OT: The keylogger
-=Be4U=-
not been used or activated for over a year...since January 2002.
In fact, the person who installed it had forgotten it was ever
there. The situation was discussed and resolved by Feb. 16, 2003.
There is no way anything found via that keylogger has ANY bearing
on the current situation whatsoever.
I was not then, NOR WAS I EVER UNFAITHFUL. I *still* haven't been.
I'm more than willing to accept the blame and guilt for whatever I
have done, whatever mistakes I *have* made....but I'll be damned if
I'm going to just stand by silently while there are lies being
inferred and insinuated.
Anyone who doesn't choose to read my posts...you have KF's.
--
-=Mara=-
"Ping Be4U: I love you -- merely reading your words soothes the
savage beast in me, the image of you in my mind wobbles my
knees - run away with me to Tahiti where we can frolic on the
beach and drink fruity drinks as the sun sets in the distance...."
The Laughing Ghoul [TING], alt.music.ozzy, 28-Aug, 2002
</malicious mode>
You're a nice person, Be4U. AHM wouldn't be the same without you.
<malicious mode>
~Trebor, alt.hackers.malicious, 22-Oct-03
Sharon B
wrote in <Xns9424A0B296324be4u@foo_blah_bar.com>:
LET
IT
GO
YOU
FROTHING
LOON
....and change your .sig, stupid scene 'ho.
-=Be4U=-
green crayon and scribbling in
news:cva3qv43bnad8jf67...@4ax.com, on the hallowed
day of Thu 30 Oct 2003 04:31:15p:
> <dusts off armor>
> He mentioned a keylogger and insinuated it had something to do
> with his actions. She has every right to defend herself.
Thank you. I had *hoped* a correction would have been posted, in
the interest of accuracy and fairness. It wasn't.
> And since you mentioned "pathos" reread *your* post.
>
> Anyway, I'm sure at this point, she has no illusions of
> reconciliation so maybe *you* should let it go.
> I do agree with the sig part tho.
Nope, sig stays, until I feel like changing it. It's certainly not
hurting anyone. Besides, TING.
Sharon B
<cva3qv43bnad8jf67...@4ax.com>:
[...]
><dusts off armor>
{raises right eyebrow....didn't realize I'd smacked you so hard}
Ah, my new little fan. So...are you gonna follow me around ng to ng
or just thread to thread in this one?
I want you to know I have standards. See my beloved r0ck for fan club
membership details. Psst: no kookfarts in my Sacred Inbox.
BTW, you might wanna fix your headers....doe.com is a valid domain
you're forging (I *highly* doubt you have permission to use it). I
*know* you don't wanna be a steenkin' thieving net abuser.
If you want to learn how to properly munge your address, just ask.
Newbie Knight Errant
--
Judge Advocate Very Large Number of Cohorts
1st Virginia Volunteers Official Cohort #11
CEsium Brigade
-r0ck
Universal License to Subject President
Human Beings to Indignities The Barefoot & Proud SharonB fanclub
Temporary License #11 Washington DC Chapter
Cheryl
[ Doc Jeff ] <m...@privacy.net> composed with style:
Seconded.
Sharon B
<m...@privacy.net> wrote in
<27i3qvgj9r3jt0rmm...@4ax.com>:
>On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:25:52 -0500, Sharon B
><queenb...@diediedie.net> wrote:
>
>Kindly fuck off already.
Or?
>You're annoying me.
is THAT why you're following me around humping all my posts?
Sharon B
<jlhN...@petitmorte.net> wrote in
<bnsjo1$14hu7l$1...@ID-94914.news.uni-berlin.de>:
>Seconded.
huh. i'm surprised at you, cheryl.
Sharon B
<tr3b0r9NO...@yahoo.com> wrote in
<e7m3qvo7ogi72i9h6...@4ax.com>:
>On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:42:57 -0500, Sharon B
><queenb...@diediedie.net> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:31:15 -0800, Trebor <jo...@doe.com> wrote in
>><cva3qv43bnad8jf67...@4ax.com>:
>>
>>[...]
>>><dusts off armor>
>>{raises right eyebrow....didn't realize I'd smacked you so hard}
>>
>>Ah, my new little fan. So...are you gonna follow me around ng to ng
>>or just thread to thread in this one?
>
>You follow mara, I follow you, mara follows... etc.. Ain't luv grand?
Apparently, or you think she's weak and needs the manly support of her
minions.
Gullible eejuts.
BTW, are you counting the one where I was having a discussion with
Hans on the finer points of dealing with email harassment and she
followed *me*?
Or is that somehow different? Is it different when y'all pile on and
bait TP for months, post reams of private email, drag RL in.....as
opposed to me putting a well deserved and long time coming thumpin' on
Mara's pointy head one day?
I'm curious how you minions justify all this.
btw....three of ya piling on me is just no fair. best go recruit more
minions.
>>I want you to know I have standards. See my beloved r0ck for fan club
>>membership details. Psst: no kookfarts in my Sacred Inbox.
>
>Are joo beggin me to mail joo?
Illiterate much?
[and I was referring to your comprehension, not your spelling--which
should be zeros not letters, with an apostrophe after the 'n' in
beggin']
HTH
>How many would you like? :)
Here's my standards thing again: I prefer my threats to be direct and
creative. Yours was neither. Veiled threats are entirely cowardly,
and email bombs are sooooo 90's. Puhleeze.
>>BTW, you might wanna fix your headers....doe.com is a valid domain
>>you're forging (I *highly* doubt you have permission to use it). I
>>*know* you don't wanna be a steenkin' thieving net abuser.
>
>Bah, I seriously doubt they'd care.
Really? Most people care very much about getting stolen from. Just
why is it, in your opinion, that domain forgery is a LARTable offense?
Because no one cares? Or do you think it might be because it's a
theft of resources?
>But, just cuz joo asked nicely,
I didn't ask, but I *was* being my usual helpful self. Had you been a
Chaney, deliberately stealing resources, I wouldn't have been so nice.
I can't abide thieves or those who would do the net doggie style.
>I
>present joo with valid addy. No kookfarts in my box either.
I *always* keep Usenet on Usenet. Too bad not everyone does, huh?
>Although,
>I hardly consider my usenet addy sacred.
You're paying for it, you can consider it any way you choose to.
>>If you want to learn how to properly munge your address, just ask.
>
>*snicker*
>
>>Newbie Knight Errant
>
>LOL
Mebbe when you start using full Agent, stop being so gullible around
women and learn to not get your boxers bunched, we can drop the newbie
part.
-=Be4U=-
taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
Thu 30 Oct 2003 06:59:08p:
[...]
>> implied not inferred. Sorry, couldn't help myself :)
>>
>>
>
> For the record, my intention wasn't to imply infidelity -
Thank you for saying that :)
> there's more to life than sex :)
>
yes, that's true.
Me
wrote:
>ThePsyko <thep...@itookmyprozac.com> delighted us to no end by
>taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
>news:Xns9424C14AF...@thebar.net, on the hallowed day of
>Thu 30 Oct 2003 06:59:08p:
>
>[...]
>>> implied not inferred. Sorry, couldn't help myself :)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> For the record, my intention wasn't to imply infidelity -
>
>Thank you for saying that :)
>
>> there's more to life than sex :)
>>
>
>yes, that's true.
