On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:42:17 -0400, Art Todesco <
acto...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Astigmatism is a little more complicated than that. There is an angle
thrown in there, too. Basically it's the difference between a
spherical lens and a cylindrical lens, with "strength" and angle of
the cylinder.
>Plus there are others, which are way beyond my
>understanding. But, if he won't give you the information, find a new
>eye doctor.
+1
>BTW, someone once told me to never go to an ophthalmologist
>for fitting glasses .... optometrists do a better job because this is
>what they do. And, not all optometrists are created equal.
Not all ophthalmologists are created equally, either. ;-) However,
if you don't have any abnormalities, going to an MD is a waste of his
time and your money. You're better off with a good OD (how to find
one is another issue). An OD can easily refer you to an
ophthalmologist, if necessary.
>As for
>'readers' it's not that big a deal, unless you have a more complicated
>prescription.
Prescription "readers"? I thought the definitions were opposite
(prescription, off-the-shelf). I do have prescription glasses for
reading but I've never heard them referred to as "readers".
>Use what works for you for the task you are doing.
>Actually, my wife has a very difficult prescription for contacts,
Some can't be fitted for contacts at all.
>however, any readers work for her ... she uses mine.
Strange. She must just be near sighted. I wouldn't think that would
be a problem for contacts at all.