Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

"Ammo Selling Like Hot Cakes"

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 11:38:02 PM7/21/09
to
Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?

By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with U. S.
rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.

Get used to it nutters. No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
"lots of ammo."


Bret Cahill


Shrikeback

unread,
Jul 21, 2009, 11:50:35 PM7/21/09
to

Yeah, I think you're right. Nobody does care.
That whole gun control freak fad has passed
away. But the thing that everybody does care
about these days is the ultramoronic hyper-
spending spree they're running in Washington.
Yet you talk about crap like this. You really
think you can distract from the trillion pound
gorilla in the room.

Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 12:10:47 AM7/22/09
to
> > Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?

> > By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with U. S.
> > rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> > Get used to it nutters.  No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
> > rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
> > "lots of ammo."
>
> Yeah, I think you're right.  Nobody does care.

Then tell rightarded nutters stop hyping their ammo spending sprees
and start discussing the high tax Clinton economic boom and the GOP
tax cut recession.


Bret Cahill


Alex Cunningham

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 12:16:13 AM7/22/09
to

You're lying again, Hoplo nutter otherwise you would not be commenting on
it.

--
Cheers!
Alex.C
There are twelve million sheep in Ontario.
Problem is nine million of them think they are people.


Shrikeback

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 12:44:25 AM7/22/09
to

Why would they switch to talking crazy?
When we are faced with a bigger problem
now. Ah, Competence, thy ways are lost.

Logan

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 12:55:18 AM7/22/09
to

I'm sure this is a foolish question, but how is this pertinent to
alt.philosophy and alt.literature?

larrylaundry

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 1:13:43 AM7/22/09
to

I agree, most liberals dislike guns because drunken idiots and gang
members killing children. But the average gun owner? Seriously, there
has never been a mass caling to disarm right-wingers, except out of
sarcasm.

Check this out, obamas gonna take away your cigarettes, so buy as much
as you can and make the tobacco industry happy. They will even
proclain, that tobacco is selling like hotcakes! We are with you on
this, trust
us with all logic and reason detached, hehe.

Fred Oinka

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 1:15:40 AM7/22/09
to

Go ahead and crosspost your bullshit so that all of usenet can see how
totally fucked in the head you are.

Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 1:22:34 AM7/22/09
to
> > Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?

> > By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with U. S.
> > rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> > Get used to it nutters.  No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
> > rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
> > "lots of ammo."
>
> You're lying again, Hoplo nutter otherwise you would not be commenting on
> it.

You think ammo buying can get the economy out of the GOP tax cut
recession?

Call it "nutter Keynesianism."


Bret Cahill


Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 1:23:29 AM7/22/09
to
> > > > Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
> > > > By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with U. S.
> > > > rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> > > > Get used to it nutters.  No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
> > > > rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
> > > > "lots of ammo."
>
> > > Yeah, I think you're right.  Nobody does care.
>
> > Then tell rightarded nutters stop hyping their ammo spending sprees
> > and start discussing the high tax Clinton economic boom and the GOP
> > tax cut recession.
>
> Why would they switch to talking crazy?

Try not to spree but if you must spree, spree local. Just shoot up
the trailer park.


Bret Cahill

Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 1:36:27 AM7/22/09
to
> > Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
>
> > By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with U. S.
> > rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> > Get used to it nutters.  No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
> > rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
> > "lots of ammo."
>
> > Bret Cahill
>
> Go ahead and crosspost your bullshit so that all of usenet can see how
> totally fucked in the head you are.

"You are vexed therefore I am right about you."

-- Nietzsche

Shrikeback

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 1:38:13 AM7/22/09
to

Are you saying, "You boys keep offa my lawn!
I just fertilized those rose bushes, myself. With
my own two hands. You stay clear, you hear?"

Shrikeback

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 1:44:30 AM7/22/09
to

Your creepy fascist imagery isn't going to help
distract from the ultramoronic, spend ourselves
into the stone age, fiscal quamire we find ourselves
in.

"We promise you lots of this money was wasted!"
-Joe Biden

"Forces in and around detroit today secured the merger
of the United Snakes with General Motors. Shoes for
Industry! Shoes for Insdustry!"
-An Amalgam of Past Headlines

Anyway, Napolean, good luck with your attempts to
obscure and dodge the central economic issue of
our times: the ultramoronic spending quagmire.

Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 1:48:13 AM7/22/09
to
> > > > > Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
> > > > > By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with U. S.
> > > > > rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> > > > > Get used to it nutters.  No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
> > > > > rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
> > > > > "lots of ammo."
>
> > > > Yeah, I think you're right.  Nobody does care.
>
> > > Then tell rightarded nutters stop hyping their ammo spending sprees
> > > and start discussing the high tax Clinton economic boom and the GOP
> > > tax cut recession.
>
> > Why would they switch to talking crazy?
> > When we are faced with a bigger problem
> > now.  Ah, Competence, thy ways are lost.
>
> I'm sure this is a foolish question, but how is this pertinent to
> alt.philosophy and alt.literature?

This is a classic example of technology bringing about change so fast
that some cannot adjust in time.

The biggest all time losers of the info age are the nutters.


Bret Cahill

Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 1:58:18 AM7/22/09
to
> > > > > > Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
> > > > > > By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with U. S.
> > > > > > rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> > > > > > Get used to it nutters.  No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
> > > > > > rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
> > > > > > "lots of ammo."
>
> > > > > Yeah, I think you're right.  Nobody does care.
>
> > > > Then tell rightarded nutters stop hyping their ammo spending sprees
> > > > and start discussing the high tax Clinton economic boom and the GOP
> > > > tax cut recession.
>
> > > Why would they switch to talking crazy?
>
> > Try not to spree but if you must spree, spree local.  Just shoot up
> > the trailer park.
>
> Your creepy fascist imagery

Well? Don't keep us settin' on the edges of our chairs.

Does the NRA and other GOP bottom fishing demagoguery encourage any
political participation other than sitting around waiting to "git
pushed too far?"

> isn't going to help
> distract from

distract from the economic issue of the precondition of free markets.

www.bretcahill.com

The more Repugliars dodge The Question the more they'll be dodging
elections.


Bret Cahill

Shrikeback

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 2:31:44 AM7/22/09
to
On Jul 21, 10:58 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
> > > > > > > By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with U. S.
> > > > > > > rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> > > > > > > Get used to it nutters.  No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
> > > > > > > rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
> > > > > > > "lots of ammo."
>
> > > > > > Yeah, I think you're right.  Nobody does care.
>
> > > > > Then tell rightarded nutters stop hyping their ammo spending sprees
> > > > > and start discussing the high tax Clinton economic boom and the GOP
> > > > > tax cut recession.
>
> > > > Why would they switch to talking crazy?
>
> > > Try not to spree but if you must spree, spree local.  Just shoot up
> > > the trailer park.
>
> > Your creepy fascist imagery
>
> Well?  Don't keep us settin' on the edges of our chairs.
>
> Does the NRA and other GOP bottom fishing demagoguery encourage any
> political participation other than sitting around waiting to "git
> pushed too far?"

You oughtn't throw that demagoguery word
around too much, Mr. Projection Matrix.

> > isn't going to help
> > distract from
>
> distract from the economic issue of the precondition of free markets.

Yeah, yeah, we know your script: free speech
"displaces" real vital speech on economic issues.
Therefore you want to censor free speech. But
that's because free speech "displaces" real speech
and is essentially censorship. Therefore free speech
is censorship, according to you. Freedom is slavery.
It goes on and on.

"When will the economic recovery begin?
Never."
-Robert Reich

Tom Biasi

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 5:03:57 AM7/22/09
to

"Logan" <logan...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:58b5c634-fb85-4629...@k19g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...

On Jul 21, 11:44 pm, Shrikeback <shrikeb...@gmail.com> wrote:


I'm sure this is a foolish question, but how is this pertinent to
alt.philosophy and alt.literature?

It isn't. And most of the time nothing is said about guns either. Some even
post in cooking groups.
They need a soap box.

Tom


Message has been deleted

tg

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 7:43:08 AM7/22/09
to

So, this brings up one of those language/philosophy type questions.
Why is it "cross-posting" instead of "multi-posting"? And why, as
long as it is limited and not spam, is it a problem?

-tg

Miss Ann Thrope

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 9:36:45 AM7/22/09
to

If cigarettes are so DANGEROUS why not COMPLETELY BAN the damned
things?? Oh,we can't do that. How would we pay for S-CHIP and Obama's
gubmint healthcare fiasco?? That's right. He can ALWAYS increase taxes
on the EVILLLLLLLL GREEDY rich !! Btw,whatever happened o the
$BILLIONS won by trial lawyers in the last lawsuit against tobacco
companies?? I know. A handfull of trial lawyers made $BILLIONS and the
states got diddly-shit.

