On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 7:17:39 PM UTC-4, Tony Hwang wrote:
> >
> I think you made a right decision. ECM motor is known for poor reliability.
> PSC motor will have less efficiency using more power but I don't know
> how much in real life.
I'm betting that it's a small enough difference that I'd never
recover the increased cost.
ECM ~$240 (that's at the one place that had a price so low
I'm not sure it's real, others were ~$360+
PSC + Cap + cap bracket $85
That's a diff of $165, assuming that low price is real. I looked
at my bills recently for last summer. Looked like the AC in July/Aug
was only ~$40 a month above April/May or Sept. And that's for the
whole AC system! The condenser fan is only 1/3 hp.
I've seen online estimates that ECM saves about 20% compared
to a regular motor when they are both run the same way. The
way they get crazy low numbers for ECM is when they are able
to run it at only 1/2 speed. Like they have numbers that show
an ECM blower can be run 24/7 for low $$, but they don't tell
you that's with it running a fractional speed. If you run
any fan at fractional speed, then you do get substantial savings.
It's like a pool pump. You can get great savings by having
a 2 speed pump. You run it at half speed for twice as long,
but it saves a lot on energy because the power goes down as
the cube of speed. (I think it's cube, maybe even higher).
The 2 speed motor costs $200. Then there are pump manufacturers
selling snake oil variable speed ECM pumps, touting their great
savings. The vast majority of those savings are because they
run it at 1/2 speed or around there. Some additional savings
are because it's ECM. But the freaking things cost $1200.
You do the math. And then, what happens when the electronics
in that variable speed pump crap out, just like my experience
here? The dual speed gives you 80% of the energy savings,
it has no electronics to fail and it costs $200. Just my
2 cents.