Re: Cars should cut out if they run out of vital fluids!

[Rod Speed]

Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote
> Fredxx <fre...@nospam.invalid> wrote
>> Commander Kinsey wrote

>>> Why don't cars switch themselves off if they run out of oil or coolant?
>>> It is funny watching them try to keep going though.

>>> https://youtu.be/zyejT4VPzlE

>>> A computer will shut down or throttle if the CPU
>>> overheats, yet car manufacturers don't have a clue.

>> If you got a decent car you would know that the ECU
>> will indeed initially go into limp mode and lots of
>> flashing lights warning you of impending damage.

> You mean a really modern car.

Wrong, as always.

> This tech should have been in cars 50 years ago.

Nope.

> If it can put up a warning light, it can shut itself off.

Yes, but fools like you will often have an accident if it does that.

>> The manufacturers daren't cut the engine
>> completely because of potential safety issues.

> Yes, because it's much safer to let the engine seize

That only happens when fools like you are the driver.

> so you skid off the road into oncoming traffic.

If you skid off the road, it wont be into oncoming traffic, stupid.

> For fuck's sake! A loss of power is not dangerous,

It can be if a fool like you is the driver.

> it's the safest thing to do!

Much safer to inform the driver that there is a problem and
let the driver do what makes sense in the circumstances.

And you stuffed up the newsgroup list because you
are completely blotto and drug crazed, as always.

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 06:36:15 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather>

--
TYPICAL retarded "conversation" between sociopath Rodent and sociopath
Birdbrain from August 26th 2018:

Birdbrain: "I have one head but 5 fingers."

Senile Rodent: "Obvious lie. You hairy legged cross dressers are so inbred
that you all have two heads."

Birdbrain: "You're the one that likes hairy legs remember?"

Senile Rodent: "The problem isnt the hairy legs, it's the gross inbreeding
that
produces two headed unemployables like you."

Birdbrain: "So why did you mention hairy legs?"

Senile Rodent: "Because that's what those who arent actually stupid enough
to shave their legs have."

Birdbrain: "You only have hairy legs if both of the following are true:
1) You're quite far back on the evolutionary scale.
2) You haven't learned what a razor is for."

Senile Rodent: "Only a terminal fuckwit or a woman shaves their legs."

Birdbrain: "There is literally zero point in having hair all over your
body."

Senile Rodent: "There is even less point in wasting your time changing what
you are born with."

MID: <fugfg5...@mid.individual.net>

[Commander Kinsey]

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 19:26:17 -0000, John Walliker <jrwal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, 12 January 2022 at 18:56:52 UTC, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 18:15:21 -0000, Fredxx <fre...@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>>
>> > On 12/01/2022 17:37, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> >> Why don't cars switch themselves off if they run out of oil or coolant?
>> >> It is funny watching them try to keep going though.
>> >>
>> >> https://youtu.be/zyejT4VPzlE
>> >>
>> >> A computer will shut down or throttle if the CPU overheats, yet car
>> >> manufacturers don't have a clue.
>> >
>> > If you got a decent car you would know that the ECU will indeed
>> > initially go into limp mode and lots of flashing lights warning you of
>> > impending damage.

>> You mean a really modern car. This tech should have been in cars 50 years ago. If it can put up a warning light, it can shut itself off.

>> > The manufacturers daren't cut the engine completely because of potential
>> > safety issues.

>> Yes, because it's much safer to let the engine seize so you skid off the road into oncoming traffic. For fuck's sake! A loss of power is not dangerous, it's the safest thing to do!
>
> Do you think aircraft engines should automatically shut down if they overheat
> or run out of fluids?

Slight difference, no engine in an aircraft means falling out of the sky, no engine in a car means slowing to a stop. Just how much further do you think you can drive when your engine is overheating? It can kill it in 30 seconds.

[Commander Kinsey]

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 19:33:43 -0000, John J <johnje...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, 12 January 2022 at 17:57:54 UTC, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
>> On 12/01/2022 17:37, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> > Why don't cars switch themselves off if they run out of oil or coolant?
>> > It is funny watching them try to keep going though.
>> >
>> > https://youtu.be/zyejT4VPzlE
>> >
>> > A computer will shut down or throttle if the CPU overheats, yet car
>> > manufacturers don't have a clue.

>> they rely on a good male driver....a wummin will just keep going
>> or it's a company car and someone else pays for repairs
>> --
>> The roads must roll ...

That's actually quite a good idea, if roads moved like conveyor belts, there would be no pollution and no accidents.

[Jim GM4DHJ ...]

indeed...but open to sabitage ....

[Commander Kinsey]

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 19:36:15 -0000, Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote
>> Fredxx <fre...@nospam.invalid> wrote
>>> Commander Kinsey wrote
>
>>>> Why don't cars switch themselves off if they run out of oil or coolant?
>>>> It is funny watching them try to keep going though.
>
>>>> https://youtu.be/zyejT4VPzlE
>
>>>> A computer will shut down or throttle if the CPU
>>>> overheats, yet car manufacturers don't have a clue.
>
>>> If you got a decent car you would know that the ECU
>>> will indeed initially go into limp mode and lots of
>>> flashing lights warning you of impending damage.
>
>> You mean a really modern car.
>
> Wrong, as always.

The above....

>> This tech should have been in cars 50 years ago.
>
> Nope.

....disagrees with the above

>> If it can put up a warning light, it can shut itself off.
>
> Yes, but fools like you will often have an accident if it does that.

And the engine dying 30 seconds later is better how?

>>> The manufacturers daren't cut the engine
>>> completely because of potential safety issues.
>
>> Yes, because it's much safer to let the engine seize
>
> That only happens when fools like you are the driver.

Do you check your instruments every 30 seconds? It can overheat that fast.

>> so you skid off the road into oncoming traffic.
>
> If you skid off the road, it wont be into oncoming traffic, stupid.

It will if it's a dual carriageway and you cross onto the other road.

[snip repetition]

>> it's the safest thing to do!
>
> Much safer to inform the driver that there is a problem and
> let the driver do what makes sense in the circumstances.

Some don't even do that. I had a Vauxhall/Opel/GM which didn't even have a warning light for no fuel. At least my Golf made a noise aswell as a light for anything important.

> And you stuffed up the newsgroup list because you
> are completely blotto and drug crazed, as always.

