On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 00:36:44 +0200, nestork
<
nestork...@diybanter.com> wrote:
>
>I don't believe there'd be anything in the code requiring a person to
>remove breakers that aren't being used, but I'd take them out if it wuz
>me.
>
>Doing so makes it immediately obvious that those spaces aren't being
>used. If you ever hire an electrician, he might not notice that there
>aren't any wires going to those breakers, and end up putting new
>breakers in somewhere else. This way, the electrician would realize
>that those spaces are available and use them instead. And that's the
>way I'd want it done if it were my house.
I've dealt with many electricians both residential and industrial. If
one of them did not check when the breaker was marked "spare" he'd not
be working for me. Every single time they would take the cover off
and check inside. We have one panel that has 20 spares now than
everything used by the previous owner moved out. Our insurance
inspector notices in about 5 seconds so I imagine a good electrician
would be as quick.