Miss Ann Thrope

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 9:39:25 AM7/22/09
to

When I get likkered up and decide to burn off some excess,outdated,un-
numbered ammo I plan to spree in YOUR trailer park. At least till the
barrel melts/likker runs out/ammo is used up !!! KOOK !!

Miss Ann Thrope

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 9:30:54 AM7/22/09
to

Then why is the AG talking about passing laws that require ID numbers
on bullets and shell casings, restrictive taxes on ammo and making it
illegal to own ammo without the gubmint ID number engraved on them??
Just a rumor I suppose. Just look at the track record of the current
far left negro that Obama appointed as Attorney General and you'll
understand why gun owners are skittish. Btw, I see where California is
releasing 25,000 prisoners because of budget shortages. How safe would
you feel if you lived in California and knew 25,000 criminals were
being released to prey upon the unarmed sheeple??

Miss Ann Thrope

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 9:31:37 AM7/22/09
to

YEBBITBUSH !!!

Miss Ann Thrope

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 9:40:32 AM7/22/09
to
> Bret Cahill- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

YEBBITBUSH !!!

Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 10:00:34 AM7/22/09
to
> > Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
>
> > By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with U. S.
> > rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> > Get used to it nutters.  No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
> > rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
> > "lots of ammo."
>
> > Bret Cahill
>
> Then why is the AG talking about passing laws that require ID numbers
> on bullets and shell casings, restrictive taxes on ammo and making it
> illegal to own ammo without the gubmint ID number engraved on them??

Responsible gun owners are proud of what they shoot.

Only criminals want to sneak around shooting people hoping to get away
with it.

> Just a rumor I suppose.

Ever think about doing some _research_?

> Just look at the track record of the current
> far left negro that Obama appointed as Attorney General and you'll
> understand why gun owners are skittish. Btw, I see where California is
> releasing 25,000 prisoners because of budget shortages. How safe would
> you feel if you lived in California and knew 25,000 criminals were
> being released to prey upon the unarmed sheeple??

I'm against addition gun regs, not because I think fundamental rights
hinge on arbitrary definitions of hardware or that I'm worried about
home invaders, but because like terrorism, domestic gun violence just
isn't that much of a threat.

Censorship is a much greater concern.

www.bretcahill.com

It's the right branch and the left branch of the American oligarchy
that like to hype guns & gun control along with all their other
culture war nonsense.

The American oligarchy will do anything to Jerry Springerize the
public debate.


Bret Cahill


Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 10:31:07 AM7/22/09
to
> > > > > > > > Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
> > > > > > > > By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with U. S.
> > > > > > > > rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> > > > > > > > Get used to it nutters.  No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
> > > > > > > > rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
> > > > > > > > "lots of ammo."
>
> > > > > > > Yeah, I think you're right.  Nobody does care.
>
> > > > > > Then tell rightarded nutters stop hyping their ammo spending sprees
> > > > > > and start discussing the high tax Clinton economic boom and the GOP
> > > > > > tax cut recession.
>
> > > > > Why would they switch to talking crazy?
>
> > > > Try not to spree but if you must spree, spree local.  Just shoot up
> > > > the trailer park.
>
> > > Your creepy fascist imagery
>
> > Well?  Don't keep us settin' on the edges of our chairs.
>
> > Does the NRA and other GOP bottom fishing demagoguery encourage any
> > political participation other than sitting around waiting to "git
> > pushed too far?"

> You oughtn't throw that demagoguery word
> around too much, Mr. Projection Matrix.

You dodged the question.

Here, we'll try again:

Does the NRA and other GOP bottom fishing demagoguery encourage any
political participation other than sitting around waiting to "git
pushed too far?"

> > > isn't going to help
> > > distract from

> > distract from the economic issue of the precondition of free markets.

> Yeah, yeah,

www.bretcahill.com

> we know your script: free speech
> "displaces" real vital speech on economic issues.

It's like what I tell the "CO2 is good for you" energy shills.

I always tell them they can get all the "natural" CO2 they want.

Just find a leak proof plastic bag and place it over their heads.

Then I add helpfully, "don't be stingy with the duct tape."

> Therefore you want to censor free speech.  

I fully support free speech on _all_ the imPOOORtant naked nazi flag
burner parade issues.

I also concede that CO2 is a vital part of the biosphere.

I also think H2O is necessary for human life.

That does _not_ mean I want an industrial pressure washer turned on
me.

That does _not_ mean I want the CO2 in the atmosphere to double.

That does _not_ mean I want the body of first amendment case law to be
based entirely on naked nazi flagburner parades.

