezing
rain, they freeze up, it doesn't take a week. Natural gas lines, not sure about,
but I would suspect that what froze was above ground and it didn't take very
long to freeze that either. Some of this seems really stupid too, like the
nuke going offline because of a sensor on the intake being frozen or
something? You would think there would be plenty of warning, that the
operators could have seen it happening, fix it, solve it, before it went offline
or failing that quickly get it going again. At least they didn't Chernobyl it.
I suppose if they did though, Abbott would be blaming that on alternative
energy too.