I finished a bedroom in our lower level that was framed by the builders. I
added wiring, sheetrocked, etc.
I never obtained a building permit. What would likely happen if I turned
myself in? Now don't go nuts with constitutional stuff and a debate about
building permits in general. I just want to know what is likely to happen.
BTW, I live in MN.
The addition the guy added on did not even meet code!
Wayne
"Bill Johnson" <bi...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:QUbg9.459442$UU1.74923@sccrnsc03...
Bill Johnson wrote:
If you're Norwegian, it's ok. If you're Swedish, they'll shoot you.
It's probably best to call anonymously (from a pay phone if you're really
paranoid <grin>) and see how the planning department responds.
-Tim
"Bill Johnson" <bi...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:QUbg9.459442$UU1.74923@sccrnsc03...
"wayne" <dontb...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:O_bg9.288165$_91.3...@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net...
Existing Garage is =
New section is --
===================================
|| ------------------------------------------------------- ||
|| | | |
||
|| | | |
||
|| | | |
||
|| | | |
||
|| | | |
||
|| | | |
||
|| | | |
||
|| | | |
||
|| ------------------------------------------------------- ||
===================================
Thanks!
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Doug Lumpkin
That's going to depend on the inspector that shows up.
The whole purpose of inspection is to see that the building is up to code.
By the book, he should make you tear off any drywall, so he can see any
wiring or piping, ect...
What you have going for you, is they probably inspected the framing if it
was done with the rest of the framing.
If I were you, I'd call the building dept. and play dumb.
Your biggest concern with your basement bedroom, will probably be egress.
If you have a basement bedroom, I'm pretty sure you need to have a fire
exit.
Good luck
-G.
--
Memorable/humorous post message text
> building a recording studio
http://www.davidlandon.com/whiprecords/history.html
There's a lot to know about building a studio.
The above link talks about a floating floor.
I didn't read the web page, but a quick google seach for "building a
recording studio" turned up 400 hits.
One thing for sure, is you don't want square walls. You don't want flat
square walls facing each other. This would create a slapback effect, and
certain frequencies will bounce around and cause bad recordings.
Of course, if you'll be doing any rap, it won't matter. :)
Contrary to popular belief building permits have more to do with
increasing taxes than they do with code requirements. My dad was told to
call when he finished building a porch so that it could be inspected. The
inspector never showed up, but the county assesor was there the next day.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
This probably happens thousands of times each day. Since the room is
completed I don't see any advantage in getting a permit. Unless the room
has a means of egress, then you probably couldn't list it as a bedroom when
you sell the house. Why are you concerned about getting a permit now as
opposed to when you were doing the work ? Just curious.
> Contrary to popular belief building permits have more to do with
> increasing taxes than they do with code requirements. My dad was told
> to call when he finished building a porch so that it could be
> inspected. The inspector never showed up, but the county assesor was
> there the next day.
How many times do I have to tell you not to sniff glue?
>Contrary to popular belief building permits have more to do with
>increasing taxes than they do with code requirements. My dad was told to
>call when he finished building a porch so that it could be inspected. The
>inspector never showed up, but the county assesor was there the next day.
I had the opposite experience on my property taxes. The value of the property was $95,000. I
demolished the existing house and garage almost two years ago. Got a building permit and
built a new house that was finished last November.
Got a notice of my propery value as of Jan 1, 2002. The value actually dropped to $91,000.
Gee, I guess that $200,000 I invested in the new house has no value.
I don't know if the county assessor can go back and correct the value if he made a mistake.
I guess I'll see when the property tax bill payable in 2003 arrives early next year. I'm
betting the value on my property will be much higher on Jan 1, 2003.
Brian Elfert
I guess what's hard to show in ASCII is a 5% splay for the walls :-)
Anyhow. I'm not to worried about how to design it as I am about how to
build it. The acoustics I understand, the construction I'm a few steps
behind...
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Doug Lumpkin
I my area the real-estate tax records are on line. You can see the value of
the land and any buildings. The dates that they were build and any permits
that were issued are also available. Maybe your tax bill was for the land
only? Buildings under construction aren't taxed as far as I know. Maybe
you can look up the tax record online and tell what is going on.
Do you have a point? Or perhaps your just trolling.
> In article <Xns928863F3A7AC...@207.217.77.25>,
> anim...@yahoo.com says...
>> KenJr opened all of our eyes with this:
>>
>>
>> > Contrary to popular belief building permits have more to do with
>> > increasing taxes than they do with code requirements. My dad was told
>> > to call when he finished building a porch so that it could be
>> > inspected. The inspector never showed up, but the county assesor was
>> > there the next day.
>>
>> How many times do I have to tell you not to sniff glue?
>>
>
> Do you have a point? Or perhaps your just trolling.
I figured you were high on glue to write something that stupid.
You're making a broad sweeping generalization about inspections, based on
one experience that your Dad had.
How much experience do you have with inspections?
Would that be a rock and ROLL studio. Wow, that's not punny.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Doug Lumpkin
In our town they re-evaluate every ten years. They will inspect and asses
any improvements or changes, but never ask about permits. My house had two
permits. One when it was built. The other was when it was re-roofed. They
took the $25 for a permit, but no one ever showed up to look. All I have is
a receipt the roofing contractor gave me. He got it to cover his ass as he
would be working outside for 2+ days.
Ed
e...@snet.net
http://pages.cthome.net/edhome
>You're making a broad sweeping generalization about inspections, based on
>one experience that your Dad had.
>How much experience do you have with inspections?
I am an inspector and I can assure you it IS only money in a lot of cases.
Certainly inspectors are interested in safety but a lot of municipalities
expect an inspector to do 30 or more a day so the polititans certainly aren't.
