SNAPPLE! Best stuff in my bong.
Ivan
> What else is good in a bong? (WATER, APPLE JUICE...)
> ******************************************************************
> Man made God in his image.
The first bong I ever had was given to me by a very good friend of mine.
He came over one night and gave it to me. I took it from him and poured
cold Pink Lemonade - Snapple into it. We smoked out of it for a while,
and then I named my bong SNAPPLE!
Try it sometime.
Any flavor you like.
SNAPPLE! MADE FROM THE BEST STUFF ON EARTH.
Heather A. Konschnik
Rgraham
milk in his.
F.Frederick Skitty
>Try some beer or whiskey then drink it afterwards. I had a friend who did
>milk in his.
Bad idea, the whole point of having water in a bong is so that it
filters out the nasty carcinogens and lets the THC molecules pass
thru'
If you use an alcohol based liquid it will absorb the THC molecules
hence making the bong less efficient. (i.e it won't filter the
carcinogens and it will absorb THC)
The only true liquid to use is water (and preferably warm water)
This has been a public service announcement on behalf of
the Bong Education Council.
http://www.compulink.co.uk/~dc/welcome.html
IGo...@omBomb.demon.co.uk Weir...@omBomb.compulink.co.uk =%^)
Web : http://www.compulink.co.uk/~dc/Welcome.html
Hit them in the face with a Funky Bass For a Happy Smiling race.
KAYAL DAVID NICHOLAS
[snip]
>The only true liquid to use is water (and preferably warm water)
>This has been a public service announcement on behalf of
>the Bong Education Council.
Why warm water? Snow bong hits are great in my opinon.
Dmitri Vesselinovich Kostov
does not reduce cancirogenic content. I've heard that from Dr. John Morgan, a
prominent reform activist, and have no reason to doubt the credibility of the
scientific study.
BTW, the THC content is reduced by 10% when you use a bong.
Christopher Sturgeon
Did you know that Snapple gives about ten cents of every purchase to an
anti-legalization organization?
Chris
(bustin Knowledge)
F.Frederick Skitty
>Sorry to disappoint you, guys, but it's been reported that water filtration
Curses ;-)
It may have been reported, but is it true ? ....Are there other
studies that say different ?
The Bong Education Council need to know.
IGo...@omBomb.compulink.co.uk =%^)
http://www.compulink.co.uk/~dc
http://www.compulink.co.uk/~ombomb
hun...@microserve.net
>Did you know that Snapple gives about ten cents of every purchase to an
>anti-legalization organization?
Well, no more snapple for me.
hun...@microserve.net
>Sorry to disappoint you, guys, but it's been reported that water filtration
>does not reduce cancirogenic content. I've heard that from Dr. John Morgan, a
>prominent reform activist, and have no reason to doubt the credibility of the
>scientific study.
>BTW, the THC content is reduced by 10% when you use a bong.
Whenever burn pot it ruduces the canboids, only by haveing it smoke at
sub flamibale tempatures you will get all the thc. Well most people just
use a water pipe for smothness, most pot smokers smoke anyways and
really dont care about their lives.
eric hobbs
on the other hand Beer is pretty cool.... oh wait that's a beer bong now
isn't it?
eric hobbs
Yeah but you get such a big hit off a bong. With relly good herb I can
afford to miss the 10%.
Rudie Boi
drink the tea... Warm it up first, though.
Marc lePine
Yeah, but who can afford to miss the extra smoke that is generally lost
through a bong? When I'm down to the last few bowls, I always end up
using a pipe only (with a chamber on, of course<g>). Joints and bongs
just waste it, which you can a lot about once you're into your dregs.
John Menendez
On Fri, 17 Nov 1995, hun...@microserve.net wrote:
> Christopher Sturgeon <stur...@ucs.orst.edu> wrote:
>
> >Did you know that Snapple gives about ten cents of every purchase to an
> >anti-legalization organization?
>
> Well, no more snapple for me.
>
>
>
I read a bumper sticker the other day that said: "Sugar is NOT
the 'Best Stuff on Earth'"
baal
John Menendez
On Fri, 17 Nov 1995, hun...@microserve.net wrote:
> Dmitri Vesselinovich Kostov <dvk5> wrote:
>
> >Sorry to disappoint you, guys, but it's been reported that water filtration
> >does not reduce cancirogenic content. I've heard that from Dr. John Morgan, a
> >prominent reform activist, and have no reason to doubt the credibility of the
> >scientific study.
