In alt.home.repair, on Sun, 21 Nov 2021 05:51:58 -0800 (PST), trader_4
It was going to run all the time, as the pond at the top filled and
overflowed into a stream going to the edge of the property.
They used to have urinals that ran all the time but I haven't seen one
in decades.
>> Keeping a bird bath full should cost a penny or two a day on your
>> water bill and you will be using treated water so the bird bath won't
>> be a science fair project. God only knows what is in that drainage
>> ditch.
>
>His pump drawing water for 200 feet wouldn't use much electricity,
>but it would be interesting to see how the small cost of that compares
>to the small cost of just using municipal water. I would not be surprised
>that the cost for the water is less.
Using city water would be like letting a faucet run all the time. Too
wasteful. It's has to be the stream, or probably what most people do
is just pump the water back up from the end of their little stream.
It turns out it's 40 feet, not 20, to the edge of the property (which is
the stream bed but a part that is dry 99% of the time), but I was right,
about 200 feet to the stream, where the stream is actually running, and
about 10 feet lift needed.
60 feet of that is also in the empty part of the stream bed and when it
floods 55 feet of it will be pushed down stream. I"ll just have to put
it back each time, a couple times a year. I could bury that part too I
suppose but there are rocks here wherever you dig and I'll bet there are
even more in the stream bed (because the dirt on top gets washed away,
but the rocks remain). (I recently heard 2nd hand from someone who knew
this area before the houses were built and he said there was one or more
truckloads of rocks removed, but there are still plenty left.
I can bury the input hose where it's in my yard, and I can bury the
electric cord.
But I could also just run a return hose from the bottom of the little
stream I want to make, only 40 feet. For some quirky reason of my own,
I don't like this as much (something like the porchlight glass issue and
what I think is "natural". One wouldn't be able to see my stream water
pouring down the side of the hill into the real stream bed.) but it
would be a lot less work and it's what I think everyone else does. --
then I'd only have to pump 40 feet sideways and 2 to 4 feet up. It just
doesn't feel as real to me, even though the other way isn't real either.
(FWIW, I also don't have my own water bill. They installed water meters
for every house, but it was I guess up to the HOA to hire someone to
read them, and that requires opening the metal hatch in the sidewalk for
every two houses. It was never done and instead, there is one meter for
the 100+ houses and every house pays the same amount. So 99% of what my
stream used would be paid for by my neighbors. Most would never see the
stream and the rest might never think about the water bill, but it's not
right of me, and when they do figure it out they'd be annoyed.)