Naa, not really. :-)
Think about it... everything one does goes back to sex in one way or
another. Ain't it great?!?!
-=Be4U=-
end by taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
day of Thu 30 Oct 2003 09:35:35p:
Shhuuush, you! I was trying to be....ummmmm....agreeable.
I figured those kinda jokes would be lost right now, ya know?
:)
Mawty
As was I, but like most of the others, she only knows one side of it.
-=Be4U=-
a lime green crayon and scribbling in
day of Thu 30 Oct 2003 11:03:39p:
> Today, Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:29:21 -0800, Two Buddha read a
> post from
> "-=Be4U=-" <be...@no-address.com> , Wicked Pete starting
> telling
> fibs about hacking
> SPNAK SPNAK
> Oh and:
>
>
>>ThePsyko <thep...@itookmyprozac.com> delighted us to no end by
>>taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
>>news:Xns9424C14AF...@thebar.net, on the hallowed day
>>of Thu 30 Oct 2003 06:59:08p:
>>
>>[...]
>>>> implied not inferred. Sorry, couldn't help myself :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> For the record, my intention wasn't to imply infidelity -
>>
>>Thank you for saying that :)
>>
>>> there's more to life than sex :)
>>>
>>
>>yes, that's true.
>
>
> thubsc1be. The shirt I was going to send rock smells great
> still. :)
>
> Yes, I broke up with the old girlfriend. NO LB OF TWENTIES.
>
>
>
huh?
btw, you're being frogged.
-=Be4U=-
day of Thu 30 Oct 2003 10:50:54p:
> From: Trebor <tr3b0r9NO...@yahoo.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.hackers.malicious
> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:50:54 -0800
>
Did you used to go by a different nic?
WDC r0ck
> Today, Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:29:21 -0800, Two Buddha read a post from
> "-=Be4U=-" <be...@no-address.com> , Wicked Pete starting telling
> fibs about hacking
> SPNAK SPNAK
> Oh and:
>
>
>
>>taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
>>news:Xns9424C14AF...@thebar.net, on the hallowed day of
>>Thu 30 Oct 2003 06:59:08p:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>>>implied not inferred. Sorry, couldn't help myself :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>For the record, my intention wasn't to imply infidelity -
>>
>>Thank you for saying that :)
>>
>>
>>>there's more to life than sex :)
>>>
>>
>>yes, that's true.
>
>
>
>
> Yes, I broke up with the old girlfriend. NO LB OF TWENTIES.
>
>
don't you send me a tshirt reeking of your gay sex at those boston bars.
i have no need for such things.
-=Be4U=-
taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
day of Thu 30 Oct 2003 11:17:22p:
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 23:13:03 -0800, "-=Be4U=-"
> <be...@no-address.com> wrote:
>
>>Trebor <tr3b0r9NO...@yahoo.com> delighted us to no end by
>>taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
>>news:2jv3qvgre9aaqg4f6...@4ax.com, on the
>>hallowed day of Thu 30 Oct 2003 10:50:54p:
>>
>>> From: Trebor <tr3b0r9NO...@yahoo.com>
>>> Newsgroups: alt.hackers.malicious
>>> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:50:54 -0800
>>>
>>
>>Did you used to go by a different nic?
>
> Nope, same mac address for quite awhile now. :)
>
lol
OK fine, don't answer me then ;p~~~~~
Sharon B
wrote in <Xns9424E2EBD4F2Fbe4u@foo_blah_bar.com>:
>Shhuuush, you! I was trying to be....ummmmm....agreeable.
not everyone is stupid and gullible
if you were really trying to be ageeable, you'd change your fuggen'
.sig
Sharon B
<tr3b0r9NO...@yahoo.com> wrote in
<2jv3qvgre9aaqg4f6...@4ax.com>:
>On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 00:02:55 -0500, Sharon B
><queenb...@diediedie.net> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:48:14 -0800, Trebor
>><tr3b0r9NO...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>><e7m3qvo7ogi72i9h6...@4ax.com>:
>>
>>>On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:42:57 -0500, Sharon B
>>><queenb...@diediedie.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:31:15 -0800, Trebor <jo...@doe.com> wrote in
>>>><cva3qv43bnad8jf67...@4ax.com>:
[...]
>She can take care of herself, I'm sure. I just don't like to see kooks
>like you jumping on someone who, from all I can see, is NICE.
you're contradicting yourself, sparky
[...]
>I don't watch everything you or she does. I couldn' really care less.
why, that is patently obvious to everyone, l'il know nuttin'
[...]
>I've never baited/piled on TP or anyone else here.
...but this is different, right? cuz it's ALWAYS different when *you*
do it.
dunbass
[...]
>I haven't seen that.
Yes, I'm quite aware that you are entirely clueless about what is
going on yet feel this obsessive NEED to throw yer 2 cents in ANYWAY
>If it happened, it must have been awhile ago.
>Obsess much?
boy are *you* asking the wrong person. talk to your poor widdle
princess, sparky
[...]
>Since she didn't/wasn't doing anything to you, It's not your place to
>do the "thumpin'". If someone is doing nothing to harm you why would
>you attack them?
gee, could this be yet *another* example of you being entirely
clueless and tossing in your two cents when you don't have any idea
what's going on?
Think?
[...]
>TP's lapdog scampers in here and calls anyone who likes mara more than
>her a "minion." Hilarious.
Yah, even more so if it was accurate, l'il knight errant.
>>btw....three of ya piling on me is just no fair. best go recruit more
>>minions.
>
>You came in here looking to stir the shizzat.
stop whining, l'il boy. very unseemly given *your* wont to follow
*me* around
>Are you gonna cry "no
>fair waa waa waa" to your owner now?
*I* never whine. How many times do I have to tell you to go fetch
more minions before it sinks in, Sparky?
psst: you give away your neutrality when you make references to my
"owner"
dunbass
[...]
>>Illiterate much?
>>[and I was referring to your comprehension, not your spelling--which
>>should be zeros not letters, with an apostrophe after the 'n' in
>>beggin']
>>
>>HTH
>
>You *are* stoopid. (f)lame that spelling error, Fido.
....and after the devastating sex lame, L'il Knight Errant reaches in
and pulls out......the IKYABWAI!!!
Idiot. Do your own work, you crass inept hack.
[...]
>You hace no sense of humor.
what are you on about, babble bjoi? I find impotent threats by
miniscule little wankers entirely too entertaining.
btw, was that *your* email bomb? ALL FIVE OF 'EM?
incompetent boob
[...]
>>Really? Most people care very much about getting stolen from. Just
>>why is it, in your opinion, that domain forgery is a LARTable offense?
>>Because no one cares? Or do you think it might be because it's a
>>theft of resources?
>
>Lowly netcop.
Are you still babbling, l'il boy? Did I net cop you? No? Careful,
delusions are apparently contagious. You're definitely running away
from the questions. Why is that? My bet is cuz you're clueless about
the 'net and are afraid to own your ignorance....not that that keeps
you from piping in on things you know nothing about.
>Blow me.
Not on your best day, l'il knight. Got anything besides sex lames and
IKYABWAI's? You're an alt.(f)lamenet reject, aintcha?
[...]
>>I didn't ask, but I *was* being my usual helpful self. Had you been a
>>Chaney, deliberately stealing resources, I wouldn't have been so nice.
>>I can't abide thieves or those who would do the net doggie style.
