To power the compressor at the higher voltage, I plan to install a 240 volt
receptacle on a dedicated 20 amp circuit. Since this circuit is intended
for a motorized appliance, the circuit must be run directly to the outdoor
service-rated panel, not an indoor sub-panel. Is this correct?
Thanks in advance.
"Banister Stairwell" <afgan...@bananastan.com> wrote in message
news:Vlsgc.6559$V17....@fe2.texas.rr.com...
I believe all you need to is to change the wires and the supply voltage.
BTW it will then draw about half the amps it did before and many have a
slight increase in performance.
--
Joseph E. Meehan
26 + 6 = 1 It's Irish Math
It's on a 20 amp circuit now and the motor draws every bit of it's rated 15
amps.
I haven't had a problem with the breaker tripping, since it's currently
plugged into the one and only 20 amp dedicated circuit receptacle in the
garage. Unfortunately, this receptale happens to be in a *very*
inconvenient location and I don't want to run the compressor with an
extension chord, nor tie up this one receptacle for the air compressor. I
figure, since I need to intall another receptical specifically for the
compressor anyway, I might as well make it a dedicated 240 volt circuit and
convert the motor to operate on 240 volts.
Besides, the motor won't draw as much current and (hopefully) won't have to
work as hard.
Power is constant. Higher volts * lower current still = same
amount of power. Workload stays the same, as does the effect on
your electric meter. Anybody told you different, they lied.
--
TP / Network Man __________________________________
If u want the races for free,
somebody has to pay for it. ($1 Earl)
You're correct, of course.
My thoughts in this case were that perhaps the motor may have been
originally designed as a 240 volt motor, with a built-in wiring setup to
accomodate 120 volts. In other words, running it at 240 volts may be better
in that (perhaps) the motor would be operating more within it's original
design parameters. Of course, this is just speculation on my part. I may
post this question to someone at Emerson Electric Co. and see what they say
(Doerr is a division of Emerson, I believe).
After looking more closely at the information plate on the motor, it does
show that the motor is rated at 7.5 amps at 230 volts. Assuming no
difference in actual motor performance from 120 to 240 volts, and other than
the new 240 volt 20 amp dedicated circuit not being maxed out amperage-wise,
are there any other compelling reasons for converting to 240 volts for this
particular application?
Thanks.
Technically this is incorrect. The amount of power delivered to the load is
the same (P=V*I) so the motor will draw 1/2 the current at 240V than it
would at 120V. But when it comes to the 'wasted power', the 240V setup
wastes less power than the 120V setup. Because the 240V setup uses 1/2 the
current, 4 times more power is wasted when using 120V (P=I^2*R). This
'wasted power' is in the form of heat in the wiring all the way back to the
transformer on the street. Also, the windings in the motor will be
producing heat. You ARE paying for the wasted power - it does show up on
your meter. However, this wasted power is so small relative to the power
consumed by the motor, that it can be neglegable.
This is where 240V helps the efficiency of the motor. As the windings
temperature increases, the resistance increases, therefore consuming more
power (therefore more power 'wasted'). Also, the life of any motor is
increased by running the motor cooler.
It would be better to run this motor at 240V because you also don't have to
worry about the motor unbalancing the electrical system. This occurs when
you have too many heavy demands on one phase (I use this term to indicate
180 deg out of phase, not 120 deg as in 3-phase) and light demands on
another phase. This causes a lower voltage on the 120V phase (and thus,
more current consumption) that has the heavy demands and a higher voltage on
the other phase.
Just my $0.02
Jeff
If the motor can be converted to 240v, there will be a wiring diagram
under the access plate that tells you what wires to swap. When you are
all done, make sure the motor does not run backwards! The compressor
should still work going backwards, but its oil pump won't work (if it
has one) and the fan on the flywheel will not blow the right direction.
If the motor runs backwards, usually you just have to reverse the two
wires you moved. Not all motors are reversable.
>>To power the compressor at the higher voltage, I plan to install a 240 volt
>>receptacle on a dedicated 20 amp circuit. Since this circuit is intended
>>for a motorized appliance, the circuit must be run directly to the outdoor
>>service-rated panel, not an indoor sub-panel. Is this correct?
An indoor subpanel is fine. Maybe I don't understand your question.
Best regards,
Bob
> After looking more closely at the information plate on the motor, it does
> show that the motor is rated at 7.5 amps at 230 volts. Assuming no
> difference in actual motor performance from 120 to 240 volts, and other than
> the new 240 volt 20 amp dedicated circuit not being maxed out amperage-wise,
> are there any other compelling reasons for converting to 240 volts for this
> particular application?
Running a convertible motor at 240V is always better than running it at 120V,
but the differences are often so small to not be worth doing anything about.
It's all in startup and at high load where the factor-of-four reduction in power
loss in the wiring at 240V over 120V will result in lower voltage drop (dips)
to the motor, easier starting, and longer life.
Compressors are almost always drawing very near full rated amps, and they
are often hard-starting. So this is particularly important for compressors.
The difference gets larger the closer the 120V circuit is to max amps, and
the longer the circuit is. If that compressor was 10A, and the total circuit
was only 20', I'd say, don't bother.
But, your compressor maxes out a 120V 15A circuit, and it's probably significantly
longer than 20'.
If it were me, I'd definately go to 240V. But I would consider leaving it a 15A
circuit on 14ga because the compressor is only half of that load. But if the
circuit is 100' or more, I'd go to 12ga (perhaps even leaving the breakers at 15A).
--
Chris Lewis, Una confibula non set est
It's not just anyone who gets a Starship Cruiser class named after them.
> If it were me, I'd definately go to 240V. But I would consider leaving it a 15A
> circuit on 14ga because the compressor is only half of that load. But if the
> circuit is 100' or more, I'd go to 12ga (perhaps even leaving the breakers at 15A).
I just reread part of this thread, and realize that the existing circuit
is 20A/120V. I'd still switch to 240V. 15A breakers, unless you intend
on sharing this circuit with other 240V equipment ("one man shop" rules
assume you'll be only running one tool at a time. Give provision for,
say, a 3HP tablesaw, and go to 20A if you think you might need it for
something else too.)
12ga if you're leaving the circuit at 15A and the circuit is going to be
longer than about 40-50'.