Oooh I misspelt something did I? Big fucking deal.

[Commander Kinsey]

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 19:36:15 -0000, Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> And you stuffed up the newsgroup list because you
> are completely blotto and drug crazed, as always.

My stupid newsreader doesn't have the function to select multiple groups with the GUI, I have to type them in.

[Commander Kinsey]

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 18:57:40 -0000, alan_m <ju...@admac.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

> On 12/01/2022 17:37, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> Why don't cars switch themselves off if they run out of oil or coolant?
>> It is funny watching them try to keep going though.
>>
>> https://youtu.be/zyejT4VPzlE
>

> Modern cars do shut down certain functions on detecting conditions. Limp
> home on half the cylinders for instance.

I'm just surprised it took this long to introduce such a basic function.

[Rod Speed]

Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote

Wrong, as always.

> no engine in a car means slowing to a stop.

Or having a serious accident.

> Just how much further do you think you can drive when your engine is
> overheating?

In your case, you were stupid enough to think that was forever.

> It can kill it in 30 seconds.

And you were stupid enough to ignore that.

[Rod Speed]

Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote

> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 19:33:43 -0000, John J <johnje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, 12 January 2022 at 17:57:54 UTC, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
>>> On 12/01/2022 17:37, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>> > Why don't cars switch themselves off if they run out of oil or
>>> > coolant?
>>> > It is funny watching them try to keep going though.
>>> >
>>> > https://youtu.be/zyejT4VPzlE
>>> >
>>> > A computer will shut down or throttle if the CPU overheats, yet car
>>> > manufacturers don't have a clue.
>>> they rely on a good male driver....a wummin will just keep going
>>> or it's a company car and someone else pays for repairs
>>> --
>>> The roads must roll ...
>
> That's actually quite a good idea,

Nope, dope.

> if roads moved like conveyor belts, there would be no pollution and no
> accidents.

Wrong, as always.

[Commander Kinsey]

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 19:52:36 -0000, NY <m...@privacy.invalid> wrote:

> "Commander Kinsey" <C...@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:op.1fwb8...@ryzen.lan...

>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 18:15:21 -0000, Fredxx <fre...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/01/2022 17:37, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>> Why don't cars switch themselves off if they run out of oil or coolant?
>>>> It is funny watching them try to keep going though.
>>>>
>>>> https://youtu.be/zyejT4VPzlE
>>>>
>>>> A computer will shut down or throttle if the CPU overheats, yet car
>>>> manufacturers don't have a clue.
>>>

>>> If you got a decent car you would know that the ECU will indeed
>>> initially go into limp mode and lots of flashing lights warning you of
>>> impending damage.
>>
>> You mean a really modern car. This tech should have been in cars 50 years
>> ago. If it can put up a warning light, it can shut itself off.
>>
>>> The manufacturers daren't cut the engine completely because of potential
>>> safety issues.
>>
>> Yes, because it's much safer to let the engine seize so you skid off the
>> road into oncoming traffic. For fuck's sake! A loss of power is not
>> dangerous, it's the safest thing to do!
>
>

> A loss of power (or a complete engine-off) *is* dangerous if it occurs at
> the wrong moment.
>
> I had a very narrow escape. My car had been driving perfectly with no sign
> from warning lights or the ECU messages on the display or any change in how
> the car "felt". I came to pull out into traffic from a side road, having
> left a good long gap, and the engine lost power about 2 seconds after I had
> started to accelerate from rest up to the speed of the traffic I was
> joining.
>
> Luckily I was able to hit the hazard switch very quickly to warn the HGV
> behind me that was rapidly closing on me, and pull over onto the verge. If
> the car had behaved as it normally did, I would have been going beyond the
> speed of the lorry. There was a bleep at the same time as the car lost
> power, and the ECU display changed - but I had my mind on other things ;-)

And if you had an overheating engine, with no cutout, then the engine seized as you were pulling out, the same would have happened anyway.

I had the same thing happen to me because the battery died (severely), shorting a lot of stuff out. But it was a very quiet road, so I pushed it back to the sideroad, then when someone appeared, he helped me push it to my destination, which was 100 yards away.

> It turned out that the car has a "depollution pouch" (maybe something like
> AdBlue) which treats the exhaust gases to reduce the amount of NOx. When I
> got the car to "limp" to my local garage, they said that this pouch had
> burst. The ECU message said "depollution failure". It was a fairly
> straightforward (if not cheap) job for the garage to replace the pouch, but
> the car couldn't have picked a worse possible time to fail.

Health and softy shooting itself in the foot.

[Commander Kinsey]

Not sure what you'd gain from sabotaging that, any more than anything else.

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 07:26:04 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent

Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather>

--

Another typical retarded "conversation" between the two resident idiots:

Birdbrain: "But imagine how cool it was to own slaves."

Senile Rodent: "Yeah, right. Feed them, clothe them, and fix them when
they're broken.
After all, you paid good money for them. Then you've got to keep an eye
on them all the time."

Birdbrain: "Better than having to give them wages on top of that."

Senile Rodent: "Specially when they make more slaves for you
and produce their own food and clothes."

MID: <fvlcdc...@mid.individual.net>

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 07:27:20 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent

Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather>

--
Another typical retarded "conversation" between the two resident idiots:

Birdbrain: "Indeed, in America they usually just shoot you."

Senile Rodent:"They hardly ever do that with cops."

Birdbrain: "Everybody shoots everybody over there,"

Senile Rodent: "Didn't notice Obama shooting anyone."

Birdbrain: "He's not American."

Senile Rodent: "Didn't notice Slick shooting anyone."

MID: <fvnuae...@mid.individual.net>

[Bob F]

Ever hear of "limp mode"?

[Peeler]

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 20:22:46 +0000, Dim GM4DHJ ... the brain dead,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blathered again:

o sabitage ....

> indeed...but open to sabitage ...

Indeed, you are as sick an asshole as the trolling attention whore you are
feeding.

[Scott Lurndal]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Roads_Must_Roll

[Peeler]

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 21:02:48 GMT, Scott Lurndal, another brain dead,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, babble:


> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Roads_Must_Roll

Yep! And the troll must troll, and the senile asshole must feed the troll!
<tsk>

[Rod Speed]

Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote

> Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote
>> Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote
>>> Fredxx <fre...@nospam.invalid> wrote
>>>> Commander Kinsey wrote

>>>>> Why don't cars switch themselves off if they run out of oil or
>>>>> coolant?
>>>>> It is funny watching them try to keep going though.

