I tend to not trust researchers that can't count, especially at the single digit level.
...Director Dr. Tess Lawrie (MBBCh, PhD), says: “we have searched the Yellow Card
reports using pathology-specific key words to group the data according to the
following five [sic] broad, clinically relevant categories:
- Bleeding, Clotting and Ischaemic ADRs
- Immune System ADRs
- ‘Pain’ ADRs
- Neurological ADRs
- ADRs involving loss of Sight, Hearing, Speech or Smell
- Pregnancy ADRs”
Even the publishers of the web page wanted to make sure that readers knew
that they weren't mis-quoting the Director. - five [sic] -
If they can't count to 6 correctly, how accurate can the rest of the analysis be?