news:42927746406769385.2915...@nntp.aioe.org...
> "Robert Green" <
robert_g...@yah00.com> wrote:
<stuff snipped>
> > Any chance they had left the flashers on deliberately to alert motorists
to
> > their presence in the roadway? Playing Advil's devocate here . . . (-:
> > I've seen that done before - leaving hazard lights flashing - when the
> > equipment takes up a lot of road space and is being left overnight.
>
> The machines have been parked in the exact same location every night for
> close to 3 weeks now. They are off the road on a flat section of land
along
> side the wooded hill that overlooks the bay. This was the first time they
> flashers were on.
That pretty much destroys my contention they were deliberately left on. )-:
> It's interesting how they park the vehicles. They have been using 3 pieces
> of equipment for the gas main project. A small Cat excavator, a larger Cat
> with a dozer bucket and excavator bucket and some kind of a compressor
> device that they tow around. Each night they position the trailer tightly
> between the 2 Cats so it can't be moved back or forth. They place the
> excavator bucket of the smaller cat on the street side of the compressor
so
> it can't be swung towards the street. There's no sense in swinging it away
> from the street because it's too close to the wooded hill so you could
> never get it out that way. Finally, they put the excavator bucket from the
Yes, those are typical anti-theft precautions. Around here (near D.C.) you
will often see a small compressor or generator unit left hanging in the air
from a crane to keep them from "sleepwalking" if you know what I mean. (-:
> > I much more impressed that you have the crew chief's cell phone number.
> > You're a "total immersion" sort of guy. <g>
> >
>
> He gave me his number so that I could set the appointment to have them
hook
> up my service. It seems like they have no real plan for the individual
> services part of the project. Last Friday they were working down the block
> when I came out to go to work. They waved me down and asked when they
could
> hook up my house. "It'll only take a couple of hours, we could do it
> today." I told them I had to check my schedule at work. He gave me his
> number so I could call and set it up a time. I called and and asked for a
> Monday morning appt and they said fine. Seems like they have no pattern,
> they're just hooking up services whenever the homeowner is available.
Maybe
> as the project winds down they'll have to be more organized, but as long
as
> they can do 2 or 3 houses a day, I guess it doesn't matter which house
they
> do when.
An interesting perspective - they take the targets of opportunity first,
which makes sense when you consider all the variables in dealing with
homeowners during the workday.
> > Now the important question is
> > whether you call him during the day to find out whether you were a hero
or
> > not.
>
> I left him my number when I called about the lights. He didn't call me
back
> the next day and I don't plan to call him.
Well, I think you've already answered the important question and proved that
you really did do a mitzvah by turning off the flashers. Mazel Tov!
> > You've made me curious. I always vote for hero but I even wonder
> > whether you legally had a right to touch that equipment, even as a good
> > samaritan.
>
> Oh, I'm sure I had no legal right to be in the vehicle. I'm pretty sure
> that if I had done something wrong, like started it up and crushed the
> compressor or drove the Cat over the hill, my phone would have been
ringing
> real early that morning.
When I was a kid we lived next to a fuel oil company and one of their trucks
was left out on the street without any brakes on. The slope of the street
was small but noticeable (it took much more effort to pedal up the block
than down. Imperceptibly, the truck started to roll and within a short time
was moving at a very good clip. One of the neighbor teens managed to climb
up into the cab and stop the truck before it did considerable damage. He
became a neighborhood hero.
From what I've seen of the problems they often have starting heavy equipment
up, I can't imagine anything accidental you might have done that would have
resulted in a runaway Cat. IOW, I don't see any *real* downside to turning
off the flashers other than you might have fallen off while climbing down.
I suppose there could have been a "deadfall" set up to injure potential
thieves, but that would have been unlikely even though heavy equipment
thefts are on the rise:
http://www.edmondsun.com/local/x1666504562/Police-Theft-of-holiday-equipment-rises
<<"These high-dollar thieves like to strike during the holidays, when heavy
equipment may be more accessible because it is being used during bad
weather, or left unattended on vacated construction sites," said Glynda Chu,
spokeswoman for the Edmond Police Department.>>
Where do you sell a huge highway grader or bulldozer? Craig's list? (-;
> > It's a tough call. I am not sure I would have done it but I would agree
> > there's a presumption it was accidental because both weren't flashing
and
> > any flashing lights would have to have been turned on during daylight,
> > perhaps accidentally, and might not be noticed by a crew departing at
> > 3:30PM.
> >
> > There's always more than one possible explanation. The driver might
have
> > been trying to get his boss to buy a new battery so he was deliberately
> > killing this one before the real cold sets in and it could be a big
hassle
> > (that's for Clare - now I *am* grasping at straws, but for comedic
effect).
> >
>
> Now that's a stretch!
Well, considering we've been entertained by the possibility they rented out
all this heavy equipment and performed actual maintenance work just to get
to burglarize your house, it's not a BIG stretch. (-:
> > So we have several questions for you to ask the crew chief:
>
> None of which will be asked. :-)
Well, maybe we can answer them without his input based on the additional
information you've supplied.
> > Were they on by design/law/insurance requirement or on by accident?
Accident. This was the only time they were on.
> > Were they LED lights (you should be able to answer, flashing LEDs are
very
> > stroboscopic - not so with incandescent hazard lights. I would bet they
are
> > LEDs nowadays because they're on hazardous equipment and the extended
run
> > time - thus avoiding a dead battery if they're lit for too long - is a
> > *real* benefit.
You could probably answer this too with a little "hard recollection" - fast,
sharp blips with no dimming or slowly pulsating? Can you visualize the
blinking? I just read a fascinating article about people with Highly
Superior Autobiographical Memory:
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/11/how-many-of-your-memories-are-fake/281558/
Apparently even people with superb memories have trouble remembering things
they haven't concentrated on. Just another nail in the coffin of the
reliability of eye-witness testimony.
Not if they offer her immunity!
> > (Sorry, I couldn't resist after the thread's beginning where it was
posited
> > that these men were out to rob you!)
> >
> > Are you sure they didn't leave radio-controlled canisters of fentanyl
sleep
> > gas so that they could invade your home, knock you out by remote control
and
> > steal all your worldly possesions even if you were armed? Better start
> > sleeping with a gas mask, just so S feels safe about your reckless
decision
> > to let them in your house. Dangerous Derby Dad, always living on the
edge.
> > (0-:
> >
>
> We've been fine since Monday. They may be waiting until they finish all
the
> houses and then get us all on the same day.
Yeah, I am sure that's the ticket.
I've read some scary stories about how bad the gas infrastructure is in the
US and how many major gas pipelines are showing signs of failure from
corrosion, ground movement and accidental punctures from earthmoving
equipment.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevebanker/2013/09/30/aging-us-gas-pipeline-infrastructure-costs-consumers-billions/
<<An August 1, 2013 report prepared for Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts
illuminates the fact that gas companies have little incentive to replace
leaky aging pipes because they are able to pass along the cost of lost gas
to consumers. As a consequence, American consumers pay about a billion
dollars a year for natural gas that never reaches their homes . . . "Gas
distribution companies in 2011 reported releasing 69 billion cubic feet of
natural gas to the atmosphere, almost enough to meet the state of Maine's
gas need for a year.">>
That's a recipe for trouble if there ever was one . . .
--
Bobby G.