>>>>> https://youtu.be/zyejT4VPzlE

>>>>> A computer will shut down or throttle if the CPU
>>>>> overheats, yet car manufacturers don't have a clue.

>>>> If you got a decent car you would know that the ECU
>>>> will indeed initially go into limp mode and lots of
>>>> flashing lights warning you of impending damage.

>>> You mean a really modern car.

>> Wrong, as always.

> The above....

>>> This tech should have been in cars 50 years ago.

>> Nope.

> ....disagrees with the above

Wrong, as always.

>>> If it can put up a warning light, it can shut itself off.

>> Yes, but fools like you will often have an accident if it does that.

> And the engine dying 30 seconds later is better how?

The engine doesn't die in 30 seconds if you pull over
and turn the engine off when you get told that there
is a major urgent problem with the engine.

>>>> The manufacturers daren't cut the engine
>>>> completely because of potential safety issues.

>>> Yes, because it's much safer to let the engine seize

>> That only happens when fools like you are the driver.

> Do you check your instruments every 30 seconds?

Don't need to, any well designed car with make it obvious
that there is an urgent major problem with the engine
without needing you to check the instruments that often.

> It can overheat that fast.

Hardly ever.

>>> so you skid off the road into oncoming traffic.

>> If you skid off the road, it wont be into oncoming traffic, stupid.

> It will if it's a dual carriageway and you cross onto the other road.

No reason why that should happen and
the engine wont seize that quickly.

>>> it's the safest thing to do!

>> Much safer to inform the driver that there is a problem and
>> let the driver do what makes sense in the circumstances.

> Some don't even do that.

Then don't buy one of those, stupid.

> had a Vauxhall/Opel/GM which didn't even have a warning light for no fuel.

You made the same stupid lie about that frog car you
seized the engine in when you ignored the warning light.

> At least my Golf made a noise aswell as a light for anything important.

And that makes a lot more sense than just turning the engine off.

>> And you stuffed up the newsgroup list because you
>> are completely blotto and drug crazed, as always.

> Oooh I misspelt something did I?

Nope, used a . instead of a , between two newsgroups.

> Big fucking deal.

Proves you are blotto and drug crazed as always.

[Rod Speed]

Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote

> Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote

>> And you stuffed up the newsgroup list because you
>> are completely blotto and drug crazed, as always.

> My stupid newsreader doesn't have the function to select
> multiple groups with the GUI, I have to type them in.

And you are actually stupid enough to keep using that steaming turd.

[Rod Speed]

Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote
> alan_m <ju...@admac.myzen.co.uk> wrote

>> Commander Kinsey wrote

>>> Why don't cars switch themselves off if they run out of oil or coolant?
>>> It is funny watching them try to keep going though.

>>> https://youtu.be/zyejT4VPzlE

>> Modern cars do shut down certain functions on detecting
>> conditions. Limp home on half the cylinders for instance.

> I'm just surprised it took this long to introduce such a basic function.

Limp home is much harder to do without a computer.

[Commander Kinsey]

On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 19:20:48 -0000, Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote

>
>> Why don't cars switch themselves off if they run out of oil or coolant?
>

> Because that can cause an accident if they do that at the wrong moment.

Cutting power to the engine doesn't make you stop instantly, it slows down like you took your foot off the gas. But seizing the engine because it didn't do it is probably worse, and definitely just as bad as far as causing an accident is concerned.

>> It is funny watching them try to keep going though.
>
>> https://youtu.be/zyejT4VPzlE
>

>> A computer will shut down or throttle if the CPU
>> overheats, yet car manufacturers don't have a clue.
>

> Its you that has never had a clue about anything at all, ever.

Didn't you get my analogy?

[Rod Speed]

Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote

> NY <m...@privacy.invalid> wrote
>> Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote

>>> Fredxx <fre...@nospam.invalid> wrote

He didn't.

> with no cutout,

But with a warning of a serious major engine problem

> then the engine seized as you were pulling out,

Could only happen if you stupidly ignored the
warning of a serious major engine problem

> the same would have happened anyway.

Wrong, as always.

> I had the same thing happen to me because the battery died (severely),
> shorting a lot of stuff out. But it was a very quiet road, so I pushed it
> back to the sideroad, then when someone appeared, he helped me push it to
> my destination, which was 100 yards away.

>> It turned out that the car has a "depollution pouch" (maybe something
>> like
>> AdBlue) which treats the exhaust gases to reduce the amount of NOx. When
>> I
>> got the car to "limp" to my local garage, they said that this pouch had
>> burst. The ECU message said "depollution failure". It was a fairly
>> straightforward (if not cheap) job for the garage to replace the pouch,
>> but
>> the car couldn't have picked a worse possible time to fail.

> Health and softy shooting itself in the foot.

Nope, dope.

[Rod Speed]

Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote

Much greater effect on the general public than anything else, stupid.

[Commander Kinsey]

This is common knowledge, unless it's a light aircraft. Pretty hard to bring a 747 down safely with no power. Even if you can, chances are, no runway big enough just there.

[repetition removed]

>> Just how much further do you think you can drive when your engine is
>> overheating?
>
> In your case, you were stupid enough to think that was forever.
>
>> It can kill it in 30 seconds.
>
> And you were stupid enough to ignore that.

Ignore what? I got no warning.

[Commander Kinsey]

Only on posh new cars. This should have been invented decades ago.

[Commander Kinsey]

That would make a great film, why has nobody done so?

[%]

Bob F <bobn...@gmail.com> wrote

Yep, what's between the phucker's ears does that 24/7/365.25

[Rod Speed]

Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote

> Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote
>> Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote

>>> Why don't cars switch themselves off if they run out of oil or coolant?

>> Because that can cause an accident if they do that at the wrong moment.

> Cutting power to the engine doesn't make you stop instantly,
> it slows down like you took your foot off the gas.

But that can still cause a massive accident if say it cuts the
engine when your in the middle of overtaking and are just
past the car you are overtaking and so cant get back into
the lane you left again, with another car coming towards
you on a single lane in each direction road.