There is no question monied interests claiming to be liberal as well
as conservative were hyping culture war nonsense 24/7/52/30 to Jerry
Springerize the public debate.

> But


> that's because free speech

free speech on _nakked nazi flagburner parades_.

> "displaces" real speech
> and is essentially censorship.  

Censorship of _economic information_.

You seem to have a problem learning that if you "merely omit" the
terms "naked nazi flagburner parade" and "economic information" I'll
just reinsert them.


Bret Cahill


Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 10:32:51 AM7/22/09
to

The more Repugliars bring up Bush the more they undermine the GOP.

Not that Repugliars have any hope no matter what they do.


Bret Cahill


James Meyers

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 2:57:17 PM7/22/09
to

"Bret Cahill" <BretC...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:5bf3974e-4bd5-4158...@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com...

> Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
>
> By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with U. S.
> rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> Get used to it nutters. No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
> rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
> "lots of ammo."
>
>
> Bret Cahill
>
Seems you do Bret! You know you are jack ass don't you?
Jim


Bert Hyman

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 3:25:59 PM7/22/09
to
In
news:5bf3974e-4bd5-4158...@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com
Bret Cahill <BretC...@aol.com> wrote:

> Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?

Sure:

"Here's Bret Cahill again, whining about something he claims he doesn't
care about."

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN be...@iphouse.com

Scotius

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 4:51:42 PM7/22/09
to
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:38:02 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
<BretC...@aol.com> wrote:

>Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
>

>By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with U. S.
>rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
>Get used to it nutters. No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
>rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
>"lots of ammo."
>
>
>Bret Cahill
>

If no one cares then why do you keep griping about the fact
that people have the right to own firearms, etc?

LEROY KNEVIL

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 4:56:37 PM7/22/09
to


GUN NUTS

Miss Ann Thrope

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 5:28:17 PM7/22/09
to
On Jul 22, 3:56 pm, LEROY KNEVIL <clitte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> GUN NUTS

Liberal nuts.

Patriot Games

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 6:41:53 PM7/22/09
to
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:38:02 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
<BretC...@aol.com> wrote:
>Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
>By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with U. S.
>rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.

Its not a US problem. Its worldwide. Even ammunition manufacturers
in other countries are working full shifts to keep up with ammo needs
worldwide.

>Get used to it nutters. No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
>rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
>"lots of ammo."

I see I need to make it my goal to post AS MANY STORIES as possible
about ammo shortages just for YOU.

larrylaundry

unread,
Jul 22, 2009, 9:10:22 PM7/22/09
to

Zombywoof wrote:

> If you think tax cuts had anything to do with the current recession
> your the one nuttier then Mr. Peanut. Tax cuts put money back into
> the hands of taxpayers who also happen to be consumers. They idea was
> to get them to start consuming again, but it didn't work.
>
> The only reason I could see for you advocating higher taxes is you
> either are 12 & living your Mom's basement, or are older and living on
> the public dime already.
> --

Taxes taxes taxes, the right can sit back while Democrats pay for
stuff while and perpetuate their tax myths while NEVER having to make
any decisions.

Anyway, I have never seen any Republicans so-called tax cuts benefit
the average American.

Fred Oinka

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 12:49:10 AM7/23/09
to

The biggest all time losers are fools who use the term "nutters".

Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 1:13:45 AM7/23/09
to
> > Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
>
> Sure:
>
> "Here's Bret Cahill again, whining about something he claims he doesn't
> care about."

That's boring for obvious reasons:

Doesn't _everyone_ whine about gush hyped crap no one cares about?


Bret Cahill


Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 1:15:57 AM7/23/09
to
> >Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
>
> >By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with U. S.
> >rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> >Get used to it nutters.  No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
> >rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
> >"lots of ammo."
>
> >Bret Cahill
>
>         If no one cares then why do you keep griping about the fact
> that people have the right to own firearms, etc?

I'd gladly support the individualist right for every nutter to have an
Apache gun ship if it would get the discussion back to economic
issues:

www.bretcahill.com

Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 1:17:50 AM7/23/09
to
> >Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
> >By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with U. S.
> >rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> Its not a US problem.  Its worldwide.  Even ammunition manufacturers
> in other countries are working full shifts to keep up with ammo needs
> worldwide.
>
> >Get used to it nutters.  No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
> >rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
> >"lots of ammo."
>
> I see I need to make it my goal to post AS MANY STORIES as possible
> about ammo shortages just for YOU.

Posting sprees are better than shooting sprees.

Newsgroups saves lives.


