Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

What if McCain wins?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Straha

unread,
May 26, 2008, 3:34:24 PM5/26/08
to
What happens if McCain wins and somehow gets 2 terms?(presume he gets
his first term by Obama saying/doing an EPIC gaffe and he gets his
second due to a more moderate libertarian party siphoning off a few
bedroom dems(yes, a left challenger is more likely but this is IMO
more interesting)) How does America and the world change because of a
2 term McCain presidency 2009-2017?

Dan Goodman

unread,
May 26, 2008, 7:07:34 PM5/26/08
to
Straha wrote:

I think the Democratic Party could nominate Dick Cheny and win, this
time around. Or rather, the Republican Party woud find a way to lose.

But if McCain does win? That would depend largely on who was running
the Executive Branch.

--
Dan Goodman
"I have always depended on the kindness of stranglers."
Tennessee Williams, A Streetcar Named Expire
Journal http://dsgood.livejournal.com
Futures http://clerkfuturist.wordpress.com
mirror 1: http://dsgood.insanejournal.com
mirror 2: http://dsgood.wordpress.com
Links http://del.icio.us/dsgood

Straha

unread,
May 27, 2008, 2:55:33 PM5/27/08
to
> But if McCain does win? That would depend largely on who was running
> the Executive Branch.
>

Don't you mean legislative branch?

Dan Goodman

unread,
May 27, 2008, 3:21:43 PM5/27/08
to
Straha wrote:

No, I do not. I mean that someone other than McCain would be running
the Executive Branch -- as distinguished from being nominally in charge.

Kevin Cherkauer

unread,
May 28, 2008, 7:42:06 PM5/28/08
to
I thought it was the Democratic Party that had the most practice at
snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. My friends, every day that goes
by, my friends, I see President McCain, my friends, looming larger.

Utopia in Decay -- The future is coming to get you.
http://home.comcast.net/~kevin.cherkauer/site/

Kevin Cherkauer


"Dan Goodman" <dsg...@iphouse.com> wrote in message
news:483b42b6$0$68541$8046...@auth.newsreader.iphouse.com...

Dan Goodman

unread,
May 28, 2008, 9:03:56 PM5/28/08
to
Kevin Cherkauer wrote:

> I thought it was the Democratic Party that had the most practice at
> snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

You're thinking only of relatively recent times. Both parties have had
periods in which they seemed incapable of winning the Presidency or
gaining Congressional majorities.

I don't think either will go the way of the Federalists and the Whigs
anytime soon. But I do think the Republicans are in for a dry spell.
Which will last till the Democrats figure that staying in power is a
no-brainer, and act on that.

Power stupidifies. The illusion of absolute power stupidifies
absolutely.


> My friends, every day that
> goes by, my friends, I see President McCain, my friends, looming
> larger.
>
> Utopia in Decay -- The future is coming to get you.
> http://home.comcast.net/~kevin.cherkauer/site/
>
> Kevin Cherkauer
>
>
> "Dan Goodman" <dsg...@iphouse.com> wrote in message
> news:483b42b6$0$68541$8046...@auth.newsreader.iphouse.com...
>
> > I think the Democratic Party could nominate Dick Cheny and win, this
> > time around. Or rather, the Republican Party woud find a way to
> > lose.

--

bm2...@eve.albany.edu

unread,
May 29, 2008, 7:11:33 PM5/29/08
to
On May 27, 1:21 pm, "Dan Goodman" <dsg...@iphouse.com> wrote:

>
> No, I do not. I mean that someone other than McCain would be running
> the Executive Branch -- as distinguished from being nominally in charge.
>
>

I am puzzled. Are you claiming McCain is going to go all senile any
day now, or what?

(And I can see a President McCain. He polls pretty well vs Obama,
there is no sign the press is planning to disengage their lips from
his buttcheeks, and PT Barnum's dictum remains in force.)

Bruce

Dan Goodman

unread,
May 30, 2008, 12:29:33 AM5/30/08
to
bm2...@eve.albany.edu wrote:

> On May 27, 1:21 pm, "Dan Goodman" <dsg...@iphouse.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > No, I do not. I mean that someone other than McCain would be running
> > the Executive Branch -- as distinguished from being nominally in
> > charge.
> >
> I am puzzled. Are you claiming McCain is going to go all senile any
> day now, or what?

No. It doesn't require senility to leave messy details like making
decisions to underlings, while you enjoy having a high-prestige job.


> (And I can see a President McCain. He polls pretty well vs Obama,
> there is no sign the press is planning to disengage their lips from
> his buttcheeks, and PT Barnum's dictum remains in force.)
>
> Bruce

--

Straha

unread,
May 31, 2008, 3:09:22 PM5/31/08
to
On May 27, 3:21 pm, "Dan Goodman" <dsg...@iphouse.com> wrote:
> No, I do not. I mean that someone other than McCain would be running
> the Executive Branch -- as distinguished from being nominally in charge.

Presume he picks Mike Huckabee for this.

Dan Goodman

unread,
Jun 20, 2008, 2:10:11 AM6/20/08
to
Straha wrote:

What makes you think _he_ would do the picking?

I don't believe that McCain would be in charge if he were elected
President.

0 new messages