Much safer to warn the driver about a serious major
engine problem that needs urgent action by the driver.

> But seizing the engine because it didn't do it is probably worse,

Wrong. Engines don't seize that quickly.

> and definitely just as bad as far as causing an accident is concerned.

Wrong, as always.

>>> It is funny watching them try to keep going though.
>>
>>> https://youtu.be/zyejT4VPzlE
>>
>>> A computer will shut down or throttle if the CPU
>>> overheats, yet car manufacturers don't have a clue.
>>
>> Its you that has never had a clue about anything at all, ever.
>
> Didn't you get my analogy?

It's a dud, as always with you.

[Rod Speed]

Wrong, as always.

> Pretty hard to bring a 747 down safely with no power.

A single engine stopping doesn't mean no power, there are
still 3 left running. The DC3 was the last common aircraft
that couldn't continue fine with one engine out and even
then it just couldn't climb, it didn't fall from the sky.

Even single engined aircraft don't fall from
the sky if the engine stops, they glide fine.

> Even if you can, chances are, no runway big enough just there.

Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you
usually manage and that's saying something.

>>> Just how much further do you think you can drive when your engine is
>>> overheating?
>>
>> In your case, you were stupid enough to think that was forever.
>>
>>> It can kill it in 30 seconds.
>>
>> And you were stupid enough to ignore that.
>
> Ignore what? I got no warning.

I proved that that was a bare faced lie.

[Rod Speed]

Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote
> Bob F <bobn...@gmail.com> wrote

Wasn't feasible until they had computer control.

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:37:40 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent

Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather>

--

Typical "conversation" between sociopathic wanker Birdbrain and the
sociopathic senile Ozzietard:

Birdbrain: "So why did you mention hairy legs?

Senile Ozzietard: "Because that's what those who arent actually
stupid enough to shave their legs have."

MID: <fugb22...@mid.individual.net>

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:42:38 +1100, %, better known as cantankerous trolling
senile geezer Rodent Speed, wrote:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

--
Tim+ about trolling Rodent Speed:
He is by far the most persistent troll who seems to be able to get under the
skin of folk who really should know better. Since when did arguing with a
troll ever achieve anything (beyond giving the troll pleasure)?
MID: <1421057667.659518815.743...@news.individual.net>

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:23:08 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent

Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather>

--

TYPICAL retarded "conversation" between sociopath Rodent and sociopath
Birdbrain from August 26th 2018:

Birdbrain: "I have one head but 5 fingers."

Senile Rodent: "Obvious lie. You hairy legged cross dressers are so inbred
that you all have two heads."

Birdbrain: "You're the one that likes hairy legs remember?"

Senile Rodent: "The problem isnt the hairy legs, it's the gross inbreeding
that
produces two headed unemployables like you."

Birdbrain: "So why did you mention hairy legs?"

Senile Rodent: "Because that's what those who arent actually stupid enough

to shave their legs have."

Birdbrain: "You only have hairy legs if both of the following are true:
1) You're quite far back on the evolutionary scale.
2) You haven't learned what a razor is for."

Senile Rodent: "Only a terminal fuckwit or a woman shaves their legs."

Birdbrain: "There is literally zero point in having hair all over your
body."

Senile Rodent: "There is even less point in wasting your time changing what
you are born with."

MID: <fugfg5...@mid.individual.net>

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:24:27 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent

Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather>

--

Another typical retarded "conversation" between Birdbrain and senile Rodent:

Senile Rodent: " Did you ever dig a hole to bury your own shit?"

Birdbrain: "I do if there's no flush toilet around."

Senile Rodent: "Yeah, I prefer camping like that, off by myself with
no dunnys around and have always buried the shit."

MID: <fv66ka...@mid.individual.net>

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:26:19 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent

Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather>

--

Another typical retarded "conversation" between the two resident idiots:

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:36:15 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent

Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather>

--

Another typical retarded conversation between our two village idiots,
Birdbrain and Rodent Speed:

Birdbrain: "You beat me to it. Plain sex is boring."

Senile Rodent: "Then fuck the cats. That wont be boring."

Birdbrain: "Sell me a de-clawing tool first."

Senile Rodent: "Wont help with the teeth."

Birdbrain: "They've never gone for me with their mouths."

Rodent Speed: "They will if you are stupid enough to try fucking them."

Birdbrain: "No, they always use claws."

Rodent Speed: "They wont if you try fucking them. Try it and see."

Message-ID: <g3cjf7...@mid.individual.net>

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:57:55 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent

Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather>

--

Another typical retarded "conversation" between the two resident idiots:

[Commander Kinsey]

So that's why I'm out of synch with clocks. No year has .25 in it.

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 09:03:25 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent

Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather>

--

Typical retarded "conversation" between the Scottish wanker and the senile
Ozzietard:

Birdbrain: "Horse shit doesn't stink."

Senile Rodent: "It does if you roll in it."

Birdbrain: "I've never worked out why, I assumed it was maybe meateaters
that made stinky shit, but then why does vegetarian human shit stink? Is it
just the fact that we're capable of digesting meat?"

Senile Rodent: "Nope, some cow shit stinks too."

Message-ID: <fv5f1t...@mid.individual.net>

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 09:04:42 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent

Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather>

--

Typical "conversation" between sociopathic wanker Birdbrain and the
sociopathic senile Ozzietard:

Birdbrain: "So why did you mention hairy legs?

Senile Ozzietard: "Because that's what those who arent actually

stupid enough to shave their legs have."

MID: <fugb22...@mid.individual.net>

[Rod Speed]

Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote

Yep. nothing viable between the ears.

> No year has .25 in it.

Even the brain dead should have noticed leap years.

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 09:37:54 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent

Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather>

--

TYPICAL retarded "conversation" between sociopath Rodent and sociopath
Birdbrain from August 26th 2018:

Birdbrain: "I have one head but 5 fingers."

Senile Rodent: "Obvious lie. You hairy legged cross dressers are so inbred
that you all have two heads."

Birdbrain: "You're the one that likes hairy legs remember?"

Senile Rodent: "The problem isnt the hairy legs, it's the gross inbreeding
that
produces two headed unemployables like you."

Birdbrain: "So why did you mention hairy legs?"

Senile Rodent: "Because that's what those who arent actually stupid enough

to shave their legs have."