Bret Cahill


Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 1:18:56 AM7/23/09
to

OK.

The biggest all time losers of the info age are the gun wackos.


Bret Cahill


Hell Stomper

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 2:14:28 AM7/23/09
to

On his chin?

Hell Stomper

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 2:15:44 AM7/23/09
to

That's better.

jaf

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 8:03:57 AM7/23/09
to
If you stop cross posting, it will!


"Bret Cahill" <BretC...@aol.com> wrote in message news:290a7a5d-6514-4fa8...@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...

Doug

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 1:41:44 PM7/23/09
to

"Bret Cahill" <BretC...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:5bf3974e-4bd5-4158...@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com...

> No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
> rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
> "lots of ammo."
>
>
> Bret Cahill
>
>

Apparently you do.

Tom Biasi

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 2:19:12 PM7/23/09
to

"tg" <tgde...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:366e012c-5890-4bc2...@a7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...

-tg

Multiposting is sending the post separately to more than one group.
Crossposting is listing more than one group in the "Newsgroups" box.
The first is a waste of bandwidth and really has no advantage.
The second is more efficient but often people include groups that are not
relevant to the post or groups that are not seen by all.
Many times I just see answers because I don't get all the groups.
Posting to more than three groups is as bad as spam imho.

Tom


Tom Biasi

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 2:21:25 PM7/23/09
to

"tg" <tgde...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:366e012c-5890-4bc2...@a7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 22, 1:15 am, Fred Oinka <stardusth...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Jul 21, 11:38 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
>
> > By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with U. S.
> > rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> > Get used to it nutters. No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
> > rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
> > "lots of ammo."
>
> > Bret Cahill
>
> Go ahead and crosspost your bullshit so that all of usenet can see how
> totally fucked in the head you are.

So, this brings up one of those language/philosophy type questions.
Why is it "cross-posting" instead of "multi-posting"? And why, as
long as it is limited and not spam, is it a problem?

-tg
As you can see just hitting "Reply group" also crossposts.
This one is only to Alt.Guns.
Tom


Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 5:28:50 PM7/23/09
to
> If you stop cross posting, it will!

Hey, he was right! It worked!


Bret Cahill


> "Bret Cahill" <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote in messagenews:290a7a5d-6514-4fa8...@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...

gore

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 8:08:55 PM7/23/09
to

"Bret Cahill" <BretC...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:149c5cc1-c18f-40b8...@p36g2000prn.googlegroups.com...

> > > > > Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
> > > > > By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with
> > > > > U. S.
> > > > > rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> > > > > Get used to it nutters. No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind
> > > > > if a
> > > > > rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47
> > > > > and
> > > > > "lots of ammo."
>
> > > > Yeah, I think you're right. Nobody does care.
>
> > > Then tell rightarded nutters stop hyping their ammo spending sprees
> > > and start discussing the high tax Clinton economic boom and the GOP
> > > tax cut recession.
>
> > Why would they switch to talking crazy?
> > When we are faced with a bigger problem
> > now. Ah, Competence, thy ways are lost.
>
> I'm sure this is a foolish question, but how is this pertinent to
> alt.philosophy and alt.literature?

This is a classic example of technology bringing about change so fast
that some cannot adjust in time.

The biggest all time losers of the info age are the nutters.


Bret Cahill

What about a president bringing "change" so fast I can't keep any in my
pocket? You leftist nutjobs can continue to herd your flock into a pasture
of wolves, but I'm not grazing. I wonder though what you stand to gain from
all of the stuff you talk. What is your disposition I wonder.


gore

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 8:45:24 PM7/23/09
to

"Miss Ann Thrope" <hoofhe...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:658279c6-6b26-4a39...@c36g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...

On Jul 22, 12:23 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > > > Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
> > > > > By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with
> > > > > U. S.
> > > > > rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> > > > > Get used to it nutters. No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind
> > > > > if a
> > > > > rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47
> > > > > and
> > > > > "lots of ammo."
>
> > > > Yeah, I think you're right. Nobody does care.
>
> > > Then tell rightarded nutters stop hyping their ammo spending sprees
> > > and start discussing the high tax Clinton economic boom and the GOP
> > > tax cut recession.
>
> > Why would they switch to talking crazy?
>
> Try not to spree but if you must spree, spree local. Just shoot up
> the trailer park.
>
> Bret Cahill

When I get likkered up and decide to burn off some excess,outdated,un-
numbered ammo I plan to spree in YOUR trailer park. At least till the
barrel melts/likker runs out/ammo is used up !!! KOOK !!

