On Tuesday, March 2, 2021 at 4:31:56 PM UTC-5, Ralph Mowery wrote:
> In article <xlx%H.28396$w%1.4...@fx03.iad>, e...@snet.xxx says...
> > They could have got their electricity from a conventional utility if
> > > they wanted a safe contract.
> > >
> > This is far beyond not safe. I'm sure many of these people knew there
> > was a risk but there is no justification for $100 bills becoming $10,000
> > with little or no notice. None. Totally immoral.
> >
> > Show me where this has happened and where it would be considered "normal
> > risk" or even a high risk.
> >
> >
> If the rates had gone up maybe 5 times it would not be too bad, but for
> electricity to jump 100 times without warning is just not right.
Agree. And keep in mind, if it went up 5x for a few days, it would still not
have a huge impact on your bill for a month. If you had a $100 monthly
bill, that's $3 a day. If it went up 5x, that would be $15 a day for three days.
Let;s say that because of the cold weather, your usage went up 5x too.
That would be $75 a day for three days or $225. So you'd have a monthly
bill of ~$325. But they are getting bills for $10K, $16k
>
> AS mentioned, I do not know anything about the TX system. Are there
> several kinds of options such as paying a flat rate per KWH or like the
> natural gas where you can take out contrct to pay so much per unit at a
> certain time frame ?
It sounds like they have an arrangement like we do here in NJ. Our bills
come from the utility, JCPL, that has been the power company forever.
But the bill is in two parts, a charge for generation and a charge for delivery.
For generation JCPL used to be the only choice. Then maybe in the
90s regulators changed the scheme so that you could choose either JCPL
or other suppliers for the generation. Several companies started sending
mailings, offering you the option to switch to them for lower cost. I looked
at it a few times. Their energy costs were a little lower, but not enough
that it made a substantial difference. The rate here now is about 13 cents,
that's total, about half for delivery, half for the generation. So if JCPl was
at 6.5 cents for the generation, these other suppliers might have been at
5.5 cents. So your total cost would be 12 cents instead of 13, which isn't
much. I never switched because of concerns that it was only a small gain,
could go the other way, etc. But I can see some elderly living on SS where
$5 a month is significant to them and they switch. And the typical marketing
offer says something like save ten to fifteen percent on your energy costs.
People see that, don't realize that the energy cost is only half their bill,
so they think their $100 bill will go down to $85 or $90. In reality it would
go to $92 to $95, assuming the energy was cheaper and stayed there.
Those were the kinds of numbers I saw and decided it wasn't worth it.
>
> It is often possible that many do not read or know how to read the fine
> print in many contracts. Just as I have been trying to find out how
> much cable and direct TV is. They show big numbers whre you can seen
> them, then at the bottom of the page it usually just says 'for 6
> months' or whatever but no price after that.
Yes and there should be some regulations that prevent what happened in TX.
I see the chowder head GOP governor just removed the requirement to wear
masks for the whole state. More brilliance, how many people will die from that?