[Mr Pounder Esquire]

Commander Kinsey wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 19:52:36 -0000, NY <m...@privacy.invalid> wrote:
>
>> "Commander Kinsey" <C...@nospam.com> wrote in message
>> news:op.1fwb8...@ryzen.lan...

>>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 18:15:21 -0000, Fredxx <fre...@nospam.invalid>

>>> wrote:
>>>> On 12/01/2022 17:37, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>>> Why don't cars switch themselves off if they run out of oil or
>>>>> coolant? It is funny watching them try to keep going though.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://youtu.be/zyejT4VPzlE
>>>>>
>>>>> A computer will shut down or throttle if the CPU overheats, yet
>>>>> car manufacturers don't have a clue.
>>>>

>>>> If you got a decent car you would know that the ECU will indeed
>>>> initially go into limp mode and lots of flashing lights warning
>>>> you of impending damage.
>>>
>>> You mean a really modern car. This tech should have been in cars
>>> 50 years ago. If it can put up a warning light, it can shut itself
>>> off.
>>>> The manufacturers daren't cut the engine completely because of
>>>> potential safety issues.
>>>
>>> Yes, because it's much safer to let the engine seize so you skid
>>> off the road into oncoming traffic. For fuck's sake! A loss of
>>> power is not dangerous, it's the safest thing to do!
>>
>>

>> A loss of power (or a complete engine-off) *is* dangerous if it
>> occurs at the wrong moment.
>>
>> I had a very narrow escape. My car had been driving perfectly with
>> no sign from warning lights or the ECU messages on the display or
>> any change in how the car "felt". I came to pull out into traffic
>> from a side road, having left a good long gap, and the engine lost
>> power about 2 seconds after I had started to accelerate from rest up
>> to the speed of the traffic I was joining.
>>
>> Luckily I was able to hit the hazard switch very quickly to warn the
>> HGV behind me that was rapidly closing on me, and pull over onto the
>> verge. If the car had behaved as it normally did, I would have been
>> going beyond the speed of the lorry. There was a bleep at the same
>> time as the car lost power, and the ECU display changed - but I had
>> my mind on other things ;-)
>

> And if you had an overheating engine, with no cutout, then the engine
> seized as you were pulling out, the same would have happened anyway.

> I had the same thing happen to me because the battery died
> (severely), shorting a lot of stuff out. But it was a very quiet
> road, so I pushed it back to the sideroad, then when someone
> appeared, he helped me push it to my destination, which was 100 yards
> away.
>> It turned out that the car has a "depollution pouch" (maybe
>> something like AdBlue) which treats the exhaust gases to reduce the
>> amount of NOx. When I got the car to "limp" to my local garage, they
>> said that this pouch had burst. The ECU message said "depollution
>> failure". It was a fairly straightforward (if not cheap) job for the
>> garage to replace the pouch, but the car couldn't have picked a
>> worse possible time to fail.
>
> Health and softy shooting itself in the foot.

When is the last time you had a job? Wanker.

[Jim GM4DHJ ...]

not that great a story and ending to it that's why

[Peter Keller]

On 13/01/22 08:54, Peeler wrote:
> <FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
> blather>

Peeler is a long, eel-like fish that lives in salt water. This fish is
also occasionally referred to as a “slime eel.”

[Peter Keller]

On 13/01/22 11:06, Peeler wrote:
> <FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
> blather>

Peeler has the ability to produce copious amounts of slime, which is
oozed as mucous from glands along his sides.

[Peter Keller]

On 13/01/22 11:06, Peeler wrote:

> <FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
> blather>

Peeler's slime is used to deter predators, because it can clog their gills.

[Peter Keller]

On 13/01/22 11:07, Peeler wrote:
> <FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
> blather>

Peeler is long and eel-like in shape, with a dorsoventrally flattened tail.

[Peter Keller]

On 13/01/22 11:09, Peeler wrote:
> <FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
> blather>

Peeler's skin is very loose, and his skull is made primarily of
cartilage rather than bone.

[Peter Keller]

On 13/01/22 11:11, Peeler wrote:
> <FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
> blather>

Peeler ranges in colour from pink to blue and grey, and is occasionally
covered in spots.

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 07:49:34 +0000, Dim GM4DHJ ... the brain dead,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blathered again:

> not that great a story and ending to it that's why

Keep your senile shit out of these ngs, you idiotic senile bullshitter!

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:11:53 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
little cyclist, blabbered again:

> Peeler is a long, eel-like fish that lives in salt water. This fish is
> also occasionally referred to as a “slime eel.”

I refer to you as a REAL DUMB gay masochistic cyclist, you gay cretin! <BG>

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:13:41 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
little cyclist, blabbered again:

> Peeler has the ability to produce copious amounts of slime, which is
> oozed as mucous from glands along his sides.

More useless shit from the resident gay dumb little cyclist! LOL

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:14:43 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
little cyclist, blabbered again:


>

> Peeler's slime is used to deter predators, because it can clog their gills.

More of the usual useless shit from the resident gay dumb little cyclist!
LOL

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:16:06 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
little cyclist, blabbered again:

> Peeler is long and eel-like in shape, with a dorsoventrally flattened tail.

More of the typical useless shit from the resident gay dumb little cyclist!
LOL

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:17:42 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
little cyclist, blabbered again:

> Peeler's skin is very loose, and his skull is made primarily of
> cartilage rather than bone.

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:19:11 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
little cyclist, blabbered again:

> Peeler ranges in colour from pink to blue and grey, and is occasionally
> covered in spots.

Yet more of the typical useless shit from the resident gay dumb little
cyclist! LOL

[soup]

On 12/01/2022 20:20, Commander Kinsey wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 19:33:43 -0000, John J <johnje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, 12 January 2022 at 17:57:54 UTC, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:

>>> The roads must roll ...
>
> That's actually quite a good idea, if roads moved like conveyor belts,
> there would be no pollution and no accidents.

No pollution? Where does the energy come from for these "conveyor belts".

[charles]

In article <srp1dk$rn0$1...@dont-email.me>,

Treadmills operated by unicorns

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England
"I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

[Peeler]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 11:11:49 +0000, dupe, yet another mentally challenged,
troll-feeding, senile moron, blathered:

> No pollution? Where does the energy come from for these "conveyor belts".

