Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
Forwarded message from M. D.
Yog & Hinduism
Thursday, December 2, 2010
An excellent summary article by Ramesh Rao in today's UK Guardian...
It is wrong to deny that yog has its origins in Hinduism
Yog has been shamelessly rebranded to make it more acceptable to
western culture, but this is based on a lie
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2010/dec/02/yog-hindu-rebranded-wrongly
A 2002 survey of Americans showed that more than half the population
expressed an interest in practicing yog, and a 2004 news report
claimed that there were nearly 15.5 million yog practitioners in the
country. Nearly 77% of the practitioners of yog are women, and half
of the yog enthusiasts have a college degree.
In the small college at which I teach in rural Virginia, at which
participation in at least one form of physical education is required,
yog classes are the first to fill up -- not aerobic dance, not
fitness walking, and certainly not weight-lifting. Yog Journal, the
most popular magazine for yog enthusiasts, now has a paid circulation
of 350,000 and a readership of more than 1,000,000. Yog has indeed
been embraced by Americans.
But as yog became more popular, and as the industry grew to be worth
nearly six billion dollars, and as a variety of savvy marketers begin
branding their "special" yog techniques, it was hard not to notice
that few yog teachers and journals mentioned the origins of the
practice and its connection to Hinduism. Yog was "secularised" to rid
it of any taint of a "pagan" tradition. The practice, the savvy
marketers claimed, was "a spiritual path, but not a religious one",
to calm the committed Christian who wanted to hang on to Jesus while
doing the "surya namaskara" (obeisance to the Sun).
Hindus are an accepting lot, and they believe that each should be
able to follow whatever spiritual path they chose, according to one's
"ishta" (desire) and "adhikara" (qualifications). And as one scholar
elegantly put it, Hinduism itself was "a rolling conference of
conceptual spaces, all of them facing all, and all of them requiring
all", enabling it to accommodate everyone in this grand cosmic
munificence, label or no label.
Alas, we love to categorise, and lay claim to God, goodness, and
"truth", and when those making monopolistic claims to these began to
dominate the world, and spread the idea of "religion" -- branding,
marketing, and enlarging market share of souls harvested and
converted -- we found the people of India (the new name for the old
Bharatavarsha) began to be labeled "Hindus" (an umbrella term to
identify all those who adhered to Indian spiritual/religious
traditions, not including Buddhism, Jainism, or Sikhism) and their
vast "rolling conference of conceptual spaces" got neatly pigeon-
holed as a religion -- a religion, very soon marked and demonised as
"heathen", "pagan", "kafr", and so on.
Thus, when a neophyte yog student, hanging on to Jesus, anxiously
queried, "Is yog part of Hinduism?", the savvy marketer claimed that
the origins of yog were lost in myth and mystery and that there "was
no indication that it was ever part of an organised religion",
accomplishing two things simultaneously -- reifying Hinduism as a
"religion" in the sense of "Abrahamic religions", and denying it as
the fount and foundation of yog.
Joining these local marketers were the Indian-origin marketers, with
the lead being taken by the savvy Deepak Chopra -- the glib, red-
sneakers-and-red-designer-glasses-wearing Hollywood guru who would
make PT Barnum proud. Thus, when Aseem Shukla of the Hindu American
Foundation wrote an essay in The Washington Post in April this year
arguing that there had been a deliberate attempt to represent yog as
separate from its origins in Hinduism, Chopra came pouncing.
Ironically, he was joining hands with those demonising Hinduism and
disemboweling it of its grand traditions. And when The New York
Times, in a front-page article, recently commended the Hindu American
Foundation for its intelligent activism, the nay-sayers screamed:
"Hindu fundamentalists!"
But what do Hindus, not the deracinated variety, actually want? It is
simply to urge the world to acknowledge that yog has its roots in the
millennia-old Indian traditions now known as Hinduism. There is no
demand that those who do yog profess any attachment to Hinduism, let
alone become Hindus! There is no tithe to be paid, no conversion
sought, no allegiance to a land and its people demanded. Hindus will
gladly acknowledge that some modern versions of yog that focus mostly
on shaping and controlling the body do have some Western innovators,
though few religion and yog scholars will deny the fact that yog
spread in the west because of the work of great teachers like T
Krishnamacharya, K Pattabhi Jois, and BKS Iyengar -- all doing their
morning and evening prayers to their chosen Hindu deities, and
proudly wearing their Hindu identity on their foreheads.
What should also be acknowledged is that most of the yog that is
taught and practiced in the West is "hutth yog", and that the focus
on the body was only a very minor aspect of yog delineated by the
great compiler of the yog aphorisms, Patanjali. In fact, of the 196
sutras in Patanjali's Yogasutras, only three focus on the body. The
primary aim of yog, Patanjali stressed in the second sutra, is to
still the mind for a transformation of consciousness.
Yog is a complete psychological system, with clear and definite
answers to explain the human condition and relieve us of our
psychological burdens. Alas, in the modern, westernised, noise-making
world, the argument presented by Hindus is under attack from the
professional anti-Hindu brigades, homegrown and foreign, whose aim is
to proclaim yog as "anaath" -- an orphan.
End of forwarded message from M. D.
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.