I am fortunate that I don't live with a time constraint or I would be looking
for another employer.
BTW what is your answer for permits that don't need an inspection to be closed?
It is used as a way to get around property tax increase "caps". If you improve
the property you take the "cap" off.
Let me put it this way then. In Cambria county in the state Pennsylvania,
building permits are used more for tax purposes than they are to insure
building codes.
My experience is with more than my dad. I've run into the same situation
a couple of times myself. When I rewired my house I ended up hiring my
own inspector just for my own peice of mind. I also know a number of
people who have had simular experiences.
Of all the people I know who have done work to their houses in this area
not a single one of them has seen an inspector. Without exception,
everyone of them has had the county assesor come shortly after completion
of the work.
Perhaps in other areas of the country things are different.
The purpose of the permit, at least their justification for it, is so
they can ascertain that the improvement meets code. I think most people
agree that meeting or exceeding code is a good thing.
The problem when a permit is not obtained until after the work is that
it may be difficult to confirm that code was met. If the only concealed
work is electrical, I would guess that the inspector, if he wanted,
could, through talking to you and observing the part of the work that is
exposed, sign off without opening up any walls. He would want to know,
for example, what wire you used; if you have some left and can show him,
that may satisfy him.
I say may satisfy him because the personality factor comes into play.
If he's a twit, you are dead. If you're a twit, you are dead.
I would go ahead and get the permit. It is becoming more and more
common that an inspection is required when the property is sold,
especially in urban areas. If such an inspection is required, and they
find unpermitted work, they tend to get their dander up, and of course
at that time you are under time constraints to complete the sale.
My town, in Ohio, is very urban and crowded, with old homestock. If one
house goes ablaze, the neighbors usually get burned too. Because of
this, our building department is very aggressive. The only time I have
had permitted work not inspected, I asked the tradesman, and he told me
some recognized tradesmen are allowed by the city to inspect their own
work. I later talked with a city inspector and he confirmed that. Our
inspectors are aggressive in that they always show up, but I don't have
a problem when they find some error in my own work, as they invariably
tell me how to correct it.
--
SPAMBLOCK NOTICE! To reply to me, delete the h from apkh.net, if it is
there.
otoh if youre sure everything is safe and up to code (I'd check for my
own safety and peace of mind)............. i always wondered why my
property taxes keep going up each year :)
On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:39:54 -0400, William Brown <wbr...@apk.net>
wrote:
I've built a couple of professional recording studios. You don't want
parallel surfaces because of standing waves but you also don't want a
polygon with corners < 90 degrees either because that will create, in
effect, a horn which will create all sorts of room sound anomalies.
Don't forget that the wall and floor are also parallel surfaces.
There's really not much architectural acoustics possible with
something as small as half a garage space though so I wouldn't get
too wrapped up in acoustical design.
F. Alton Everest wrote probably the most readable books on small
recording studio construction.
------------------------------------------=o&>o----
Steve Manes, Brooklyn, USA
www.magpie.com
Right. This is why many houses are sold as having x-bedrooms and a den (or
more recently a "home office"). By calling it something else and saying no
one sleeps in there the codes are not as strict.
I don't know anything about Oregon but for any of the codes I'm familiar
with it would be exempt because it is not attached to the building
structure. That fact alone qualifies it as a "temporary construction" and
therefor of no interest to the building inspectors anywhere I have lived.
Right on the money. The City of St. Paul, MN is so blatant about it that
the requirement for whether or not you need a permit is (and I quote),
"...if said improvement will increase the value of the property by $300 or
more...".
Naturally there is no recipricol inspection for things that *reduce* the
property value. Our taxes are still accessed on the property having a
garage. Said garage collapsed under its own weight and was hauled off as
fire wood five years before I moved in here, but we're still forced to pay
the taxes for having it.
Huh. Our local laws allow challenging the tax assessor's assessment if
his assessment does not properly reflect material facts about the
property (such as, say, a garage or swimming pool that no longer
exists!). You have no such provisions in your local laws?
--
Eric Lee Green EMAIL: mailto:er...@badtux.org WEB: http://badtux.org
There is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress.
- Mark Twain
In NYC too. That process was at the heart of a recent scandal
involving a sizable number of crooked Finance Dept assessors and
millions of dollars of bribes. The city mails out its assessments at
the beginning of the year. You have three months to challenge them.
An assessor reinspects the property and adjusts the assessment, if
applicable.
In this case, the assessors just took an envelope for favorable
reassessments.
There sure is here in Ottawa, Canada.
cheers,
-alan
I guess it's more of a future piece of mind thing. When I sell the thing
down the road years from now, I don't want to get bit.
I know many, many people on my street that have done work without permits.
As a matter of fact, I'd say permits are the exception.
"Vox Humana" <vhu...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:nulg9.120048$N9.19...@twister.neo.rr.com...
Locally, you would have to pay double the permit fee, remove enough
drywall for inspection of electrical and possibly framing, provide
plans and diagrams, and endure the inpsections.
Jeff
"-G." <anim...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns92883761C706C...@207.217.77.24...
> Doug Lumpkin opened all of our eyes with this:
>
> > building a recording studio
>
> http://www.davidlandon.com/whiprecords/history.html
>
> There's a lot to know about building a studio.
> The above link talks about a floating floor.
> I didn't read the web page, but a quick google seach for "building a
> recording studio" turned up 400 hits.
> One thing for sure, is you don't want square walls. You don't want flat
> square walls facing each other. This would create a slapback effect, and
> certain frequencies will bounce around and cause bad recordings.
> Of course, if you'll be doing any rap, it won't matter. :)
>