That's the right spirit, dupe! Ask an attention-starved, PROVEN clinically
insane troll a question so you can draw yet more idiotic statements from the
filth! <tsk>

[Snit]

Wind power. Put huge sails next to the roads.

If the wind is not going the right direction just add huge fans.

Done and done.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

[Rod Speed]

Brian Gaff (Sofa) <bri...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote

> I often wonder why they don't self protect.

Essentially because it is too dangerous to turn the
engine off, even with a warning that that will happen.

> After all you should get a warning first, like top within x miles or the
> engine will self protect and stop.

But some fools will ignore the warning or not
be able to understand it or be deaf etc or have
a poor hearing aid that doesn’t allow them to
hear the warning in a noisy car etc.

Limp home mode is protecting the car and is much safer.


> Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote

[Peeler]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 05:11:18 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent

Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>


--
Tim+ about trolling Rodent Speed:
He is by far the most persistent troll who seems to be able to get under the
skin of folk who really should know better. Since when did arguing with a
troll ever achieve anything (beyond giving the troll pleasure)?
MID: <1421057667.659518815.743...@news.individual.net>

[Rod Speed]

NY <m...@privacy.invalid> wrote

> Brian Gaff (Sofa) <bri...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote

>> I often wonder why they don't self protect. After all you should get a

>> warning first, like top within x miles or the engine will self protect
>> and stop.

> Yes, a warning that gives you chance to correct a problem (eg top up level
> of oil) is better than one which is too late and just shuts the car down
> or gives you a "do not drive any further" error.

Trouble is reliably delivering the warning before shutting down
with the deaf, those with poor hearing aids or just the stupid that
ignore warnings or don’t understand the language the warning is
given in. Much safer to use limp home mode instead.

> That reminds me: I'll check the oil level in my car now. Whenever I've
> remembered recently, it's been after I've started the engine and been
> driving, so any dipstick measurement will be inaccurate.

It doesn’t need to be accurate.

[Peeler]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 05:27:32 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent

Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

--

williamwright addressing Rodent Speed:
"This is getting beyond ridiculous now. You're trying to prove black's
white. You're arguing with someone who has been involved with the issues all
his working life when you clearly have no knowledge at all. I think you're
just being a pillock for the sake of it. You clearly don't actually believe
your own words. You must have a very empty life, and a sad embittered soul.
MID: <j08o6b...@mid.individual.net>

[Rod Speed]

charles <cha...@candehope.me.uk> wrote
> soup <inv...@invalid.com> wrote
>> Commander Kinsey wrote
>>> John J <johnje...@gmail.com> wrote

>>>> Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote

>>>>> The roads must roll ...

>>> That's actually quite a good idea, if roads moved like conveyor
>>> belts, there would be no pollution and no accidents.

>> No pollution? Where does the energy come from for these "conveyor
>> belts".

> Treadmills operated by unicorns

But unicorns shit too.

[Peeler]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 05:49:23 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent

Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

--

Norman Wells addressing trolling senile Rodent:
"Ah, the voice of scum speaks."
MID: <g4t0jt...@mid.individual.net>

[Sam E]

On 1/13/22 06:12, charles wrote:
> In article <srp1dk$rn0$1...@dont-email.me>,
> soup <inv...@invalid.com> wrote:
>> On 12/01/2022 20:20, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 19:33:43 -0000, John J <johnje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, 12 January 2022 at 17:57:54 UTC, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
>
>>>>> The roads must roll ...
>>>
>>> That's actually quite a good idea, if roads moved like conveyor belts,
>>> there would be no pollution and no accidents.
>
>> No pollution? Where does the energy come from for these "conveyor belts".
>
> Treadmills operated by unicorns

eating corn from magic buckets, which are always full no matter how much
has been eaten. The power to make this happen is taken from the "big
crunch" at the end of the universe.

[notX]

On 1/12/22 15:42, % wrote:

[snip]

>> Ever hear of "limp mode"?
>
> Yep, what's between the phucker's ears does that 24/7/365.25

BTW, the number of days in the average year is 365.2425

365 + (1 / 4) - (1 / 100) + (1 / 400)

considering the leap year rules (multiple or 4 unless multiple of 100
unless multiple of 400)

Interestingly, this is a whole number of seconds: 31,556,952

[Commander Kinsey]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 00:32:19 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire <MrPo...@rationalthought.com> wrote:

> Commander Kinsey wrote:

>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 19:52:36 -0000, NY <m...@privacy.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> "Commander Kinsey" <C...@nospam.com> wrote in message
>>> news:op.1fwb8...@ryzen.lan...
>>>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 18:15:21 -0000, Fredxx <fre...@nospam.invalid>
>>>> wrote:

>>>>> On 12/01/2022 17:37, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>>>> Why don't cars switch themselves off if they run out of oil or
>>>>>> coolant? It is funny watching them try to keep going though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://youtu.be/zyejT4VPzlE
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A computer will shut down or throttle if the CPU overheats, yet

>>>>>> car manufacturers don't have a clue.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you got a decent car you would know that the ECU will indeed
>>>>> initially go into limp mode and lots of flashing lights warning
>>>>> you of impending damage.
>>>>
>>>> You mean a really modern car. This tech should have been in cars
>>>> 50 years ago. If it can put up a warning light, it can shut itself
>>>> off.
>>>>> The manufacturers daren't cut the engine completely because of
>>>>> potential safety issues.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, because it's much safer to let the engine seize so you skid
>>>> off the road into oncoming traffic. For fuck's sake! A loss of
>>>> power is not dangerous, it's the safest thing to do!
>>>
>>>
>>> A loss of power (or a complete engine-off) *is* dangerous if it
>>> occurs at the wrong moment.
>>>
>>> I had a very narrow escape. My car had been driving perfectly with
>>> no sign from warning lights or the ECU messages on the display or
>>> any change in how the car "felt". I came to pull out into traffic
>>> from a side road, having left a good long gap, and the engine lost
>>> power about 2 seconds after I had started to accelerate from rest up
>>> to the speed of the traffic I was joining.
>>>
>>> Luckily I was able to hit the hazard switch very quickly to warn the
>>> HGV behind me that was rapidly closing on me, and pull over onto the
>>> verge. If the car had behaved as it normally did, I would have been
>>> going beyond the speed of the lorry. There was a bleep at the same
>>> time as the car lost power, and the ECU display changed - but I had
>>> my mind on other things ;-)
>>
>> And if you had an overheating engine, with no cutout, then the engine
>> seized as you were pulling out, the same would have happened anyway.
>> I had the same thing happen to me because the battery died
>> (severely), shorting a lot of stuff out. But it was a very quiet
>> road, so I pushed it back to the sideroad, then when someone
>> appeared, he helped me push it to my destination, which was 100 yards
>> away.
>>> It turned out that the car has a "depollution pouch" (maybe
>>> something like AdBlue) which treats the exhaust gases to reduce the
>>> amount of NOx. When I got the car to "limp" to my local garage, they
>>> said that this pouch had burst. The ECU message said "depollution
>>> failure". It was a fairly straightforward (if not cheap) job for the
>>> garage to replace the pouch, but the car couldn't have picked a
>>> worse possible time to fail.
>>
>> Health and softy shooting itself in the foot.
>
> When is the last time you had a job? Wanker.

