On Sunday, October 9, 2022 at 4:08:34 AM UTC-4, T wrote:
> On 10/8/22 23:55, micky wrote:
> > It only gave trump 300 or 400 votes iirc, and it didn't have anything to
> > do with voter fraud. It was a question about what was
> > permitted/required for curing incompletely filled-out absentee ballots.
> > The law there provided that if a mail-in ballot wasn't fully filled out,
> > the voter was allowed to complete it after the BOElections received it,
> > but there was a question about maybe the deadline date or what fields.
> > IIRC, the most commmon field was the signature, but I'm not sure. At
> > any rate, it didn't involve voter fraud.
> > So none of the cases showed voter fraud.
> > I think it's a mistake that so many people hoping to spread the truth
> > say "no cases of widespread voter fraud." Which makes it seem like
> > there was moderate amounts, maybe covering 40 or 50% of the state
> > instead of 70%. In reality it was under 1%, just like always (for the
> > last 50 years at least.)
> Hi Micky,
> You did a good job of parroting the narrative.
You did a good job at submitting opinion as if it were fact.
This is the crazy right wing news organization that is fully invested in the stolen election
lie citing a top Trump stolen election attorney's statement to Congress. There is nothing
there, no data to look at, nothing about how they did whatever analysis they claimed to have
done. We've seen this before from team Trump, just compare to lists, make giant assumptions
that people with the same name are in fact the same person, etc. That's why when this BS
gets to court, Trump loses almost every time. They brought cases based on their evidence or
actually lack thereof 64 times after the election, losing or withdrawing 63 cases. That's because
unlike testifying before a Republican committee in Congress, courts demand actual proof.
As for the this Trump lawyer and his ethics and credibility, we have this:
According to IRS records, Binnall owes the U.S. government for unpaid taxes dating back to 2010. The IRS filed a $139,242 lien against Binnall almost four years ago—in August 2018— and it covers unpaid amounts every tax year from 2010 to 2015. Records on file with the City of Alexandria, VA, show that, as of May 5, Binnall has not paid off the lien.
The central fallacy here is that because someone's cell phone was near a
drop off box, that means that they were dropping off ballots. These boxes
were at busy locations so they would be easy to access like municipal buildings,
libraries, near streets, etc. Could be a FedEx guy passing by or a car driving by
a box near a street. For starters, they didn't provide any comparison data, like
for the same locations, but in the months before voting started, to show what
kind of hits that would have resulted in. That's a very obvious comparison that
a legitimate truth seeker would have made.
Wow, you have a whopping seven people there. That sure would have changed the
election. If this is the standard, then any president could have been a scum bag
malignant narcissist sore loser and claimed his election loss was stolen. And notice
that again, there was no attempt to track this down, to go to the address, see who
lives there and try to get answers and find out what really happened. It's based on
comparing records, who knows which one is actually correct.
And what exactly was the country supposed to do with all this? We had an election,
Biden won by a wide margin. We still don't have anything that shows any widespread
fraud that could have changed that. What is it that the Republicans propose? Because
of some possible small level of irregularities that we know will exist in an election with
150 mil voters, that we just ignore the election and let the current president remain?
Let them remain for months while we battle out what to do, which will never be
resolved? We have laws that cover this, they were followed. Trump had months to
challenge this, to show actual evidence instead of just BS statements and lies. He
brought 64 cases, lost or withdrew 63, including cases like this before Republican
judges that he appointed:
Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so,” Bibas wrote in a 21-page ruling dismissing a lawsuit that sought to stop the certification of Pennsylvania's voting results. “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”
This was among the latest repudiations of President Donald Trump’s unsubstantiated claim that the election he lost to former Vice President Joe Biden was rigged and that millions of votes were illegally cast or discounted.
But Bibas, 51, is not just another judge on another court. He is a Trump appointee on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, with jurisdiction over Pennsylvania and two other states. A former member of the conservative Federalist Society, Bibas was appointed in 2017, one of 53 appellate judges the president has put on the federal bench since he took office, more than any other president since Jimmy Carter.
Bibas is not the only Republican-appointed federal judge to dismiss Trump’s claims of rampant voting fraud and tabulation irregularities. Steven Grimberg of the Northern District of Georgia and several other Republican-appointed judges, have ruled against the president.
That's were the issue is settled, not by the flapping gums of a Trumptard lawyer.
> I am sure you have a precanned narrative for those too.
> There are more, but why bother with someone who believes
> that narratives are the truth.
> Do you have a narrative for 1876's election too?
> > And Cindy here has asked you since right after the election a very
> > simple question. What did your local election officials say when you went
> > there and asked them about what you claim?
> Other did. Sec State office claimed ignorance. When
> I heard their story, I did not bother. The fix was in.
> And I told Cindy this several times too. Guess
> you missed that part. Maybe you like reading my stuff
> so much, you like me to repeat myself
Sure, I believe that. A great patriot like you, upon seeing something, somewhere
that lead you to believe that your vote was not counted, didn't go to your local
election officials and inquire. Instead you sat on your ass and relied on others
telling you things. If that part is even true, I'm sure the others were some anonymous
Trumptards on the internet.
You already do a good job repeating yourself here. I just like to point this
classic example out, because it shows that while bitching about election fraud,
when you claim to have personally found out that your vote was not
counted, you never even inquired with the local election officials to
find out if that was true or not, what happened, etc. You have REPUBLICAN
local election officials, instead of going to them, you instead go to the
internet and start spreading Trumptard BS. Why would someone that wants
to help Trump, that claims fraud, not go report and find out about their own
alleged fraud? If it was true, you could add it to one of Trump's cases,
help him prove fraud. You could take it to the media, maybe you;d get on TV
to tell your example. You didn't go to your election officials either
because it's a lie or you figured that they would clear it up and the result
would be that your vote was in fact counted. If this really happened to me,
I would have been over to the local election officials immediately because
I would want it corrected and exposed, fixed so it can't happen again.