>
>I can do what I want. Are j00 gonna stop me? LOL
Yer just a kid, aintcha? That would explain it.
>>>I
>>>present joo with valid addy. No kookfarts in my box either.
>>
>>I *always* keep Usenet on Usenet. Too bad not everyone does, huh?
>
>I never check my throwaway accounts so I wouldn't know about that.
What does your checking your mail accounts have to do with net abuse,
you utter dunbass? Can you stay on point? You don't have an opinion
about net abuse because you don't check your email? What kind of
inane stupidity is *that*?
<snaps fingers>
[...]
>>Mebbe when you start using full Agent, stop being so gullible around
>>women and learn to not get your boxers bunched, we can drop the newbie
>>part.
>
>This *is* full Agent, you blithering retard.
....and I'll prove it to you as soon as I find the $30 bucks to turn
it on!!!!!
>I'll enter my serial
>number when I feel like it. That OK wit you, hrmm?
nice two step. it's always the oddest things that make y'all dance
Sharon B
<tr3b0r9NO...@yahoo.com> wrote in
<cn95qvg09hko6jqbb...@4ax.com>:
[larn to snip, fool....jeez]
>Uh, ya might wanna lay off the booze a bit, gramma.
GUFFAW
WAY TO SLAM YER PRINCESS!!
dunbass.
guess yer a knight errant in more ways than one
[yah, i know....all that went totally over your head, cuz you have no
clue what you just did--that's okay, others got it]
--
Member of The Committee for Aesthetic Deletions
Overseer of Prejudicial Eliminations
Judge Advocate Very Large Number of Cohorts
1st Virginia Volunteers Official Cohort #11
CEsium Brigade
-r0ck
Universal License to Subject President
Human Beings to Indignities The Barefoot & Proud SharonB fanclub
Temporary License #11 Washington DC Chapter
Member of The Feminist Junta
Ilena Ayala
"[ Doc Jeff ]" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:6ts5qvkmu2ktuvqlq...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 06:52:12 -0500, Sharon B
> <queenb...@diediedie.net> wrote:
<snip>
> >if you were really trying to be ageeable, you'd change your fuggen'
> >.sig
>
It boggles the mind, doesn't it? Sheesh, if I had a sig that bothered
Sharon that much, it'd be worth keeping just to annoy her.
Hmmmn, maybe I just could borrow Mara's sig...... :-)
-Ilena Ayala
Watch this space!
Me
Hows about we copy it... no sense in everybody passing around just
one.
Cheryl
Me <no-address_...@no-address.com> composed with style:
Add me to the lits. I'll wear it.
WDC r0ck
wtf?
passing around just one? everybody should have one. ask buzz. he knows.
Cheryl
Trebor <tr3b0r9NO...@yahoo.com> composed with style:
The whole thing. If something is replicated enough, human nature
denotes that it will become something desensitized.
Sharon B
<no-address_...@no-address.com> wrote in
<n3c6qvcemm56if1ot...@4ax.com>:
No, six on one ain't nearly enough, either.
TRY HARDER
Personally, I think you'd look pretty silly sporting a .sig that has
Psyko declaring his love for you....not that there's anything wrong
with that.
Of all people, I'd have thought *you* would be pleased that he was
reconciled with his wife and trying to make a success of his marriage
and raise their daughter together. To encourage an old flame to
continue running around with a .sig from when they were together
*after* being publicly told to quit stalking him is really beneath
you.
I'm disappointed in you.
Cheryl
Sharon B <queenb...@diediedie.net> composed with style:
It is a quote from The Ghoul. Or are you perpetuating the outing of a
sock? The Ghoul (tintg) isn't really a person, therefor not something
to worry your pretty head about.
WDC r0ck
i love it when you ladies chat. "worry your pretty little head". now,
give her a hug...
cmon...r0ck needs a little entertainment tonight. i'm stuck at work
with a bunch of angry servers. help a brother out?
Cheryl
WDC r0ck <r0...@cotse.dot.dot.dot.com> composed with style:
I don't like you anymore.
WDC r0ck
WTF?
Ilena Ayala
"WDC r0ck" <r0...@cotse.dot.dot.dot.com> wrote in message
news:WcHob.43686$AU.3...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
<snip>
> cmon...r0ck needs a little entertainment tonight. i'm stuck at work
> with a bunch of angry servers. help a brother out?
Sheesh. Just tell the guys in the restaurant to simmer down. ;-)
Will it help if I post more links for booby pics? I do *have* more I can
share...
-Ilena Ayala
Keep watching this space!
Geist
wrote:
>In news:WcHob.43686$AU.3...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net,
>WDC r0ck <r0...@cotse.dot.dot.dot.com> composed with style:
>> i love it when you ladies chat. "worry your pretty little head".
>> now, give her a hug...
>>
>> cmon...r0ck needs a little entertainment tonight. i'm stuck at work
>> with a bunch of angry servers. help a brother out?
>
>I don't like you anymore.
>
OUCH!! Damn...
--
WDC r0ck
> "WDC r0ck" <r0...@cotse.dot.dot.dot.com> wrote in message
> news:WcHob.43686$AU.3...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> <snip>
>
>>cmon...r0ck needs a little entertainment tonight. i'm stuck at work
>>with a bunch of angry servers. help a brother out?
>
>
> Sheesh. Just tell the guys in the restaurant to simmer down. ;-)
lol. servers =! waiters.
a bunch of angry computers. lol
> Will it help if I post more links for booby pics? I do *have* more I can
> share...
ABSOLUTELY!11!
Cheryl
Because you and Sharon and the sock are making a hard thing like a
love break-up a very difficult thing for a woman that you guys really
seemed to like. Just because apparently now your allegiance is now
with TP. It just isn't right. Their love relationship was very
public in this group. No one seemed to be bothered by that when it
was all good. Now that it isn't, the jokes and the insults are flying
and no one seems to care that feelings are hurt. This was a
relationship that wasn't a one-night-stand. It involved family, and
children, and you guys are acting like it was all a joke. No, it
isn't my business. But it was in our face and it *was* our business.
It was something some of us saw as good. Admit it, it was good. Shit
happens, breakups happen and it isn't our business.
Ilena Ayala
Here j00 go! More booby pics! :-)
http://www.photolib.noaa.gov/historic/c&gs/theb1450.htm
http://www.cocos-tourism.cc/rbb.htm
-Ilena Ayala
WDC r0ck
hmmm. perhaps. i'd argue it became our business when mara, who plays
innocent and coy in this froup, started portraying TP as the bad guy.
She's an entirely different beast in email. she can't seem to let go of
TP - with her talking about loving until her dying day and assorted
nonsense.
then seeing her play TP as the bad guy, when her wacked out feelings and
psychotic episodes are to blame, just made me sick. TP is a good guy
and doesn't deserve to have his name trashed because Mara can't "deal
with it".
perhaps it's none of my business. but this is alt.hackers.malicious.
all bets are off here. you want civilized and polite? move the hell out.
Me
<queenb...@diediedie.net> wrote:
>No, six on one ain't nearly enough, either.
>
>TRY HARDER
Hey, nobody on *this* side of the isle is playing bully. *You* started
the attacks. I just don't think they are warranted.
>Of all people, I'd have thought *you* would be pleased that he was
>reconciled with his wife and trying to make a success of his marriage
>and raise their daughter together.
