"HeyBub" <hey...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
news:w9ydnc3Z7tS4x77S...@earthlink.com...
>
j...@myplace.com wrote:
> > Most people know that dropping a cord or appliance that is plugged
> > into an outlet into a bathtub filled with water will electrocute the
> > person in the tub.
>
> And most people would be wrong. The person in the tub would have to be
> touching the toaster, or whatever, thrown in the tub. Even then, if the
> internals of the appliance didn't fry, the circuit breaker would trip. At
> most, if touching the device, the bather would experience maybe a
> quarter-second of jolt.
Completely and utterly wrong, HeyBub. Here's why:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters_(2004_season)#Appliances_in_the_Bath
<<Appliances in the Bath
One can be killed by dropping an electrical appliance into a bath full of
water.
Confirmed!
The electrocution effect is increased if the appliance drops farther from
the drain or if the water has more salt in it (such as due to urine or epsom
salts). They also proved that devices (and probably by extension, sockets)
with GFCIs are effective at preventing these electrocutions, as a
GFCI-equipped hairdryer cut off on contact with the water.>>
The only reason that more people don't die is:
http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/pubs/success/dryers.html
<<In the early 1980's there was an average of 18 electrocutions each year
involving hand-held hair dryers. Most of these deaths occurred when the hair
dryer fell, or was pulled, into a bathtub of water. From 1990 through 1992,
there was an average of only four electrocutions a year associated with hair
care equipment. How did this decrease, from an average of 18 deaths a year
to an average of 4 deaths a year, come about?
In October 1987, hair dryers were required to provide protection against
electrocutions when the product was immersed in water with the switch off.
Research by CPSC staff of the behavior of small children led to further CPSC
recommendations to UL that protection be required in both the "on" and "off"
positions. This requirement became effective on January 1, 1991.>>
There were 18 confirmed deaths, but hundreds more non-lethal yet severe
shocks. Contrary to popular belief, bathtub electrocutions occur without
people touching external objects while in the tub. Your entire body is
connected to the home's ground/neutral wire through the tub and there's no
better way to get skin to conduct electricity than to moisten it. You've
seen them sponge people's heads before the skull electrode is lowered on the
electric chair. Same reason.
It doesn't take very high current levels to kill by electrocution, again
contrary to popular belief. All it takes is enough current applied exactly
the right way to interrupt the heartbeat. In fact, there's a certain low
current "sweet spot" that is far more lethal than much higher currents
because of the "muscle clamping" effect of the heart.
People seem to be hung up on the "path of least resistance" line of
thinking, and that's dangerous. The current will take *every* possible path
with the amount of current being limited by the resistance along that path.
I don't know why so many people seem to believe that direct physical contact
to a "hot" wire is necessary in a tub or pool.
Current can follow many paths simultaneously. IIRC, it only requires 100 mA
of AC current to cause an electrocution death. For a 10 amp source, that
means only 1% of the current needs to flow through your body. The other 99%
can flow through another, lower resistance path. That one percent can, and
has, killed people. That's the reason GFCI's are now required in every
bathroom and around pools. Lots of people died.
Ironically, water's low conductivity turns out to make bathtub
electrocutions possible because its low enough to prevent blowing a fuse but
high enough to allow enough current to pass to cause electrocution. That's
the precise reason GFCI's were created. To deal with situations where a
fuse didn't blow yet the circuit was able to provide a lethal amount of
current.
http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~p616/safety/fatal_current.html says:
"skin resistance may vary from 1000 ohms for wet skin to over 500,000 ohms
for dry skin."
Ironically, low currents can be more lethal than higher ones because of how
the heart muscle reacts. The "Fatal Current" site goes on to say:
<<As shown in the chart, shock is relatively more severe as the current
rises. For currents above 10 milliamps, muscular contractions are so strong
that the victim cannot let go of the wire that is shocking him. At values as
low as 20 milliamps, breathing becomes labored, finally ceasing completely
even at values below 75 milliamps.
As the current approaches 100 milliamps, ventricular fibrillation of the
heart occurs - an uncoordinated twitching of the walls of the heart's
ventricles which results in death.
Above 200 milliamps, the muscular contractions are so severe that the heart
is forcibly clamped during the shock. This clamping protects the heart from
going into ventricular fibrillation, and the victim's chances for survival
are good.>>
--
Bobby G.