Hahaha I love it!


Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 10:59:42 PM7/23/09
to
> > > > > > Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
> > > > > > By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with
> > > > > > U. S.
> > > > > > rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> > > > > > Get used to it nutters. No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind
> > > > > > if a
> > > > > > rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > "lots of ammo."
>
> > > > > Yeah, I think you're right. Nobody does care.
>
> > > > Then tell rightarded nutters stop hyping their ammo spending sprees
> > > > and start discussing the high tax Clinton economic boom and the GOP
> > > > tax cut recession.
>
> > > Why would they switch to talking crazy?
> > > When we are faced with a bigger problem
> > > now. Ah, Competence, thy ways are lost.
>
> > I'm sure this is a foolish question, but how is this pertinent to
> > alt.philosophy and alt.literature?
>
> This is a classic example of technology bringing about change so fast
> that some cannot adjust in time.
>
> The biggest all time losers of the info age are the nutters.
>
> Bret Cahill
>
> What about a president bringing "change" so fast I can't keep any in my
> pocket?

It took Clinton 8 years of high taxes for his economic boom.

It took W. Bush 8 years of tax cuts for the rich for his credit
meltdown depression.

If the white guys get 8 years to "straighten" out the country then
under equal protection, the black guy gets 8 years as well.


Bret Cahill


Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 11:02:04 PM7/23/09
to
> > > > > > Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
> > > > > > By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with
> > > > > > U. S.
> > > > > > rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> > > > > > Get used to it nutters. No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind
> > > > > > if a
> > > > > > rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > "lots of ammo."
>
> > > > > Yeah, I think you're right. Nobody does care.
>
> > > > Then tell rightarded nutters stop hyping their ammo spending sprees
> > > > and start discussing the high tax Clinton economic boom and the GOP
> > > > tax cut recession.
>
> > > Why would they switch to talking crazy?
>
> > Try not to spree but if you must spree, spree local. Just shoot up
> > the trailer park.
>
> > Bret Cahill
>
> When I get likkered up and decide to burn off some excess,outdated,un-
> numbered ammo I plan to spree in YOUR trailer park. At least till the
> barrel melts/likker runs out/ammo is used up !!! KOOK !!

> Hahaha I love it!

Whatever happened to the rightard "Yeeeeehaaa!"

? ? ?


Bret Cahill


Fred Oinka

unread,
Jul 23, 2009, 11:14:47 PM7/23/09
to

If you ever hear that, it's all over.

Message has been deleted

OneThrown

unread,
Jul 24, 2009, 4:19:52 PM7/24/09
to
On Jul 22, 12:55 am, Logan <logan.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 21, 11:44 pm, Shrikeback <shrikeb...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> > On Jul 21, 9:10 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Can anyone come up with a more boring hackneyed expression?
> > > > > By now all 14 trillion people on the planet are bored stiff with U. S.
> > > > > rightards hyping their ammo spending sprees.
>
> > > > > Get used to it nutters.  No one on newsgroups gives a rats behind if a
> > > > > rightard nutter has an M1A1 tank let alone some candy ass AK-47 and
> > > > > "lots of ammo."
>
> > > > Yeah, I think you're right.  Nobody does care.
>
> > > Then tell rightarded nutters stop hyping their ammo spending sprees
> > > and start discussing the high tax Clinton economic boom and the GOP
> > > tax cut recession.
>
> > Why would they switch to talking crazy?
> > When we are faced with a bigger problem
> > now.  Ah, Competence, thy ways are lost.
>
> I'm sure this is a foolish question, but how is this pertinent to
> alt.philosophy and alt.literature?

Actually a very good question IMO. I sort of wonder the same thing
myself. This stuff belongs in alt.politics or alt.gun-control or
something. I would think alt.philosophy would be for more reasoned
argument about more pertinent matters. But hey, I'm just one of the
ignorant cretins. My opinion doesn't count, I'm sure.

Bret Cahill

unread,
Jul 24, 2009, 7:38:20 PM7/24/09
to
> So you're in favor of high taxes huh?  

Warren Buffet supports tax hikes on the rich.

Maybe even rightards could figger it out:

1. Clinton hikes taxes and Buffet makes 20 billion during the high
tax Clinton economic boom.

2. Dumbya cuts taxes on the rich and Buffet loses 40 billion in the
resulting GOP tax cut Oct. '08 credit meltdown.

Heck, Pavlov's doggie would be smart enough to figger it out.


Bret Cahill

0 new messages