I sincerely hope they make it work and that they make a wonderful home
for their daughter.
>To encourage an old flame to
>continue running around with a .sig from when they were together
>*after* being publicly told to quit stalking him is really beneath
>you.
See, I've stayed completely out of this because the whys and where
fores are none of my business, but I'm not going to sit here silently
while you come around in what appears to be the role of a hired gun
and try your best to run her into the ground. None of this is *your*
business either. He wrote the stuff, and he continued to sport it in
his headers and footers right up until the day he pulled the switch.
We *ALL* saw that first hand. If she wants to put it in a sig, that's
her business. It's not something she made up, and Lord knows sigs are
*often* used to make a point in AHM. It looks to me like she's making
a statement about simple honesty. However, I pass no judgement. I like
the guy. I always have. I have no idea what was going through his head
when he was writing it or when he was disavowing it, and as I've said
it's_not_my_business... and it's not your's either.
>I'm disappointed in you.
I'm disappointed in you as well. I've always known that you could be
vicious, but I always thought your heart was in the right place. I
always saw you as the type that would *defend* others against a bully.
I never thought I'd see you BE the bully against someone that as near
as I can tell has never done a thing to you or anyone else. Is there
any particular reason that you feel compelled to insert yourself into
this and viciously attack her? I mean really, if everyone would leave
it alone the whole situation would just go away eventually. Heck,
other than the sig, I thought it pretty much *had* gone away until you
showed up making the whole situation headline news again.
Cheryl
you're in 7th grade.
> perhaps it's none of my business. but this is
> alt.hackers.malicious.
> all bets are off here. you want civilized and polite? move the
> hell out.
O, hell no. I didn't ask for that. I said their break up isn't part
of AHM as we know it. So let it the fuck go already.
WDC r0ck
why not? they air their dirty laundry here...this is a public forum.
are you saying you've never taking a side on an issue?
> Unless you're in 7th grade.
come now. by your logic, anybody who has taken a side has the mental
capacity or social skills of a 7th grader? So, that would include
democrats, republicans, pro-lifers, pro-choicers, the NRA, the NEA, the
PTA, the local School Board, and just about everybody in the United
States. surely you can't be serious.
>>perhaps it's none of my business. but this is
>>alt.hackers.malicious.
>>all bets are off here. you want civilized and polite? move the
>>hell out.
>
>
> O, hell no. I didn't ask for that. I said their break up isn't part
> of AHM as we know it.
mara made it a part of AHM. my previous reply stands. if you don't
like it, k/f "WDC r0ck <r0...@cotse.dot.dot.dot.com>".
> So let it the fuck go already.
i love it when you curse.
WDC r0ck
> Amen Bro!! I agree with this post 100%
That slurping sound brought to you by today's suckass, Trebor. lol
Cheryl
WDC r0ck
the "amen bro" amused me. as I sit here staring at hundreds and
hundreds of servers, his comment amused me. you got a problem with that?
Cheryl
I don't have a problem with anything other than the pain of two
people. The ones who stick their fucking noses where it doens't
belong deserve the humiliation they get in replies from those of us
who wonder why the fuck you seem hell bent to care so much?
Router Nazi
i'm entitled to be an asshole every now and then. i'm at work when i
should be out partying. i'm angry. i'm going to be an asshole tonight.
if you don't care for my post, use a killfile.
or perhaps you need instructions?
Cheryl
Router Nazi <r0...@cotse.dot.dot.dot.com> composed with style:
Heh
Cheryl
Cheryl <jlhN...@petitmorte.net> composed with style:
Ferthermore (fuck the spelling) I'M THE ONE who is entitled to be an
asshole. When you lose your child and your whole world turns to shit
you're entitled to be an asshole. Why are you entitled to be an
asshole? Born that way?
Router Nazi
Do you know how many people die each day in this country? You think you
have some special entitlement to be bitchy because you lost your son?
I feel a twinge of sympathy for you about your son. I didn't know about
him. Yet, thanks to your advertising the fact worldwide, I'm sure
everybody in this froup knows about him now.
Furthermore, don't you think you are soiling his memory by using him to
garner sympathy?
> Why are you entitled to be an asshole?
You missed the part about me being stuck at work while the entire world
is out partying? Allow me:
>>>i'm entitled to be an asshole every now and then. i'm at work when
>>>i should be out partying. i'm angry. i'm going to be an asshole
>>> tonight. if you don't care for my post, use a killfile.
> Born that way?
Perhaps. But I'd rather be an asshole then a...
i'll leave it at that.
Router Nazi
> Well, at least I'm amusing, that's the main thing. :)
wait a minute. you read the post as it was intended to be read, but
Cheryl kooks out about it? what's wrong with this picture?
Cheryl
I feel I am entitled because I am me. I don't use my grief for
sympathy. Haven't for the last year. I'm allowed to be an asshole
(which I don't think I'm being) because of grief. I do not use that;
haven't. I may act bitter sometimes but I say how I feel. If someone
posts some stupid shit I feel I have the right to compare it to the
death of one's child.
> I feel a twinge of sympathy for you about your son.
Twinge. O, thank you. <rolls eyes>
I didn't know
> about him. Yet, thanks to your advertising the fact worldwide, I'm
> sure everybody in this froup knows about him now.
>
They already did.
> Furthermore, don't you think you are soiling his memory by using
> him to garner sympathy?
>
Huh?
>> Why are you entitled to be an asshole?
>
> You missed the part about me being stuck at work while the entire
> world is out partying? Allow me:
>
Ok, I'll allow you to suck his dick:
Router Nazi
> Ermmm.... Your troll isn't working? :)
>
troll hell. i'm just asking a question.
btw, i'm not hatter.
Router Nazi
what a shame...
btw, your newsreader is broken.
Cheryl
Geist <ge...@petitmorte.n3t> composed with style:
Heh. Like it matters. He has DeAnna to tell him stories. That's all
that matters to him on Usenet.
-=Be4U=-
taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
news:KaIob.21855$Q9....@nwrddc02.gnilink.net, on the hallowed
day of Fri 31 Oct 2003 10:14:02p:
> hmmm. perhaps. i'd argue it became our business when mara,
> who plays innocent and coy in this froup,
I don't "play" anything. I am who I am, and I am who I have ALWAYS
been.
> started portraying TP as the bad guy.
I'm not "portraying" anyone as anything. Everyone has to take
responsibility for their own actions. I've made mistakes over the
last 2 months 24 days and some assorted hours, and have made amends
and apologized publicly for them, as well as made it as right as I
could after the fact.
That doesn't excuse anything anyone *else* has done. You people
claim anyone who "defends" him is merely stating their opinion or
their views, and anyone who 'defends" me only knows one side of the
story. You can't have it both ways.
Steve himself has stated publicly that he hasn't told *anyone* the
whole story, so how is it YOU know what really happened?
Contrary to anything you or Sharon would LIKE to believe...I'm not
an idiot. If this thing made ANY sense whatsofucking ever...it
would have been different. I'm sorry if the facts bother you.
Except for extremely rare posts of mine...including this one I'm
writing now...I haven't brought this INTO the newsgroup. I have
tried to keep it OUT of the newsgroup.
> She's an entirely different beast in email.
And you know this how?
> she can't seem to let go of TP - with her talking about loving
> until her dying day and assorted nonsense.
yes...the same "assorted nonsense" I heard for 2-1/2 years. The
same nonsense I heard up until the very DAY he decided to change
our whole lives without even talking to me in person about it.