When is the last time you had a wife?

[Commander Kinsey]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:27:32 -0000, Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> NY <m...@privacy.invalid> wrote
>> Brian Gaff (Sofa) <bri...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote
>
>>> I often wonder why they don't self protect. After all you should get a
>>> warning first, like top within x miles or the engine will self protect
>>> and stop.
>
>> Yes, a warning that gives you chance to correct a problem (eg top up level
>> of oil) is better than one which is too late and just shuts the car down
>> or gives you a "do not drive any further" error.
>
> Trouble is reliably delivering the warning before shutting down
> with the deaf, those with poor hearing aids or just the stupid that
> ignore warnings or don’t understand the language the warning is
> given in. Much safer to use limp home mode instead.

Might aswell have a warning before that. If it's ignored, so what, you still have the limp home.

[Commander Kinsey]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:11:18 -0000, Rod Speed <rod.sp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Brian Gaff (Sofa) <bri...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote
>
>> I often wonder why they don't self protect.
>
> Essentially because it is too dangerous to turn the
> engine off, even with a warning that that will happen.
>
>> After all you should get a warning first, like top within x miles or the
>> engine will self protect and stop.
>
> But some fools will ignore the warning or not
> be able to understand it or be deaf etc or have
> a poor hearing aid that doesn’t allow them to
> hear the warning in a noisy car etc.

My Golf for just running out of fuel would put on a warning light, then if ignored flash it, then if ignored start beeping at me.

[Commander Kinsey]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 07:49:34 -0000, Jim GM4DHJ ... <kinvig...@ntlworld.com> wrote:

> On 12/01/2022 21:42, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 21:02:48 -0000, Scott Lurndal <sc...@slp53.sl.home>
>> wrote:

>>
>>> "Commander Kinsey" <C...@nospam.com> writes:
>>>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 19:33:43 -0000, John J <johnje...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>

>>>>> On Wednesday, 12 January 2022 at 17:57:54 UTC, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/01/2022 17:37, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>>>> > Why don't cars switch themselves off if they run out of oil or
>>>>>> coolant?
>>>>>> > It is funny watching them try to keep going though.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > https://youtu.be/zyejT4VPzlE
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > A computer will shut down or throttle if the CPU overheats, yet car
>>>>>> > manufacturers don't have a clue.

>>>>>> they rely on a good male driver....a wummin will just keep going
>>>>>> or it's a company car and someone else pays for repairs
>>>>>> --

>>>>>> The roads must roll ...
>>>>
>>>> That's actually quite a good idea, if roads moved like conveyor
>>>> belts, there would be no pollution and no accidents.
>>>

>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Roads_Must_Roll
>>
>> That would make a great film, why has nobody done so?

> not that great a story and ending to it that's why

It's a damn good basis for one thought, the film could always add and adjust.

[Commander Kinsey]

Fertiliser, not pollution.

[Commander Kinsey]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:24:10 -0000, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 13, 2022 at 4:11:49 AM MST, "soup" wrote <srp1dk$rn0$1...@dont-email.me>:
>
>> On 12/01/2022 20:20, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 19:33:43 -0000, John J <johnje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, 12 January 2022 at 17:57:54 UTC, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
>>
>>>>> The roads must roll ...
>>>
>>> That's actually quite a good idea, if roads moved like conveyor belts,
>>> there would be no pollution and no accidents.
>>
>> No pollution? Where does the energy come from for these "conveyor belts".
>
> Wind power. Put huge sails next to the roads.
>
> If the wind is not going the right direction just add huge fans.
>
> Done and done.

You remind me of the guy I sold my wind turbine to. He probably has the only place you can get meaningful power from those stupid things, a yacht.

[Commander Kinsey]

A genuine quote from Boris Johnson before he became prime minister: "It comes from the plug".
https://youtu.be/sjeUrIc61KM?t=102

But the point is it can be generated by clean fuels like nuclear/wind/solar/hydro, and any pollution is not right next to the user.

[%]

notX <not....@all.invalid> wrote

> On 1/12/22 15:42, % wrote:

>>> Ever hear of "limp mode"?
>>
>> Yep, what's between the phucker's ears does that 24/7/365.25
>
> BTW, the number of days in the average year is 365.2425
>
> 365 + (1 / 4) - (1 / 100) + (1 / 400)

Yeah, I couldn’t be bothered to work it out that accurately.

[Peeler]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 17:03:16 +1100, %, better known as cantankerous trolling
senile geezer Rodent Speed, wrote:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

--

Marland revealing the senile sociopath's pathology:
"You have mentioned Alexa in a couple of threads recently, it is not a real
woman you know even if it is the only thing with a female name that stays
around while you talk to it.
Poor sad git who has to resort to Usenet and electronic devices for any
interaction as all real people run a mile to get away from you boring them
to death."
MID: <gfkt3m...@mid.individual.net>

[Peter Keller]

On 13/01/22 23:08, Peeler wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:11:53 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
> little cyclist, blabbered again:
>
>
>
>> Peeler is a long, eel-like fish that lives in salt water. This fish is
>> also occasionally referred to as a “slime eel.”
>
> I refer to you as a REAL DUMB gay masochistic cyclist, you gay cretin! <BG>

Thanks for the compliment.

