Then if the same case had been brought, the SC would have heard it, because
it would have had enormous significance. The SC did hear the issues brought in FL.
I read the dissenting opinions though and they raised very good points. It's valuable
to get a ruling on some of this, like the PA SC extending the deadline, to put some
lines in the sand for the future. I think they are right, the court should have heard
at least that case. Why wait until similar happens again in a future election?
The other cases, I'm not sure which ones they are, what they
are about, etc. It also could have helped with some of the anger from Republicans
who feel they haven't been treated fairly if the SC heard some of these.