DRAFT: ATTRACTIVE AMERICAN WOMEN
TXZZ
First of all gentleman, I would like to beg patience, in advance for
the following UNREALISTIC AND FANCIFUL alternate history. However,
there have been unrealistic what-if's on this group before; I beg the
patience for my rough draft of:
ATTRACTIVE AMERICAN WOMEN:
First of all, we need to identify the causes namely:
1. Puritanism
2. Slavery (strict sexual taboos against sleeping with the buff negro
men and enslaved negro ladies)
3. Anglophilia (more francophilia means sexier women, perhaps a
nastier revolution?)
4. Underfunded FDA (maybe Nixon could help this)
In any event, absent slavery the US gets much more Hispanic
immigration to the south than it did OTL, so that alone should help
things.
However, the counter-culture of the American 60's was just too
radically feminist. Problem is even 2nd wave feminism can't just be
handwaved away.
Thus, the cultural matrix, both north and south, was bad from the get
go. IS there any way we can get "attractive american women" without
radically altering America's cultural matrices?
TXZZ
This qualifies as alternate history becaue american women are not
attractive
Matt Giwer
As American women represent all races and nations on the planet it is not
clear what might please you. Perhaps if you took a look at the men ...
--
The boundary between the sciences and the humanities is unbreechable. Any
scientist can obtain a degree in any of the fine arts if he is interested.
The opposite is not possible.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 4182
http://www.giwersworld.org/holo2/ a11
Sun Oct 25 23:12:13 EDT 2009
Marcus Aurelius
representation (the right to vote) and the governmental obligation to
serve in our military, inclusive of combat duty, the vast majority of
American women (with some exceptions) would rather not have the right
to vote rather than face military duty, especially combat duty. Of
course, many American men,ALSO, would rather lose the right to vote
than serve in the US Military, especially combat duty.
The rational and just implication of the aforementioned is that
electoral representation should be linked to military service and the
willingness to serve in the combat arms (as it used to be the case in
Switzerland and many ancient nations). Otherwise, it is highly likely,
as it is and was the case now in the USA, that the cowardly and base
electoral majority will victimize, oppress, and discriminate against
those courageous and patriotic enough to serve in our military.
Good Habit
> electoral representation should be linked to military service and the
> willingness to serve in the combat arms (as it used to be the case in
> Switzerland and many ancient nations).
Wrong - Switzerland never had a link between military service and voting
rights. Of course it is true that the number of people that got a
deferement used to be much lower than today, and that women didn't have
the vote on federal level until 1971 - but this was not _formally_
linked, and men considered unfit to serve still could vote...
TXZZ
> TXZZ wrote:
> > On Oct 25, 2:43 am, TXZZ <poopdog...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> ALTERNATE HISTORY
>
> >> First of all gentleman, I would like to beg patience, in advance for
> >> the following UNREALISTIC AND FANCIFUL alternate history. However,
> >> there have been unrealistic what-if's on this group before; I beg the
> >> patience for my rough draft of:
>
> >>ATTRACTIVEAMERICANWOMEN:
>
> >> First of all, we need to identify the causes namely:
>
> >> 1. Puritanism
> >> 2. Slavery (strict sexual taboos against sleeping with the buff negro
> >> men and enslaved negro ladies)
> >> nastier revolution?)
> >> 4. Underfunded FDA (maybe Nixon could help this)
>
> >> In any event, absent slavery the US gets much more Hispanic
> >> immigration to the south than it did OTL, so that alone should help
> >> things.
>
> >> radically feminist. Problem is even 2nd wave feminism can't just be
> >> handwaved away.
>
> >> Thus, the cultural matrix, both north and south, was bad from the get
> >> radically altering America's cultural matrices?
>
> > This qualifies as alternate history becaueamericanwomenare not
> >attractive
>
> clear what might please you. Perhaps if you took a look at the men ...
>
> --
> The boundary between the sciences and the humanities is unbreechable. Any
> scientist can obtain a degree in any of the fine arts if he is interested.
> The opposite is not possible.
> -- The Iron Webmaster, 4182
> http://www.giwersworld.org/holo2/a11
> Sun Oct 25 23:12:13 EDT 2009
What a panzy liberal who approves of the reverse-discrimination
affecting all levels of society