Steve and I have BOTH always shared a lot of our daily lives,
together and seperately, in the newsgroups. I haven't changed that,
and obviously neither has he. And if no one has a problem with him
making tacky posts about another woman's vagina, smoking pot, going
to a midnight BBQ, etc etc...then no one should have a problem with
anything *I* have to post. I'd like to see these posts where you
claim I am "making him out to be the bad guy". Or maybe I should be
posting about giving different guys blow jobs, and what their
genitals looked like? Come on r0ck, get real. You're more than
welcome to KF me. Trust me, my feelings won't be hurt. Honest.
> then seeing her play TP as the bad guy, when her wacked out
> feelings and psychotic episodes are to blame,
God help you, should you ever experience what I have the last 2
months. That's all I have to say.
> just made me
> sick. TP is a good guy and doesn't deserve to have his name
> trashed because Mara can't "deal with it".
Exactly HOW have *I* "trashed his name"?
> perhaps it's none of my business. but this is
> alt.hackers.malicious. all bets are off here. you want
> civilized and polite? move the hell out.
Why not take your OWN advice? You claim "all bets are off". Does
that just apply to you and Sharon, and yet everyone else has to
play by YOUR rules? how terribly convenient for you.
You can't have it both ways. There is also a lot you don't know.
--
-=Mara=-
"Ping Be4U: I love you -- merely reading your words soothes the
savage beast in me, the image of you in my mind wobbles my
knees - run away with me to Tahiti where we can frolic on the
beach and drink fruity drinks as the sun sets in the distance...."
The Laughing Ghoul [TING], alt.music.ozzy, 28-Aug, 2002
</malicious mode>
You're a nice person, Be4U. AHM wouldn't be the same without you.
<malicious mode>
~Trebor, alt.hackers.malicious, 22-Oct-03
Router Nazi
see, there you go...gotta drag a lady into this. lol
Router Nazi
> On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 07:56:47 GMT, Router Nazi
> There are no stoopid questions, only stoopid...
stoopid isn't accurate here. how about hardheaded, stubborn, angry people?
-=Be4U=-
taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
day of Fri 31 Oct 2003 11:00:15p:
> why not? they air their dirty laundry here...this is a public
> forum. are you saying you've never taking a side on an issue?
[...]
> mara made it a part of AHM. my previous reply stands.
Yes, this is a "public forum" and all. Steve complained that people
were just "accepting" my side of things, without considering there
are two sides. You're obviously doing the same.
Cheryl
Cheryl
-=Be4U=- <be...@no-address.com> composed with style:
> Contrary to anything you or Sharon would LIKE to believe...I'm not
> an idiot. If this thing made ANY sense whatsofucking ever...it
> would have been different. I'm sorry if the facts bother you.
If you were an idiot, I doubt Steve would have spent two + years with
you. This isn't about you being anything. I think this is peer
presure.
-=Be4U=-
day of Fri 31 Oct 2003 10:32:55p:
> Amen Bro!! I agree with this post 100%
>
<voice of Indigo Montoya>
I must know who you are!
lol
Come on...what was the old nym?
-=Be4U=-
taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
day of Fri 31 Oct 2003 11:28:45p:
> Ferthermore (fuck the spelling) I'M THE ONE who is entitled to
> be an asshole. When you lose your child and your whole world
> turns to shit you're entitled to be an asshole.
I'd second that....
except "asshole" is probably the one thing I *haven't* been clled
lol
Router Nazi
despite what you believe, no.
-=Be4U=-
end by taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
day of Fri 31 Oct 2003 08:06:13p:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 22:54:34 -0500, "Ilena Ayala"
> <il...@compuserve.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"[ Doc Jeff ]" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
>>news:6ts5qvkmu2ktuvqlq...@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 06:52:12 -0500, Sharon B
>>> <queenb...@diediedie.net> wrote:
>><snip>
>>> >if you were really trying to be ageeable, you'd change your
>>> >fuggen' .sig
>>>
>>> What is it about that sig which bothers you so?
>>
>>It boggles the mind, doesn't it? Sheesh, if I had a sig that
>>bothered Sharon that much, it'd be worth keeping just to annoy
>>her.
>>
>>Hmmmn, maybe I just could borrow Mara's sig...... :-)
>>
>>-Ilena Ayala
>>Watch this space!
>
> Hows about we copy it... no sense in everybody passing around
> just one.
lol
There's over 1,000 to choose from.
-=Be4U=-
taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
day of Fri 31 Oct 2003 08:20:44p:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:10:49 -0500, "Cheryl"
> <jlhN...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>
>>In news:n3c6qvcemm56if1ot...@4ax.com,
>>Me <no-address_...@no-address.com> composed with
>>style:
>>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 22:54:34 -0500, "Ilena Ayala"
>>> <il...@compuserve.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "[ Doc Jeff ]" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:6ts5qvkmu2ktuvqlq...@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 06:52:12 -0500, Sharon B
>>>>> <queenb...@diediedie.net> wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>>> if you were really trying to be ageeable, you'd change
>>>>>> your fuggen' .sig
>>>>>
>>>>> What is it about that sig which bothers you so?
>>>>
>>>> It boggles the mind, doesn't it? Sheesh, if I had a sig
>>>> that bothered Sharon that much, it'd be worth keeping just
>>>> to annoy her.
>>>>
>>>> Hmmmn, maybe I just could borrow Mara's sig...... :-)
>>>>
>>>> -Ilena Ayala
>>>> Watch this space!
>>>
>>> Hows about we copy it... no sense in everybody passing around
>>> just one.
>>
>>Add me to the lits. I'll wear it.
>
> What part of her sig are j00 guys refering to?:)
Prolly the part about YOU. You're *such* a trouble maker lol!
Router Nazi
ah. now we get down to the good stuff. were you picked on when you
were growing up? did the cool kids not play with you? have you become
a social outcast?
talk to the doctor...
Cheryl
-=Be4U=-
taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
day of Fri 31 Oct 2003 09:38:45p:
> Because you and Sharon and the sock are making a hard thing
> like a love break-up a very difficult thing for a woman that
> you guys really seemed to like. Just because apparently now
> your allegiance is now with TP. It just isn't right. Their
> love relationship was very public in this group. No one seemed
> to be bothered by that when it was all good. Now that it
> isn't, the jokes and the insults are flying and no one seems to
> care that feelings are hurt. This was a relationship that
> wasn't a one-night-stand. It involved family, and children,
yes, it did. It does, and not just his.
> and you guys are acting like it was all a joke. No, it isn't
> my business. But it was in our face and it *was* our business.
> It was something some of us saw as good. Admit it, it was
> good. Shit happens, breakups happen and it isn't our business.
>
>
wow...
Cheryl
You're not a very good therapist. Where the fuck did you get that
from? Shall I quote my post that you replied to? No need, it is
right up there. Do you have a reading comprehension problem?
Router Nazi
> On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 08:04:41 GMT, Router Nazi
bah. ain't talking about you.
Router Nazi
you're entitled to your opinion...even if it's wrong. ain't America great?