> >BTW, the THC content is reduced by 10% when you use a bong.
>
> Whenever burn pot it ruduces the canboids, only by haveing it smoke at
> sub flamibale tempatures you will get all the thc. Well most people just
> use a water pipe for smothness, most pot smokers smoke anyways and
> really dont care about their lives.
>
>
>
Read in High Times that a couple drops of H2O on a bowl helps
keep the temp just right for evaporating the THC off the pot w/out burning
it. All that's left is dead leaf matter...
baal
Martin Brawnson
: "depth," as well as the quickest onset. Perhaps it's because you're "forced" to smoke so much so
: quickly, and no chemicals are lost, like are lost on a bong's water and cylinder, or a bowl's
: interior. Joints just get stronger and stronger after each toke because the increasingly smaller
: roach has even more THC in it than it did a second ago.
Well, I think joints are wasteful. First of all, you have to use
much more pot in a joint to smoke say 3 people, than in a bong. Second of
all, they smoke like crazy if you roll a big cone! You may get more, but
the second you finish taking a heave, CLOUDS of smoke come off the thing.
If you could capture it, it would be efficient, but it's not. My personal
favorite device is the bong. My friend made a wicked bong, and then one
day the screen broke, so we had to fix it. We made a makeshift screen and
shoved it into the bottom of the bowl and found out that made it SUPER
POWERFUL! (the bong's name is ARNIE! :). We smoked a gram in 3 tokes
between 3 people (it's a big bowl. 2 g capacity) and we got hit in the
head so fucking hard. I've NEVER seen my eyes that red before. (including
after the legendary 1-foot j, "Mt. Cannabis" (named after the huge pile
of weed on the table while rolling)).
Martin Brawnson
: COLD WATER W/PLENTY OF ICE. SMOOTH, SMOOTH, SMOOTH.
If you put the bong in the fridge for a couple of hours with the
water in it, THEN add ice, that works better. :)
MindTracks
writes:
> Well, I think joints are wasteful.
to all of you who I've caught saying this.... have you ever considered
the possibility that maybe you just don't know how to roll a good joint??
It takes mad skills......
zep...@ix.netcom.com
>Christopher Sturgeon <stur...@ucs.orst.edu> wrote:
>>Did you know that Snapple gives about ten cents of every purchase to an
>>anti-legalization organization?
>Well, no more snapple for me.
damn right....i hate snapple anyways. Now I REALLY FUCKING HATE IT!
Hunter
>hun...@microserve.net (hun...@microserve.net) wrote:
>>Christopher Sturgeon <stur...@ucs.orst.edu> wrote:
Ditto here!
Hunter
Tom Petty
>Did you know that Snapple gives about ten cents of every purchase to an
>anti-legalization organization?
Which organization is it?
Tom
Tim Meehan
>>>Did you know that Snapple gives about ten cents of every purchase to an
>>>anti-legalization organization?
>>Well, no more snapple for me.
>damn right....i hate snapple anyways. Now I REALLY FUCKING HATE IT!
This thread's STILL fucking going!?!?!
(I've been out of a.d.p for a while...)
--
Tim Meehan - Toronto | "One of my favorite things about this group
du...@interlog.com | (alt.society.generation-x) is that we tend to
tim.m...@utoronto.ca | quote each other in our sigs." -- Amanda Wilson
-=- http://www.interlog.com/~duke -=- +1(416)449-2369 -=-
your HIGHness
>zep...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
>>hun...@microserve.net (hun...@microserve.net) wrote:
>
>>>Christopher Sturgeon <stur...@ucs.orst.edu> wrote:
>
>>>>anti-legalization organization?
>
>>>Well, no more snapple for me.
>
>>damn right....i hate snapple anyways. Now I REALLY FUCKING HATE IT!
>
>
>Hunter
Hold up- how do you know this? -your HIGHness-
Sally Thomas
Adam Jarrett
: tomp...@selway.umt.edu (Tom Petty)
FEDERAL DRUG ADMINIATRATION or how ever you spell that ...
stoney yeah haa--
__ ___
/ ) / ( > _/_ _/_
/--/ __/ __. ______ __/___. __ __ _ / /
/ (_(_/_(_/|_/ / / <_ / / (_/|_/ (_/ (_</_<___<__
<_/