On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 19:27:23 -0700, rbowman wrote:
> And might consume as much power as it produced.
Might? I decided to perform a simple first order estimation:
From
https://www.usa.philips.com/healthcare/product/HC1076773/simplyflo-oxygen-concentrator/specifications
we get some basic specs on the concentrator:
4.1 Kg, 2 litres/min O2 produced, 120 W power consumed. (Also specified is
O2 concentration 87% to 96%; I use 91% for calculation below marked with
"&".)
From
https://www.gregraven.org/hotwater/calculators/airflow-hp.html we get
(for a 1600 cc engine) the relation of 54 cubic feet per minute of normal
air to make 78 horsepower.
First, we figure out how many of the O2 concentrators we need:
54 cubic feet per minute = 1530 litres / min. If one O2 concentrator
produces 2 litres / min, we need the equivalent of 765 O2 concentrators.
These (or one big one) will weigh in at 3.1 metric tons (4.1 kg * 765), and
require 120 W * 765 = 92 Kw = 122 hp.
The power from the engine though, is 5 * 78 hp * 0.91 (&) = 335 hp. (The
factor of 5 is the gain from using pure oxygen instead of air). But we need
to subtract the 122 hp used by the concentrator, thus 233 hp. Effective
'gain' is 233 / 78 = 3.0
From
http://blogs.youwheel.com/2014/04/14/engine-weight-a-comprehensive-list/
We get an entry for a 1600 cc engine:
VW flat-4 Type 1 250 1600cc dual port
I have no idea of the actual power rating of this engine; I am only
interested in the weight of 250 Kg.
So the entire contraption (concentrator + engine) ends up wighing 3.35
metric tons (3.1 + 0.25).
Total power available to wheels is increased by a factor of 3.
Total weight is increased by a factor of 13.5
So on first glance, probably it won't work. But then again, one big
concentrator should be more efficient than 765 small ones. If it could be
made 4 or 5 times more efficient (13.5 / 3), we reach the break-even point.
Then, we need to work out how not to burn holes through the engine head.