Router Nazi
oh my...i've been naughty. spank me. lol
-=Be4U=-
taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
day of Sat 01 Nov 2003 12:08:32a:
> In news:Xns94269A440Fbe4u@foo_blah_bar.com,
> -=Be4U=- <be...@no-address.com> composed with style:
>
>> Contrary to anything you or Sharon would LIKE to believe...I'm
>> not an idiot. If this thing made ANY sense whatsofucking
>> ever...it would have been different. I'm sorry if the facts
>> bother you.
>
> If you were an idiot, I doubt Steve would have spent two +
> years with you.
Agreed. HE isn't an idiot, either. Never was.
> This isn't about you being anything. I think
> this is peer presure.
Someone mentioned a witch hunt. They forgot to mention they were
*starting* one. lol
-=Be4U=-
end by taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
day of Sat 01 Nov 2003 12:05:38a:
> On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 00:09:26 -0800, "-=Be4U=-"
> <be...@no-address.com> wrote:
>
>>Trebor <tr3b0r9NO...@yahoo.com> delighted us to no end by
>>taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
>>news:qik6qvg9d1doo6fm8...@4ax.com, on the
>>hallowed day of Fri 31 Oct 2003 10:32:55p:
>>
>>> Amen Bro!! I agree with this post 100%
>>>
>>
>><voice of Indigo Montoya>
>>I must know who you are!
>>
>>lol
>
> Finally, someone gets it! :)
Heh, it's one of my all time favorite movies. No worries,
though...I'm not gonna start quoting the Billy Crystal scene where
he's asking why he should bring the guy back to life :)
>>Come on...what was the old nym?
>
> Why? it's been a looong time since I've trolled err.. posted
> here. :) I am Trebor, what more is there to say?
>
*sigh*
The email's valid (although looks like it's not). All I know is,
you've been here a few days, yet you know everyone inc the history.
So color me curious already :)
-=Be4U=-
lime green crayon and scribbling in
01 Nov 2003 01:12:10a:
> On Saturday 01 November 2003 02:11 am -=Be4U=- spake thusly
> unto the great unwashed masses gathered in
> alt.hackers.malicious:
>
>> "Cheryl" <jlhN...@petitmorte.net> delighted us to no end by
>> taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
>> news:bnvnai$15omcb$1...@ID-94914.news.uni-berlin.de, on the
>> hallowed day of Fri 31 Oct 2003 11:28:45p:
>>
>>> Ferthermore (fuck the spelling) I'M THE ONE who is entitled
>>> to be an asshole. When you lose your child and your whole
>>> world turns to shit you're entitled to be an asshole.
>>
>> I'd second that....
>>
>> except "asshole" is probably the one thing I *haven't* been
>> clled lol
>>
>
> Asshole! ;P
>
Buhahahahahahahaha! TANK j00!!!!!!! <takes a bow>
Ya know, the bartender I work with most nights says he doesn't feel
"fullfilled" if he goes an entire night without someone calling him
an asshole. One night a drunken bride called him "her bitch". He
had to be content with that for that night :)
-=Be4U=-
lime green crayon and scribbling in
01 Nov 2003 01:14:55a:
> On Saturday 01 November 2003 02:09 am -=Be4U=- spake thusly
> unto the great unwashed masses gathered in
> alt.hackers.malicious:
>
>> Trebor <tr3b0r9NO...@yahoo.com> delighted us to no end
>> by taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
>> news:qik6qvg9d1doo6fm8...@4ax.com, on the
>> hallowed day of Fri 31 Oct 2003 10:32:55p:
>>
>>> Amen Bro!! I agree with this post 100%
>>>
>>
>> <voice of Indigo Montoya>
>> I must know who you are!
>>
>> lol
>>
>>
>> Come on...what was the old nym?
>>
>
> My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Now prepare to
> die.
GOD I *love* that movie!!!!!!
Glad to see you know the words...now the REA question is...
can...
you do...
the accent????
*_^
-=Be4U=-
lime green crayon and scribbling in
01 Nov 2003 01:14:55a:
> My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Now prepare to
> die.
>
Btw, AFAIR, he doesn't say "now".
-=Be4U=-
taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
day of Sat 01 Nov 2003 01:04:25a:
[...]
>>*sigh*
>>The email's valid (although looks like it's not).
>
> It is.
I meant *mine*, j00 silly goose :)
> Use it if you want.
Bah, I know your type. You never check your spamcatcher accounts.
> However, I prolly still won't tell
> j00. :)
Would it help if I stomped my feet?
> Btw, I know all 'bout html haxors and such, well maybe
> not *all* but, I do use a proxy, even to read. :)
Well damn...there's something familiar about j00....
>> All I know is, you've been here a few days, yet you know
>> everyone inc the history.
>
> I've always luved this group. I started reading it when I was
> just a g0at, dontcha know. :)
A g0at, or a y0ung buck?
>
>>So color me curious already :)
>
> It's part of the charm of this froup. :)
Grrrrrrrrr....<grumble grumble>
-=Be4U=-
lime green crayon and scribbling in
Nov 2003 01:32:39a:
>> Buhahahahahahahaha! TANK j00!!!!!!! <takes a bow>
>>
> Thought you needed a pick-me-up.
>
:)
At the risk of sounding "all innocent and coy acting"...yes.
And thank j00 :)
-=Be4U=-
01 Nov 2003 01:39:34a:
>> can...
>>
>> you do...
>>
>> the accent????
>>
>> *_^
>>
>
> I was Inigo Montoya in a former life girl. Of course I can do
> the voice.
Well daaaaaamn!
> Shit, I can even drink wine with Iocane powder and
> still get jiggy wid it!
Buhahahahaha! Forgive me for EVER doubting you!
> The Dreaded Pirate Roberts is a pussy.
He is, isn't he?
> I killed him and there ain't a damn thing Miracle Max can do
> this time!
Geez, you remember the names better than *I* do :)
> I even fscked Buttercup in the fire swamp!
No way! She's waiting for her true love to come back...and she
won't marry that evil swishy guy, either!
> oh yeah.
> Fezzik is a bitch too. I stomped a mud hole in his ass!
He was funny, yet irritating :)
-=Be4U=-
01 Nov 2003 01:41:38a:
> On Saturday 01 November 2003 03:17 am -=Be4U=- spake thusly
> unto the great unwashed masses gathered in
> alt.hackers.malicious:
>
>> Twisted <spam...@slowbox.com> delighted us to no end by
>> taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
>> news:1238386.x...@slowbox.com, on the hallowed day of
>> Sat 01 Nov 2003 01:14:55a:
>>
>>> My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Now prepare
>>> to die.
>>>
>>
>> Btw, AFAIR, he doesn't say "now".
>>
>
> Well whoop me with a noodle. i believe you're right. ;P
heh...imagine that! Now where's that noodle....
:)
-=Be4U=-
lime green crayon and scribbling in
Nov 2003 01:54:18a:
> Yeah baby! LOL. Do I make you randy?
>
Who's Randy? Isn't he that geeky guy in my Perl class?
lol
you're up late tonight...
-=Be4U=-
01 Nov 2003 02:06:01a:
> I need to go to bed soon. or I'm liable to finish this bottle
> of Canadian Mistg I'm workin' on now.
>
ahhhhhhh..it ALL makes sense now :)
lol
Me
<tr3b0r9NO...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 00:58:18 -0800, "-=Be4U=-" <be...@no-address.com>
>Btw, I know all 'bout html haxors and such, well maybe not *all* but,
>I do use a proxy, even to read. :)
<snicker>
Ilena Ayala
"-=Be4U=-" <be...@no-address.com> wrote in message
news:Xns942619A277C7be4u@foo_blah_bar.com...
