Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Gas valve on flexible pipe??

500 views
Skip to first unread message

Ken

unread,
Jun 13, 2013, 7:55:44 AM6/13/13
to
A couple of years ago I had my furnace replaced and the installer
installed the gas cutoff valve for the furnace on the flexible Gas
Appliance Connector rather than on the rigid pipe feeding it. I
objected and made him run additional rigid pipe up to the point at which
the cutoff valve was installed because I saw it as unsafe. Yesterday I
was talking to a plumber who was installing rigid pipe for a gas
connection and mentioned my objection to the gas valve being installed
on flexible connecting pipe. He implied that it was not illegal. The
type of piping I am talking about can be seen at:

http://www.menards.com/main/plumbing/rough-plumbing/pipe-tubing-fittings/pipes/flexible-gas-pipes/gas-appliance-connector-with-efv/p-1932464-c-9448.htm
I realize there are many new choices for connecting gas that did not
exist years ago, so perhaps he is referring to one of those? My
question is: Is it legal (to code) to put a cutoff valve on flexible
piping such as the link above shows, or must it be on rigid pipe??

tra...@optonline.net

unread,
Jun 13, 2013, 8:48:33 AM6/13/13
to
On Jun 13, 7:55 am, Ken <K...@invalid.com> wrote:
>         A couple of years ago I had my furnace replaced and the installer
> installed the gas cutoff valve for the furnace on the flexible Gas
> Appliance Connector rather than on the rigid pipe feeding it.  I
> objected and made him run additional rigid pipe up to the point at which
> the cutoff valve was installed because I saw it as unsafe.  Yesterday I
> was talking to a plumber who was installing rigid pipe for a gas
> connection and mentioned my objection to the gas valve being installed
> on flexible connecting pipe.  He implied that it was not illegal.  The
> type of piping I am talking about can be seen at:
>
> http://www.menards.com/main/plumbing/rough-plumbing/pipe-tubing-fitti...
>         I realize there are many new choices for connecting gas that did not
> exist years ago, so perhaps he is referring to one of those?  My
> question is:  Is it legal (to code) to put a cutoff valve on flexible
> piping such as the link above shows, or must it be on rigid pipe??

It's an interesting question. I think the key to your question may be
what's the definition of "installed on a flexible connecting pipe".
Seems
there are several possibilities:

A - It's installed in the middle of a flex line and the valve itself
is not
secured to anything other than the flex pipe.

B - It's on one end of a flex line and the other end of the valve is
connected to rigid pipe.

C - It's installed in the middle of a flex line and the valve is
fastened
to a support

From what your furnace guy was going to do sounds like it was
method A. I would not think that would be allowed, but then one
would think that if this was a real HVAC company doing the install,
they would be familiar with the code. If an inspection/permit was
required, then you would think the installers would know what is
or isn't allowed or else it's going to fail.

I would think option C would have to be allowed, because CSST
is used for all kinds of gas piping now, not just for short connection
to an appliance. So, if you have CSST running through a building,
you're going to have to have valves in places.

Hopefully someone will know the actual code.

Ken

unread,
Jun 13, 2013, 10:06:42 AM6/13/13
to
Sorry for the confusion, I guess I should have been more explicit.

Originally, the gas valve was attached to rigid pipe and a flex line
(about 2 foot) was run from the gas control valve to the old furnace.
This is how most gas connections are made to things like gas clothes
dryers. When he took out the original furnace, he changed the position
of it in a way that the existing rigid pipe was several (perhaps six)
feet away from the control area of the furnace. (Where the access
panels are) In order to make the connection from the existing rigid
pipe to the new furnace, he removed the cut off valve from the rigid
pipe, attached a flex pipe about 6-8 feet long, attached the cut off
valve to the end of it, and finally ran a 2 foot flex pipe to the
furnace control valve. In other words, the cut off valve was at the end
of a long flex pipe and not directly attached to rigid pipe.

I hope the above clarifies the situation. Of the choices above, I
would say that (A) was probably the best description. I felt
uncomfortable with a flex line that long and felt it was vulnerable with
no way to cut off the gas if it leaked. Perhaps I was overly cautious?

recycl...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 13, 2013, 10:18:40 AM6/13/13
to
I don’t know the exact NPC code but that is definitely illegal.

DD_BobK

unread,
Jun 13, 2013, 11:16:21 AM6/13/13
to
On Jun 13, 7:06 am, Ken <K...@invalid.com> wrote:
In other words.... he did a hack job / "scab on" because he wanted to
finish in the minimum amount of time.

"He implied that it was not illegal." Of course he did... to support
his poor installation job.

In dependent of whether it was legal or not, how many people would
chose that installation means over piped close & valve securely
anchored?