It really is a very great compliment to be called a cretin by YOU.
Especially by YOU.
And I have no fucking interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a bicycle, a very convenient delightful economical
viable means of transport.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the
fuckwitted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.

[Peter Keller]

On 13/01/22 23:10, Peeler wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:13:41 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
> little cyclist, blabbered again:
>
>
>
>> Peeler has the ability to produce copious amounts of slime, which is
>> oozed as mucous from glands along his sides.
>
> More useless shit from the resident gay dumb little cyclist! LOL

Thanks.

[Peter Keller]

On 13/01/22 23:10, Peeler wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:14:43 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
> little cyclist, blabbered again:
>
>
>>
>> Peeler's slime is used to deter predators, because it can clog their gills.
>
> More of the usual useless shit from the resident gay dumb little cyclist!
> LOL

You are very welcome.

[Peter Keller]

On 13/01/22 23:12, Peeler wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:17:42 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
> little cyclist, blabbered again:
>
>
>
>> Peeler's skin is very loose, and his skull is made primarily of
>> cartilage rather than bone.
>
> More of the typical useless shit from the resident gay dumb little cyclist!
> LOL

How lovely you are.

[Peter Keller]

About 44 BC

[Peter Keller]

On 13/01/22 23:12, Peeler wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:19:11 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
> little cyclist, blabbered again:
>
>
>> Peeler ranges in colour from pink to blue and grey, and is occasionally
>> covered in spots.
>
> Yet more of the typical useless shit from the resident gay dumb little
> cyclist! LOL

*kisses*

[Peter Keller]

On 14/01/22 07:24, Peeler wrote:
> <FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

Peeler lacks jaws.

[Peter Keller]

On 14/01/22 07:46, Peeler wrote:
> <FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

Peeler grips the decaying matter between his dental plates and ties
himself in knots to tear it open.

[Peeler]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 22:20:57 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
little cyclist, blabbered again:
>>

>> I refer to you as a REAL DUMB gay masochistic cyclist, you gay cretin! <BG>
>
> Thanks for the compliment.

My pleasure! Any time again, you ridiculous weird masochistic gay little
cyclist! LOL

[Peeler]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 22:21:46 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
little cyclist, blabbered again:
>>

>> More useless shit from the resident gay dumb little cyclist! LOL
>
> Thanks.

Sure! Any time again, you ridiculous weird masochistic gay little cyclist!
LOL

[Peeler]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 22:22:30 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
little cyclist, blabbered again:

>> More of the usual useless shit from the resident gay dumb little cyclist!
>> LOL
>
> You are very welcome.

My pleasure! Any time again, you useless weird idiotic masochistic gay
little cyclist! LOL

[Peeler]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 22:23:08 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
little cyclist, blabbered again:
>>

>> More of the typical useless shit from the resident gay dumb little cyclist!
>> LOL
>
> How lovely you are.

It you "think" so, you ridiculous weird masochistic gay little cyclist! LOL

[Peeler]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 22:24:02 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
little cyclist, blabbered again:

>> When is the last time you had a wife?
>
> About 44 BC

IOW, you NEVER had one, you weird masochistic gay little cyclist! No
suprise! <BG>

[Peeler]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 22:24:40 +1300, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent

Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

>> Yet more of the typical useless shit from the resident gay dumb little
>> cyclist! LOL
>
> *kisses*

You are disgusting, you perverted weird masochistic gay cyclist!

[Peeler]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 22:26:53 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
little cyclist, blabbered again:

> Peeler lacks jaws.

More of the typical useless shit from the resident gay dumb little cyclist!
LOL

[Peeler]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 22:28:54 +1300, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
little cyclist, blabbered again:

> Peeler grips the decaying matter between his dental plates and ties
> himself in knots to tear it open.

And ore of the typical useless shit from the resident gay dumb little
cyclist! LOL

[Max Demian]

On 13/01/2022 21:14, notX wrote:
> On 1/12/22 15:42, % wrote:
>

> [snip]

>
>>> Ever hear of "limp mode"?
>>
>> Yep, what's between the phucker's ears does that 24/7/365.25
>
> BTW, the number of days in the average year is 365.2425
>
> 365 + (1 / 4) - (1 / 100) + (1 / 400)
>

> considering the leap year rules (multiple or 4 unless multiple of 100
> unless multiple of 400)
>
> Interestingly, this is a whole number of seconds: 31,556,952

But that's calculating the year's length from Pope Gregory' rules, which
is rather arse about face.

--
Max Demian

[Snit]

On Jan 13, 2022 at 4:40:52 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.1fyj2...@ryzen.lan>:

Was he devilishly handsome, too?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

[Peeler]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 18:51:27 GMT, Shit the git, the senile troll and
troll-feeding senile asshole, blathered again:

> Was he devilishly handsome, too?

He couldn't have been as devilishly retarded as both of you, Shit the git!

--
Some facts about the trolling senile shithead:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

[Commander Kinsey]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 18:51:27 -0000, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 13, 2022 at 4:40:52 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
> <op.1fyj2...@ryzen.lan>:
>
>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:24:10 -0000, Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 13, 2022 at 4:11:49 AM MST, "soup" wrote <srp1dk$rn0$1...@dont-email.me>:
>>>
>>>> On 12/01/2022 20:20, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 19:33:43 -0000, John J <johnje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wednesday, 12 January 2022 at 17:57:54 UTC, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> The roads must roll ...
>>>>>
>>>>> That's actually quite a good idea, if roads moved like conveyor belts,
>>>>> there would be no pollution and no accidents.
>>>>
>>>> No pollution? Where does the energy come from for these "conveyor belts".
>>>
>>> Wind power. Put huge sails next to the roads.
>>>
>>> If the wind is not going the right direction just add huge fans.
>>>
>>> Done and done.
>>
>> You remind me of the guy I sold my wind turbine to. He probably has the only
>> place you can get meaningful power from those stupid things, a yacht.
>
> Was he devilishly handsome, too?

I can't remember, I was looking at the money in his hand. He very nearly didn't get it as I almost fell off the ladder getting it down and was about to drop it before the weight pulled me to one side, but I just managed to grab the roof. I'd forgotten it was that heavy.

[Snit]

On Jan 14, 2022 at 12:29:32 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
<op.1fz23...@ryzen.lan>:

I would imagine it would have to be made fairly sturdy to not break in heavier
winds.