> Trebor <tr3b0r9NO...@yahoo.com> delighted us to no end by
> taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
> day of Fri 31 Oct 2003 10:32:55p:
>
> > Amen Bro!! I agree with this post 100%
> >
>
> <voice of Indigo Montoya>
> I must know who you are!
LMAO...I made my other response to Trebor *before* I saw this post.
-Ilena Ayala
Geist
wrote:
>In news:3fa34531...@192.168.1.255_+++ATH0_,
>Geist <ge...@petitmorte.n3t> composed with style:
>> On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 00:10:14 -0500, "Cheryl"
>> <jlhN...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>
>>> In news:WcHob.43686$AU.3...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net,
>>> WDC r0ck <r0...@cotse.dot.dot.dot.com> composed with style:
>>
>>>> i love it when you ladies chat. "worry your pretty little head".
>>>> now, give her a hug...
>>>>
>>>> cmon...r0ck needs a little entertainment tonight. i'm stuck at
>>>> work with a bunch of angry servers. help a brother out?
>>>
>>> I don't like you anymore.
>>>
>>
>> OUCH!! Damn...
>
>Heh. Like it matters. He has DeAnna to tell him stories. That's all
>that matters to him on Usenet.
>
LOL, I thought YOU were DeAnna.
--
Me
<r0...@cotse.dot.dot.dot.com> wrote:
>come now. by your logic, anybody who has taken a side has the mental
>capacity or social skills of a 7th grader? So, that would include
>democrats, republicans, pro-lifers, pro-choicers, the NRA, the NEA, the
>PTA, the local School Board, and just about everybody in the United
>States. surely you can't be serious.
Umm, THEIR love life is no ones business but theirs. See, in case you
haven't noticed, politics and everything ELSE you mentioned affects
EVERYONE. People are SUPPOSED to be involved in politics, because it
DIRECTLY affects them.
Me
<queenb...@diediedie.net> wrote:
>On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 01:30:39 -0500, Me
><no-address_...@no-address.com> wrote in
><c7h6qvkrv7r3c4s51...@4ax.com>:
>
>>On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:54:30 -0500, Sharon B
>><queenb...@diediedie.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>No, six on one ain't nearly enough, either.
>>>
>>>TRY HARDER
>>
>>Hey, nobody on *this* side of the isle is playing bully.
>
>Only cuz y'all are too incompetent to carry it off, certainly not for
>lack of trying....it's mostly in your choice of materials. Fat lames,
>sex lames, etc.
What on earth are you talking about? Please point out even *one* post
where I've mentioned anyone's weight, sex, or anything else that
wasn't relevant to my point, which, ONE MORE TIME, was LEAVE IT ALONE.
>>*You* started
>>the attacks. I just don't think they are warranted.
>
>i disagree.
I suppose you're entitled to your opinion, but you are apparently in
the minority in your views. Don't be surprised when that majority
treats you like the bully that you look to be. We'd all be better off
if you'd just leave it alone.
>when I stoop to making private info public, you be sure and lemme
>know.
You mean like making a two foot long header professing undying love
for someone? I have no problem with that, but lets apply the same
rules across the board, k?
>>None of this is *your*
>>business either.
>
>yah, but it's different when *you all* do it.
Don't hand me that crap. I've done *nothing* more that ask you to butt
out of it and leave it and her alone.
>>He wrote the stuff, and he continued to sport it in
>>his headers and footers right up until the day he pulled the switch.
>>We *ALL* saw that first hand. If she wants to put it in a sig, that's
>>her business. It's not something she made up, and Lord knows sigs are
>>*often* used to make a point in AHM.
>
>Exactly. She's baiting him, deliberately and to keep it in the public
>venue....cuz gawd knows one can't possibly play drama queen without an
>audience.
And so what if she were doing just that? This is AHM. Two freakin'
thirds of the sigs in here are baitings over personal vendettas. Heck,
most of the sigs *you've* ever used were EXACTLY that. Is there some
reason you can't treat it like all the rest of the trollings in here
and ignore it?
>>It looks to me like she's making
>>a statement about simple honesty. However, I pass no judgement. I like
>>the guy. I always have. I have no idea what was going through his head
>>when he was writing it or when he was disavowing it, and as I've said
>>it's_not_my_business... and it's not your's either.
>
>I've let it slide for the two months some of y'all have been having at
>it. I dun like pile ons (though your all's attempts at one on me is
>highly amusing),
You attack from the stance of a bully sticking your nose into
something that isn't your concern, you shouldn't be surprised that you
get treated like one.
>and am fed up with all the subtle digs, manipulative
>behavior and outright kookery. Enough. Time for plain speaking and
>brutal honesty.
I believe that's what I've just done.
Let_it_freakin_go. It's_NOT_your_affair.
>Leave people alone that have made it clear they don't want to be
>pestered--stop trying to "negate any no contact order". Keep Usenet
>on Usenet, stop making private info public. No, she really *can't*
>light candles, turn off lights and stop rain with her psychic
>powers---that's crazy.
I have no idea what you are talking about and don't care. No one has
ever mentioned anything of the sort to me but even if they had it
doesn't mean she should be ruthlessly attacked by you over something
that is completely unrelated and isn't any of your business.
>ANYONE else I'd have drug into AUK already.
>
>>>I'm disappointed in you.
>>
>>I'm disappointed in you as well. I've always known that you could be
>>vicious, but I always thought your heart was in the right place.
>
>You only think differently now because of the personality and
>ignorance of the various hijinx.
None of which were any of my business so I had no reason to know them,
whatever they may or may not have been.
>>I never thought I'd see you BE the bully against someone that as near
>>as I can tell has never done a thing to you or anyone else.
>
>The "near as I can tell" is the key.
She shoot your puppy? I didn't think so.
>>Is there
>>any particular reason that you feel compelled to insert yourself into
>>this and viciously attack her?
>
>Yes, and were I being vicious, her kooky butt would be in AUK. Y'all
>are *trying* to be, but you need more minions....and ammo. Ie, less
>fat lames, age lames, sex lames, get a life lames, 'you love psyko'
>lames.
>*yawn*
I've posted nothing of the sort. I've plainly stated that I've taken
no side. You should do the same and stay out of it. It's not your
affair.
>>I mean really, if everyone would leave
>>it alone the whole situation would just go away eventually.
>
>that was *my* thoughts and original advice, but it's been months, so
>apparently quite a few, including her, are unwilling or unable to.
If she doesn't want to let it go, it's *her* problem. The only thing
I've noticed anyone *else* in here object to is you and your minions
(as few as they are) slamming her. See, while I haven't "taken sides",
some of us can understand why she'd be hurt. We *saw* the two foot
headers posted daily professing undying love for her that weren't
removed until *after* he'd walked away. I don't fault him because I
don't know the whole story, never will and don't want to, but I can
understand her confusion and hurt. Let her grieve and eventually
she'll find someone new and get over it. If she doesn't, it's still
not your concern.
>>Heck,
>>other than the sig,
>
>.....you've just contradicted yourself AGAIN, unintentionally siding
>with my point.
No I haven't. She can put anything she wants in a sig to make any
statement she wishes to. The 1st amendment assures that.