The code is the minimum acceptable standard.. the minimum is not
always "best practice".

cl...@snyder.on.ca

unread,
Jun 13, 2013, 5:12:35 PM6/13/13
to
It's legal, but certainly not "smart".

samjoh...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 14, 2013, 8:18:20 AM6/14/13
to
This is really great information

Oren

unread,
Jun 14, 2013, 2:51:09 PM6/14/13
to
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:06:42 -0500, Ken <K...@invalid.com> wrote:

>When he took out the original furnace, he changed the position
>of it in a way that the existing rigid pipe was several (perhaps six)
>feet away from the control area of the furnace.

What I hear you say is that this installer would not spend a few bucks
to extend the rigid pipe closer to the connection point and put the
valve on the rigid pipe.

I would not have a gas valve in the middle of a flex line that you
showed. That is silly, even it MAY happen to be legal, but I would
disagree that it is.

Just sayin'

tra...@optonline.net

unread,
Jun 14, 2013, 4:38:01 PM6/14/13
to
On Jun 13, 10:06 am, Ken <K...@invalid.com> wrote:
> trad...@optonline.net wrote:
> > On Jun 13, 7:55 am, Ken <K...@invalid.com> wrote:
> >>          A couple of years ago I had my furnace replaced and the installer
> >> installed the gas cutoff valve for the furnace on the flexible Gas
> >> Appliance Connector rather than on the rigid pipe feeding it.  I
> >> objected and made him run additional rigid pipe up to the point at which
> >> the cutoff valve was installed because I saw it as unsafe.  Yesterday I
> >> was talking to a plumber who was installing rigid pipe for a gas
> >> connection and mentioned my objection to the gas valve being installed
> >> on flexible connecting pipe.  He implied that it was not illegal.  The
> >> type of piping I am talking about can be seen at:
>
> >>http://www.menards.com/main/plumbing/rough-plumbing/pipe-tubing-fitti...
> >>          I realize there are many new choices for connecting gas that did not
> >> exist years ago, so perhaps he is referring to one of those?  My
> >> question is:  Is it legal (to code) to put a cutoff valve on flexible
> >> piping such as the link above shows, or must it be on rigid pipe??
>
> dryers.  When he took out the original furnace, he changed the position
> of it in a way that the existing rigid pipe was several (perhaps six)
> feet away from the control area of the furnace.  (Where the access
> panels are)  In order to make the connection from the existing rigid
> pipe to the new furnace, he removed the cut off valve from the rigid
> pipe, attached a flex pipe about 6-8 feet long, attached the cut off
> valve to the end of it, and finally ran a 2 foot flex pipe to the
> furnace control valve.  In other words, the cut off valve was at the end
> of a long flex pipe and not directly attached to rigid pipe.
>
>         I hope the above clarifies the situation.  Of the choices above, I
> would say that (A) was probably the best description.  I felt
> uncomfortable with a flex line that long and felt it was vulnerable with
> no way to cut off the gas if it leaked.  Perhaps I was overly cautious?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I don't think you were overly cautious. I'd say you have good
sense and the installer did not. Your better description seems
to indicate another problem, which is I don't believe a flexible
pipe like that is permitted to pass through the cabinet
opening of a furnace. The concern being that if it touches the
cabinet, vibration from the furnace could cause the line to fail
over time. Normally, black pipe is used to come out of the
cabinet. Then you have a tee, one end going down and capped
off to form a short stub that is supposed to help prevent any
debris, condensate etc from getting into the furnace. The the
gas valve is usually located right there by the tee, or close by,
again with black pipe.



Was there a permit? Inspection required? You sure would
think that someone doing pro furnace installs would know
what it takes to pass inspection. It ain't that hard. I put my
own furnace in and it passed first time. I used all rigid black
pipe, but the flex stuff is permitted too, at least in most areas.

micky

unread,
Jun 15, 2013, 1:23:46 AM6/15/13
to
Isn't the weakness of flex pipe that it leaks after enough flexing?

What good is it to put the valve on the end of a leaking pipe?

It should be on the end of a pipe that doesn't leak.

tra...@optonline.net

unread,
Jun 15, 2013, 10:01:59 AM6/15/13
to
On Jun 15, 1:23 am, micky <NONONOmis...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> It should be on the end of a pipe that doesn't leak.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

While I agree it should go before the flex pipe when connecting an
appliance, there is still some purpose to the valve in any case.
It's primary use is to shut off the gas while connecting or
disconnecting
the appliance.

cl...@snyder.on.ca

unread,
Jun 16, 2013, 7:43:02 PM6/16/13
to
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 01:23:46 -0400, micky <NONONO...@bigfoot.com>
wrote:
And pipe that can leak should not be allowed.
0 new messages