<sigh> I don't have all day for this. Got stuff to do.
Later, kids.
Router Nazi
0% chance of that.
ThePsyko
<tr3b0r9NO...@yahoo.com> made his/her contribution to mankind by
stating in news:p9s7qvkkb6gjga5j1...@4ax.com:
> Path:
> newsspool2.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!elnk-p
> as-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!new
> sfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.arcor-online.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!2
> 11-20-121-51.hinet-ip.hinet.NET!not-for-mail From: Trebor
> <tr3b0r9NO...@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: alt.hackers.malicious
> Subject: Re: OT: The keylogger
> Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 09:50:33 -0800
> Organization: none
> Lines: 83
> Message-ID: <p9s7qvkkb6gjga5j1...@4ax.com>
> References: <Xns9424C14AF...@thebar.net>
> <Xns9424DA9A019EAbe4u@foo_blah_bar.com>
> <n1t3qv0iifcg7vna0...@4ax.com>
> <Xns9424E2EBD4F2Fbe4u@foo_blah_bar.com>
> <s5j4qv8h32hi0cei2...@4ax.com>
> <6ts5qvkmu2ktuvqlq...@4ax.com>
> <bnvah5$89i$2...@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com>
> <n3c6qvcemm56if1ot...@4ax.com>
> <q2f6qvk2n4tmouldf...@4ax.com>
> <bnveou$15pvff$1...@ID-94914.news.uni-berlin.de>
> <s887qvg86c9gtf5it...@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host:
> 211-20-121-51.hinet-ip.hinet.net (211.20.121.51) Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1067709874 40864290 211.20.121.51 (16
> [92164]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
> trialware X-No-Archive: yes
> Xref: news.earthlink.net alt.hackers.malicious:629790
> X-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 10:04:35 PST
> (newsspool2.news.pas.earthlink.net)
>
> On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 07:11:52 -0500, Sharon B
> <queenb...@diediedie.net> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 00:02:53 -0500, "Cheryl" <jlhN...@petitmorte.net>
>>wrote in <bnveou$15pvff$1...@ID-94914.news.uni-berlin.de>:
>>
>>>In news:q2f6qvk2n4tmouldf...@4ax.com,
>>>Sharon B <queenb...@diediedie.net> composed with style:
>>>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:06:13 -0500, Me
>>>> <no-address_...@no-address.com> wrote in
>>>> <n3c6qvcemm56if1ot...@4ax.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 22:54:34 -0500, "Ilena Ayala"
>>>>> <il...@compuserve.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "[ Doc Jeff ]" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:6ts5qvkmu2ktuvqlq...@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 06:52:12 -0500, Sharon B
>>>>>>> <queenb...@diediedie.net> wrote:
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>> if you were really trying to be ageeable, you'd change your
>>>>>>>> fuggen' .sig
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is it about that sig which bothers you so?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It boggles the mind, doesn't it? Sheesh, if I had a sig that
>>>>>> bothered Sharon that much, it'd be worth keeping just to annoy
>>>>>> her.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmmmn, maybe I just could borrow Mara's sig...... :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Ilena Ayala
>>>>>> Watch this space!
>>>>>
>>>>> Hows about we copy it... no sense in everybody passing around just
>>>>> one.
>>>>
>>>> No, six on one ain't nearly enough, either.
>>>>
>>>> TRY HARDER
>>>>
>>>> Personally, I think you'd look pretty silly sporting a .sig that
>>>> has Psyko declaring his love for you....not that there's anything
>>>> wrong with that.
>>>>
>>>> Of all people, I'd have thought *you* would be pleased that he was
>>>> reconciled with his wife and trying to make a success of his
>>>> marriage and raise their daughter together. To encourage an old
>>>> flame to continue running around with a .sig from when they were
>>>> together *after* being publicly told to quit stalking him is really
>>>> beneath
>>>> you.
>>>>
>>>> I'm disappointed in you.
>>>
>>>It is a quote from The Ghoul. Or are you perpetuating the outing of
>>>a sock? The Ghoul (tintg) isn't really a person,
>>
>>In *this* case, it is a distinction without a difference as is made
>>clear by the following:
>>
>>*******************************************************************
>>Trebor: I do agree with the sig part tho.
>>
>>Nope, sig stays, until I feel like changing it. It's certainly not
>>hurting anyone. Besides, TING.
>>*******************************************************************
>
> Add me to j00r litz.
>
> 8<psychotic nuna yer busnezz Mara humping stuff>8
>
> Oh, and Sharon,
> I DEMAND THAT JOO GET A SIG. DO IT NOW. RIGHT NOW. NOT WHEN YOU FEEL
> LIKE IT. DO IT NOW! YOUR LACK OF A SIG IS CAUSING PEOPLE EMOTIONAL
> DISTRESS. pshht.
> -=Trebor=-
> "Ping Be4U: I love you -- merely reading your words soothes the
> savage beast in me, the image of you in my mind wobbles my
> knees - run away with me to Tahiti where we can frolic on the
> beach and drink fruity drinks as the sun sets in the distance...."
> The Laughing Ghoul [TING], alt.music.ozzy, 28-Aug, 2002
>
>
hypocrisy archived
--
/(bb|[^b]{2})/ that is the Question
ThePsyko
Public Enemy #7
"the largest fucktard I've ever seen in any NG." - Mike LaLonde,
Confirmed NetKook
-=Be4U=-
taking a lime green crayon and scribbling in
day of Sat 01 Nov 2003 04:11:52a:
> Combine the above comment with this one made just prior re his
> demand she leave him alone:
>
> "...mentioning me in 2 very recent posts (and it was a nice
> reference, btw) negate and "no contact request"."
>
> ....now add to that her recent claims that she can light
> candles, turn off lights and stop rain with the power of her
> mind and what do you have?
>
> Try and keep *your* "pretty head" focused and stop grasping
> straws in an effort to defend the indefensible. Stalking is
> not funny and she keeps the entire thing in the public domain
> every time she posts, baiting with every use of that .sig in
> addition to other subtle and not so subtle baiting, and has
> been doing it for the last two months. Enough.
>
>
I am not "baiting" anyone. Nor have I posted portions of private
email in this newsgroup with the wrong date attributed to it, and
out of context.
Again....Ghoul hasn't posted here in years, and what usenet quote I
use as a sig has no bearing on any of this. But I can certainly add
to it, if it amuses you so much.
--
-=Mara=-
"Ping Be4U: I love you -- merely reading your words soothes the
savage beast in me, the image of you in my mind wobbles my
knees - run away with me to Tahiti where we can frolic on the
beach and drink fruity drinks as the sun sets in the distance...."
The Laughing Ghoul [TING], alt.music.ozzy, 28-Aug, 2002
</malicious mode>
-=Be4U=-
Sat 01 Nov 2003 10:27:40a:
> oh.. is it sig war time..
>
> fuck this is pathetic
>
>
Could you at LEAST get the date right on yours?
Ya know, I *could* have added THIS one:
Message-ID: <Xns93C6BCB5C...@marashouse.org>
Sorry.. after this last weekend all I can see when I picture your
face is your smiling eyes and angelic glow :)
~ThePsyko, AHM, 7-28-03...a mere 5 days before...
But I figured you'd be upset.
No one's seen or heard from The Laughing Ghoul in *ages*.